Facebook fight over politics between 'keyboard gangsters' ends in shooting - Canadanewsmedia
Connect with us

Politics

Facebook fight over politics between 'keyboard gangsters' ends in shooting

Published

on






TAMPA, Fla. (AP) – A political argument on Facebook led to a 44-year-old Florida man driving to the home of a stranger he'd been arguing with and shooting him.
    
Now Brian Sebring faces felony charges of aggravated battery and carrying a concealed gun. Sebring tells the Tampa Bay Times he "just snapped and let primal rage take over" on Monday.
    
Sebring says he was responding to a felon who wanted to share his political opinions even though he'd lost the right to vote. He says Alex Stephens took the fight to private messenger, where it escalated.
    
Police say Stephens was shot in the thigh and buttocks and was treated at a hospital. Sebring spotted a police officer on his way home and turned himself in.
    
Sebring says he's ruined his life "all because of some keyboard gangsters."
 

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Digital Advertising Upends Formula For How Political Parties Pick Winners And Losers

Published

on

By


AdExchanger Politics” is a recurring feature that tracks developments in politics and digital advertising. 

Today’s column is written by Ray Kingman, CEO at Semcasting.

Political parties and their leadership pick winners and losers – when they legislate and, especially, in how they allocate resources to candidates running for office.

The idea of picking winners and losers through spending isn’t without precedent. On the eve of the 2016 election, the conventional wisdom was that Donald Trump would lose badly. Three weeks before Election Day, Politico reported that the Republican National Committee had spent zero dollars on television ads.

In the 2018 midterms, the formula for deciding winners and losers could be based on a different dynamic due to the polarization within the parties and the ways in which digital communication is democratizing the campaign process for more candidates.

With as many as four or five “parties” seemingly in play in this election cycle, how do party loyalty and the candidate’s flavor of ideology affect fundraising and on-the-ground support from the national parties?

For example, the challenge for the GOP seeking to retain control of the House and Senate is determining which GOP “party” they are going to back – the traditional Republican establishment, Tea Party Freedom Caucus members or the Trump-ites? On the Democrat side, will national support go toward traditional Democrats, the Bernie Bros or those on the far left?

Traditionally, the national parties and Congressional leadership direct a significant portion of fundraising and determine the races worth contesting. These groups historically throw resources behind candidates that allow them to buy prime-time television advertising and, more importantly, fully fund get-out-the-vote (GOTV) efforts in local districts.

However, many candidates in 2018 are taking the Citizen’s United ruling to heart by raising significant war chests and building campaign infrastructures independent of their party.

The GOP outraised the Democrats by a wide margin in 2017, but that advantage has all but disappeared. A record number of emergent state, local and congressional candidates are running for the first time on the Democratic Party side. Many younger candidates and female candidates are stepping up and breaking records for enthusiasm and fundraising.

In the second fundraising quarter of 2018, 50 of these House Democratic candidates outraised Republican incumbents, with 21 of them raising more than $1 million. In open races with no incumbent, the Democratic candidates have outraised the GOP in 25 of the 30 races.

Part of a 2018 candidate’s go-it-alone strategy is based on the fact that voters are more inclined to consume information digitally. Some 43% of adults get their news online, and that trend is accelerating, according to a 2017 Pew Research study.

Through social, display and mobile devices, candidates have more refined tools for reaching the voters they want to reach. Instead of wasting half of their campaign dollars on TV to reach everyone in a designated market area or ZIP code, candidates have increasingly bought into digital. Borrell Associates forecasts digital at 22% of political spend for 2018. At an estimated $1.9 billion, this is a 2,539% increase in digital since 2014, while broadcast television spend is forecast at $3.3 billion, a drop of 30% for the same period.

Increased polarization is a driving factor in pushing campaign managers to be very precise about their ad buys. They limit their targeting to the constituents that they align with and who they feel are persuadable on specific issues. Programmatic targeting at the individual voter level helps candidates reach the intended audience with display, social and especially streaming video on mobile and connected TV.

While spending on social media is actually forecast to decline slightly from 2016 because of Facebook’s controversies, mobile and streaming video are expected to more than make up for it. Compared to the same quarter last year, the audience for video delivered over the internet is experiencing astronomical growth across movies, episodic TV shows and linear television. EMarketer forecasts that 22 million people will have cut the cord on cable, satellite or telco TV service – up 62% from 16.7 million in 2016.

A threefold increase in mobile and connected TV streaming services also aligns with major increases in engagement from urban and millennial voters – a traditional stronghold of Democrats.

While institutional and PAC monies from both sides will come into play in the final two months to support the party favorites that have the best chance of winning, those bets will be placed to protect parties that most voters see as divided.

Fortunately, candidates who have built their own infrastructure and established a robust following will have the resources to drive their own messaging on key local issues and GOTV in their districts. Persuasion and GOTV efforts for them will continue at record levels – in no small part because of their engagement with digital media on the devices that their voters have come to trust.

Follow Semcasting (@Semcasting) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Tiffany Haddish Shows No One Escapes the Nightmare of Thanksgiving Politics in The Oath

Published

on

By


And now we know what she looks like getting tased.

Long before 2016, many people had survived their families at Thanksgiving by instituting strict "no politics" rules. Now that we’re all trapped in an unending collective nightmare, that might be a morally questionable policy—but in Tiffany Haddish’s newest movie, it looks completely impossible.

Haddish stars alongside Ike Barinholtz in The Oath (which is also Barinholtz’s directorial debut) about a family Thanksgiving that goes from fighting over politics to fighting with fists and knives. There are plenty of lines that sound like they could have come from almost any Internet comments section—like, "My favorite thing about liberals! As soon as they’re triggered, they call everyone a Nazi"—but framed by some cryptic, The Purge-sounding government mandate called the "Patriot Oath."

The Oath debuts October 12, with enough time for you to have your own Thanksgiving where you can tell someone, "I just want to one more time say I am really sorry you got tased."

[embedded content]

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Turnbull supporters rally in face of Dutton leadership rumblings – politics live

Published

on

By


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Turnbull supporters rally in face of Dutton leadership rumblings – politics live  The Guardian
  2. Full coverage



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2018 Canada News Media

%d bloggers like this: