Media
4 things we learned from the court case challenging the RCMP’s treatment of journalists at Fairy Creek logging blockades – The Narwhal
The Supreme Court of B.C. is expected to decide on Tuesday whether to intervene to resolve a conflict between several journalism organizations, including The Narwhal, and the RCMP.
The conflict arose after the police force began limiting access for journalists reporting on the enforcement of an injunction prohibiting the blocking of logging roads in the Fairy Creek watershed, where hundreds of people have been arrested in recent weeks. The area, which sits on the territory of the Pacheedaht First Nation and Ditidaht First Nation, is considered to be the last intact valleys of old-growth forest on southern Vancouver Island and protesters say they are defending it.
The Narwhal and other media organizations, including the Canadian Association of Journalists, The Discourse, IndigiNews, Ricochet, Capital Daily, Canada’s National Observer, the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (APTN) and Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE), are asking the court to modify the injunction order so that it directs the RCMP to allow media access if there is no operational reason to restrict journalists.
The media coalition alleges the RCMP has “intentionally excluded” journalists from the area as it conducts arrests in secret. The RCMP says it has been addressing media needs while also trying to ensure public safety. This has resulted in a system where the RCMP has asked journalists to “check in” at a designated place and time. The system also requires journalists to be escorted by an RCMP representative at all times.
For journalists and members of the public, the case has significant implications about whether the RCMP has the power to engage in a major enforcement action, while preventing journalists or members of the public from seeing all that unfolds.
Here are four key details about the case.
1. The Canadian government says it is opposing the media application even though it agrees with journalists, because it thinks the application for improved access is ‘meaningless’
The attorney general of Canada told the court in the federal government’s submission on June 25: “The relief sought by the applicants is a bare declaration of law, with which Canada does not disagree. However, such declarations are meaningless and should not be granted by courts. A declaration of law will only be granted if it will have practical utility by settling a live controversy between the parties, and not where it is merely restating law.”
2. The RCMP provided incorrect information to journalists covering the conflict
At times, the RCMP has been unable to provide accurate information to journalists about what is going on at Fairy Creek. For example, on May 21, the RCMP told journalists that no enforcement was planned and didn’t arrange any meet up. “However, there was later a last-minute decision to remove protesters from tree stands,” wrote the attorney general in the submission.
The RCMP then sent media relations officers to meet journalists at an access point, but did not escort journalists into the enforcement area due to claims that “sensitive police tactics were being used.”
“Since that time, it has been clarified that the information was incorrect and that the methods are not sensitive,” the attorney general admitted. “As a result, policy changed to allow for media access during such operations.”
3. The RCMP provided incorrect information to the court about the conflict
In a sworn affidavit, RCMP Sgt. Elenore Sturko made a series of false statements regarding journalist Brandi Morin, who was on assignment for Ricochet on June 2. Sturko alleged that Morin informed her that two people travelling with her should be allowed inside the enforcement area since they were members of the media.
Morin subsequently submitted her own affidavit, backed up by recordings, that show she stated that the two women were “not members of the media” and that she was profiling them as part of her coverage.
“I can advise that Sgt. Sturko noted the mistake and raised it with our [federal Justice Department] representatives counsel before the hearing,” RCMP spokesperson Dawn Roberts told The Narwhal in an email. “During the hearing the mistake was acknowledged in court. So to be clear, Sgt. Sturko was quick to identify the mistake and ensure same was raised and corrected during the hearing before the Judge.”
4. The federal government and RCMP believe their actions are ‘reasonably necessary to carry out their duties’
The RCMP and the federal government have argued in court that they believe their approach is reasonable due to security and safety concerns. They say the area where officers are conducting arrests is hazardous, with dense vegetation and limited area for police to clear obstacles and enforce the injunction. They also say that a lack of cell phone coverage in a large part of the area makes it difficult to communicate.
The government also asked the court to consider other factors that could restrict access, such as whether journalists are acting in good faith in a news-gathering activity, whether they are not actively assisting or advocating for protesters and whether they are not obstructing or interfering with police.
There did not appear to be any evidence that any journalist covering the conflict or seeking to cover the conflict was not acting in good faith.
The court’s decision in the case is expected Tuesday.
[unable to retrieve full-text content]
DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation. Barron’s
Source link
[unable to retrieve full-text content]
DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation. Barron’s
Source link
Media
Three drones downed after explosions heard in Iran’s Isfahan: State media – Al Jazeera English
Iran’s air defences have brought down three small drones over the central city of Isfahan, state media reported, hours after United States broadcasters, quoting senior US officials, said Israeli missiles had hit an Iranian site.
Iranian state television reported explosions in Isfahan as air defences were activated and flights across several areas, including the capital, Tehran, and Isfahan, were suspended.
Airspace was reopened about four and a half hours after the incident and there were no reports of casualties.
Second Brigadier General Siavash Mihandoust, the top military official in Isfahan, told state media that air defence batteries hit “a suspicious object” and there was no damage.
ABC News and CBS News had reported earlier that Israel had carried out a military operation in Iran.
Italy’s Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said the US told the Group of Seven (G7) foreign ministers that it had been “informed at the last minute” by Israel about an attack on Iran.
“But there was no sharing of the attack by the US. It was a mere information,” Tajani told reporters in Capri, Italy, where the G7 ministers met.
However, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken refused to confirm reports about the Israeli attack, during a news conference in Capri.
“I’m not going to speak to that, except to say that the United States has not been involved in any offensive operation,” Blinken said.
The top US diplomat said the G7’s focus is on de-escalation. Asked to describe the current US-Israel relationship, Blinken noted that Israel makes its own decisions, but the US is committed to its security.
Iranian media said no strikes were launched on Iran from outside the country, and the attack was believed to have been carried out using small quadcopters that would have to have been launched from inside Iran.
Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera’s Dorsa Jabbari said Iranian media were downplaying the incident.
“The location in Isfahan province is an Iranian military airbase that belongs to the country’s army, and not the Revolutionary Guards [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, IRGC]. I think it’s important to highlight that,” she said. “This base houses multiple squadrons of F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft.”
“We also understand that the air defence systems over the city of Tabriz in the northwestern part of Iran were also activated,” Jabbari reported.
A military factory belonging to the Iranian army in Isfahan was attacked by multiple quadcopters in January 2023, failing to damage the facility that was protected by air defence batteries and mesh wiring on its roof to counter small unmanned aerial vehicles.
Iran blamed Israel for that attack and arrested four people, executing one of them in January 2024, for operating on behalf of Mossad, the Israeli spy agency.
Israel had promised to respond after Iran launched a barrage of drones and missiles on the country on April 13, after a suspected Israeli attack on Iran’s consulate compound in Damascus killed 16 people, including two IRGC senior generals.
Governments around the world urged restraint and a push to de-escalate tensions across the region.
Isfahan is considered a strategically important city and one that is host to several important sites, including military research and development facilities, as well as bases. The nearby city of Natanz is the location of one of Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites.
In a speech in Damghan, in central Iran, Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi made no mention of Isfahan but praised the Iranian attacks on Israel, saying they gave the country strength and unity.
Kioumars Heydari, the commander-in-chief of the ground forces of the Iranian army, said Iran remains vigilant to confront any other potential aerial threats.
“If suspicious flying objects appear in the sky of the country, they will be targeted by our powerful air defence,” he was quoted as saying by the state-run IRNA news agency ahead of Friday prayers in Tehran.
‘No damage’ to nuclear facilities
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that “there is no damage” to Iranian nuclear sites as the United Nations nuclear watchdog’s chief Rafael Grossi called for restraint and said nuclear facilities should never be targeted in military conflicts.
IAEA can confirm that there is no damage to #Iran’s nuclear sites. DG @rafaelmgrossi continues to call for extreme restraint from everybody and reiterates that nuclear facilities should never be a target in military conflicts. IAEA is monitoring the situation very closely. pic.twitter.com/4F7pAlNjWM
— IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency ⚛️ (@iaeaorg) April 19, 2024
The reported attack “was far more limited than many expected”, Iranian arms control expert Ali Ahmadi told Al Jazeera, adding that Israel “has much more limitations in its operational range” than many think.
“Certainly, after Iran’s retaliatory capacity was criticised, it benefits from advertising how ineffective what Israel did was as well. Iran also needs to prepare the public for a much softer reaction than it has talked about in the last couple of days,” he pointed out.
Ahmadi said that prior to today’s incident, Iran was preparing several options for a massive retaliation, including getting allies involved.
But considering the limited scope and impact of the alleged attack, which he described as a “security sabotage” rather than a “military assault”, it would be a mistake to carry out a significant response, he stressed.
There were also reports of explosions in Iraq and Syria, with Iranian state media saying there were explosions at multiple military-linked sites in Syria.
Syria’s official news agency SANA quoted a military source as saying that missile strikes in the early hours of the morning caused material damage to air defence sites in the country’s southern region. The report did not specify the exact location and the extent of the damage but blamed Israel.
The US and a number of European countries had been calling on Israel not to respond to Iran’s attack.
On Thursday, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres painted a dark picture of the situation in the Middle East, warning that spiralling tensions over Israel’s war on Gaza and Iran’s attack on Israel could descend into a “full-scale regional conflict”.
“The Middle East is on a precipice. Recent days have seen a perilous escalation – in words and deeds,” Guterres told the UN Security Council.
“One miscalculation, one miscommunication, one mistake, could lead to the unthinkable – a full-scale regional conflict that would be devastating for all involved,” he said, calling on all parties to exercise “maximum restraint”.
Capital gains tax change draws ire from some Canadian entrepreneurs worried it will worsen brain drain – CBC.ca
U of T Engineering PhD student is working to improve the sustainable treatment of Ontario's drinking water – U of T Engineering News – U of T Engineering News
Scientists Say They Have Found New Evidence Of An Unknown Planet… – 2oceansvibe News
Silver investment demand jumped 12% in 2019
12 Bizarre Things People Did Just To Make Social Media Content
Global Media Markets, 2015-2020, 2020-2025F, 2030F – TV and Radio Broadcasting, Film and Music, Information Services, Web Content, Search Portals And Social Media, Print Media, & Cable – GlobeNewswire
-
Investment23 hours agoUK Mulls New Curbs on Outbound Investment Over Security Risks – BNN Bloomberg
-
Sports22 hours ago
Auston Matthews denied 70th goal as depleted Leafs lose last regular-season game – Toronto Sun
-
Media2 hours ago
DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation. – Barron's
-
Business20 hours ago
BC short-term rental rules take effect May 1 – CityNews Vancouver
-
Media4 hours ago
Trump Media alerts Nasdaq to potential market manipulation from 'naked' short selling of DJT stock – CNBC
-
Art20 hours ago
Collection of First Nations art stolen from Gordon Head home – Times Colonist
-
Investment20 hours ago
Benjamin Bergen: Why would anyone invest in Canada now? – National Post
-
Tech23 hours ago
Save $700 Off This 4K Projector at Amazon While You Still Can – CNET
