adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Investment

5 Investment Opportunities With Over 700% Upside, According to Cathie Wood

Published

 on

Cathie Wood is the head of Ark Invest, an investment company managing several exchange-traded funds. By focusing on “big ideas” like artificial intelligence, gene editing, and outer space, Wood has amassed a faithful following of futuristically minded investors. Which is why you’re here: You want to know which stocks are changing the world and consequently have at least 700% upside, according to Wood.

Here are the five investment opportunities: Zoom Video Communications (ZM -0.28%), Roku (ROKU 1.63%), Bitcoin (BTC -0.43%), Block (SQ 1.94%), and Tesla (TSLA 3.23%). Ark Invest and Wood have price targets for all of these, ranging from 700% upside to nearly 6,000% upside in Bitcoin’s case.

I believe Wood’s commentary about these five investment opportunities is valuable — the team at Ark Invest actively researches its big ideas and condenses those findings down for us. It’s a useful tool.

However, there’s one quintessential thing missing from the aforementioned tool. And this one thing can make or break you as an investor. Don’t worry: I’ll share which of these five ideas I believe is the most attractive investment today. But I hope you’ll walk away from this article better equipped to make that call for yourself.

300x250x1

Here’s why Cathie Wood loves these five ideas

At the end of the day, Cathie Wood is an investor like you and me. And to invest in something (not speculate), it’s imperative to develop an investment thesis: a succinctly expressed opinion of what will happen in the future that would cause your investment to go up.

Below are Wood’s price targets for these five investments. However, Wood didn’t give these price targets in a vacuum. To the contrary, each price target came with an investment thesis — that’s the more important part for investors. Here’s my brief synopsis of each one:

  • Zoom price target: $1,500 per share by 2026. Over the next three to four years, Ark Invest believes that Zoom’s user base can triple or more. And it believes that its average revenue per user can triple or more. This exponential top-line growth will result in better profit margins for the company. And assuming the stock’s valuation remains comparable to what it is now, this will all result in life-changing returns for shareholders.
  • Roku price target: $605 per share by 2026. Over the next three to four years, active accounts on Roku could triple or more. And these Roku users will stream more video content than they are right now. This engaged and incredibly large user base will allow the platform to demand higher ad rates, resulting in outsize revenue growth. Like Zoom, Ark Invest believes this revenue growth will help Roku’s profit margins and send the stock soaring.
  • Bitcoin price target: $1 million per coin by 2030. Compared to asset classes like real estate, gold, and bonds, Bitcoin’s market capitalization is small. But Wood believes many catalysts will change that, including the following: More people will use it to store value, countries will hold some Bitcoin in their treasuries, major enterprises will add it to their balance sheets, and regular people will increasingly use it as money — as a means of exchange on financial transactions. And all of this demand will help push the value of each coin to $1 million.
  • Block price target: $500 per share by 2025. In general, Ark Invest sees an incredible secular trend underway right now: People are abandoning traditional banks in favor of fintech solutions like Block. The investment company believes that one of the biggest drivers for Block’s business over the next few years will be Block’s Cash App. It not only projects impressive growth in active Cash App users, but it also believes Block will monetize users at a better rate. This will be a primary driver of shareholder returns, although Ark Invest does see additional upside in its Square and crypto ecosystems.
  • Tesla price target: $4,600 per share by 2026. By 2026, Ark Invest expects Tesla’s annual revenue from electric vehicle sales to be an order of magnitude (10 times) larger than what it was in 2021. More than this, it expects the company to generate over $100 billion just with its ride-sharing network — something that doesn’t yet exist. This scale will allow its gross margin to double over the next few years, unlocking greater profitability and a much higher price per share.

Wood may be wrong about many of these assumptions. But here’s the point right now: Long-term investing is based on fundamental analysis like the above. It’s not based on lines on a chart, but rather concrete developments in the real world.

Whenever you buy a stock, you should be able to clearly articulate what you believe is going to happen and how that will make your investment gain in value. Ark Invest clearly does that.

Dissecting Wall Street’s opinions

For any investor hoping to glean insight from Wood’s investment theses, my first recommendation would be to throw away the price targets with each. Start dissecting Wall Street’s opinions by looking at the core assumptions.

Largely absent from the five investment theses listed above is a healthy dose of pessimism — what could go wrong. But that’s the quintessential quality you need to develop to be a well-balanced investor. You must learn to consider both sides of an argument.

For example, only parts of Ark Invest’s investment thesis for Roku are on track right now. In the third quarter of 2022, the company had 65.4 million active accounts, up 16% year over year. So, it’s gaining users like Ark Invest hopes. And streaming hours per active user were also up in Q3, which is another part of the investment thesis.

However, Roku’s profit margin hasn’t been expanding with greater scale and there’s reason to believe that negative trend could continue. The company’s hardware devices cost more to make than what the company is able to sell them for. And in Q3, Roku announced the launch of Roku Smart Home, which will usher in an entire portfolio of hardware devices that will be sold cheaply, potentially hurting profits. This lack of profitability could put a damper on the roughly 1,000% upside implied with Ark Invest’s price target.

Similarly, I believe it may be a tad optimistic to project more than $100 billion in revenue for Tesla from a business segment that doesn’t exist yet. If it fails to launch soon, that would almost assuredly drag down this key component to Ark Invest’s $4,600 per share price target.

In the end, I could poke holes in the investment theses from Ark Invest for all five of these ideas, even though I own four of them. I nonetheless value the opinions of Wood and others because there’s always perspective they bring to the table. However, it’s still healthy to look at both sides of the argument before drawing your own conclusions.

If you don’t read any further, let this be your actionable takeaway: Never let someone else’s price target be your reason for buying. Always consider what could go right and what could go wrong before investing.

Why Zoom stock stands out from the rest

For those still with me, I’ll keep my promise and share why I believe Zoom stock is the best opportunity right now of these five. But starting with a caveat, I believe there’s zero chance it will hit Ark Invest’s price target of $1,500 per share by 2026. That’s OK with me because I believe it can still beat the market.

Some investors believed Zoom’s relevance would die as COVID-19 restrictions loosened. And they’re partly right. Zoom records revenue from consumers in its online segment. Revenue from the online segment has dropped throughout its fiscal 2023 (which mostly runs through calendar 2022) and management expects an 8% year-over-year drop for the whole year for this part of the business.

However, Zoom’s enterprise business is still growing and now accounts for more than half of the business — this will be the value driver in coming years, in my opinion.

All of Zoom’s ancillary products have an enterprise customer focus. Zoom Phone looks to upgrade internal phone system at office buildings. Zoom Rooms modernizes conference rooms. And newly launched Zoom Mesh is a content delivery network built for enterprises — it speeds up internet connections.

Through the first three quarters of fiscal 2023, Zoom’s research and development (R&D) expenses have more than doubled from the comparable period of fiscal 2022. However, developing new services for enterprise customers is imperative. And even though it’s spending more, the company remains profitable.

I expect these R&D investments to eventually pay off for Zoom with reinvigorated revenue growth from a loyal enterprise customer base. As I said, I don’t expect $1,500 per share. But long-term, market-beating returns are likely from here. But that said, you should seek out the counterargument to my own before deciding to invest in Zoom stock for yourself.

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Taxes should not wag the tail of the investment dog, but that’s what Trudeau wants

Published

 on

Kim Moody: Ottawa is encouraging people to crystallize their gains and pay tax. That’s a hell of a fiscal plan

The Canadian federal budget has been out for a week, which is plenty of time to absorb just how terrible it is.

300x250x1

The problems start with weak fiscal policy, excessive spending and growing public-debt charges estimated to be $54.1 billion for the upcoming year. That is more than $1 billion per week that Canadians are paying for things that have no societal benefit.

Next, the budget clearly illustrates this government’s continued weak taxation policies, two of which it apparently believes  are good for entrepreneurs. But the proposed $2-million Canadian Entrepreneurs Incentive (CEI) and $10-million capital gains exemption for transfers to an employee ownership trust (EOT) are both laughable.

Why? Well, for the CEI, virtually every entrepreneurial industry (except technology) is not eligible. If you happen to be in an industry that qualifies, the $2-million exemption comes with a long, stringent list of criteria (which will be very difficult for most entrepreneurs to qualify for) and it is phased in over a 10-year period of $200,000 per year.

For transfers to EOTs, an entrepreneur must give up complete legal and factual control to be eligible for the $10-million exemption, even though the EOT will likely pay the entrepreneur out of future profits. The commercial risk associated with such a transfer is likely too great for most entrepreneurs to accept.

Capital gains tax hike

But the budget’s highlight proposal was the capital gains inclusion rate increase to 66.7 per cent from 50 per cent for dispositions effective after June 24, 2024. The proposal includes a 50 per cent inclusion rate on the first $250,000 of annual capital gains for individuals, but not for corporations and trusts. Oh, those evil corporations and trusts.

There is a lot wrong with this proposed policy. The first is that by not putting individuals, corporations and trusts on the same taxation footing for capital gains taxation, the foundational principle of integration (the idea that the corporate and individual tax systems should be indifferent to whether an investment is held in a corporation or directly by the taxpayer) is completely thrown out the window. This is wrong.

Some economists have come out in strong favour of the proposal, mainly because of equity arguments (a buck is a buck), but such arguments ignore the real world of investing where investors look at overall risk, liquidity and the time value of money.

If capital gains are taxed at a rate approaching wage taxation rates, why would entrepreneurs and investors want to risk their capital when such investments might be illiquid for a long period of time and be highly risky?

They will seek greener pastures for their investment dollars and they already are. I’ve been fielding a tremendous number of questions from investors over the past week and I’d invite those academics and economists who support the increased inclusion rate to come live in my shoes for a day to see how the theoretical world of equity and behaviour collide. It’s not good and it certainly does nothing to help Canada’s obvious productivity challenges.

Of course, there has been the usual chatter encouraging such people to leave (“don’t let the door hit you on the way out,” some say) from those who don’t understand basic economics and taxation policy, but these cheerleaders should be careful what they wish for. The loss of successful Canadians and their investment dollars affects all of us in a very negative way.

The government messaging around this tax proposal has many people upset, including me. Specifically, it is the following paragraph in the budget documents that many supporters are parroting that is upsetting:

“Next year, 28.5 million Canadians are not expected to have any capital gains income, and 3 million are expected to earn capital gains below the $250,000 annual threshold. Only 0.13 per cent of Canadians with an average income of $1.4 million are expected to pay more personal income tax on their capital gains in any given year. As a result of this, for 99.87 per cent of Canadians, personal income taxes on capital gains will not increase.” (This is supposedly about 40,000 taxpayers.)

Bluntly, this is garbage. It outright ignores several facts.

For one thing, there are hundreds of thousands of private corporations owned and controlled by Canadian resident individuals. Those corporations will be subject to the increased capital gains inclusion rate with no $250,000 annual phase-in. Because of the way passive income is taxed in these Canadian-controlled private corporations, the increased tax load on realized capital gains will be felt by individual shareholders on the dividend distribution required to recover certain refundable corporate taxes.

Furthermore, public corporations that have capital gains will pay tax at a higher inclusion rate and this results in higher corporate tax, which means decreased amounts are available to be paid out as dividends to individual shareholders (including those held by individuals’ pensions).

The budget documents simply measured the number of corporations that reported capital gains in recent years and said it is 12.6 per cent of all corporations. That measurement is shallow and not the whole story, as described above.

Tax hit for cottages

There are also millions of Canadians who hold a second real estate property, either a cottage-type and/or rental property. Those properties will eventually be sold, with the probability that the gain will exceed the $250,000 threshold.

Upon death, an individual will often have their largest capital gains realized as a result of deemed dispositions that occur immediately prior to death. This will have the distinct possibility of capital gains that exceed $250,000.

And people who become non-residents of Canada — and that is increasing rapidly — have deemed dispositions of their assets (with some exceptions). They will face the distinct possibility that such gains will be more than $250,000.

The politics around the capital gains inclusion rate increase are pretty obvious. The government is planning for Canadian taxpayers to crystallize their inherent gains prior to the implementation date, especially corporations that will not have a $250,000 annual lower inclusion rate. For the current year, the government is projecting a $4.9-billion tax take. But next year, it dramatically drops to an estimated $1.3 billion.

This is a ridiculous way to shield the government’s tremendous spending and try to make them look like they are holding the line on their out-of-control deficits. The government is encouraging people to crystallize their gains and pay tax. That’s a hell of a fiscal plan.

There’s an old saying that tax should not wag the tail of the investment dog, but that is exactly what the government is encouraging Canadians to do in the name of raising short-term taxation revenues. It is simply wrong.

I hope the government has some second sober thoughts about the capital gains proposal, but I’m not holding my breath.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Everton search for investment to complete 777 deal – BBC.com

Published

 on

By


Getty Images
  • 2 hours ago

Everton are searching for third-party investment in order to push through a protracted takeover by 777 Partners.

The Miami-based firm agreed a deal to buy the Toffees from majority owner Farhad Moshiri in September, but are yet to gain approval from the Premier League.

On Monday, Bloomberg reported the club’s main financial adviser Deloitte has been seeking fresh funding from sports-focused investors and lenders to get 777’s deal over the line.

300x250x1

BBC Sport has been told this is “standard practice contingency planning” and the process may identify other potential lenders to 777.

Sources close to British-Iranian businessman Moshiri have told BBC Sport they remain “working on completing the deal with 777”.

It is understood there are no other parties waiting in the wings to takeover should the takeover fall through and the focus is fully on 777.

The Americans have so far loaned £180m to Everton for day-to-day operational costs, which will be turned into equity once the deal is completed, but repaying money owed to MSP Sports Capital, whose deal collapsed in August, remains a stumbling block.

777 says it can stump up the £158m that is owed to MSP Sports Capital and once that is settled, it is felt the deal should be completed soon after.

Related Topics

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Warren Buffett Predicts 'Bad Ending' for Bitcoin — Is It a Doomed Investment? – Yahoo Finance

Published

 on

By


NanoStockk / Getty Images

Currently sitting in sixth on Forbes’ Real-Time Billionaires List, Berkshire Hathaway co-founder, chairman and CEO Warren Buffett is a first-rate example of an investor who stuck to his core financial beliefs early in life to become not only a success but a once-in-a-lifetime inspiration to those who followed in his footsteps.

One of the most trusted investors for decades, the 93-year-old Buffett isn’t shy to pontificate on his investment philosophy, which is centered around value investing, buying stocks at less than their intrinsic value and holding them for the long term.

Read Next: Warren Buffett: 6 Best Pieces of Money Advice for the Middle Class
Find Out: 5 Genius Things All Wealthy People Do With Their Money

300x250x1

He’s also quite vocal on investments he deems worthless. And one of those is Bitcoin.

Sponsored: Protect Your Wealth With A Gold IRA. Take advantage of the timeless appeal of gold in a Gold IRA recommended by Sean Hannity.

Buffett’s Take on Bitcoin

Over the past decade, it’s been clear that the crypto craze isn’t something Buffett wants any part of. He described Bitcoin as “probably rat poison squared” back in 2018.

“In terms of cryptocurrencies, generally, I can say with almost certainty that they will come to a bad ending,” Buffett said in 2018. And his stance hasn’t wavered since. According to Benzinga, Buffett believes that cryptocurrencies aren’t a viable or valuable investment.

“Now if you told me you own all of the Bitcoin in the world and you offered it to me for $25, I wouldn’t take it because what would I do with it? I’d have to sell it back to you one way or another. It isn’t going to do anything,” Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting in 2022.

Although the Oracle of Omaha has his misgivings about the unpredictable investment, does that mean crypto is doomed as an investment? Not necessarily.

For You: 10 Valuable Stocks That Could Be the Next Apple or Amazon

Is Buffett Wrong About Bitcoin?

Bitcoin bulls argue that while it’s not government-issued, cryptocurrency is as fungible, divisible, secure and portable as fiat currency and gold. Because they occupy a digital space, cryptocurrencies are decentralized, scarce and durable. They can last as long as they can be stored.

Crypto boosters continue to predict massive growth in the coin’s value. Earlier this year, SkyBridge Capital founder and former White House director of communications Anthony Scaramucci told reporters that Bitcoin could exceed $170,000 by mid-2025, and Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood predicts Bitcoin will hit $1.48 million by 2030, according to Fortune.

“They really don’t understand the concept and the whole history of money,” Scaramucci said of crypto critics like Buffett on a recent episode of Jason Raznick’s “The Raz Report.” Because we place a value on “traditional” currency, it is essentially worthless compared with the transparent and trustworthy digital Bitcoin, Scaramucci said.

Currently trading around the $66,000 mark, Bitcoin is up nearly 50% in 2024. This means it’s massively outperforming most indexes this year, including the S&P 500, which is up about 6% in 2024.

Although Berkshire Hathaway has invested heavily in Bitcoin-related Brazilian fintech company Nu Holdings, which has its own cryptocurrency called Nucoin, it’s possible Buffett will never come around fully to crypto, despite its recent surge in value. It’s contrary to the reliable investment strategy that has served him very well for decades.

“The urge to participate in something where it looks like easy money is a human instinct which has been unleashed,” Buffett said. “People love the idea of getting rich quick, and I don’t blame them … It’s so human, and once unleashed you can’t put it back in the bottle.”

More From GOBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Warren Buffett Predicts ‘Bad Ending’ for Bitcoin — Is It a Doomed Investment?

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending