adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Art

How Ridley Scott’s ‘Napoleon’ Repeats One of Art History’s Biggest Conspiracies – artnet News

Published

 on


Ridley Scott’s Napoleon (2023), his latest feature film—which has been called his “finest since Gladiator—was released yesterday following its November 14 premiere in Paris.

The film includes one of art history’s biggest conspiracies: that Napoleon Bonaparte, France’s first and most-famous emperor, had his troops fire canons at the Great Pyramid of Giza during his Egyptian campaign in 1798, shooting off the nose of the Great Sphinx in the process.

But did it happen? TIME spoke to the historian Michael Broers who consulted on the film, who remarked that Scott knew that “nothing like that happened”. The director decided to keep the scene in which the top of the Great Pyramid was shot off, after it made Broers laugh. In an interview with the Times Ridley Scott himself described the scene as “a fast way of saying he took Egypt”. The Great Pyramid and Sphinx in Giza are iconic Egyptian images, with archaeological evidence placing the Sphinx’s construction to 2500 B.C.E., while the Great Pyramid is the only remaining wonder of the ancient world.

[embedded content]

However, it wasn’t Napoleon’s canon fire that damaged the face of this colossal structure. In drawings made by Danish explorer Frederic Louis Norden in 1737 and displayed in 1744, the Sphinx had already lost its nose at least 60 years before Napoleon’s invasion. Historian Bassam el-Shamaa also confirmed that the tale was no more than a rumor in his 2009 book Hokam Misr El-Qadema (Ancient Egypt’s Rulers), given that Napoleon’s battle actually occurred in the neighbourhood of Imbaba, around four hours away by foot from the Pyramid complex.

The main theories to explain the loss of the Sphinx’s nose are iconoclastic attacks taking place between the 10th and early 18th centuries, or progressive natural erosion from the elements over the course of the limestone statue’s five millennia lifetime. The Napoleonic conspiracy theory is believed to have appeared around the dawn of the 20th century.

More Trending Stories:  

Masterpiece or Hot Mess? Here Are 7 Bad Paintings by Famous Artists 

Who Won Auction Week? Here Are 9 Takeaways From New York’s Nearly $2 Billion Fall Sales 

Kurt Cobain’s Old Jeans Just Set an Auction Record for Levi’s 

Seller’s Remorse: How a Thrift Store Owner Let a $191,000 Painting Slip Through His Fingers for $4 

A Prankster Used A.I. to ‘Improve’ Edward Hopper’s Classic ‘Nighthawks’ 

Chinese Artist Chen Ke Celebrates the Women of Bauhaus in a Colorful, Mixed-Media Paris Debut 

A Centuries-Spanning Exhibition Investigates the Age-Old Lure of Money 

Meet the Woman Behind ‘Weird Medieval Guys,’ the Internet Hit Mining Odd Art From the Middle Ages 

Follow Artnet News on Facebook:
Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

40 Random Bits of Trivia About Artists and the Artsy Art That They Articulate – Cracked.com

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

40 Random Bits of Trivia About Artists and the Artsy Art That They Articulate  Cracked.com

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

John Little, whose paintings showed the raw side of Montreal, dies at 96 – CBC.ca

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

John Little, whose paintings showed the raw side of Montreal, dies at 96  CBC.ca

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

A misspelled memorial to the Brontë sisters gets its dots back at last

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.

More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.

The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.

They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.

“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”

It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.

Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”

Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.

“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending