adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Slightly reshaped Giller Prize to go on, despite boycotts and protests

Published

 on

TORONTO – The shine on CanLit’s glitziest night has dulled, at least according to some, amid sustained backlash against the Giller Foundation for maintaining ties with lead sponsor Scotiabank and other funders linked to Israel.

Monday’s Giller Prize gala is set to take a slightly different shape this year after pro-Palestinian protesters interrupted the ceremony last November.

It brought the televised event to a brief halt — not a risk this year as the CBC won’t be broadcasting live. Instead, the event will be taped and air hours later.

Neither the Giller Foundation nor the TV network connected the change to the protests when asked, and noted they’ve made the same move for other awards shows in recent years.

But the demonstrations and calls to action continue to ripple through the world of Canadian literature. The protesters were arrested that night, and soon after hundreds of people signed a letter calling for the charges against them to be dropped, many of them authors with ties to the award.

“There isn’t really a way I can rationalize my way out of this if I feel that what’s happening is a genocide and I feel that it’s wrong,” said Thea Lim, a past Giller finalist who signed the letter early on and has continued to align with advocacy group No Arms in the Arts.

It became a question for her of “sway,” Lim said. Her lofty position in the CanLit scene — one she still credits in part to the spot of her debut novel “An Ocean of Minutes” on the Giller short list in 2018 — meant she might have some influence on an issue she cared deeply about.

“It also gave me a feeling of having created a space for other authors to be able to do that,” Lim said.

“Because there’s a lot of risk and I think we’re seeing that very clearly,” she said.

Lim and others are protesting the Giller Foundation’s funders, in particular Scotiabank, due to its stake in Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit Systems. No Arms in the Arts is also protesting funders Indigo and the Azrieli Foundation — the former for its CEO’s charity that supports Israeli Defense Force officers from abroad, and the latter in part for its link to Israeli real estate company Azrieli Group.

Dozens of authors pulled their books from consideration for this year’s Giller Prize, including some who went on to nab spots on other notable short lists such as the Writers’ Trust fiction prize and the Governor General’s Literary Award.

Meanwhile, CanLit Responds has strengthened its calls for action against the Giller, urging all members of the Canadian literary scene to boycott the event. The letter had more than 200 signatories as of Saturday, who pledged to abstain from submitting works to the prize or participating in any events related to it — “for as long as it takes until our demands are met.”

To Lim, the collective action seems to be paying off. While the Giller Foundation hasn’t cut ties with the big bank altogether, it did remove Scotiabank from the name of its prize.

Giller executive director Elana Rabinovitch, whose late father founded the award some 30 years ago to honour his deceased wife, said in a statement at the time that the foundation was still grateful for the bank’s support but that the prize was not political.

Rabinovitch said in an email Saturday, after declining interview requests, that the Giller’s contract with Scotiabank expires at the end of next year and that the organization would announce the next steps when it’s ready.

Rabinovitch also said that while she supports the authors’ right to protest, she questions their methods.

“Nobody could take issue with writers saying what they think, writing what they believe and protesting what they might see as unfair,” she said. “But boycotting, censoring, and blacklisting writers seems to me antithetical to the spirit of what great literature is all about.”

For their part, some of this year’s shortlisted authors have said they’re still working through how to communicate their feelings on the boycott.

“I can say that I’ve been thinking about it non-stop and writing about it every day for weeks now, because what has to be said has to be said so meticulously, because it matters so much, and so I’m not ready yet to talk about it,” said Anne Michaels, a finalist for her novel “Held.”

Similarly, Anne Fleming, whose novel “Curiosities” made the list, said she didn’t “want to wade into it.”

“I think it’s a complicated situation,” Fleming said in the hours after she was shortlisted. “I think what I do feel comfortable saying is I think that, broadly speaking, as a culture, we’re in the middle of an important shake up about where funding for the arts comes from. It’s not just the Giller. It extends far beyond that, and it’s not just here.”

Lim and many of the other authors who have spoken out against the sponsorship feel it’s notable that Scotiabank’s subsidiary sold some of its stake in Elbit Systems.

Securities filings show the bank’s 1832 Asset Management had about 642,000 shares in Elbit at the end of the second quarter of this year, worth about US$113 million. That’s down from about 2,237,000 shares worth US$467.4 million a year earlier.

Scotiabank has denied the protests had anything to do with that change, saying the calls were based on “investment merit” and were made independently of the bank itself. But Israeli business publication Globes reported Elbit’s CEO attributed the partial divestment — and a correlated temporary drop in share price — to antiwar pressure in Canada.

Scotiabank has declined to comment on the protests.

Lim said the partial divestment is a partial win.

She said taking a stand on this issue has also made room for something new to grow.

“For me, it has recast the way that I think about connections, the way that I think about cultural capital, and how much I’d be willing to give up of, not necessarily dollars, because everyone knows there’s not a lot of money in Canadian publishing, but out of prestige and fame,” Lim said.

While she’s no longer rubbing elbows with wealthy benefactors, Lim said the No Arms in the Arts movement has led to other opportunities, including four book club events featuring authors who withdrew their books from Giller contention. There, the authors read from their books and discuss ways the literary community can create change.

The winner of the Giller will receive $100,000, while the finalists receive $10,000. For translated works, the money is split, with 70 per cent going to the author and 30 per cent to the translator.

Other shortlisted writers this year include Conor Kerr for “Prairie Edge,” Deepa Rajagopalan for the short story collection “Peacocks of Instagram” and Eric Chacour for his novel “What I Know About You,” translated from the original French by Pablo Strauss.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 17, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

“A pretty cool idea’: Documentary series to follow Straschnitzki’s basketball dreams

Published

 on

CALGARY – Former Humboldt Bronco hockey player Ryan Straschnitzki has an entourage these days — complete with cameras and microphones — now that he’s changed his path to the Paralympics from the ice to the hardwood.

“Prairie Cat Productions reached out and mentioned this idea of kind of filming me in my wheelchair basketball career and possibly presenting it to a TV network,” Straschnitzki said in an interview.

“I thought it was a pretty cool idea and I like doing cool things.”

The 25-year-old from Airdrie, Alta., was paralyzed from the chest down in 2018 when a semi-trailer ran a stop sign and barrelled into the path of the Humboldt Broncos’ bus in rural Saskatchewan.

Sixteen people died and 13 were seriously injured.

Straschnitzki played on Alberta’s para hockey team and had been training with the Paralympic development team, but his journey ended at the Team Canada Olympic tryouts.

In July 2023, he decided to try to make the 2028 Paralympic basketball squad.

The decision caught the attention of Lucas Frison, the founder of Regina-based Prairie Cat Productions, who had completed a documentary for CBC on the Bronco team in the season after the crash.

Straschnitzki was recently filmed at Calgary’s Winsport arena where he geared up and played some sledge hockey with friends and former teammates, all the while being followed by the cameras.

Each episode of the six-part series titled “We Were Broncos” runs 30 minutes and will air on AMI. It will follow him as he pursues wheelchair basketball, with sledge hockey being part of his early story.

Other episodes will focus on Straschnitzki’s progress over the next several months, an explanation of wheelchair basketball, attending tournaments and the crash itself.

Frison, the producer and director, said the series has a personal tie.

“My best friend was Mark Cross, the assistant coach of the Broncos, who died in the crash so I’ve always been connected to Humboldt and the community and the story,” Frison said.

“Ryan wasn’t featured in my previous documentary because it was following some the players that were on that team the next season…but I’ve always followed along with what Ryan is doing.”

Straschnitzki said he’s been working hard to learn the skills he needs to play basketball, a sport he hadn’t pursued before hockey, but realizes he is learning from his mistakes.

Straschnitzki said it’s been a bit intimidating having this much attention.

“I just want to showcase to people what I’m doing and how I’m getting there,” he said.

“I can talk the talk all day, but I have to earn it and show people what I’m actually doing.”

Frison said if all goes well he hopes there will be a second season.

“It’s got to be someone that people can grab onto and want to see succeed,” he said.

“Will be make the Paralympic team? I don’t know. But even the up and downhill stuff, they want to follow him on the journey.

“If he fails at some things, people can relate.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Small plane crashes in Slovenia, killing 3 people

Published

 on

LJUBLJANA, Slovenia (AP) — A small plane crashed on Sunday in foggy weather in northeast Slovenia, killing three people on board, police said.

Police said they were informed about the accident around noon on Sunday. The Cessna Skyhawk plane was on a panoramic flight in the area of Prekmurje when it fell, police told Slovenia’s public broadcaster RTV Slovenia.

The report said the plane was initially set to carry four people but one person stayed behind.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Big voter turnout this year benefited Republicans, contradicting conventional political wisdom

Published

 on

The 2024 presidential election featured sky-high turnout, approaching the historic levels of the 2020 contest and contradicting long-held conventional political wisdom that Republicans struggle to win races in which many people vote.

According to Associated Press elections data, more than 153 million ballots were cast in this year’s race between Republican Donald Trump, now the president-elect, and Democrat Kamala Harris, the vice president, with hundreds of thousands of more still being tallied in slower-counting states such as California. When those ballots are fully tabulated, the number of votes will come even closer to the 158 million in the 2020 presidential contest, which was the highest turnout election since women were given the right to vote more than a century ago.

“Trump is great for voter turnout in both parties,” said Eitan Hersh, a political scientist at Tufts University.

The former president’s victory in both the Electoral College and popular vote — Trump currently leads Harris by nearly 2.5 million votes nationwide — also contradicts the belief in politics that Democrats, not Republicans, benefit from high-turnout elections.

Trump himself voiced it in 2020 when he warned that a Democratic bill to expand mail balloting would lead to “levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.” That warning came as Trump began to sow conspiracy theories about using mail voting during the coronavirus pandemic, which he then used to falsely claim his 2020 loss was due to fraud.

That claim led to a wave of new laws adding regulations and rolling back forms of voting in GOP-controlled states and an expansion of mail voting in Democratic-led ones, as the battle over turnout became a central part of political debate. Such laws usually have a miniscule impact on voting but inspired allegations of voter suppression from Democrats and cheating from Republicans.

“It’s such an embarrassing story for proponents on both sides, because it’s so obviously wrong,” Hersh said.

Though both sides are likely to continue to battle over how elections are run, Trump’s high-turnout victory may take some of the urgency out of that confrontation.

“Now I think, you just won the popular vote, I think it’ll quiet down,” said Patrick Ruffini, a Republican data analyst and pollster who has long argued his party can succeed in a high-turnout election with a diverse electorate.

Experts note that turnout in the seven swing states at the heart of the election was even higher than in the rest of the country.

“This was a campaign in seven states much more so than previous elections have felt like,” Ruffini said.

While the rest the country shifted significantly from 2020, when Democrat Joe Biden won the popular vote by 7 million, or 4.5 percentage points, the outcome in the swing states was closer. The turnout story also was different. Turnout dropped from 2020 in noncompetitive states such as Illinois, which recorded more than 500,000 fewer votes than in the last presidential election, and Ohio, which reported more than 300,000 less.

Meanwhile, the number of votes cast topped those in 2020 in the battleground states of Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, all of which Trump won. Arizona’s turnout was nearly even with four years ago, as the state continued to count ballots.

Harris even met or topped Biden’s vote totals in Georgia, Nevada, North Carolina and Wisconsin, and turnout has far eclipsed that of the 2016 presidential election, when 135.6 million voters cast ballots in a race won by Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton. The problem for Democrats is that Trump did better in the battlegrounds than four years ago.

“The Harris campaign did a pretty good job getting voters out who wouldn’t have come out,” said Tom Bonier, a Democratic data analyst. “She did get her voters out. Trump got more.”

Those Trump turnout victories included first-time voter Jasmine Perez, 26, who voted for Trump at the Las Vegas Raiders stadium.

“I’m a Christian and he really aligns with a lot of my values as a Christian in America, and I like that he openly promotes Christianity in America,” Perez said.

Voting alongside her was Diego Zubek, 27, who voted for Trump in 2016 but didn’t vote in 2020 because he figured Trump would win easily. He voted for Trump this year.

“I wasn’t going to let that happen again,” Zubek said.

A key part of the GOP strategy was reaching out to voters such as Perez and Zubek, encouraging early and mail voting after Republicans had largely abandoned them in the past two elections due to Trump’s lies about vote fraud. Conservatives mounted extensive voter registration and get-out-the-vote operations targeting infrequent voters, a demographic that many operatives have long believed would not vote for the GOP.

More than half the votes were cast before Election Day this year, according to AP tracking of the advanced vote.

During the campaign, Andrew Kolvet, a spokesman for Turning Point Action, a conservative group that ran a get-out-the-vote campaign with more than 1,000 workers in multiple battleground states, cited Stacey Abrams, a onetime Democratic candidate for Georgia governor, as an inspiration in his group’s effort. Abrams’ success mobilizing Black voters and other groups in her home state that were less likely to vote helped pave the way for Biden’s 2020 win there.

“We saw that Trump has this amazing reservoir of low-propensity conservatives who needed a little coaxing,” Kolvet said in an interview Friday. “They didn’t think their vote mattered, and their No. 1 pushback was they didn’t understand, really, how to vote.”

Kolvet acknowledged that conservatives long believed large turnout didn’t help them but contended that’s changed in the Trump era: “Our ideas are more popular,” he said.

Whether it continues is up to what happens next in Washington.

“It’s going to be up to conservatives to make good on those campaign promises,” Kolvet said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending