adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Science

A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar – Nature.com

Published

 on


  • 1.

    Kaspi, V. M. & Beloborodov, A. M. Magnetars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 261–301 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Olausen, S. A. & Kaspi, V. M. The McGill Magnetar Catalog. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 212, 6 (2014).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Esposito, P. et al. A very young radio-loud magnetar. Astrophys. J. Lett. 896, 30 (2020).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T. & Lorimer, D. R. Fast radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 4 (2019).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Spitler, L. G. et al. A repeating fast radio burst. Nature 531, 202–205 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    The CHIME/FRB Collaboration. CHIME/FRB detection of eight new repeating fast radio burst sources. Astrophys. J. Lett. 885, 24 (2019).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Kumar, P. et al. Faint repetitions from a bright fast radio burst source. Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, 30 (2019).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Fonseca, E. et al. Nine new repeating fast radio burst sources from CHIME/FRB. Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, 6 (2020).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Lyubarsky, Y. A model for fast extragalactic radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 442, L9–L13 (2014).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Beloborodov, A. M. A flaring magnetar in FRB 121102? Astrophys. J. Lett. 843, 26 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Metzger, B. D., Margalit, B. & Sironi, L. Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 4091–4106 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Project: system overview. Astrophys. J. 863, 48 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Palmer, D. M. A forest of bursts from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13675 (2020).

  • 14.

    Israel, G. L. et al. The discovery, monitoring and environment of SGR J1935+2154. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 3448–3456 (2016).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Cordes, J. M. & Lazio, T. J. W. NE2001. I. A new model for the galactic distribution of free electrons and its fluctuations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0207156 (2002).

  • 16.

    Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N. & Wang, N. A new electron-density model for estimation of pulsar and FRB distances. Astrophys. J. 835, 29 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    He, C., Ng, C.-Y. & Kaspi, V. The correlation between dispersion measure and X-ray column density from radio pulsars. Astrophys. J. 768, 64 (2013).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Kothes, R., Sun, X., Gaensler, B. & Reich, W. A radio continuum and polarization study of SNR G57.2+0.8 associated with magnetar SGR 1935+2154. Astrophys. J. 852, 54 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Zhang, C. F. et al. A highly polarised radio burst detected from SGR 1935+2154 by FAST. Astron. Telegr. 13699 (2020).

  • 20.

    CHIME/FRB. A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2872-x (2020).

  • 21.

    Zhou, P. et al. Revisiting the distance, environment and supernova properties of SNR G57.2+0.8 that hosts SGR 1935+2154. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03517 (2020).

  • 22.

    Mereghetti, S. et al. INTEGRAL IBIS and SPI-ACS detection of a hard X-ray counterpart of the radio burst from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13685 (2020).

  • 23.

    Ridnaia, A. et al. Konus-Wind observation of hard X-ray counterpart of the radio burst from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13688 (2020).

  • 24.

    Zhang, S. N. et al. Insight-HXMT X-ray and hard X-ray detection of the double peaks of the fast radio burst from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13696 (2020).

  • 25.

    Zhang, S. N. et al. Geocentric time correction for Insight-HXMT detection of the X-ray counterpart of the FRB by CHIME and STARE2 from SGR 1935+2154. Astron. Telegr. 13704 (2020).

  • 26.

    Tendulkar, S. P., Kaspi, V. M. & Patel, C. Radio nondetection of the SGR 1806–20 giant flare and implications for fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. 827, 59 (2016).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Scholz, P. et al. Simultaneous X-ray, gamma-ray, and radio observations of the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. 846, 80 (2017).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    von Kienlin, A. Fermi GBM GRBs 191104 A, B, C and triggers 594534420/191104185 and 594563923/191104527 are not GRBs. GCN Circ. 26163 (2019).

  • 29.

    Ambrosi, E., D’Elia, V., Kennea, J. A. & Palmer, D. Trigger 933276: Swift detection of further activity from SGR 1935+2154. GCN Circ. 26169 (2019).

  • 30.

    Palmer, D. Trigger 933285: Swift detection of the brightest burst so far from SGR 1935+2154. GCN Circ. 26171 (2019).

  • 31.

    Pearlman, A. B., Majid, W. A., Prince, T. A., Kocz, J. & Horiuchi, S. Pulse morphology of the Galactic Center magnetar PSR J1745–2900. Astrophys. J. 866, 160 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Hessels, J. W. T. et al. FRB 121102 bursts show complex time–frequency structure. Astrophys. J. Lett. 876, 23 (2019).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Burgay, M. et al. Search for FRB and FRB-like single pulses in Parkes magnetar data. In Pulsar Astrophysics: the Next Fifty Years (eds Weltevrede, P. et al.) 319–321 (2018).

  • 34.

    Bera, A. & Chengalur, J. N. Super-giant pulses from the Crab pulsar: energy distribution and occurrence rate. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, L12–L16 (2019).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Marcote, B. et al. A repeating fast radio burst source localized to a nearby spiral galaxy. Nature 577, 190–194 (2020).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    The CHIME/FRB Collaboration. Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source. Nature 582, 351–355 (2020).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Patel, C. et al. PALFA single-pulse pipeline: new pulsars, rotating radio transients, and a candidate fast radio burst. Astrophys. J. 869, 181 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Pol, N., Lam, M. T., McLaughlin, M. A., Lazio, T. J. W. & Cordes, J. M. Estimates of fast radio burst dispersion measures from cosmological simulations. Astrophys. J. 886, 135 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Shannon, R. M. et al. The dispersion–brightness relation for fast radio bursts from a wide-field survey. Nature 562, 386–390 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Hurley, K. et al. An exceptionally bright flare from SGR 1806–20 and the origins of short-duration γ-ray bursts. Nature 434, 1098–1103 (2005).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Lyutikov, M. Radio emission from magnetars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 580, 65–68 (2002).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Kumar, P., Lu, W. & Bhattacharya, M. Fast radio burst source properties and curvature radiation model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 2726–2739 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Zhang, Y. G. et al. Fast radio burst 121102 pulse detection and periodicity: a machine learning approach. Astrophys. J. 866, 149 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Bhandari, S. et al. The Survey for Pulsars and Extragalactic Radio Bursts—II. New FRB discoveries and their follow-up. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 1427–1446 (2018).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Ravi, V. The prevalence of repeating fast radio bursts. Nat. Astron. 3, 928–391 (2019).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Agarwal, D. et al. A fast radio burst in the direction of the Virgo cluster. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 1–8 (2019).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Taylor, M. et al. The core collapse supernova rate from the SDSS-II Supernova Survey. Astrophys. J. 792, 135 (2014).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Gourdji, K. et al. A sample of low-energy bursts from FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. Lett. 877, 19 (2019).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Gajjar, V. et al. Highest frequency detection of FRB 121102 at 4–8 GHz using the Breakthrough Listen digital backend at the Green Bank Telescope. Astrophys. J. 863, 2 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Bannister, K. W. et al. A single fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy at cosmological distance. Science 365, 565–570 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Ng, C. et al. CHIME FRB: an application of FFT beamforming for a radio telescope. In Proc. XXXII General Assembly and Scientific Symp. Intl Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS) J33-2 (2017).

  • 52.

    Masui, K. W. et al. Algorithms for FFT beamforming radio interferometers. Astrophys. J. 879, 16 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: the MCMC hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 125, 306 (2013).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Newburgh, L. B. et al. Calibrating CHIME: a new radio interferometer to probe dark energy. Proc. SPIE 9145, 91454V (2014).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Berger, P. et al. Holographic beam mapping of the CHIME pathfinder array. In Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VI (eds Hall, H. J., Gilmozzi, R. & Marshall, H. K.) 99060D (SPIE, 2016).

  • 56.

    Bandura, K. et al. Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) pathfinder. In Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes V (eds Stepp, L. M., Gilmozzi, R. & Hall, H. J.) 914522 (SPIE, 2014).

  • 57.

    Bandura, K. et al. ICE: a scalable, low-cost FPGA-based telescope signal processing and networking system. J. Astron. Instrum. 5, 1641005 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Burn, B. J. On the depolarization of discrete radio sources by Faraday dispersion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 133, 67–83 (1966).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Brentjens, M. A. & de Bruyn, A. G. Faraday rotation measure synthesis. Astron. Astrophys. 441, 1217–1228 (2005).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Sobey, C. et al. Low-frequency Faraday rotation measures towards pulsars using LOFAR: probing the 3D Galactic halo magnetic field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 3646–3664 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J. & Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proc. Second Intl Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD’96 (eds Simoudis, E., Han, J. & Fayyad, U.) 226–231 (AAAI, 1996).

  • 62.

    Arnaud, K. A. Xspec: the first ten years. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V (eds Jacoby, G. & Barnes, J.) 17 (ASP, 1996).

  • 63.

    Karachentsev, I. D. & Kaisina, E. I. Star formation properties in the local volume galaxies via Hα and far-ultraviolet fluxes. Astron. J. 146, 46 (2013).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Jarrett, T. H. et al. The WISE Extended Source Catalog (WXSC). I. The 100 largest galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 245, 25 (2019).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Gehrels, N. Confidence limits for small numbers of events in astrophysical data. Astrophys. J. 303, 336–346 (1986).

    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Let’s block ads! (Why?)

    728x90x4

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Science

    NASA's Voyager 1 resumes sending engineering updates to Earth – Phys.org

    Published

     on


    NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft is depicted in this artist’s concept traveling through interstellar space, or the space between stars, which it entered in 2012. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

    For the first time since November, NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft is returning usable data about the health and status of its onboard engineering systems. The next step is to enable the spacecraft to begin returning science data again. The probe and its twin, Voyager 2, are the only spacecraft to ever fly in interstellar space (the space between stars).

    Voyager 1 stopped sending readable science and engineering data back to Earth on Nov. 14, 2023, even though mission controllers could tell the was still receiving their commands and otherwise operating normally. In March, the Voyager engineering team at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California confirmed that the issue was tied to one of the spacecraft’s three onboard computers, called the flight data subsystem (FDS). The FDS is responsible for packaging the science and engineering data before it’s sent to Earth.

    300x250x1

    The team discovered that a responsible for storing a portion of the FDS memory—including some of the FDS computer’s software code—isn’t working. The loss of that code rendered the science and engineering data unusable. Unable to repair the chip, the team decided to place the affected code elsewhere in the FDS memory. But no single location is large enough to hold the section of code in its entirety.

    So they devised a plan to divide affected the code into sections and store those sections in different places in the FDS. To make this plan work, they also needed to adjust those code sections to ensure, for example, that they all still function as a whole. Any references to the location of that code in other parts of the FDS memory needed to be updated as well.

    NASA’s Voyager 1 resumes sending engineering updates to Earth
    After receiving data about the health and status of Voyager 1 for the first time in five months, members of the Voyager flight team celebrate in a conference room at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory on April 20. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

    The team started by singling out the responsible for packaging the spacecraft’s engineering data. They sent it to its new location in the FDS memory on April 18. A radio signal takes about 22.5 hours to reach Voyager 1, which is over 15 billion miles (24 billion kilometers) from Earth, and another 22.5 hours for a signal to come back to Earth. When the mission flight team heard back from the spacecraft on April 20, they saw that the modification had worked: For the first time in five months, they have been able to check the health and status of the spacecraft.

    During the coming weeks, the team will relocate and adjust the other affected portions of the FDS software. These include the portions that will start returning science data.

    Voyager 2 continues to operate normally. Launched over 46 years ago, the twin Voyager spacecraft are the longest-running and most distant spacecraft in history. Before the start of their interstellar exploration, both probes flew by Saturn and Jupiter, and Voyager 2 flew by Uranus and Neptune.

    Provided by
    NASA

    Citation:
    NASA’s Voyager 1 resumes sending engineering updates to Earth (2024, April 22)
    retrieved 22 April 2024
    from https://phys.org/news/2024-04-nasa-voyager-resumes-earth.html

    This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
    part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

    Adblock test (Why?)

    728x90x4

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Science

    Osoyoos commuters invited to celebrate Earth Day with the Leg Day challenge – Oliver/Osoyoos News – Castanet.net

    Published

     on


    Osoyoos commuters can celebrate Earth Day as the Town joins in on a national commuter challenge known as “Leg Day,” entering a chance to win sustainable transportation prizes.

    The challenge, from Earth Day Canada, is to record 10 sustainable commutes taken without a car.

    300x250x1

    “Cars are one of the biggest contributors to gas emissions in Canada,” reads an Earth Day Canada statement. “That’s why, Earth Day Canada is launching the national Earth Day is Leg Day Challenge.”

    So far, over 42.000 people have participated in the Leg Day challenge.

    Participants could win an iGo electric bike, public transportation for a year, or a gym membership.

    The Town of Osoyoos put out a message Monday promoting joining the national program.

    For more information on the Leg Day challenge click here.

    Adblock test (Why?)

    728x90x4

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Science

    Early bird may dodge verticillium woes in potatoes – Manitobe Co-Operator

    Published

     on


    Verticillium wilt is a problem for a lot of crops in Manitoba, including canola, sunflowers and alfalfa.

    Read Also

    Field stress can translate to potato skin flaws.

    In potatoes, the fungus Verticillium dahlia is the main cause of potato early die complex. In a 2021 interview with the Co-operator, Mario Tenuta, University of Manitoba soil scientist and main investigator with the Canadian Potato Early Dying Network, suggested the condition can cause yield loss of five to 20 per cent. Other research from the U.S. puts that number as high as 50 per cent.

    It also becomes a marketing issue when stunted spuds fall short of processor preferences.

    Verticillium in potatoes can significantly reduce yield and, being soil-borne, is difficult to manage.

    Preliminary research results suggest earlier planting of risk-prone fields could reduce losses, in part due to colder soil temperatures earlier in the season.

    Unlike other potato fungal issues that can be addressed with foliar fungicide, verticillium hides in the soil.

    “Commonly we use soil fumigation and that’s very expensive,” said Julie Pasche, plant pathologist with North Dakota State University.

    There are options. In 2017, labels expanded for the fungicide Aprovia, Syngenta’s broad-spectrum answer for leaf spots or powdery mildews in various horticulture crops. In-furrow verticillium suppression for potatoes was added to the label.

    There has also been interest in biofumigation. Mustard has been tagged as a potential companion crop for potatoes, thanks to its production of glucosinolate and the pathogen- and pest-inhibiting substance isothiocyanate.

    Last fall, producers heard that a new, sterile mustard variety specifically designed for biofumigation had been cleared for sale in Canada, although seed supplies for 2024 are expected to be slim. AAC Guard was specifically noted for its effectiveness against verticillium wilt.

    Timing is everything

    Researchers at NDSU want to study the advantage of natural plant growth patterns.

    “What we’d like to look at are other things we can do differently, like verticillium fertility management and water management, as well as some other areas and how they may be affected by planting date,” Pasche said.

    The idea is to find a chink in the fungus’s life cycle.

    Verticillium infects roots in the spring. From there, it colonizes the plant, moving through the root vascular tissue and into the stem. This is the cause of in-season vegetative wilting, Pasche noted.

    As it progresses, plant cells die, leaving behind tell-tale black dots on dead tissue. Magnification of those dots reveals what look like dark bunches of grapes — tiny spheres containing melanized hyphae, a resting form of the fungus called microsclerotia.

    The dark colour comes from melanin, the same pigment found in human skin. This pigmentation protects the microsclerotia from ultraviolet light.

    Adblock test (Why?)

    728x90x4

    Source link

    Continue Reading

    Trending