Adam Pankratz: It's amateur hour in Canadian politics. Time for big money | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Adam Pankratz: It’s amateur hour in Canadian politics. Time for big money

Published

 on

A rather bizarre and niche issue has been roiling Vancouver municipal politics in recent days.

Mark Marissen, political insider and candidate for mayor in the 2022 election, and his party, Progress Vancouver, have been found guilty of violating B.C.’s campaign finance laws over its late filing of financial reports. For their sins, Marissen is banned from running for office for three years and Progress Vancouver has been deregistered as a political entity. The party’s financial reports revealed additional problems: improperly recorded donor records, prohibited donations and a prohibited $50,000 loan. Marissen, on behalf of himself and Progress Vancouver, has stated that they were victims of bad legal advice as to the origination of campaign dollars.

Marissen’s long history in politics makes the fact that he should commit such an apparently basic error all the more strange, but does shed light on a little-known problem in Canadian politics: lack of funding resulting in low levels of political professionalism. This is a disservice to Canadians.
It may not be a cry one often hears, but it is true: there is not enough money in Canadian politics.

Donation limits are too low, and resulting pay and salaries are so minimal, that campaigns and political parties are frequently amateurish or fanatically ideological. Few sane people who have other options would willingly insert themselves into the thankless circus that politics has become for the measly financial rewards available. As a result, many campaigns are run by first-timers or part-timers doing their level best to keep up with complicated rules. Canada would benefit from a more professional political class and higher contribution limits.

Campaign contribution limits are absurdly low. Federally, the most one can contribute to a single candidate is $1,700. The same applies to the various political parties. In B.C., the provincial limit is $1,324 for 2023. Donations from corporations are banned entirely, when not so long ago they were permitted to give up to $5,000.

The contribution limits and bans come from a good place: the desire to limit undue influence over politicians. Unlimited money in politics, as we can easily see in the United States, has clearly deleterious effects. However, Canada has gone too far the other way. Our current situation so severely limits fundraising that many campaigns can barely pay their staff a real wage. Financially speaking, political involvement is highly unattractive so the best people Canada has to offer simply stay away. The result is a paucity of robust debates and conversations about good policy and the future of the country.

When violations are chased down each election cycle, the results are often comical. Recent violations from independent candidates have seen Elections Canada going after people who are not even financially able to pay the $500 dollar fine assessed. How is this a good use of anyone’s time or resources? We can’t defend ourselves against actual foreign interference, but let’s nail the guy who was never a threat to win and came in fourth in his riding.

While some may think that if Elections Canada is going to “miss” one way or another, missing by reducing donations to a trickle is better than allowing too much influence via a large monetary contribution. However, this is frequently not the case. Ask any candidate and they will tell you that the pool of people willing to donate even a modest amount is vanishingly small. As a result, candidates will appeal to and take money from almost anyone they can.

Indeed, anyone who wonders why politicians pander to fringes or patently undesirable groups should consider our strict financing laws which, though designed to stop this type of a result, can often encourage it. When $1,700 is suddenly the top dollar a candidate can get, COVID anti-vaxxers and people advocating child gender transitioning alike can have the ear of the candidate. Is this desirable? It may seem equitable, but the reality is not all ideas are good and a better filter would not go amiss.

The political environment these days makes candidate recruitment harder than ever. Campaign financing laws make recruitment of qualified, professional staff equally difficult. The frequent consequence: campaigns run by amateurs with listless candidates who sometimes violate election laws with little or no intent. This is not a recipe for strong local representation or elected member independence.

Though it often presents as such, politics is not a game. The decisions made by elected officials affect our lives deeply, as we painfully learned during COVID. Mark Marissen is a relatively high profile example of how even those familiar with the electoral rules have to rely on advice from a very small handful of lawyers who bother to do the thankless job of assisting political entities, often for little or no money. This scenario repeats every election cycle because there simply aren’t enough dollars to go around. We need more.

Canada’s campaigns should be better and the system we set up to select elected officials should match. Right now, however, we are not allowing candidates or political parties the funds needed to run the professional system Canadians deserve.

 

Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version