AI is Already in the Newsroom | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Media

AI is Already in the Newsroom

Published

 on

For journalists who work — or used to work — at G/O Media, the disclaimer at the bottom of numerous articles on the company’s e-commerce site, The Inventory, offers an unsettling vision of the future: “This article was generated by an AI engine which may produce inaccurate information.”

That warning appears on every article credited to “The Inventory Bot,” a highly productive virtual employee with its byline on 10 articles published on December 14th alone. “It’s absolutely the most inane way to announce that your article is trash, like pure garbage,” says a former G/O writer who lost their job in a recent round of human-employee layoffs. “There’s no thought process going on behind this except, ‘we want as many articles on our site as possible as quickly as possible. And we don’t give a shit about the content.’” (A G/O spokesperson emphasizes that The Inventory “is an e-commerce site, separate and apart from our other editorial properties.”) The former G/O writer doesn’t blame the advent of AI for his own layoff, but there have been some job losses at the company due to automation: The entire staff of Gizmodo en Español was replaced by a years-old translation tool in August, according to the spokesperson.

G/O Media at least labels its robo-content. A more venerable brand, Sports Illustrated, became the face of AI-journalism calamity in recent weeks after publishing what were reported to be AI-written articles attributed to nonexistent people, complete with AI-generated headshots. (The articles came from a third-party company, Advon Commerce. SI’s parent company, Arena Group, says the vendor told them the articles were human-written, albeit with fake bylines and photos. The outlet Futurism, which broke the news about the articles, quoted a newsroom source insisting at least some of the text was AI-generated, as well.) Four Arena Group executives, including the CEO, Ross B. Levinsohn, were fired after the scandal, though an Arena Group spokesperson says the timing was coincidental and related to ownership changes.

“Journalism is going to change more in the next three or five years than it has in the last 30 years.”

David Caswell, StoryFlow Ltd. founder

The true possibilities of generative AI began to reveal themselves to the world beyond Silicon Valley in 2023, leaving many industries either bracing for disruption, jumping on the technology as rapidly as possible, or both. The business of news is no exception, with multiple outlets embarrassing themselves this year by using AI tools they either didn’t prompt correctly or weren’t yet up to the tasks at hand: CNET found itself forced to correct errors in over half of 77 AI-generated articles they posted; Microsoft’s MSN highlighted fake news stories after abandoning human curators for an AI-powered homepage; Gannett had to stop using an automated news-writing company, LedeAI, that kept inserting the phrase “close encounter of the athletic kind” into high-school sports stories.

“These tools have a tendency to mess up, to get facts wrong, to hallucinate, to spread misinformation, even when they think it’s right,” says Jack Brewster, enterprise editor for the watchguard organization Newsguard.

Generative AI is “not quite there yet to be an autopilot,” adds Brad Weitz, CEO of Data Skrive , which has been using human-guided machine-learning technology to generate hundreds of sports stories a week for outlets including the Associated Press, ESPN, and USA Today since 2018 or so — without causing any significant controversy.  Similarly, outlets including the AP and Bloomberg have been utilizing pre-ChatGPT AI tools for years to generate straightforward stories on earnings reports and stock market status updates. “It’s not going to replace humans for an extended period of time,” Weitz says. “We look at it as, can we use this type of technology to make humans more efficient?”

Still, the micro-scandals of 2023 are just a few stray drops of water from an impending flood that may well reshape an entire industry. “Journalism is going to change more in the next three or five years than it has in the last 30 years,” argues David Caswell, formerly of the BBC and Yahoo!, and now founder of StoryFlow Ltd., a AI-in-news consulting firm. Caswell’s extensive experience is on the technology side of the news business, rather than editorial, and his current line of work offers obvious incentive to predict radical change, but he’s far from alone in his assessment. Near-instantaneous automated rewrites of news stories by competing sites and newly AI-equipped search engines alike could cause job losses and potentially devastating decreases in traffic and profits; the proliferation of AI news sites indistinguishable from real ones, sometimes with completely fake stories, seems fated to further erode public trust in journalism – and even any remaining societal sense of shared truths.

In the past month, developments have begun to speed up. The New York Times hired an editorial director of Artificial Intelligence Initiatives. German news giant Axel Springer (owner of U.S. publications Politico and Business Insider) struck a deal with ChatGPT creators OpenAI that will allow ChatGPT to offer “real-time news” when answering users’ questions. Semafor spotted Investing.com allegedly rewriting competitors’ news articles with AI and without credit — one of many recent developments that augur an era where AI-powered sites routinely rewrite human-reported scoops. (A spokesperson for Investing.com says the company is “working on and implementing an AI product to assist its editorial team… Investing.com has access to a wide array of financial instruments and is often generating its data from the same sources as other publishers in the industry. It is transparent and responsible in its development and use of AI, clearly specifying when it is deployed to assist its content team.” )

A startup called Channel1.ai debuted a proof-of-concept episode of a newscast starring AI-generated anchors. Apple reportedly opened talks with a long list of major publishers, offering massive payouts in exchange for using their content to train their AI systems. And Wall Street reiterated its bullishness about AI’s future, with J.P. Morgan excitedly predicting “mass-scale white collar job realignment” that will impact “content creators” — which could become a self-fulfilling prophecy as investors in media properties push for AI adoption.

Perhaps even more consequentially, big tech‘s own use of AI loomed as an ominous external threat to publishers, with new forms of search preventing readers from even reaching their sites. Multiple executives at major publishers told the Wall Street Journal last week that the AI-powered search that Google is slowly rolling out could devastate traffic by drawing from their content to answer users’ questions – without directing them to external links. Even as Axel Springer struck its deal with OpenAI, its chairman and CEO, Mathias Döpfner, told the WSJ that “AI and large language models have the potential to destroy journalism and media brands as we know them.”

LIKE MANY NEWS OUTLETS, Sports Illustrated is under significant financial pressure, which likely left management willing to “try anything,” according to a source familiar with the publication and the broader media business. “I know the tenor of the feeling of the newsroom is that Arena doesn’t care about the quality of the content,” he says. “If it takes pennies to produce and it makes you a quarter, then it’s a return, right?” (An Arena Group spokesperson pointed back to its statement denying the use of AI.)

At G/O media, the former writer recalls the first AI-generated articles appearing — without human editorial input — on the company’s sites within a week of a memo announcing that the company would be experimenting with the technology. “We saw a couple of AI articles in our back end… and then they got published without really any of us knowing,” the writer says. “It was very, very fast. We didn’t look at it. We didn’t get a chance. We didn’t edit it. We didn’t touch it. And almost as soon as it went up, we realized just how bad it was. And our editor-in-chief was like, ‘please send all the corrections you have,’ and it took us 30 minutes to an hour for all of us collectively to nitpick this absurd AI-generated article that none of us had any say in.” (The G/O Media spokesperson claims the writers’ union refused to help with the company’s AI experiments, and says the first article the company posted was “just a list about Star Wars” on Gizmodo.)

Justin Harvey, co-founder and CEO of the startup Infobot.AI, which aims to provide custom AI-powered newsfeeds to readers, sees existing news organizations as mostly focused on using AI to cut costs — and, potentially, workers. “They’re trying to take their existing newsroom and just expand the margins, like, ‘How do we get rid of some of the people? How do we make it more efficient?’ In his mind, that gives startups like his own more room to pioneer newsgathering innovations, like using AI to examine and find newsworthy material in public records — everything from city council meetings to S.E.C. filings — at a scale no human could match. (At the same time, Harvey admits he has no idea yet how the company will turn its product into profits.) One of the hottest startups in the space is Instagram founder Kevin Systrom’s app Artifact, which uses AI as a headline-recommendation tool, as well as  — more boldly — to re-write “clickbait” headlines.

Some smaller news sites have also found room to be innovative. Rappler, based in the Philippines, won an international AI-journalism competition in November thanks to TLDR, a project that used AI to reformat their news stories into shorter and more visually driven alternate formats to appeal to younger and more text-averse users. As Caswell sees it, that kind of easy reformatting of outlets’ reporting is one of the most promising uses of AI for news organizations.”It’s not a completely automated thing,” says Caswell, who coached the company as part of the competition. “But it vastly steps up the scale at which they can do it.”

Other small outlets have popped up that appear to be purely exploitative, and they’re likely just the beginning. Newsguard has identified more than 600 “unreliable AI-generated news and information websites” this year, some of which publish entirely false articles to garner traffic, including erroneous obituaries for celebrities.

The number of such sites will almost certainly “grow exponentially over the next few years,” says Newsguard’s Brewster. “We’ll see thousands by next year. I mean, what’s stopping a Super PAC from using artificial intelligence to start its own website that looks like local news and generates content that’s favorable for whatever political candidate it’s backing? It just lowers the barrier to entry for spreading misinformation. You have the power of thousands of writers at your disposal.”

It’s also probable that higher-profile, better-funded news sites will pop up to take advantage of large language models’ skill at summarization and paraphrasing to near-instantly grab breaking news stories reported by human journalists elsewhere and post aggregated versions — which, if done at large enough scale, could cannibalize the traffic and profits that fund actual newsgathering. “Someone’s going to just come out and say, ‘All right, fine, I’m just going to create a completely 100 percent AI-driven news site and have zero editors or anything on staff,” predicts Eddie Kim, founder of the news-metrics site Memo.

Such a site could release “a paraphrased version of an article with just the information that’s in the article, two minutes after their competitor publishes their scoop,” says Caswell. “It’s morally reprehensible, but it’s legal because you can’t copyright the facts… You pay a lot of money as a news organization for your reporters and your infrastructure to do original reporting. And then, five minutes after it gets published, it’s used as raw material, without payment for a consumer experience somewhere else.” He adds that the AI-powered search Google is starting to use is alarming publishers because it presents exactly the same problem, without even involving another news brand. “These are major, major structural changes.”

At the same time, some existing news organizations may end up turning over some of their aggregation to AI. The question is whether that will free up staff to do more original work, or if — in an ever-brutal business — that simply means eventually replacing some human workers with automation. There are some signs that at least top organizations will choose the former road. Bloomberg, the Associated Press, and more recently, the Wall Street Journal’s long standing use of pre-ChatGPT tools has expanded their output seemingly without negative impact on their human staffing.

Says the former G/O writer, “If you were basically able to tell writers, ‘You don’t have to do aggregated content anymore. We have an AI bot to take care of that. Instead, you guys should focus on voicey pieces, reported pieces and investigations,’ I think that would be that positive in a lot of ways.”

AI CAN REWRITE TEXT INSTANTLY and absorb and summarize documents faster than any human, but it can’t yet jump on a phone call or Zoom for even the most basic interviews, can’t work a network of sources, can’t trail a subject for an in-depth feature. “Things that are truly investigative, or things that require someone to speak to primary sources” are likely insulated for now from AI-driven change, says Kim. That said, news organizations that fund that kind of work also rely on scale and profits partially generated by aggregated work that may become harder to monetize. And outlets “whose current product is largely built on packaging commodity information” are likely to struggle the most in the coming world, as Caswell recently wrote.

Even Channel1, the company planning custom newscasts with AI anchors, recognizes the limits  and dangers of journalism without human intervention. “At a base level, this technology is terrifying,” says Channel 1 co-founder Adam Mosam, acknowledging the risks of totally convincing footage of nonexistent news anchors. “We’re hoping to get out in front of this inevitable future and create best practices for the world that we’re moving toward.”

For Channel1, only a portion of news scripts will be AI-written, with the rest provided through partnerships (they expect to announce one next month with a major news organization), and their own human staff. “We are AI native, as opposed to 100 percent AI,” says Mosam. “And the difference is we have people at every stage of the newsroom.”

For now, LLMs struggle with some basic journalistic tasks — try to get OpenAI’s GPT-4 to edit a transcript of an interview into a clean Q+A, and you’ll find that it’s quietly rewritten quotes, or simply invented new ones. Some researchers argue that a certain amount of “hallucination” — as the AI’s inventions are known — will always be necessary to allow for creativity in these models. But it’s clear that drawing any conclusions from current limitations is a mistake.

“People generally overestimate what the system can do now and underestimate what it can do in 10 years,” says Infobot’s Harvey. “People probably overestimate what it can do now by 20% or something, and they underestimate what it’s gonna be able to do in the future by 10,000 percent. But probably most people can’t even begin to grapple with the concept of where this is going. ”

 

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Bayo Onanuga battles yet another media – Punch Newspapers

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Bayo Onanuga battles yet another media  Punch Newspapers



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Blood In The Snow Film Festival Celebrates 13 Years!

Published

 on

Blood in the Snow FILM FESTIVAL

Celebrates

13 YEARS

Be Afraid.  Be Very Afraid”

Toronto, on – Blood in the Snow Film Festival (BITS), a unique and imaginative showcase of contemporary Canadian genre films are pleased to announce the popular Festival is back for its 13th exciting year.  The highly anticipated Horror Film festival presented by Super Channel runs November 18th– 23rd at Toronto’s Isabel Bader Theatre  The successful, long running festival takes on many different faces this year that include Scary, Action Horror, Horror Comedy, Sci-Fi and Thrillers.  Festival goers will be kept on the edge of their seats with this year’s powerful line-up.

Blood in the Snow Festival begins with the return of alumni (Wolf Cop) Lowell Deans action horror feature Dark Match featuring wrestling veteran Chris Jericho followed by the mysterious Hunting Mathew Nichols. The unexpected thrills continue with Blood in the Snow World Premiere of Pins and Needles and the Fantasia Best First Feature Award winner, Self Driver.  The festival ends this year on a fun note with the Toronto Premiere of Scared Sh*tless (featuring Kids in the Halls Mark McKinney).  Other titles include the horror anthology series Creepy Bits and Zoom call shock of Invited by Blood in the Snow alumni Navin Ramaswaran (Poor Agnes). The festival will also include five feature length short film programs including the festivals comedy horror program Funny Frights and Unusual Sights and the highly anticipated Dark Visions program, part of opening night festivities.  Blood in the Snow Film Festival Director and Founder, Kelly Michael Stewart anticipates this year’s festival to be its strongest.  This was the first time in our 13 year history, all our programmers agreed on the exact same eight feature programs we have selected.”

Below is this year’s horror fest’s exciting lineup of features and shorts scheduled to screen, in-person at the Isabel Bader theatre. 

**All festival features will be preceded by a short film and followed by a Q&A with filmmakers.

Tickets for the Isabel Bader Theatre lineup on sale now and can be purchased  https://www.bloodinthesnow.ca

Super Channel is pleased to once again assume the role of Presenting Sponsor for the Blood in the Snow Film Festival. We extend our sincere appreciation to the entire BITS team for their unwavering commitment to amplifying the voices of diverse filmmakers and providing a platform for the celebration of Canadian genre content. – Don McDonald, the CEO of Super Channel

Blood in the Snow Festival 2024 Full screening schedule:

Monday November 18th
7pm – Dark Visions

Shiva (13:29) dir. Josh Saltzman

Shiva is an unnerving tale about a recently widowed woman who breaks with a long-held Jewish mourning ritual in hopes of connecting with her deceased husband.

How to Stay Awake (5:30) dir. Vanessa Magic

A woman fights to stay awake, to avoid battling the terrifying realm of sleep paralysis, but as she risks everything to break free, will she be released from the grip of her nocturnal tormentor?

Pocket Princess (9:45) dir. Olivia Loccisano

A young girl must take part in a dangerous task in order to complete her doll collection in this miniature fairytale.

For Rent (10:33) dir. Michèle Kaye

In her new home, Donna unravels a sinister truth—her landlord is a demon with a dark appetite. As her family mysteriously vanishes, Donna confronts the demonic landlord, only to plunge into a shadowy game where the house hungers for more than just occupants. An ominous cycle begins, shrouded in mystery.

Lucys Birthday (9:29) dir. Peter Sreckovic

A father struggles to enjoy his young daughter’s birthday despite a series of strange and disturbing disruptions.

Parasitic (10:00) dir. Ryan M Andrews

Last call at a dive bar, a writer struggling to find his voice gets more than he bargains for.

 Naualli (6:00) dir. Adrian Gonzalez de la Pena

A grieving man seeks revenge, unwittingly awakening a mystical creature known as the Nagual.

The Saint and The Bear (6:34) dir. Dallas R Soonias

Two strangers cross paths on an ominous park bench.

The Sorrow (13:00) dir. Thomas Affolter

A retired army general and his live-in nurse find they are not alone in a house filled with dark secrets.

Cadabra (6:00) dir. Tiffany Wice

An amateur magician receives more than he anticipated when he purchases a cursed hat from the estate of his deceased hero.

9:30 – Dark Match dir. Lowell Dean Horror / Action

A small time WRESTLING COMPANY accepts a well-paying but too good to be true gig.

 

Tuesday November 19th
7pm – Mournful Mediums

Night Lab (15:00) dir. Andrew Ellinas

When a mysterious package arrives from one of the lab’s field research stations, a promising young researcher uncovers a conspiracy against her masterminded by her jealous boss. She soon finds herself having to grapple with her conscience before making a life-or-death decision.

Dirty Bad Wrong (14:40) dir. Erica Orofino

Desperate to keep her promise to host the best superhero party for her 6-year-old, young mother Sid, a sex worker, takes extreme measures and books a last-minute client with a dark fetish.

Midnight at the lonely river (17:00) dir. Abraham Cote

When the lights go out at a seedy little motel bar, at the crossroads of a seedy little town, nefarious happenings are taking place, and three predators are enacting their evil deeds. Enter Vicky, a drifter who quickly realizes whats happening right under everyones nose. After midnight, In the shadows of this dim establishment, evil begets evil, and the predator becomes the prey.

Mean Ends (14:58) dir. Émile Lavoie

A buried body, a missing sister and an inquisitive neighbour makes for a hell of an evening. And the sun isnt close to settling on Erics sh*tty day.

Stuffy (18:26) dir. Dan Nicholls

A young couple sets off in the middle of the night to bury their kid’s stuffed bunny, as one of them is convinced that the stuffy might be cursed.

Dungeon of Death (18:33) dir. Brian P. Rowe

Torturer Raullin loves a work challenge, especially if that challenge involves hurting people to extract information from them.

9:30 – Hunting Matthew Nichols (96 mins) dir. Markian Tarasiuk

Twenty-three years after her brother mysteriously disappeared, a documentary filmmaker sets out to solve his missing person’s case. But when a disturbing piece of evidence is revealed, she comes to believe that her brother might still be alive.

w/ short: Josephine (6:15) dir. John Francis Bregar

A man haunted by his past seeks forgiveness from his deceased wife, but a session with two spirit mediums leads to an unsettling encounter.

Wednesday November 20th
7pm – BITS and BYTES

Ezra (10:57) dirs. Luke Hutchie, Mike Mildon, Marianna Phung

After fleeing the dark and demonic chains of his shadowy old home, Ezra, a killer gay vampire, takes a leap of faith and enters the modern world.

Head Shop (18:14 episode 1-3) dir. Namaï Kham Po

In a post-apocalyptic world, Annas life and work are dominated by her father Sylvestre, a short-tempered mechanic with a terrible reputation for tearing the head off anyone who dares cross him. He decides that shes old enough to follow in his footsteps, much to her dismay. To prove herself, she must now decapitate her first victim. Can she find a way to defy fate?

D dot H (18 :15 episodes 1-2) dirs. Meegwun Fairbrother, Mary Galloway

Struggling artist Doug is visited by the beautiful and enigmatic H, who claims he holds the power to visiting inconceivable places.” Still half-asleep, Doug is shocked when H vanishes suddenly and her doppelganger, Hannah, strides past.

Creepy Bits: Last Sonata (21:08) dir.

Adrian Bobb, Ashlea Wessel, David J. Fernandes, Sid Zanforlin and Kelly Paoli.

Set among forests, lakes, and small towns, Creepy Bits is a horror anthology series helmed by five innovative filmmakers exploring themes of human vs. nature, the invasion and destruction of the natural world by outsiders, and isolation within a vast, eerie landscape that is not afraid to fight back.

Tales from the Void: Whistle in the Woods” (24:36) dir. Francesco Loschiavo

Horror anthology TV series based on stories from r/NoSleep. Each tale blends genre thrills & social commentary exploring the dark side of the human psyche.

9:30 – Self Driver dir. Michael Pierro Thriller

Facing mounting expenses and the unrelenting pressure of modern living, a down-on-his-luck cab driver is lured on to a mysterious new app that promises fast, easy money. As his first night on the job unfolds, he is pulled ever deeper into the dark underbelly of society, embarking on a journey that will test his moral code and shake his understanding of what it means to have freewill. The question becomes not how much money he can make, but what he’ll be compelled to do to make it.
 

w/ short: Northern Escape (10:38) dirs. Lucy Sanci, Alexis Korotash

A couple on a cottage getaway tries to work on their relationship but ends up getting more than they bargained for when they discover something sinister lurking beneath the surface.

Thursday November 21st
7pm – Funny Frights

Midnight Snack (1:41) dir. Sandra Foisy

Hunger always strikes in the dead of night.

Hell is a Teenage Girl (15:00) dir. Stephen Sawchuk

Every Halloween, the small town of Springboro is terrorized by its resident SLASHER – a masked serial killer who targets sinful teenagers that break The Rules of Horror’ – dont drink, dont do drugs, and dont have sex!

Gaslit (10:36) dir. Anna MacLean

A woman goes to dangerous lengths to prove she wasn’t responsible for a fart.

Bath Bomb (9:55) dir. Colin G Cooper

A possessive doctor prepares an ostensibly romantic bath for his narcissistic boyfriend, but after an accusation of infidelity, things take a deeply disturbing turn.

Any Last Words (14:22) dir. Isaac Rathé

A crook trying to flee town is paid an untimely visit by some of his former colleagues. What would you say to save your life if you were staring down the barrel of a gun?

Papier mâché (4:30) dir. Simon Madore

A whimsical depiction of the hard and tumultuous life of a piñata.

The Living Room (9:59) dir. Joslyn Rogers

After an unexpected call from Lady Luck, Ms. Valentine must choose between her sanity and her winnings – all before the jungle consumes her.

A Divine Comedy: What the Hell (8:55) dir. Valerie Lee Barnhart
 Dante’s classic Hell is falling into oblivion. Charlotte,

sharp-witted Harpy, navigates the chaos and sets out despite the odds for a new life and destiny.

Mr Fuzz (2:30) dir. Christopher Walsh

A long-limbed, fuzzy-haired creature will do whatever it takes to keep you watching his show.

Out of the Hands of the Wicked (5:00) dirs. Luke Sargent, Benjamin Hackman

After a harrowing journey home from hell, old Pa boasts of his triumph over evil, and how he came to lock the devil in his heart.

The Shitty Ride (9:13) dir. Cole Doran

Hoping to impress the girl of his dreams, Cole buys a used car but gets more than he bargained for with his shitty ride.

9:30 – Invited dir. Navin Ramaswaran Horror

When a reluctant mother attends her daughter’s Zoom elopement, she and the rest of the family in attendance quickly realize the groom is part of a Russian cult with deadly intentions.

w/ shorts: Defile dir. Brian Sepanzyk

A couple’s secluded getaway is suddenly interrupted by a strange family who exposes them to the horrors that lie beyond the tree line.

 A Mother’s Love dir. Lisa Ovies

A young girl deals with the consequences of trusting someone online.

Friday November 22nd
7:00 pm – Creepy Bits (anthology horror series)

Creepy Bits is a short horror anthology series that explores pandemic age themes of isolation, paranoia and distrust of authority, serving them up in bite-sized chunks. Directed by Adrian Bobb, Ashlea Wessel, David J. Fernandes, Sid Zanforlin and Kelly Paoli.

9:30 – Pins and Needles (81 min) dir. James Villeneuve Horror / Thriller

Follows Max, a diabetic, biology grad student who is entrapped in a devilish new-age wellness experiment and must escape a lethal game of cat and mouse to avoid becoming the next test subject to extend the lives of the rich and privileged.

w/ short: Adjoining (11:42) dirs. Harrison Houde, Dakota Daulby

A couple’s motel stay takes a chilling turn when they discover they’re being observed, leading to unexpected consequences.

Saturday November 23rd
4pm – Emerging Screams (94 mins)

Apnea (14:58) dir. David Matheson

A single, working mother finds her career and her offbeat sons safety in jeopardy when she discovers that her late mother is possessing her in her sleep.

Nereid (7:48) dir. Lori Zozzolotto

A mysterious woman escapes from an abusive relationship with earth shattering results.

BedLamer (15:00) dir. Alexa Jane Jerrett

On the shores of a small fishing village lives a lonely settlement of men – capturing and domesticating otherworldly creatures that were never meant to be tamed.

Blocked (6:30) dir. Aisha Alfa

A new mom is literally consumed with the futility of cleaning up after her kid.

Dance of the Faery (10:23) dir. Kaela Brianna Egert

A young woman cleans up her estranged, great aunt’s home after her death. Upon inspection, she soon realizes that her eccentric obsession with fairies was not born out of love, but of fear.

Deep End (7:36) dir. Juan Pablo Saenz

A gay couple’s heated argument during a hike spiral into a nightmare when one of them vanishes, leading the other to a mysterious cave that could reveal the chilling truth.

Ojichaag – Spirit Within (11:21) dir. Rachel Beaulieu

An emotionally devastated woman seeks comfort in her choice to end her life. As she faces death in the form of a spirit, she must decide to let herself go to fight to stay alive.

Lure (9.56) dir. Jacob Phair

A tormented father awaits the return of the man who saved his son’s life.

Let Me In (10:00) dirs. Joel Buxton, Charles Smith

A reluctant man interviews an unusual immigration candidate: himself from a doomed dimension

7:00 pm –The Silent Planet (95 mins) dir. Jeffrey St. Jules Sci-fi

An aging convict serving out a life sentence alone on a distant planet is forced to confront his past when a new prisoner shows up and pushes him to remember his life on earth

w/ short: Ascension (3:57) dir. Kenzie Yango

Deep in a remote forest, two friends, Mia and Riley, embark on a leisurely hike. As tensions run high between the two, a strange humming noise appears that seems to be coming from somewhere in the woods.

9:30 – Scared Shitless (73 mins) dir. Vivieno Caldinelli Horror / Comedy

A plumber and his germophobic son are forced to get their hands dirty to save the residents of an apartment building, when a genetically engineered, blood-thirsty creature escapes into the plumbing system.
 

w/ short: Oh…Canada (6:20) dir. Vincenzo Nappi

Oh, Canada. Such a wonderful place to live – WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. A musical look into the artifice surrounding Canadian identity.

 

Tickets for the Isabel Bader Theatre lineup on sale now and can be purchased https://www.bloodinthesnow.ca/#festival

 

Follow “Blood In The Snow” Film Festival:

https://www.instagram.com/bitsfilmfest/

 

Media Inquiries:

Sasha Stoltz Publicity:

Sasha Stoltz | Sasha@sashastoltzpublicity.com | 416.579.4804
https://www.sashastoltzpublicity.com

Continue Reading

Media

It’s time for a Halloween movie marathon. 10 iconic horror films

Published

 on

 

Sometimes, you just have to return to the classics.

That’s especially true as Halloween approaches. While you queue up your spooky movie marathon, here are 10 iconic horror movies from the past 70 years for inspiration, and what AP writers had to say about them when they were first released.

We resurrected excerpts from these reviews, edited for clarity, from the dead — did they stand the test of time?

“Rear Window” (1954)

“Rear Window” is a wonderful trick pulled off by Alfred Hitchcock. He breaks his hero’s leg, sets him up at an apartment window where he can observe, among other things, a murder across the court. The panorama of other people’s lives is laid out before you, as seen through the eyes of a Peeping Tom.

James Stewart, Grace Kelly, Thelma Ritter and others make it good fun.

— Bob Thomas

“Halloween” (1978)

At 19, Jamie Lee Curtis is starring in a creepy little thriller film called “Halloween.”

Until now, Jamie’s main achievement has been as a regular on the “Operation Petticoat” TV series. Jamie is much prouder of “Halloween,” though it is obviously an exploitation picture aimed at the thrill market.

The idea for “Halloween” sprang from independent producer-distributor Irwin Yablans, who wanted a terror-tale involving a babysitter. John Carpenter and Debra Hill fashioned a script about a madman who kills his sister, escapes from an asylum and returns to his hometown intending to murder his sister’s friends.

— Bob Thomas

“The Silence of the Lambs” (1991)

“The Silence of the Lambs” moves from one nail-biting sequence to another. Jonathan Demme spares the audience nothing, including closeups of skinned corpses. The squeamish had best stay home and watch “The Cosby Show.”

Ted Tally adapted the Thomas Harris novel with great skill, and Demme twists the suspense almost to the breaking point. The climactic confrontation between Clarice Starling and Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine) is carried a tad too far, though it is undeniably exciting with well-edited sequences.

Such a tale as “The Silence of the Lambs” requires accomplished actors to pull it off. Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins are highly qualified. She provides steely intelligence, with enough vulnerability to sustain the suspense. He delivers a classic portrayal of pure, brilliant evil.

— Bob Thomas

“Scream” (1996)

In this smart, witty homage to the genre, students at a suburban California high school are being killed in the same gruesome fashion as the victims in the slasher films they know by heart.

If it sounds like the script of every other horror movie to come and go at the local movie theater, it’s not.

By turns terrifying and funny, “Scream” — written by newcomer David Williamson — is as taut as a thriller, intelligent without being self-congratulatory, and generous in its references to Wes Craven’s competitors in gore.

— Ned Kilkelly

“The Blair Witch Project” (1999)

Imaginative, intense and stunning are a few words that come to mind with “The Blair Witch Project.”

“Blair Witch” is the supposed footage found after three student filmmakers disappear in the woods of western Maryland while shooting a documentary about a legendary witch.

The filmmakers want us to believe the footage is real, the story is real, that three young people died and we are witnessing the final days of their lives. It isn’t. It’s all fiction.

But Eduardo Sanchez and Dan Myrick, who co-wrote and co-directed the film, take us to the edge of belief, squirming in our seats the whole way. It’s an ambitious and well-executed concept.

— Christy Lemire

“Saw” (2004)

The fright flick “Saw” is consistent, if nothing else.

This serial-killer tale is inanely plotted, badly written, poorly acted, coarsely directed, hideously photographed and clumsily edited, all these ingredients leading to a yawner of a surprise ending. To top it off, the music’s bad, too.

You could forgive all (well, not all, or even, fractionally, much) of the movie’s flaws if there were any chills or scares to this sordid little horror affair.

But “Saw” director James Wan and screenwriter Leigh Whannell, who developed the story together, have come up with nothing more than an exercise in unpleasantry and ugliness.

— David Germain

Germain gave “Saw” one star out of four.

“Paranormal Activity” (2009)

The no-budget ghost story “Paranormal Activity” arrives 10 years after “The Blair Witch Project,” and the two horror movies share more than a clever construct and shaky, handheld camerawork.

The entire film takes place at the couple’s cookie-cutter dwelling, its layout and furnishings indistinguishable from just about any other readymade home constructed in the past 20 years. Its ordinariness makes the eerie, nocturnal activities all the more terrifying, as does the anonymity of the actors adequately playing the leads.

The thinness of the premise is laid bare toward the end, but not enough to erase the horror of those silent, nighttime images seen through Micah’s bedroom camera. “Paranormal Activity” owns a raw, primal potency, proving again that, to the mind, suggestion has as much power as a sledgehammer to the skull.

— Glenn Whipp

Whipp gave “Paranormal Activity” three stars out of four.

“The Conjuring” (2013)

As sympathetic, methodical ghostbusters Lorraine and Ed Warren, Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson make the old-fashioned haunted-house horror film “The Conjuring” something more than your average fright fest.

“The Conjuring,” which boasts incredulously of being their most fearsome, previously unknown case, is built very in the ’70s-style mold of “Amityville” and, if one is kind, “The Exorcist.” The film opens with a majestic, foreboding title card that announces its aspirations to such a lineage.

But as effectively crafted as “The Conjuring” is, it’s lacking the raw, haunting power of the models it falls shy of. “The Exorcist” is a high standard, though; “The Conjuring” is an unusually sturdy piece of haunted-house genre filmmaking.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “The Conjuring” two and half stars out of four.

Read the full review here.

“Get Out” (2017)

Fifty years after Sidney Poitier upended the latent racial prejudices of his white date’s liberal family in “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner,” writer-director Jordan Peele has crafted a similar confrontation with altogether more combustible results in “Get Out.”

In Peele’s directorial debut, the former “Key and Peele” star has — as he often did on that satirical sketch series — turned inside out even supposedly progressive assumptions about race. But Peele has largely left comedy behind in a more chilling portrait of the racism that lurks beneath smiling white faces and defensive, paper-thin protestations like, “But I voted for Obama!” and “Isn’t Tiger Woods amazing?”

It’s long been a lamentable joke that in horror films — never the most inclusive of genres — the Black dude is always the first to go. In this way, “Get Out” is radical and refreshing in its perspective.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “Get Out” three stars out of four.

Read the full review here.

“Hereditary” (2018)

In Ari Aster’s intensely nightmarish feature-film debut “Hereditary,” when Annie (Toni Collette), an artist and mother of two teenagers, sneaks out to a grief-support group following the death of her mother, she lies to her husband Steve (Gabriel Byrne) that she’s “going to the movies.”

A night out with “Hereditary” is many things, but you won’t confuse it for an evening of healing and therapy. It’s more like the opposite.

Aster’s film, relentlessly unsettling and pitilessly gripping, has carried with it an ominous air of danger and dread: a movie so horrifying and good that you have to see it, even if you shouldn’t want to, even if you might never sleep peacefully again.

The hype is mostly justified.

— Jake Coyle

Coyle gave “Hereditary” three stars out of four.

Read the full review here. ___

Researcher Rhonda Shafner contributed from New York.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version