Animal abuse on the rise across Canada | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

Animal abuse on the rise across Canada

Published

 on

Cruelty

In Canada, animal abuse is on the rise. It knows no racial, class or geographic boundaries. There are few studies or statistics available on the number of animals abused in Canada each year. Many provinces in Canada don’t actually have laws against animal cruelty – but this doesn’t mean they aren’t happening! Lack of awareness may also be a reason for the increase of animal abuse across Canada. No punishment for most abusers means they have free rein to continue harming animals as much as possible without repercussions – which means more animals needlessly suffering at their hands every day

Animal abuse is on the rise across Canada and is happening in big cities and small towns. It knows no racial, class or geographic boundaries.

Animal abuse is on the rise across Canada, and it’s happening in big cities and small towns. It knows no racial, class or geographic boundaries.

Animal abuse is a national problem that needs to be addressed at all levels of government—from local governments to provincial governments to the federal government.

The health risks associated with animal cruelty include stress-related illnesses such as anxiety disorders and depression; cardiovascular disease; gastrointestinal disorders (including ulcers); respiratory diseases like asthma; skin conditions such as eczema; infectious diseases including rabies and tuberculosis; musculoskeletal problems including bone fractures/dislocations leading to chronic pain years later after initial injury occurred initially due to trauma sustained during childhood development stage when young children were being abused by parents who didn’t care about them anymore so they weren’t cared for properly like they should’ve been cared for back then instead now we’re paying dearly because we didn’t do anything about this issue until now which made things worse than ever before now there’s going extinct more species every day because people aren’t caring enough anymore which means less resources available for research purposes too much money wasted away without any results coming out yet so why waste anymore time doing nothing just

There are few studies or statistics available on the number of animals abused in Canada each year.

The Canadian government does not track the number of animals abused in Canada. In most provinces, animal abuse is considered a crime but only if it involves someone being injured or killed.

In some countries, including the United States and many member states within the European Union (EU), there are no laws against animal cruelty or neglect—and therefore no official statistics on how many animals are abused each year.

Many provinces in Canada don’t actually have laws against animal cruelty.

Several provinces and territories have laws that prohibit animal cruelty. In these cases, it’s a crime to harm or neglect an animal in any way. However, many municipalities do not have their own laws against animal cruelty—and some don’t even have laws against abuse of other types of animals! For example:

  • Newfoundland and Labrador (Newfoundland)
  • Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia)
  • Ontario (Ontario)

The only province where you can be prosecuted for animal cruelty is Saskatchewan; however, there are still many municipalities within that province which lack basic services like police protection or even garbage collection.*

Lack of awareness may also be a reason for the increase of animal abuse.

There are several reasons why animal abuse is on the rise. The first reason is that there isn’t enough awareness about animal abuse and its prevention. This lack of awareness could be due to a number of factors:

  • We don’t know how many animals are being abused in Canada, so we can’t measure it accurately.
  • The laws surrounding animal cruelty haven’t changed much since they were first implemented, so people aren’t aware that what they do now might be considered illegal under new legislation if passed by Parliament later this year (or next year).

No punishment for most abusers means they have free rein to continue harming animals.

Animal abuse is a serious crime and should be punished. However, the majority of animal abusers are not charged with a crime and do not receive any punishment for their actions. This means that they have free rein to continue harming animals in Canada without fear of being charged with a crime or sentenced to jail time.

In fact, many offenders who are arrested for animal cruelty or neglect have been let go by police after being rescued from their homes by animal control officers (ACOs). ACOs often return such animals back into the same environment where they were initially abused—which can cause further psychological harm on top of what was already inflicted upon them when initially mistreated at home.

Animal abusers should be punished as much as possible, but due to lack of regulations, few are ever held accountable for their actions.

  • Animal abusers should be punished as much as possible, but due to lack of regulations, few are ever held accountable for their actions.
  • There is a lack of awareness about the problem and how it can affect your life.
  • Animal abuse is not just a problem in big cities and small towns; it’s happening everywhere!

Conclusion

Animal abuse is a huge problem across Canada and the United States, but it doesn’t have to be. There are laws that can be enacted in your community to make sure that animals are protected and treated properly by their owners. If you’re an animal abuser who has been caught abusing animals, there’s still hope for you! Contact us today so we can help get justice for all types of victims of animal cruelty everywhere.”

 

News

Australia plans a social media ban for children under 16

Published

 on

 

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — The Australian government announced on Thursday what it described as world-leading legislation that would institute an age limit of 16 years for children to start using social media, and hold platforms responsible for ensuring compliance.

“Social media is doing harm to our kids and I’m calling time on it,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

The legislation will be introduced in Parliament during its final two weeks in session this year, which begin on Nov. 18. The age limit would take effect 12 months after the law is passed, Albanese told reporters.

The platforms including X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook would need to use that year to work out how to exclude Australian children younger than 16.

“I’ve spoken to thousands of parents, grandparents, aunties and uncles. They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids online,” Albanese said.

The proposal comes as governments around the world are wrestling with how to supervise young people’s use of technologies like smartphones and social media.

Social media platforms would be penalized for breaching the age limit, but under-age children and their parents would not.

“The onus will be on social media platforms to demonstrate they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access. The onus won’t be on parents or young people,” Albanese said.

Antigone Davis, head of safety at Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the company would respect any age limitations the government wants to introduce.

“However, what’s missing is a deeper discussion on how we implement protections, otherwise we risk making ourselves feel better, like we have taken action, but teens and parents will not find themselves in a better place,” Davis said in a statement.

She added that stronger tools in app stores and operating systems for parents to control what apps their children can use would be a “simple and effective solution.”

X did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. TikTok declined to comment.

The Digital Industry Group Inc., an advocate for the digital industry in Australia, described the age limit as a “20th Century response to 21st Century challenges.”

“Rather than blocking access through bans, we need to take a balanced approach to create age-appropriate spaces, build digital literacy and protect young people from online harm,” DIGI managing director Sunita Bose said in a statement.

More than 140 Australian and international academics with expertise in fields related to technology and child welfare signed an open letter to Albanese last month opposing a social media age limit as “too blunt an instrument to address risks effectively.”

Jackie Hallan, a director at the youth mental health service ReachOut, opposed the ban. She said 73% of young people across Australia accessing mental health support did so through social media.

“We’re uncomfortable with the ban. We think young people are likely to circumvent a ban and our concern is that it really drives the behavior underground and then if things go wrong, young people are less likely to get support from parents and carers because they’re worried about getting in trouble,” Hallan said.

Child psychologist Philip Tam said a minimum age of 12 or 13 would have been more enforceable.

“My real fear honestly is that the problem of social media will simply be driven underground,” Tam said.

Australian National University lawyer Associate Prof. Faith Gordon feared separating children from there platforms could create pressures within families.

Albanese said there would be exclusions and exemptions in circumstances such as a need to continue access to educational services.

But parental consent would not entitle a child under 16 to access social media.

Earlier this year, the government began a trial of age-restriciton technologies. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, the online watchdog that will police compliance, will use the results of that trial to provide platforms with guidance on what reasonable steps they can take.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland said the year-long lead-in would ensure the age limit could be implemented in a “very practical way.”

“There does need to be enhanced penalties to ensure compliance,” Rowland said.

“Every company that operates in Australia, whether domiciled here or otherwise, is expected and must comply with Australian law or face the consequences,” she added.

The main opposition party has given in-principle support for an age limit at 16.

Opposition lawmaker Paul Fletcher said the platforms already had the technology to enforce such an age ban.

“It’s not really a technical viability question, it’s a question of their readiness to do it and will they incur the cost to do it,” Fletcher told Australian Broadcasting Corp.

“The platforms say: ’It’s all too hard, we can’t do it, Australia will become a backwater, it won’t possibly work.’ But if you have well-drafted legislation and you stick to your guns, you can get the outcomes,” Fletcher added.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

A tiny grain of nuclear fuel is pulled from ruined Japanese nuclear plant, in a step toward cleanup

Published

 on

TOKYO (AP) — A robot that has spent months inside the ruins of a nuclear reactor at the tsunami-hit Fukushima Daiichi plant delivered a tiny sample of melted nuclear fuel on Thursday, in what plant officials said was a step toward beginning the cleanup of hundreds of tons of melted fuel debris.

The sample, the size of a grain of rice, was placed into a secure container, marking the end of the mission, according to Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, which manages the plant. It is being transported to a glove box for size and weight measurements before being sent to outside laboratories for detailed analyses over the coming months.

Plant chief Akira Ono has said it will provide key data to plan a decommissioning strategy, develop necessary technology and robots and learn how the accident had developed.

The first sample alone is not enough and additional small-scale sampling missions will be necessary in order to obtain more data, TEPCO spokesperson Kenichi Takahara told reporters Thursday. “It may take time, but we will steadily tackle decommissioning,” Takahara said.

Despite multiple probes in the years since the 2011 disaster that wrecked the. plant and forced thousands of nearby residents to leave their homes, much about the site’s highly radioactive interior remains a mystery.

The sample, the first to be retrieved from inside a reactor, was significantly less radioactive than expected. Officials had been concerned that it might be too radioactive to be safely tested even with heavy protective gear, and set an upper limit for removal out of the reactor. The sample came in well under the limit.

That’s led some to question whether the robot extracted the nuclear fuel it was looking for from an area in which previous probes have detected much higher levels of radioactive contamination, but TEPCO officials insist they believe the sample is melted fuel.

The extendable robot, nicknamed Telesco, first began its mission August with a plan for a two-week round trip, after previous missions had been delayed since 2021. But progress was suspended twice due to mishaps — the first involving an assembly error that took nearly three weeks to fix, and the second a camera failure.

On Oct. 30, it clipped a sample weighting less than 3 grams (.01 ounces) from the surface of a mound of melted fuel debris sitting on the bottom of the primary containment vessel of the Unit 2 reactor, TEPCO said.

Three days later, the robot returned to an enclosed container, as workers in full hazmat gear slowly pulled it out.

On Thursday, the gravel, whose radioactivity earlier this week recorded far below the upper limit set for its environmental and health safety, was placed into a safe container for removal out of the compartment.

The sample return marks the first time the melted fuel is retrieved out of the containment vessel.

Fukushima Daiichi lost its key cooling systems during a 2011 earthquake and tsunami, causing meltdowns in its three reactors. An estimated 880 tons of fatally radioactive melted fuel remains in them.

The government and TEPCO have set a 30-to-40-year target to finish the cleanup by 2051, which experts say is overly optimistic and should be updated. Some say it would take for a century or longer.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said there have been some delays but “there will be no impact on the entire decommissioning process.”

No specific plans for the full removal of the fuel debris or its final disposal have been decided.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

PWHL unveils game jerseys with new team names, logos

Published

 on

TORONTO – The Professional Women’s Hockey League has revealed the jersey designs for its six newly named teams.

Each PWHL team operated under its city name, with players wearing jerseys featuring the league’s logo in its inaugural season before names and logos were announced last month.

The Toronto Sceptres, Montreal Victoire, Ottawa Charge, Boston Fleet, Minnesota Frost and New York Sirens will start the PWHL’s second season on Nov. 30 with jerseys designed to reflect each team’s identity and to be sold to the public as replicas.

Led by PWHL vice-president of brand and marketing Kanan Bhatt-Shah, the league consulted Creative Agency Flower Shop to design the jerseys manufactured by Bauer, the PWHL said Thursday in a statement.

“Players and fans alike have been waiting for this moment and we couldn’t be happier with the six unique looks each team will don moving forward,” said PWHL senior vice president of business operations Amy Scheer.

“These jerseys mark the latest evolution in our league’s history, and we can’t wait to see them showcased both on the ice and in the stands.”

Training camps open Tuesday with teams allowed to carry 32 players.

Each team’s 23-player roster, plus three reserves, will be announced Nov. 27.

Each team will play 30 regular-season games, which is six more than the first season.

Minnesota won the first Walter Cup on May 29 by beating Boston three games to two in the championship series.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version