Artemis agreements leave big questions about space mining largely unanswered - AlKhaleej Today | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Science

Artemis agreements leave big questions about space mining largely unanswered – AlKhaleej Today

Published

 on


Last week, the United States, Australia, Canada, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom signed the relatively tight Artemis Accords, a series of rather vague recognitions on the future of space exploration. NASA has reportedly been working bilaterally with each of the signatories for some time to work out the details (or lack thereof) of the agreement. While Russia, which has long been a US partner in space exploration, hasn’t signed yet, NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine hopes it will soon.

Artemis is the goddess of the moon in Greek mythology, and the deals appear to be interested, at least initially, in the upcoming similarly named U.S. Artemis Lunar Exploration Program, which is slated to resume manned missions to the moon through 2024. The deal is said to be the further consolidate the principles set out in the 1967 Space Treaty and its descendants. Therefore, the agreements – despite their broad, albeit superficial range of topics – seem to have a special purpose: The signing of the bilateral agreements, which are a prerequisite for inclusion in these NASA manned lunar missions, is intended to provide legal support for the mining of the moon and others Heavenly bodies.

Eight countries sign agreements on the future of space exploration. Photo: Getty Images

While it is ironic that on the eve of the 20th anniversary of human existence in space on the aptly named International Space Station, the US led these bilateral agreements for the most part alone, it is understandable why that choice was made. NASA administrators have essentially admitted that the UN Committee for the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) is probably the best forum for determining what we can and cannot do in space in the face of things like moon mining and mineral extraction It is not time to wait for the consensus-based body to come to a decision, especially if diplomacy, from a US perspective, calls for an underperformance provision that sees resource extraction from the moon as a necessity for future lunar bases.

While the issues of space mining are relatively new to space law, much of the other language agreed in the agreements reaffirms longstanding practice, if not full, of international law as set out in the first four of the five space treaties and as enacted by practiced by most of the aerospace nations for the past half century. These repetitions include, for example, the obligation to register relevant space objects as well as a renewed confirmation of the obligation to help personnel in need in space.

In particular, in the text of the new agreement, the term “astronaut” from the previous space treaties has been replaced by the more general term “personnel”. It is possible that this was intended, given the looming reality that future space travel will include civilian tourists and other unconventional passengers who are not astronauts in the traditional sense.

Regardless of the particular realization that billionaires like Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic will play an increasingly important role in space travel, there’s little other recognition that much of space exploration beyond Branson’s suborbital tourist flights will also be private in nature.

Richard Branson’s thoughts on an astronaut’s helmet. Photo: Getty Images

Indeed, the only direct recognition of the increasingly central role of private space actors seems to be that a data exchange exception has been worked out for these private actors. That’s it. In fact, it is unclear whether the lack of other outsourcing of private actors in the rest of the document implies that there aren’t any, and whether the private sector is equally tied to them or simply not part of the business. The latter seems more likely.

A particularly interesting aspect of the treaty is the commitment to preserve older landing sites as a common legacy of humanity, as if the bags of astronaut droppings that were unceremoniously thrown on the moon had a sacred value. However, this has been the goal of a number of non-governmental organizations for some time, so it is not surprising that it eventually became a multinational document. Similarly, in relation to the protection of the space environment, in the last two essential, albeit short and vague, paragraphs the parties have agreed to address one of the greatest problems in space – debris from space, also known as space debris. The agreements make a clear distinction between the space debris that we left on the moon and which is now protected under the treaties from the circulating space debris that must be removed with the garbage.

The most surprising part of the deals, however, was the not-too-subtle burying of the leadership. Finally, near the end of the document, the parties agree to the main purpose of the document outlined above: the mining of celestial bodies is legal under international law, and countries have the right to create “safety zones” that appear to be comparable to those in the document, excluding economic zones of the sea protecting distant coasts and national interests.

The controversial topic of space mining has been bouncing around for some time (like a lunar astronaut in an eighth of Earth’s gravity). The space treaties are somewhat ambiguous on this issue. You clearly state that space is the “province of all humanity” and that national appropriation is discouraged, but it is not clear whether that means you cannot extract any resources at all. For example, the Antarctic Treaty system, which regulates Antarctica, which is almost as remote, had to expressly stipulate a mining ban, as this is not clear enough from the other treaty texts.

Another inhospitable place, the deep sea, is also considered a universal resource, and like in Antarctica, we are allowed to extract fish from the deep sea. In addition, deep-sea lawns allow minerals to be extracted under international law, although none have yet been extracted. To some extent, the US is trying to create the same understanding of space, with the support of a handful of other international actors.

At least two countries, the US in 2015 under President Obama and Luxembourg in 2017 and possibly the most recently the United Arab Emirates, already have laws that provide for the extraction of minerals from extraterrestrial bodies. The signing of these new agreements merely further concretizes this US understanding of international space law in the Artemis Agreement. This US legal understanding could become an established law, especially if other nations don’t oppose NASA’s mining activities on the moon.

To get the ball going early, NASA transparently offered in September to buy extracted lunar regolites from private companies to set a precedent for further strengthening its position in international mining law. NASA hopes no one will cause international fuss when this happens.

Perhaps this lucrative business opportunity can help fund the next Israeli moon shot and provide much-needed financial assistance to the growing Israeli civil space industry.

These were the details of the news Artemis agreements leave big questions about space mining largely unanswered for this day. We hope that we have succeeded by giving you the full details and information. To follow all our news, you can subscribe to the alerts system or to one of our different systems to provide you with all that is new.

It is also worth noting that the original news has been published and is available at de24.news and the editorial team at AlKhaleej Today has confirmed it and it has been modified, and it may have been completely transferred or quoted from it and you can read and follow this news from its main source.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Here’s how Helene and other storms dumped a whopping 40 trillion gallons of rain on the South

Published

 on

 

More than 40 trillion gallons of rain drenched the Southeast United States in the last week from Hurricane Helene and a run-of-the-mill rainstorm that sloshed in ahead of it — an unheard of amount of water that has stunned experts.

That’s enough to fill the Dallas Cowboys’ stadium 51,000 times, or Lake Tahoe just once. If it was concentrated just on the state of North Carolina that much water would be 3.5 feet deep (more than 1 meter). It’s enough to fill more than 60 million Olympic-size swimming pools.

“That’s an astronomical amount of precipitation,” said Ed Clark, head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Water Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. “I have not seen something in my 25 years of working at the weather service that is this geographically large of an extent and the sheer volume of water that fell from the sky.”

The flood damage from the rain is apocalyptic, meteorologists said. More than 100 people are dead, according to officials.

Private meteorologist Ryan Maue, a former NOAA chief scientist, calculated the amount of rain, using precipitation measurements made in 2.5-mile-by-2.5 mile grids as measured by satellites and ground observations. He came up with 40 trillion gallons through Sunday for the eastern United States, with 20 trillion gallons of that hitting just Georgia, Tennessee, the Carolinas and Florida from Hurricane Helene.

Clark did the calculations independently and said the 40 trillion gallon figure (151 trillion liters) is about right and, if anything, conservative. Maue said maybe 1 to 2 trillion more gallons of rain had fallen, much if it in Virginia, since his calculations.

Clark, who spends much of his work on issues of shrinking western water supplies, said to put the amount of rain in perspective, it’s more than twice the combined amount of water stored by two key Colorado River basin reservoirs: Lake Powell and Lake Mead.

Several meteorologists said this was a combination of two, maybe three storm systems. Before Helene struck, rain had fallen heavily for days because a low pressure system had “cut off” from the jet stream — which moves weather systems along west to east — and stalled over the Southeast. That funneled plenty of warm water from the Gulf of Mexico. And a storm that fell just short of named status parked along North Carolina’s Atlantic coast, dumping as much as 20 inches of rain, said North Carolina state climatologist Kathie Dello.

Then add Helene, one of the largest storms in the last couple decades and one that held plenty of rain because it was young and moved fast before it hit the Appalachians, said University of Albany hurricane expert Kristen Corbosiero.

“It was not just a perfect storm, but it was a combination of multiple storms that that led to the enormous amount of rain,” Maue said. “That collected at high elevation, we’re talking 3,000 to 6000 feet. And when you drop trillions of gallons on a mountain, that has to go down.”

The fact that these storms hit the mountains made everything worse, and not just because of runoff. The interaction between the mountains and the storm systems wrings more moisture out of the air, Clark, Maue and Corbosiero said.

North Carolina weather officials said their top measurement total was 31.33 inches in the tiny town of Busick. Mount Mitchell also got more than 2 feet of rainfall.

Before 2017’s Hurricane Harvey, “I said to our colleagues, you know, I never thought in my career that we would measure rainfall in feet,” Clark said. “And after Harvey, Florence, the more isolated events in eastern Kentucky, portions of South Dakota. We’re seeing events year in and year out where we are measuring rainfall in feet.”

Storms are getting wetter as the climate change s, said Corbosiero and Dello. A basic law of physics says the air holds nearly 4% more moisture for every degree Fahrenheit warmer (7% for every degree Celsius) and the world has warmed more than 2 degrees (1.2 degrees Celsius) since pre-industrial times.

Corbosiero said meteorologists are vigorously debating how much of Helene is due to worsening climate change and how much is random.

For Dello, the “fingerprints of climate change” were clear.

“We’ve seen tropical storm impacts in western North Carolina. But these storms are wetter and these storms are warmer. And there would have been a time when a tropical storm would have been heading toward North Carolina and would have caused some rain and some damage, but not apocalyptic destruction. ”

___

Follow AP’s climate coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/climate

___

Follow Seth Borenstein on Twitter at @borenbears

___

Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Science

‘Big Sam’: Paleontologists unearth giant skull of Pachyrhinosaurus in Alberta

Published

 on

 

It’s a dinosaur that roamed Alberta’s badlands more than 70 million years ago, sporting a big, bumpy, bony head the size of a baby elephant.

On Wednesday, paleontologists near Grande Prairie pulled its 272-kilogram skull from the ground.

They call it “Big Sam.”

The adult Pachyrhinosaurus is the second plant-eating dinosaur to be unearthed from a dense bonebed belonging to a herd that died together on the edge of a valley that now sits 450 kilometres northwest of Edmonton.

It didn’t die alone.

“We have hundreds of juvenile bones in the bonebed, so we know that there are many babies and some adults among all of the big adults,” Emily Bamforth, a paleontologist with the nearby Philip J. Currie Dinosaur Museum, said in an interview on the way to the dig site.

She described the horned Pachyrhinosaurus as “the smaller, older cousin of the triceratops.”

“This species of dinosaur is endemic to the Grand Prairie area, so it’s found here and nowhere else in the world. They are … kind of about the size of an Indian elephant and a rhino,” she added.

The head alone, she said, is about the size of a baby elephant.

The discovery was a long time coming.

The bonebed was first discovered by a high school teacher out for a walk about 50 years ago. It took the teacher a decade to get anyone from southern Alberta to come to take a look.

“At the time, sort of in the ’70s and ’80s, paleontology in northern Alberta was virtually unknown,” said Bamforth.

When paleontogists eventually got to the site, Bamforth said, they learned “it’s actually one of the densest dinosaur bonebeds in North America.”

“It contains about 100 to 300 bones per square metre,” she said.

Paleontologists have been at the site sporadically ever since, combing through bones belonging to turtles, dinosaurs and lizards. Sixteen years ago, they discovered a large skull of an approximately 30-year-old Pachyrhinosaurus, which is now at the museum.

About a year ago, they found the second adult: Big Sam.

Bamforth said both dinosaurs are believed to have been the elders in the herd.

“Their distinguishing feature is that, instead of having a horn on their nose like a triceratops, they had this big, bony bump called a boss. And they have big, bony bumps over their eyes as well,” she said.

“It makes them look a little strange. It’s the one dinosaur that if you find it, it’s the only possible thing it can be.”

The genders of the two adults are unknown.

Bamforth said the extraction was difficult because Big Sam was intertwined in a cluster of about 300 other bones.

The skull was found upside down, “as if the animal was lying on its back,” but was well preserved, she said.

She said the excavation process involved putting plaster on the skull and wooden planks around if for stability. From there, it was lifted out — very carefully — with a crane, and was to be shipped on a trolley to the museum for study.

“I have extracted skulls in the past. This is probably the biggest one I’ve ever done though,” said Bamforth.

“It’s pretty exciting.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 25, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

The ancient jar smashed by a 4-year-old is back on display at an Israeli museum after repair

Published

 on

 

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — A rare Bronze-Era jar accidentally smashed by a 4-year-old visiting a museum was back on display Wednesday after restoration experts were able to carefully piece the artifact back together.

Last month, a family from northern Israel was visiting the museum when their youngest son tipped over the jar, which smashed into pieces.

Alex Geller, the boy’s father, said his son — the youngest of three — is exceptionally curious, and that the moment he heard the crash, “please let that not be my child” was the first thought that raced through his head.

The jar has been on display at the Hecht Museum in Haifa for 35 years. It was one of the only containers of its size and from that period still complete when it was discovered.

The Bronze Age jar is one of many artifacts exhibited out in the open, part of the Hecht Museum’s vision of letting visitors explore history without glass barriers, said Inbal Rivlin, the director of the museum, which is associated with Haifa University in northern Israel.

It was likely used to hold wine or oil, and dates back to between 2200 and 1500 B.C.

Rivlin and the museum decided to turn the moment, which captured international attention, into a teaching moment, inviting the Geller family back for a special visit and hands-on activity to illustrate the restoration process.

Rivlin added that the incident provided a welcome distraction from the ongoing war in Gaza. “Well, he’s just a kid. So I think that somehow it touches the heart of the people in Israel and around the world,“ said Rivlin.

Roee Shafir, a restoration expert at the museum, said the repairs would be fairly simple, as the pieces were from a single, complete jar. Archaeologists often face the more daunting task of sifting through piles of shards from multiple objects and trying to piece them together.

Experts used 3D technology, hi-resolution videos, and special glue to painstakingly reconstruct the large jar.

Less than two weeks after it broke, the jar went back on display at the museum. The gluing process left small hairline cracks, and a few pieces are missing, but the jar’s impressive size remains.

The only noticeable difference in the exhibit was a new sign reading “please don’t touch.”

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version