The Bank of Canada’s governing council believes it will be appropriate to cut interest rates this year if the economy develops as expected, although there is disagreement among members on the likely timeline, according to a summary of discussions that took place ahead of the latest rate decision.
Governor Tiff Macklem and his deputies kept the policy rate steady at 5 per cent on March 6, the fifth consecutive hold since last summer.
While they remain concerned about stubborn inflation and the risk of easing monetary policy too soon, Canada’s top central bankers are now openly discussing the timing of rate cuts – albeit with reservations.
“Members agreed that if the economy evolves in line with the Bank’s projection, the conditions for rate cuts should materialize over the course of this year,” said the summary of deliberations, published Wednesday.
“However, there was some diversity of views among Governing Council members about when there would likely be enough evidence that these conditions were in place, and how to weight the risks to the outlook.”
The argument for lowering interest rates was bolstered on Tuesday, when Statistics Canada reported a surprising drop in inflation in February. The consumer price index rose at an annual rate of 2.8 per cent, the second consecutive month that inflation has been back within the Bank of Canada’s 1-per-cent-to-3-per-cent target range.
After that data, Bay Street analysts and traders upped their bets that the central bank will begin lowering interest rates in June, although an earlier cut in April or a later first cut in July are possible.
In some ways the Summary of Deliberations is already stale, given the new inflation data. But it does contain important insights into how central bankers are thinking about the housing market, the correct way of measuring underlying inflation and wage pressures.
In particular, policy makers are nervous about a rebound in real estate, with would-be buyers rushing back into the market in anticipation of rate cuts.
“While house prices continued to fall in January, recent strength in resales could translate into a pickup in house prices and stoke shelter price inflation,” the summary said.
Shelter inflation, which is the biggest driver of overall CPI inflation, is a challenge for the central bank. A big part of it is tied to rising mortgage interest costs, which are the direct result of the bank’s past interest rate hikes. Bank officials have also said that rising rents stem from an imbalance between housing supply and population growth that can’t be fixed by changing interest rates.
That’s led some analysts to suggest the bank should look past shelter inflation when setting interest rates. But the bank does not seem especially keen on this argument.
“Members agreed that if mortgage interest costs were the only component holding up inflation, there could be some capacity to look through them, so as not to unduly restrain economic activity to get headline inflation back to 2 per cent. However, this was not the current situation,” the summary said.
“Most components of shelter inflation, such as rent and expenses related to home ownership (including insurance, taxes and repairs), were still rising significantly in January.”
A second key insight from the document is that bank officials are taking an expansive view of “underlying inflation.”
For months, they’ve said they want to see a sustained drop in underlying inflation before cutting rates, although it has never been clear what metrics they are talking about.
The summary clarified that they are not just looking at CPI-trim and CPI-median, their two preferred measures of core inflation. They are also looking at other measures like CPI excluding food and energy, as well as “the distribution of inflation rates across components of the CPI basket.”
Alongside measures of underlying inflation, Mr. Macklem and his team are watching other indicators, such as the overall balance between supply and demand in the economy, corporate pricing behaviour, inflation expectations and wage growth.
While most of these are trending in the right direction, the pace of wage growth has remained higher than the bank thinks is compatible with 2 per cent inflation. These labour market dynamics, however, are starting to change.
“Governing Council members noted that recent data were beginning to show signs of easing wage pressures,” the summary said, noting that data from Statistics Canada’s Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours and National Accounts were lower than in the Labour Force Survey.
The bank’s next interest rate decision is on April 10.
OTTAWA – The federal government is expected to boost the minimum hourly wage that must be paid to temporary foreign workers in the high-wage stream as a way to encourage employers to hire more Canadian staff.
Under the current program’s high-wage labour market impact assessment (LMIA) stream, an employer must pay at least the median income in their province to qualify for a permit. A government official, who The Canadian Press is not naming because they are not authorized to speak publicly about the change, said Employment Minister Randy Boissonnault will announce Tuesday that the threshold will increase to 20 per cent above the provincial median hourly wage.
The change is scheduled to come into force on Nov. 8.
As with previous changes to the Temporary Foreign Worker program, the government’s goal is to encourage employers to hire more Canadian workers. The Liberal government has faced criticism for increasing the number of temporary residents allowed into Canada, which many have linked to housing shortages and a higher cost of living.
The program has also come under fire for allegations of mistreatment of workers.
A LMIA is required for an employer to hire a temporary foreign worker, and is used to demonstrate there aren’t enough Canadian workers to fill the positions they are filling.
In Ontario, the median hourly wage is $28.39 for the high-wage bracket, so once the change takes effect an employer will need to pay at least $34.07 per hour.
The government official estimates this change will affect up to 34,000 workers under the LMIA high-wage stream. Existing work permits will not be affected, but the official said the planned change will affect their renewals.
According to public data from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, 183,820 temporary foreign worker permits became effective in 2023. That was up from 98,025 in 2019 — an 88 per cent increase.
The upcoming change is the latest in a series of moves to tighten eligibility rules in order to limit temporary residents, including international students and foreign workers. Those changes include imposing caps on the percentage of low-wage foreign workers in some sectors and ending permits in metropolitan areas with high unemployment rates.
Temporary foreign workers in the agriculture sector are not affected by past rule changes.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 21, 2024.
OTTAWA – The parliamentary budget officer says the federal government likely failed to keep its deficit below its promised $40 billion cap in the last fiscal year.
However the PBO also projects in its latest economic and fiscal outlook today that weak economic growth this year will begin to rebound in 2025.
The budget watchdog estimates in its report that the federal government posted a $46.8 billion deficit for the 2023-24 fiscal year.
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland pledged a year ago to keep the deficit capped at $40 billion and in her spring budget said the deficit for 2023-24 stayed in line with that promise.
The final tally of the last year’s deficit will be confirmed when the government publishes its annual public accounts report this fall.
The PBO says economic growth will remain tepid this year but will rebound in 2025 as the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts stimulate spending and business investment.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.
OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the level of food insecurity increased in 2022 as inflation hit peak levels.
In a report using data from the Canadian community health survey, the agency says 15.6 per cent of households experienced some level of food insecurity in 2022 after being relatively stable from 2017 to 2021.
The reading was up from 9.6 per cent in 2017 and 11.6 per cent in 2018.
Statistics Canada says the prevalence of household food insecurity was slightly lower and stable during the pandemic years as it fell to 8.5 per cent in the fall of 2020 and 9.1 per cent in 2021.
In addition to an increase in the prevalence of food insecurity in 2022, the agency says there was an increase in the severity as more households reported moderate or severe food insecurity.
It also noted an increase in the number of Canadians living in moderately or severely food insecure households was also seen in the Canadian income survey data collected in the first half of 2023.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct 16, 2024.