Connect with us

Media

Barbara Kay: The epic lies partisan media and Democrats used to try to take down Trump – National Post

Published

 on


Before focusing on Trump as the object of suspicion, Clinton’s operatives should have been put under the microscope

Article content

Donald Trump is an awful human being: narcissistic, abusive, arrogant, vengeful, untruthful, sexist, bombastic and sporadically unhinged, most undeniably so when he lost the 2020 election. But that doesn’t mean he was a Russian asset during the 2016 election campaign, as alleged in the infamous “Steele dossier,” the foundation for a conspiracy theory that has been embraced by the Democrats and their media allies since the former president came to power.

Advertisement

Article content

Now collapsing under the weight of Special Counsel John Durham’s methodical probe, the Russia collusion hoax may be, as one conservative pundit inelegantly put it, “the most successful ratf—ing enterprise in American history.”

If the Steele dossier had been given a tenth of the transparent scrutiny the Jan. 6 Capitol riot is receiving, Trump’s tenure might have been 10 times less divisive than it was. Specifically, Americans might have been spared the counter-theory circulating amongst Trump’s paranoid base that his presidency was continually sabotaged by a media-abetted cabal of partisan intelligence and law-enforcement agents.

Their paranoia wasn’t unfounded, alas. So why not also believe the 2020 election was stolen? As Wall Street Journal editorial writer Barton Swaim put it : “four years of subversion, slander and scorched-earth resistance made (Trump’s) cockamamie claims sound credible to a large audience of otherwise sane and sensible Americans.”

Advertisement

Article content

The 35-page Steele dossier, allegedly composed by former British MI6 agent Christopher Steele, was channelled through a commercial research firm known as Fusion GPS. It began as garden-variety opposition research undertaken by Hillary Clinton supporters, in the hopes of branding Trump as a puppet of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Trump being Trump, it’s no stretch to believe he could have fallen victim to a honey trap during his 2013 visit to Moscow for the Miss Universe pageant, as the dossier alleged (although the disgusting hanky-panky described therein clashed so absurdly with Trump’s well-known germaphobia, it was quietly disappeared), or that his business interests in Russia might have swayed his political judgment. But these are side circuses. The real question is: did Trump literally collude with Russia to manipulate the 2016 election or not?

Advertisement

Article content

The reigning narrative positioned Steele as a credible source with a proven record for funnelling solid information to the U.S. government. And so, the story goes, when he found “troubling” evidence of Trump’s collusion, Steele brought it straight to the FBI.

In truth, Steele had no special standing with anyone. The Steele dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign through its law firm , Perkins Coie; its objective was to whip up the core allegations against Trump.

Before focusing on Trump as the object of suspicion, the House and Senate intelligence committees — not to mention the media — should have immediately put Clinton’s operatives under the microscope. Durham’s investigation has done exactly that. And what do we see?

Advertisement

Article content

We see Russian emigrant Igor Danchenko revealed as Steele’s primary source. Danchenko worked at the Washington, D.C.-based Brookings Institution, a centre-left think-tank, from 2005 through 2010, so was well connected with Democratic elites. He was recently indicted on five counts of making false statements to the FBI.

According to the indictment against him , Danchenko was in fact receiving much of his “information” from a man who has been revealed to be Charles Dolan, the former head of the Democratic Governors Association and state chairman of Bill Clinton’s 1992 and 1996 presidential campaigns. The indictment notes he was an active “volunteer” on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

But Dolan had also spent much of his career focused on Russian affairs, including a 2006-2014 stint handling “global public relations for the Russian government,” which involved frequent interactions with Russian officials and Russian Embassy personnel. The indictment alleges that in the run-up to the 2016 election, Dolan attended at least three meetings at the Russian Embassy in Washington, D.C.

Advertisement

Article content

Dolan was apparently not put off by Danchenko’s sketchy background, though he acknowledged it in a 2016 email to an acquaintance, in which he allegedly wrote that Danchenko “is too young for KGB. But I think he worked for FSB” (the KGB’s post-communism iteration). He then coolly noted (wink emoji), “And when I first met him, he knew more about me than I did.”

Both Danchenko and Dolan attended an October 2016 conference in Russia, which Dolan helped plan. In a June 2016 planning trip, Dolan is said to have toured the presidential suite at the Moscow hotel where the Trump honey trap allegedly occurred. While at the conference, Dolan and Danchenko are also alleged to have had meetings with senior officials at the Kremlin — taken, according to Dolan, without direction from, or even awareness by, the Clinton campaign.

Advertisement

Article content

Well, he would say that, wouldn’t he.

The long list of politicians, government agency honchos and supportive media who knew or suspected the Steele dossier was bollocks, but desperately clutched at any straw that might unseat Trump, and then brazenly underwrote its trustworthiness for public consumption, is sobering.

To cite just one example, whose shamelessness speaks for all, Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, frequently stood before his peers in Congress and fiercely but falsely claimed to hold evidence of Trump’s criminal conspiracy with Russia. Collectively, they were crazed Captain Ahab; Trump was their Moby Dick.

On Nov. 4, the Washington Post, which for years dedicated itself to endorsing the Steele dossier, offered what, if you squint hard, looks like an apology for its epic investigative failure: “The (Durham) allegations cast new uncertainty on some past reporting on the dossier by news organizations, including the Washington Post.”

Advertisement

Article content

The Wall Street Journal, by contrast, is coming up roses. Its editorial board and columnists — Holman Jenkins, in particular, who, skeptical from Day 1, has covered this story responsibly and in depth — deserve the Pulitzer prizes that were wrongly bestowed for coverage of this, ahem, “ratf—ing enterprise,” on the Washington Post and the New York Times.

National Post
kaybarb@gmail.com
Twitter.com/BarbaraRKay

The big issues are far from settled. Sign up for the NP Comment newsletter, NP Platformed.

  1. Demonstrators call for the impeachment of U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 26, 2019.

    Rex Murphy: A political travesty is unfolding south of the border

  2. Donald Trump, left, and Joe Biden.

    Bob Woodward on ‘Question Man’ Biden and Trump 2024: Full Comment with Anthony Furey

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Social media giants monetise anger and trolling is the result. A crackdown is welcome – The Guardian

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Social media giants monetise anger and trolling is the result. A crackdown is welcome  The Guardian



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Princeton the focus of international media – the story on the story – Penticton Western News – Pentiction Western News

Published

 on


Over the past two weeks the community has been flooded…with media.

Princeton quickly became a focus for journalists across Canada and around the globe, following the devastating events that started Sunday, Nov. 14, when the Tulameen River breached its banks.

Last Thursday, correspondents working for The New York Times were trekking through muck on Fenchurch Avenue, interviewing residents who were starting the process of cleaning out their homes.

“In the town of Princeton, which was uncomfortably close to this summer’s wildfires and was hit by record heat, bands of volunteers of all ages were roving the streets and helping out,” wrote Ian Austen. “There are a lot of tears in Princeton and other communities right now, but they’re not all from grief over what’s lost. When flood victims described the kindness of those volunteers to me, some broke out in tears of gratitude.”

The U.K. based Guardian also reached out to area homeowners.

Ed Staples, from Coalmont, was interviewed.

“After a summer of staying indoors to shield his lungs from thick smoke, Staples said he’s sad to see the loss in his community so soon after the fires,” The Guardian wrote. ‘It’s heartbreaking, I get choked up thinking about it,’ said Staples. ‘These are real people who have lost everything and it’ll take months or years to get their lives in order.’”

Princeton Mayor Spencer Coyne has fielded hundreds of requests for interviews, and granted many.

“I’ve done so many interviews,” he told the Spotlight, “I don’t know who all I’ve interviewed with. It’s kind of been a blur to be honest…I was doing, by lunch time, about eight interviews a day at one point.”

Coyne said this has given him the opportunity to keep Princeton’s needs top-of-mind for government officials, who hold the purse strings for emergency aid. “If I’m not out there, Abbotsford is going to be the story…It’s getting us the attention we need.”

Coyne appeared live on the CBC’s The National, and on the television program Power and Politics. He’s spoken frequently with regional affiliates of all the major networks.

While he doesn’t particularly relish the limelight, Coyne is uniquely qualified to take on the press. “At one time I was a small town reporter. I worked for Black Press, I worked for (The Similkameen News Leader.)”

Recently a journalist writing for the Globe and Mail followed the mayor for an entire day, as he made the rounds of the community.

“Shortly after 11:30 a.m. on Sunday, Mr. Coyne jumped in his yellow Nissan Xterra and began driving around town, checking on crew progress and speaking to residents about their needs. His cellphone rang constantly. He made a stop at the one-runway airport where the small lounge was crammed with people bringing in dogs and cats in animal carriers,” wrote Anthony Davis.

There’s been absurdity, attached to some of Coyne’s experiences.

“One interview, I won’t say what network and what show, they began telling me what I should be wearing in the interview and what the backdrop should be…like a bookshelf.”

Coyne eventually gave that interview, via his phone, wearing a high-visibility vest, while inside the Princeton fire hall.

During an interview with the BBC, he was asked about local temperatures. When the mayor reported the temperature was hovering at about minus 3 degrees Celsius, he was asked, “And why is that?”

After requesting the question be repeated, Coyne responded, “Well, it’s November. This is when we start to turn into winter.”

Coyne said he often prefers to communicate with local media.

“Local media has been invaluable, absolutely invaluable,” he stated. “I really appreciate the efforts of the Spotlight in order to keep accurate information going out.”

Related: Princeton’s water system hanging – literally – by a fire hose

Related: Princeton ‘as ready as it can be’ for the next 24 hours

Do you have something to add to this story, or something else we should report on? Email:andrea.demeer@similkameenspotlight.com


 
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Local peer outreach team continuing without Northern Health, claims health authority lied to media – Energeticcity.ca

Published

 on


A public outcry took place once it was announced funding was being cut. Schultz believes NH’s statement was an attempt to save face.

“Northern Health is committed to harm reduction and overdose prevention in Fort St. John, and working to improve existing services, and implement additional and expanded services. Peers play an important role in Overdose Prevention work, and Northern Health will work with peers to ensure this continues,” said Northern Health in a statement to local media.

The group was formed in April, providing harm reduction services and tackling the stigma surrounding drug addiction. In October, NH informed the team that they were restructuring the funding model.

There were 30 peers working for the outreach teams that were fired, and more than 20 with lived experience were employed by the group, said Schultz.

The peers helped offer food, hygiene kits, first aid, naloxone kits, harm reduction supplies, info on detox and treatment, and warm clothing for those in need. Afterwards, they were paid a cash honorarium, which is what NH has cut.

Schultz and another leader, Neil Bramsleven, were in contact with the health authority to work on the community mobile harm reduction program. Schultz describes the program as a mobile safe injection site.

They were the only ones contacted to continue working for the health authority due to meeting specific criteria, including being clean from drugs and alcohol, said Schultz.

“NH Leadership is in contact and discussion with the peer outreach team leaders to continue peer outreach services in Fort St. John,” said Northern Health in a statement.

Schultz has pulled her application for the mobile program following the release of NH’s statement.

“There are no outreach programs right now, and they have no plans of getting outreach programs.”

Schultz showed Energeticcity an email with an NH worker, which confirms there are no outreach programs in the city.

“They did admit that it was untrue about peer outreach continuing. They said they don’t talk with the person who deals with the media.”

Peers were previously paid by NH to go on patrol, but Schultz says they will now run on a voluntary basis.

“We will accept donations from the community, and we will get harm reduction from mental health.”

At this point, Schultz says the team doesn’t want anything to do with the health authority.

“Peers are real. Peers are honest. We have one passion, and that’s to help people. We’re not even going to work with Northern Health anymore. We will volunteer our time.”

Anyone looking to donate to the team can contact Schultz at 250-329-8374.

Eryn Collins, Regional Manager, Public Affairs & Media Relations with NH, says the health authority is aware of the pushback and is working to get clarity on concerns being raised.

With files from Tom Summer, Local Journalism Initiative, Alaska Highway News

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending