Bars, parties and farms — some of Canada’s coronavirus hotspots | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

Bars, parties and farms — some of Canada’s coronavirus hotspots

Published

 on

What do Montreal bars, southern Ontario farms and Prairie Hutterite communities have in common?

They’re all linked to recent coronavirus outbreaks.

Initially, long term care homes were hotspots for the disease in Canada, but the number of new cases reported and ongoing outbreaks in the facilities have trended downwards recently, according to researchers at Ryerson University who have been tracking LTC outbreaks.

Now, experts say, more recent outbreaks share a few things in common: they are in indoor settings where it’s tricky to maintain physical distance or social events where people don’t want to.

Here’s a look at some current outbreaks in Canada, and what we can learn from them.

1. Montreal bars

Hundreds of people lined up outside a hospital in Montreal this week.

They were there to get tested for COVID-19, after an outbreak was reported, linked to the city’s famous bar scene.

Local health officials asked everyone who had visited a bar in Montreal since July 1 to get tested, and as of Friday, they had found at least 30 cases linked to bars.

“The bars are just a classic example of why I’m not big on bars opening up,” said Dr. Gerald Evans, chair of the division of infectious diseases at Kingston General Hospital.

“They have all of the ideal elements that that one would expect to have in a circumstance that’s going to greatly facilitate transmission of the virus.”

 

These include crowds, a closed-in space with poor ventilation, and poor mask use — since people can’t drink a beer with a mask on, he said.

People also tend to spend an hour or more in the bar, which can increase their exposure.

Then there’s the beer. “Once you start drinking, your ability to think about the fact that you’re standing closer than four to six feet from somebody else kind of drops off,” he said, and other normal safety precautions might drop as well.

Robyn Lee, an assistant professor of epidemiology at the University of Toronto, says other provinces, like Ontario, should keep Quebec’s experience in mind as they reopen their own bars.

 

“I think we will see the same thing,” she said.

“I think the rest of Canada is no different from Quebec when we’re opening venues that provide a high-risk environment for transmission like these.”

2. Parties in Montérégie and Kelowna

Outside Montreal, in the Montérégie region, a handful of house parties — one with more than 100 people — have also contributed to a local outbreak.

Officials in B.C. are also blaming 27 cases on private parties in Kelowna, as of Thursday.

These are caused by the same kinds of issues as bars, Lee said: namely a lot of unmasked people in an enclosed space.

“It’s the same kind of problem. You have a bunch of people in a small space,” she said.

People might move from room to room, talking to all sorts of different people, which presents issues, she said.

“I think part of the issue too is a lot of this transmission is happening when people don’t know they have COVID-19,” she said. Recent evidence suggests that 40 to 45 per cent of people don’t have symptoms or develop symptoms well after they become infectious to others.

This means that they might do things like go to parties, because they feel fine, but can accidentally pass the virus on to people they meet.

3. Misericordia Hospital in Edmonton

The Misericordia Hospital in Edmonton is in the middle of an outbreak, with more than 50 cases reported as of Friday, among both patients and staff.

Alberta Health Services has announced a task force to look into the outbreak and how it occurred.

While he can’t comment specifically on the Misericordia outbreak, Evans said that hospital outbreaks do happen from time to time.

“The minute you get lots and lots of patients with COVID-19, then of course you increase the probability of transmission because you’ve just got lots more people in there.”

Most hospitals create special COVID-19 units, but you have to carefully monitor staff as they go in and out. And, over time, staff’s PPE use might slide, because “people just get tired of it,” he said.

Common areas, like break rooms where people eat lunch, can also lead to transmission among staff.

4. Migrant farm workers in Windsor-Essex county

“Windsor-Essex area, right now, is ground zero. But at any moment, this could be another community anywhere in Canada,” Chris Ramsaroop, an organizer with the group Justice for Migrant Workers, told Global News this week.

The southern Ontario county has had more than 800 cases linked to agricultural work, in an outbreak that has gone on for weeks.

Many farms in the area employ temporary migrant workers.

Agricultural workers reside in shared, often cramped spaces where physical distancing is “absent,” Ramsaroop said. They share bathrooms and are transported around properties in groups.

This is bad news for coronavirus transmission, Evans said. If several people are sharing a bedroom, then if one person has the virus, they will expose all their roommates overnight.

“Everybody in that room is going to eventually be have some sort of exposure happen,” he said.

That, compounded with conditions that leave workers reluctant to complain or seek medical care, lest their employers withdraw their immigration permits, have contributed to the outbreak, according to Ramsaroop.

5. Hutterite communities in Prairie provinces

A number of Hutterite communities have been linked to coronavirus cases in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, health officials in those provinces say.

Some cases appear to have been linked to an Alberta funeral, but Alberta officials say the risk of spread to the larger community is low and that affected people have been quarantined.

The communities are cooperating with health officials, they say, and officials condemn any discrimination against these individuals.

In close-knit communities where people gather to have meals, work and pray together, they are again increasing the likelihood of spreading the virus, Lee said.

“When you’re in close proximity to another person who has COVID-19, you’re at higher risk of being infected with the virus. So it’s just a setting that is more likely to allow for spread.”

When it comes to lessons from these outbreaks, “I think the key is ensuring that people are able to maintain physical distancing,” Lee said.

That can mean encouraging outdoor activities as much as possible and cutting down on things like shared washrooms in workplaces, she said.

“And then, educating the population of Canada just how much transmission can happen when you actually don’t know you have symptoms.”

Even if you feel fine, you might still pass the virus along, so you should take precautions, she said.

 

Source: – Globalnews.ca

Source link

News

Australia plans a social media ban for children under 16

Published

 on

 

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — The Australian government announced on Thursday what it described as world-leading legislation that would institute an age limit of 16 years for children to start using social media, and hold platforms responsible for ensuring compliance.

“Social media is doing harm to our kids and I’m calling time on it,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

The legislation will be introduced in Parliament during its final two weeks in session this year, which begin on Nov. 18. The age limit would take effect 12 months after the law is passed, Albanese told reporters.

The platforms including X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook would need to use that year to work out how to exclude Australian children younger than 16.

“I’ve spoken to thousands of parents, grandparents, aunties and uncles. They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids online,” Albanese said.

The proposal comes as governments around the world are wrestling with how to supervise young people’s use of technologies like smartphones and social media.

Social media platforms would be penalized for breaching the age limit, but under-age children and their parents would not.

“The onus will be on social media platforms to demonstrate they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access. The onus won’t be on parents or young people,” Albanese said.

Antigone Davis, head of safety at Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the company would respect any age limitations the government wants to introduce.

“However, what’s missing is a deeper discussion on how we implement protections, otherwise we risk making ourselves feel better, like we have taken action, but teens and parents will not find themselves in a better place,” Davis said in a statement.

She added that stronger tools in app stores and operating systems for parents to control what apps their children can use would be a “simple and effective solution.”

X did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. TikTok declined to comment.

The Digital Industry Group Inc., an advocate for the digital industry in Australia, described the age limit as a “20th Century response to 21st Century challenges.”

“Rather than blocking access through bans, we need to take a balanced approach to create age-appropriate spaces, build digital literacy and protect young people from online harm,” DIGI managing director Sunita Bose said in a statement.

More than 140 Australian and international academics with expertise in fields related to technology and child welfare signed an open letter to Albanese last month opposing a social media age limit as “too blunt an instrument to address risks effectively.”

Jackie Hallan, a director at the youth mental health service ReachOut, opposed the ban. She said 73% of young people across Australia accessing mental health support did so through social media.

“We’re uncomfortable with the ban. We think young people are likely to circumvent a ban and our concern is that it really drives the behavior underground and then if things go wrong, young people are less likely to get support from parents and carers because they’re worried about getting in trouble,” Hallan said.

Child psychologist Philip Tam said a minimum age of 12 or 13 would have been more enforceable.

“My real fear honestly is that the problem of social media will simply be driven underground,” Tam said.

Australian National University lawyer Associate Prof. Faith Gordon feared separating children from there platforms could create pressures within families.

Albanese said there would be exclusions and exemptions in circumstances such as a need to continue access to educational services.

But parental consent would not entitle a child under 16 to access social media.

Earlier this year, the government began a trial of age-restriciton technologies. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, the online watchdog that will police compliance, will use the results of that trial to provide platforms with guidance on what reasonable steps they can take.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland said the year-long lead-in would ensure the age limit could be implemented in a “very practical way.”

“There does need to be enhanced penalties to ensure compliance,” Rowland said.

“Every company that operates in Australia, whether domiciled here or otherwise, is expected and must comply with Australian law or face the consequences,” she added.

The main opposition party has given in-principle support for an age limit at 16.

Opposition lawmaker Paul Fletcher said the platforms already had the technology to enforce such an age ban.

“It’s not really a technical viability question, it’s a question of their readiness to do it and will they incur the cost to do it,” Fletcher told Australian Broadcasting Corp.

“The platforms say: ’It’s all too hard, we can’t do it, Australia will become a backwater, it won’t possibly work.’ But if you have well-drafted legislation and you stick to your guns, you can get the outcomes,” Fletcher added.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

A tiny grain of nuclear fuel is pulled from ruined Japanese nuclear plant, in a step toward cleanup

Published

 on

 

TOKYO (AP) — A robot that has spent months inside the ruins of a nuclear reactor at the tsunami-hit Fukushima Daiichi plant delivered a tiny sample of melted nuclear fuel on Thursday, in what plant officials said was a step toward beginning the cleanup of hundreds of tons of melted fuel debris.

The sample, the size of a grain of rice, was placed into a secure container, marking the end of the mission, according to Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, which manages the plant. It is being transported to a glove box for size and weight measurements before being sent to outside laboratories for detailed analyses over the coming months.

Plant chief Akira Ono has said it will provide key data to plan a decommissioning strategy, develop necessary technology and robots and learn how the accident had developed.

The first sample alone is not enough and additional small-scale sampling missions will be necessary in order to obtain more data, TEPCO spokesperson Kenichi Takahara told reporters Thursday. “It may take time, but we will steadily tackle decommissioning,” Takahara said.

Despite multiple probes in the years since the 2011 disaster that wrecked the. plant and forced thousands of nearby residents to leave their homes, much about the site’s highly radioactive interior remains a mystery.

The sample, the first to be retrieved from inside a reactor, was significantly less radioactive than expected. Officials had been concerned that it might be too radioactive to be safely tested even with heavy protective gear, and set an upper limit for removal out of the reactor. The sample came in well under the limit.

That’s led some to question whether the robot extracted the nuclear fuel it was looking for from an area in which previous probes have detected much higher levels of radioactive contamination, but TEPCO officials insist they believe the sample is melted fuel.

The extendable robot, nicknamed Telesco, first began its mission August with a plan for a two-week round trip, after previous missions had been delayed since 2021. But progress was suspended twice due to mishaps — the first involving an assembly error that took nearly three weeks to fix, and the second a camera failure.

On Oct. 30, it clipped a sample weighting less than 3 grams (.01 ounces) from the surface of a mound of melted fuel debris sitting on the bottom of the primary containment vessel of the Unit 2 reactor, TEPCO said.

Three days later, the robot returned to an enclosed container, as workers in full hazmat gear slowly pulled it out.

On Thursday, the gravel, whose radioactivity earlier this week recorded far below the upper limit set for its environmental and health safety, was placed into a safe container for removal out of the compartment.

The sample return marks the first time the melted fuel is retrieved out of the containment vessel.

Fukushima Daiichi lost its key cooling systems during a 2011 earthquake and tsunami, causing meltdowns in its three reactors. An estimated 880 tons of fatally radioactive melted fuel remains in them.

The government and TEPCO have set a 30-to-40-year target to finish the cleanup by 2051, which experts say is overly optimistic and should be updated. Some say it would take for a century or longer.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said there have been some delays but “there will be no impact on the entire decommissioning process.”

No specific plans for the full removal of the fuel debris or its final disposal have been decided.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Strong typhoon threatens northern Philippine region still recovering from back-to-back storms

Published

 on

 

MANILA, Philippines (AP) — A strong typhoon was forecast to hit the northern Philippines on Thursday, prompting a new round of evacuations in a region still recovering from back-to-back storms a few weeks ago.

Typhoon Yinxing is the 13th to batter the disaster-prone Southeast Asian nation this season.

“I really pity our people but all of them are tough,” Gov. Marilou Cayco of the province of Batanes said by telephone. Her province was ravaged by recent destructive storms and is expected to be affected by Yinxing’s fierce wind and rain.

Tens of thousands of villagers were returning to emergency shelters and disaster-response teams were again put on alert in Cagayan and other northern provinces near the expected path of Yinxing. The typhoon was located about 175 kilometers (109 miles) east of Aparri town in Cagayan province on Thursday morning.

The slow-moving typhoon, locally named Marce, was packing sustained winds of up to 165 kilometers (102 miles) per hour and gusts of up to 205 kph (127 mph) and was forecast to hit or come very near to the coast of Cagayan and outlying islands later Thursday.

The coast guard, army, air force and police were put on alert. Inter-island ferries and cargo services and domestic flights were suspended in northern provinces.

Tropical Storm Trami and Typhoon Kong-rey hit the northern Philippines in recent weeks, leaving at least 151 people dead and affecting nearly 9 million others. More than 14 billion pesos ($241 million) worth of rice, corn and other crops and infrastructure were damaged.

The deaths and destruction from the storms prompted President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to declare a day of national mourning on Monday when he visited the worst-hit province of Batangas, south of the capital, Manila. At least 61 people perished in the coastal province.

Trami dumped one to two months’ worth of rain in just 24 hours in some regions, including in Batangas.

“We want to avoid the loss of lives due to calamities,” Marcos said in Talisay town in Batangas, where he brought key Cabinet members to reassure storm victims of rapid government help. “Storms nowadays are more intense, extensive and powerful.”

In 2013, Typhoon Haiyan, one of the strongest recorded tropical cyclones, left more than 7,300 people dead or missing, flattened entire villages and caused ships to run aground and smash into houses in the central Philippines.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version