adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Belarusian opposition leader: Exiled media needs our help now, more than ever

Published

 on

Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya is is the leader of democratic Belarus.

The Belarus village of Vyazynka is best known as the birthplace of Yanka Kupala, one of our greatest poets. More recently, however, it was featured in a depressing report by human rights activists monitoring the tyranny of Alexander Lukashenko, the country’s despot whose efforts to silence dissent are growing more desperate by the day.

Arrested for taking part in an unauthorized political demonstration, a Vyazynka resident was taken to a local detention center, where he was forced to stand and watch Lukashenko speeches playing continuously on a television monitor 10 hours a night, for three successive nights.

If only Lukashenko could restrict himself to such childish and futile punishments — but instead, he has launched an all-out assault on freedom of speech. According to Reporters Without Borders, Belarus has now become “one of the most dangerous countries for journalists in the world.”

300x250x1

You may like

But while the democratic Belarusian media has remained a prime target for Lukashenko’s retribution, even in exile, they continue to investigate his regime, inspiring thousands to continue the fight.

As the democratic leader of Belarus — whose victory in the 2020 presidential election was illegally overturned by Lukashenko — I’ve been subject to his vicious persecution myself. Threats to my life and my children forced me to flee into exile, and today —January 17, 2023 — marks the start of my trial in absentia in a Minsk court, facing a long list of bogus charges including treason against the state, inciting mass riots and conspiring to seize power.

Well, perhaps that last part is true.

I conspired with millions of Belarusian voters to seize democratic power from a dictator who has turned our country into a vassal state of President Vladimir Putin’s Russia. I only became a presidential candidate because Lukashenko’s secret police locked up my husband, Siarhai, for daring to oppose him. And now I find myself fighting to rally our country’s democrats in the face of unprecedented efforts to silence them.

It was in May 2021 that the rest of the world caught its first real glimpse of the lengths to which Lukashenko was prepared to go in his campaign against journalists. A Ryanair flight from Athens to Vilnius was forcibly diverted to Minsk, after Belarusian agents faked reports of a bomb threat.

On board the flight was Roman Pratasevich, a dissident Belarus reporter, who had gone into exile to escape arrest. Pratasevich and his Russian girlfriend, Sofia Sapega, were escorted off the plane and detained. But international outcry at this state-sponsored hijacking still failed to secure the release of the two passengers.

Sapega was eventually sentenced to six years in jail on nonsensical charges. The fate of Pratasevich remains unknown. He was released under house arrest, made several confessions that appeared to have been extracted through torture or threats, and has not been heard from in several months.

Since then, the democratic media in Belarus has stayed in Lukashenko’s crosshairs.

Just a few days ago, five extraordinary women who played key roles at Tut.by — one of the country’s most popular news websites — were put on trial behind closed doors, on a long list of trumped-up charges ranging from tax evasion to “incitement of social hatred and discord.” Liudmila Chekina, the group’s chief executive, and editor-in-chief Maryna Zolatava have already spent 20 months in jail. Both are now suffering from serious ill health.

Absurdly, the Belarus KGB listed these journalists as “persons involved in terrorist activities.” But Tut.by’s real “offense” was its diverse coverage of local and international affairs, including critical commentaries on the criminal overturning of the 2020 election.

Meanwhile, almost all other independent media in the country has been designated as “extremist” and forced to shut down or flee. The Belarusian Association of Journalists calculates that over 400 journalists have left the country in the past few years. And at least 33 media workers are behind bars, with Belarus ranking below China, Myanmar, Vietnam and Iran as the world’s most enthusiastic jailer of journalists.

In some cases, imprisoned Belarus journalists whose initial sentences expired have been sentenced to new terms before their release. Just last year, Katsiaryna Andreyeva, a correspondent with Belsat TV, was about to complete a two-year sentence for reporting on the 2020 election protests, when a court sentenced her to another eight years for “giving away state secrets.”

Even those who publicly quit journalism and fell silent were pursued for supposed offenses. Another Belsat TV reporter, Larysa Shchyrakova, was fined for “co-operating with a foreign media outlet” in 2018 and subjected to repeat arrests and harassment. She announced that she was leaving journalism last February and published no further work, yet she was still arrested in December on charges of “discrediting” Belarus. The few truly independent journalists who still work in the country now do so anonymously — and at great risk to themselves and their families.

Putin has unleashed havoc across the border in Ukraine with Lukashenko’s help. The vast majority of my people are horrified by what is happening to our neighbor, and we understand why the plight of our independent media sometimes escapes attention. But it is a mistake to allow Lukashenko free rein to smother dissent.

And it isn’t just the people of Belarus who are suffering from his narcissistic excess — his support of Putin is crucial to Russia’s strategy in Ukraine. As long as Lukashenko barks like a Russian lapdog, Ukraine’s struggle for freedom will be much harder.

One way the rest of the world can help now is by supporting the exiled Belarus media. I am meeting global business leaders at Davos this week and urging them to support independent Belarusian newspapers, digital outlets, radio stations and television channels with advertising and subscription revenues. An independent media is the lifeblood of democracy, and it is crucial that Belarus citizens have access to the facts. The alternative is torture — hours of Lukashenko propaganda aired repeatedly on state media.

I look forward to the day when true media freedom finally returns to my country. As Kupala once wrote: “Send messengers forth, send unto the world’s bound/ As falcon from falcon’s nest winging/ Let them fly, fly away until warriors sound/ Set the thunder of good news ringing.”

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation. – Barron's

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation.  Barron’s

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation. – Barron's

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation.  Barron’s

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Three drones downed after explosions heard in Iran’s Isfahan: State media – Al Jazeera English

Published

 on


Iran’s air defences have brought down three small drones over the central city of Isfahan, state media reported, hours after United States broadcasters, quoting senior US officials, said Israeli missiles had hit an Iranian site.

Iranian state television reported explosions in Isfahan as air defences were activated and flights across several areas, including the capital, Tehran, and Isfahan, were suspended.

Airspace was reopened about four and a half hours after the incident and there were no reports of casualties.

300x250x1

Second Brigadier General Siavash Mihandoust, the top military official in Isfahan, told state media that air defence batteries hit “a suspicious object” and there was no damage.

ABC News and CBS News had reported earlier that Israel had carried out a military operation in Iran.

Italy’s Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said the US told the Group of Seven (G7) foreign ministers that it had been “informed at the last minute” by Israel about an attack on Iran.

“But there was no sharing of the attack by the US. It was a mere information,” Tajani told reporters in Capri, Italy, where the G7 ministers met.

However, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken refused to confirm reports about the Israeli attack, during a news conference in Capri.

“I’m not going to speak to that, except to say that the United States has not been involved in any offensive operation,” Blinken said.

The top US diplomat said the G7’s focus is on de-escalation. Asked to describe the current US-Israel relationship, Blinken noted that Israel makes its own decisions, but the US is committed to its security.

Iranian media said no strikes were launched on Iran from outside the country, and the attack was believed to have been carried out using small quadcopters that would have to have been launched from inside Iran.

Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera’s Dorsa Jabbari said Iranian media were downplaying the incident.

“The location in Isfahan province is an Iranian military airbase that belongs to the country’s army, and not the Revolutionary Guards [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, IRGC]. I think it’s important to highlight that,” she said. “This base houses multiple squadrons of F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft.”

“We also understand that the air defence systems over the city of Tabriz in the northwestern part of Iran were also activated,” Jabbari reported.

A military factory belonging to the Iranian army in Isfahan was attacked by multiple quadcopters in January 2023, failing to damage the facility that was protected by air defence batteries and mesh wiring on its roof to counter small unmanned aerial vehicles.

Iran blamed Israel for that attack and arrested four people, executing one of them in January 2024, for operating on behalf of Mossad, the Israeli spy agency.

Israel had promised to respond after Iran launched a barrage of drones and missiles on the country on April 13, after a suspected Israeli attack on Iran’s consulate compound in Damascus killed 16 people, including two IRGC senior generals.

Governments around the world urged restraint and a push to de-escalate tensions across the region.

Isfahan is considered a strategically important city and one that is host to several important sites, including military research and development facilities, as well as bases. The nearby city of Natanz is the location of one of Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites.

In a speech in Damghan, in central Iran, Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi made no mention of Isfahan but praised the Iranian attacks on Israel, saying they gave the country strength and unity.

Kioumars Heydari, the commander-in-chief of the ground forces of the Iranian army, said Iran remains vigilant to confront any other potential aerial threats.

“If suspicious flying objects appear in the sky of the country, they will be targeted by our powerful air defence,” he was quoted as saying by the state-run IRNA  news agency ahead of Friday prayers in Tehran.

‘No damage’ to nuclear facilities

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that “there is no damage” to Iranian nuclear sites as the United Nations nuclear watchdog’s chief Rafael Grossi called for restraint and said nuclear facilities should never be targeted in military conflicts.

The reported attack “was far more limited than many expected”, Iranian arms control expert Ali Ahmadi told Al Jazeera, adding that Israel “has much more limitations in its operational range” than many think.

“Certainly, after Iran’s retaliatory capacity was criticised, it benefits from advertising how ineffective what Israel did was as well. Iran also needs to prepare the public for a much softer reaction than it has talked about in the last couple of days,” he pointed out.

Ahmadi said that prior to today’s incident, Iran was preparing several options for a massive retaliation, including getting allies involved.

But considering the limited scope and impact of the alleged attack, which he described as a “security sabotage” rather than a “military assault”, it would be a mistake to carry out a significant response, he stressed.

There were also reports of explosions in Iraq and Syria, with Iranian state media saying there were explosions at multiple military-linked sites in Syria.

Syria’s official news agency SANA quoted a military source as saying that missile strikes in the early hours of the morning caused material damage to air defence sites in the country’s southern region. The report did not specify the exact location and the extent of the damage but blamed Israel.

The US and a number of European countries had been calling on Israel not to respond to Iran’s attack.

On Thursday, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres painted a dark picture of the situation in the Middle East, warning that spiralling tensions over Israel’s war on Gaza and Iran’s attack on Israel could descend into a “full-scale regional conflict”.

“The Middle East is on a precipice. Recent days have seen a perilous escalation – in words and deeds,” Guterres told the UN Security Council.

“One miscalculation, one miscommunication, one mistake, could lead to the unthinkable – a full-scale regional conflict that would be devastating for all involved,” he said, calling on all parties to exercise “maximum restraint”.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending