Connect with us


Best to stagger restart of Canadian economy: UW professor –



It’s tough to think of a world post COVID-19, let alone how and when the Canadian economy will open up.

Moving too quickly could put us right back at square one, so a University of Waterloo professor says the most prudent approach would be to have more of a soft opening of certain sectors.

“We identify businesses or sectors of the economy that could be safely reopened, where workers can remain safe,” Craig Janes, Director of UW’s School of Public Health and Health Systems tells The Mike Farwell Show on 570 NEWS.

“We’ll probably have to think about opening schools and daycares if we do that, because you can’t send workers back to work if their children don’t have any place to go.”

He says there needs to be a lot of thought into how schools and daycares reopen, so they’re safe when the time comes.

“Those are going to be some complicated decisions that will have to be made at that point,” Janes says.

He says aggressive amounts of testing and follow up will have to be in place beforehand, so they can be “more surgical” in their approach to prevent and mitigate more spread of the virus.

“If there’s someone whose infected, we can intervene immediately, we can get them isolated,” he said.

Janes goes on to say any decision-making will also have to go along with the COVID-19 situation in the United States.

“We’re very interconnected with the United States,” he said, “They have a lot of people moving back and forth, even with travel restrictions.”

“We’re always going to be a potential for reintroducing infections from the south.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


People more important than the economy, pope says about Covid crisis –



By Philip Pullella

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – Pope Francis said on Sunday that people are more important than the economy, as countries decide how quickly to reopen their countries from coronavirus lockdowns.

Francis made his comments, departing from a prepared script, at the first noon address from his window overlooking St. Peter’s Square in three months as Italy’s lockdown drew to an end.

“Healing people, not saving (money) to help the economy (is important), healing people, who are more important than the economy,” Francis said.

“We people are temples of the Holy Spirit, the economy is not,” he said.

Francis did not mention any countries. Many governments are deciding whether to reopen their economies to save jobs and living standards, or whether to maintain lockdowns until they are sure the virus is fully under control.

The pope’s words were met with applause by hundreds of people in the square, many of whom wore masks and kept several meters from each other. The square was reopened to the public last Monday. Normally tens of thousands attend on a Sunday.

The last time the pope delivered his message and blessing from the window was March 1, before Italy, where more than 33,000 people have died from the virus, imposed a lockdown. The last restrictions will be lifted on Wednesday.

Francis led the crowd in silent prayer for medical workers who lost their lives by helping others.

He said he hoped the world would come out of the crisis more united, rather than divided.

“People do not come out of a crisis like this the same as before. We will come out either better or worse than before. Let’s have the courage to emerge better than before in order to build the post-crisis period of the pandemic positively,” he said.

(Reporting by Philip Pullella; Editing by Susan Fenton)

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


COVID-19 is hastening the green economy, and we are far behind –



In Newfoundland and Labrador, we immediately need both jobs and training for workers who want to transition out of oil, writes contributor Lori Lee Oates. (Submitted)

This week Premier Dwight Ball, Minister of Natural Resources Siobhan Coady, new Memorial University president Vianne Timmons and two industry associations held a news conference. They called on the federal government to provide subsidies for oil companies in the Newfoundland and Labrador offshore.

Their message demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding of what has to happen to meet Paris Accord emission reduction targets for 2030. It also ignored the research on where the global economy is going, as other nations prepare green economic stimulus packages.

In May 2018, the International Labour Organization released a report which estimated that 24-million new jobs would be created in the move to a green economy, by 2030.

It also predicted a loss of six million jobs in the oil sector. However, that represents a net gain of 18-million jobs that will be created by this fundamental shift. Green energy is simply more job intensive than the fossil fuel energy sector and a far better bet for the economic future of this province.

What this means for Newfoundland and Labrador is that we need to take steps immediately to ensure we take full advantage of the green economic recovery. We also need to increase training opportunities.

Like any revolution, those who get there first will seize the high ground and become the new centres of excellence. Green energy services are a product that we will be able to export globally, and they will be in high demand for decades to come.

This is an opportunity for us to fully enter the global service economy for the first time in our history.

‘Green energy services are a product that we will be able to export globally, and they will be in high demand for decades to come,’ writes Lori Lee Oates. (Patrick Pleul/dpa via Associated Press)

The writing is on the wall

For some years now, financial analysts such as former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have warned of the dangers of ignoring climate change in financial planning.

The COVID-19 pandemic has hastened the move to a green economy. This is likely the best opportunity we will ever have, as a planet, to get on track to meet greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, as outlined by the 2015 Paris Accord.

Even before the pandemic, the IMF was warning against subsidizing the oil industry. A 2019 paper maintained that we must factor in the cost of external factors like natural disasters and health care to calculate the true cost of fossil fuel subsidies.

Furthermore, the IMF found that there was a net economic gain to ending oil subsidies.

Indeed, wildfires in Australia this year are expected to cost $100 billion. There is a very real price tag to failing to deal with climate change. Other costs include drought, starvation, war, pollution and all manner of natural disasters.

Experts have been pressing for jurisdictions that are heavily dependent on oil to diversify. That includes scholars and analysts in this province.

In the absence of an economic update from the provincial government so far this year, best estimates are that Newfoundland and Labrador will run a deficit of $2-3 billion.

In Newfoundland and Labrador, we immediately need both jobs and training for workers who want to transition out of oil. We must insist that the federal and provincial governments prioritize workers over oil companies and their major global contractors.

Prof. Jeff Colgan of the Watson Institute at Brown University has argued that high-priced oil jurisdictions such as Canada will be wiped out of the global industry as part of the post-coronavirus oil shock. Colgan, who is Canadian, also predicted a high level of bankruptcies and mergers in the sector.

While the oil industry has long depended on subsidies, some experts are now urging nations to invest in green energy, rather than recover jobs that will have to be replaced in a few years to meet 2030 climate goals.

One of the findings of the IMF 2019 study was that Canada invests $60 billion annually in oil subsidies. Notably, most of this money goes to oil operators and tier one contractors that are headquartered outside of this country.

Oil subsidies largely do not go to supply and service companies that are home-grown and based in Newfoundland and Labrador. These are also companies that could easily transition into supplying lower carbon energy sectors, with fairly minimal supports.

Frankly, our provincial trade associations should be doing a better job of advocating for transitional funding for local companies, rather than championing the cause of major multinationals.

The fact that the oil sector is in such desperate need of subsidies to survive demonstrates that it is not nearly as lucrative as it claims it to be. The data that proponents present on the economic benefits of oil never factors in the total costs of oil subsidies.

Wildfires in Australia this year are expected to cost $100 billion. (Saeed Khan/AFP/Getty)

The year the world woke up to climate change

Oxford Dictionaries chose “climate emergency” as its word of the year for 2019. We can expect massive shifts in energy sectors globally during the coming decade.

In 2019, 11,000 scientists across the globe signed off on an article in Bioscience, based on climate data from the last 40 years. They recommended the following:

Replacing fossil fuels with low-carbon renewables and cleaner sources of energy. For them this meant that existing fossil fuels should be left in the ground;

  •  Promptly reducing emissions;
  •  Quickly curtailing habitat and biodiversity loss;
  •  Eating mostly a plant-based diet, while reducing global consumption of animal products;
  •  Shifting governance goals from GDP growth to human wellbeing; and
  •  Stabilizing the world’s population. They said family planning services should be available to all people. We must remove barriers to full gender equity and achieve primary and secondary education, as a global norm.

It has become increasingly clear since the Paris Accord was negotiated in 2015 that keeping an increase in global warming to 2 C is not enough.

We also now know that we must keep global warming to 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels in order to prevent irreparable damage to the natural environment. Last year ended with a global average temperature of 1.1 C above pre-industrial levels.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres has warned that we are currently way off track in meeting either the 1.5 C or 2 C targets that the Paris agreement called for.

Time is quickly running out for us to avert the worst impacts of climate disruption.

Canada, notably, is a signatory to the Paris Accord and has ratified it at home.

A pumpjack works at a well head on an oil and gas installation near Cremona, Alta. (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press)

The future is now

Increasingly, there have been calls for green energy stimulus spending since the economic downturn caused by COVID-19.

The Oxford Review of Economic Policy has accepted astudy which surveyed 231 financial experts across central banks, finance ministries, and economics experts throughout the G20.

These experts identified five areas of economic stimulus which could displace the fossil fuel intensive economy, rather than entrench it. These include:

  •  Building efficiency retrofits;
  •  Investment in education and training;
  •  Natural capital investment;
  •  Clean research and development (this is NOT oil R&D).

Notably, our government is cutting post-secondary education, in both the university and college systems, at a time when we need to be re-training people for the green economy.

The study also found that without a green recovery, it will be nearly impossible to meet the goals of the Paris Accord. However, if the world comes together on green stimulus, this will be nearly sufficient to mitigate the most disastrous impacts of climate change that are predicted within the next 10 years.

The European Union is now poised to announce the world’s greenest economic recovery package. Proposals include:

  •  Up to 80-billion euros to boost electric vehicle (EV) sales;
  •  Doubling investment in charging networks; an option to exempt EVs from value-added taxes;
  •  91-billion euros a year to seal up drafty buildings;
  •  Plans to offer homebuyers green mortgages (for energy efficient homes);
  •  An annual 10-billion euros to support renewal energy and hydro infrastructure.

We are already behind on retraining

Governments and oil companies should have been retraining and transitioning oil employees for some years now.

In Newfoundland and Labrador, we immediately need both jobs and training for workers who want to transition out of oil. We must insist that the federal and provincial governments prioritize workers over oil companies and their major global contractors.

In their stimulus response, they must also prioritize the green economy over the oil economy, as many nations are already doing. If we do this right, we can become a green energy centre of excellence in the global environment.

However, for that to happen, we must act on building the green economy right now.

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


Cuthand: First Nations must be included in the new economy – Saskatoon StarPhoenix



Article content continued

On the surface, it was ridiculous and condemned by Indigenous and environmental groups, but on the other hand, her comment reflects the misguided belief of the Kenney government and, to a lesser extent, Premier Scott Moe in Saskatchewan that things will just continue as before.

The world economy is in a state of flux. China will continue to retaliate against Canada for the arrest and possible deportation of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou. Oil prices will remain low for the foreseeable future and Canada, like most western nations, has taken on record amounts of debt.

The oil industry is evolving due to environmental concerns, competition from OPEC and an economy that may take years to recover. For example, air travel, a major consumer of fuel, will be drastically changed. Smaller airliners, reduced fleets and fears of contagion will affect the usage of fuel. The petroleum industry will remain an important source of energy in the future, but the worldwide glut will continue to keep prices low.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading