Biggest Risks When Investing In A Syndication And How To Avoid Them - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Investment

Biggest Risks When Investing In A Syndication And How To Avoid Them – Forbes

Published

 on


Getty

Many investors are now putting their money into real estate, especially multifamily properties. There are a number of good reasons to do this. Prices for multifamily properties have skyrocketed over the past several years, and because of their limited availability and the fact that downsizing retired baby boomers are keeping vacancy rates low, prices will continue to rise.

If you’re a passive investor and want to start investing in real estate, the best way to do this is through syndication. Basically, a syndicator, or general partner, will form an entity (usually a limited liability corporation, or LLC) and then allocate shares in that entity to individual investors based on the amount each is investing. By investing with the syndicator, you’ll enjoy all of the tax benefits, income and potential appreciation without any of the hard work.

As with any investment, there are risks involved in a syndication. However, understanding those risks and ways to avoid them can make your real estate investment a safer one. Let’s take a look at some of the biggest risks along with ways to prevent them.

1. Losing Your Money

While losing your money is possible, it is unlikely. It would take a catastrophic event for passive investors to lose their money. The more likely scenario is that you won’t earn the returns that were outlined by the syndicator projected in your private placement memorandum (PPM).

Solution: Diversify your investments among different markets as well as different syndicators. Here’s why: If there were a recession, each market would be impacted in different ways. By spreading your investments across several markets, you will minimize your overall risks.

By investing with different syndicators, you will have the opportunity to participate in a variety of deals that have unique investment criteria. Limiting your investments to a single syndicator prevents you from seeing other opportunities that may be more advantageous to your investment goals.

Make sure you do your due diligence. Inquire about how experienced they are, whether they have managed to perform well and whether you share the same appetite for risk as they have. Some syndicators — like myself — are very conservative, and some are not. I advise looking for a syndicator who takes a conservative approach. It may be due to my background as a lawyer, but I’m conservative in nature. When I analyze a deal, I always plug in numbers that show the price will be lower than when it was purchased. If the deal still looks strong, then it’s a great deal.

One example that shows how conservative a syndicator is, is how the syndicator analyzes the exit cap versus in-place cap rate. That’s an important factor to look at before investing. Always ask the syndicator what cap rate they purchased the property at and what they’re predicting the exit cap rate to be. If you’re conservative, you want to invest in a deal where the exit cap rate is higher than the in-place or market cap rate. Finally, look at how the syndicator makes their occupancy assumptions. Stating that occupancy is at 97% of 100% isn’t conservative, and it isn’t reasonable.

2. Losing Your Passive Investor Protection

Passive investing means the investors don’t get involved in putting the deal together, finding other investors or managing the property in any way. If they do, they become active and lose their passive investor status.

A passive investor doesn’t have to have any knowledge or experience with real estate to invest in properties. That’s the role of the syndicator, or lead investor. The only real areas you shouldn’t be passive about are vetting the deal and the sponsor, and doing your due diligence on your investment.

The law protects you from bearing any responsibility on managing the property. You, personally, can’t be sued — the syndicator is the one who is exposed to that risk. However, you might lose that protection if you take an active role in managing the asset in any way.

Solution: Don’t take an active role in managing the property. Otherwise, you may find yourself with the same responsibilities as the general partner/syndicator.

3. Lack Of Transparency

There’s a reason investors pay syndicators fees when investing: so they don’t have to worry about any aspect of managing the property. Passive investors must feel comfortable with not controlling the deal, which is what a true passive investment is all about.

However, you want to feel comfortable with the person who is managing your money. If they don’t maintain proper communication, you won’t know what’s going on with your investment and won’t always know if it’s doing well.

Solution: Be sure you’re comfortable with the type of communication they offer. For instance, we provide monthly updates and share financial reports with our investors on a quarterly basis. Others do the same, and some share updates quarterly, semi-annually or sometimes annually. Some don’t submit any reports at all. I strongly believe that transparency is key and try to communicate with investors on a regular basis. If you’re comfortable with a yearly update, that’s fine, though I’d recommend investing with someone who is more communicative.

Summary

Avoiding the biggest risks in a syndication will provide you with peace of mind when you invest your money. The risk of losing all of your money is slim, but you may not earn the returns projected by the syndicator. Another risk is losing your passive investor status and legal protection, so never play an active role in managing the asset. Finally, avoid lack of transparency by talking with the syndicator before you invest, and have an understanding of how often and in what form they will keep you appraised of your investment. Eliminating these risks will make for a more successful investment.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

S&P/TSX composite down more than 200 points, U.S. stock markets also fall

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was down more than 200 points in late-morning trading, weighed down by losses in the technology, base metal and energy sectors, while U.S. stock markets also fell.

The S&P/TSX composite index was down 239.24 points at 22,749.04.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was down 312.36 points at 40,443.39. The S&P 500 index was down 80.94 points at 5,422.47, while the Nasdaq composite was down 380.17 points at 16,747.49.

The Canadian dollar traded for 73.80 cents US compared with 74.00 cents US on Thursday.

The October crude oil contract was down US$1.07 at US$68.08 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was up less than a penny at US$2.26 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was down US$2.10 at US$2,541.00 an ounce and the December copper contract was down four cents at US$4.10 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

S&P/TSX composite up more than 150 points, U.S. stock markets also higher

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 150 points in late-morning trading, helped by strength in technology, financial and energy stocks, while U.S. stock markets also pushed higher.

The S&P/TSX composite index was up 171.41 points at 23,298.39.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 278.37 points at 41,369.79. The S&P 500 index was up 38.17 points at 5,630.35, while the Nasdaq composite was up 177.15 points at 17,733.18.

The Canadian dollar traded for 74.19 cents US compared with 74.23 cents US on Wednesday.

The October crude oil contract was up US$1.75 at US$76.27 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was up less than a penny at US$2.10 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was up US$18.70 at US$2,556.50 an ounce and the December copper contract was down less than a penny at US$4.22 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 29, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Crypto Market Bloodbath Amid Broader Economic Concerns

Published

 on

The crypto market has recently experienced a significant downturn, mirroring broader risk asset sell-offs. Over the past week, Bitcoin’s price dropped by 24%, reaching $53,000, while Ethereum plummeted nearly a third to $2,340. Major altcoins also suffered, with Cardano down 27.7%, Solana 36.2%, Dogecoin 34.6%, XRP 23.1%, Shiba Inu 30.1%, and BNB 25.7%.

The severe downturn in the crypto market appears to be part of a broader flight to safety, triggered by disappointing economic data. A worse-than-expected unemployment report on Friday marked the beginning of a technical recession, as defined by the Sahm Rule. This rule identifies a recession when the three-month average unemployment rate rises by at least half a percentage point from its lowest point in the past year.

Friday’s figures met this threshold, signaling an abrupt economic downshift. Consequently, investors sought safer assets, leading to declines in major stock indices: the S&P 500 dropped 2%, the Nasdaq 2.5%, and the Dow 1.5%. This trend continued into Monday with further sell-offs overseas.

The crypto market’s rapid decline raises questions about its role as either a speculative asset or a hedge against inflation and recession. Despite hopes that crypto could act as a risk hedge, the recent crash suggests it remains a speculative investment.

Since the downturn, the crypto market has seen its largest three-day sell-off in nearly a year, losing over $500 billion in market value. According to CoinGlass data, this bloodbath wiped out more than $1 billion in leveraged positions within the last 24 hours, including $365 million in Bitcoin and $348 million in Ether.

Khushboo Khullar of Lightning Ventures, speaking to Bloomberg, argued that the crypto sell-off is part of a broader liquidity panic as traders rush to cover margin calls. Khullar views this as a temporary sell-off, presenting a potential buying opportunity.

Josh Gilbert, an eToro market analyst, supports Khullar’s perspective, suggesting that the expected Federal Reserve rate cuts could benefit crypto assets. “Crypto assets have sold off, but many investors will see an opportunity. We see Federal Reserve rate cuts, which are now likely to come sharper than expected, as hugely positive for crypto assets,” Gilbert told Coindesk.

Despite the recent volatility, crypto continues to make strides toward mainstream acceptance. Notably, Morgan Stanley will allow its advisors to offer Bitcoin ETFs starting Wednesday. This follows more than half a year after the introduction of the first Bitcoin ETF. The investment bank will enable over 15,000 of its financial advisors to sell BlackRock’s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC. This move is seen as a significant step toward the “mainstreamization” of crypto, given the lengthy regulatory and company processes in major investment banks.

The recent crypto market downturn highlights its volatility and the broader economic concerns affecting all risk assets. While some analysts see the current situation as a temporary sell-off and a buying opportunity, others caution against the speculative nature of crypto. As the market evolves, its role as a mainstream alternative asset continues to grow, marked by increasing institutional acceptance and new investment opportunities.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version