adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

BIS warns economies are approaching 'tipping point' where high inflation becomes entrenched – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


People shop at a Walmart Supercentre in Toronto on March 13, 2020.CARLOS OSORIO/Reuters

Many economies are approaching a tipping point where high inflation becomes normal while economic growth slows sharply, the Bank for International Settlements warned in its annual report published Sunday.

Countries around the world are facing a dangerous cocktail of high inflation, slowing economic growth and heightened financial vulnerabilities tied to high debt levels and rising interest rates, said the BIS, which acts as a bank for the world’s central banks.

This may quickly turn into a period of stagflation resembling the high-inflation and low-growth era of 1970s and early 1980s, the organization said. It argued that economic policy makers around the world need to move rapidly to halt inflation, even if that means causing significant economic hardship.

300x250x1

“We may be reaching a tipping point, beyond which an inflationary psychology spreads and becomes entrenched. This would mean a major paradigm shift,” the BIS said.

Liberals fail to act with urgency before a long hot summer of inflation

It might be time to admit we just don’t know that much about inflation

Central banks around the world have stepped up the pace of interest rate increases in recent months to try to tame inflation. Two weeks ago, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced the largest interest rate hike since 1994. The Bank of Canada has increased its benchmark rate at three consecutive rate decisions, and hinted that it is considering a supersized 0.75 percentage point rate increase in July. That would be three times the size of a normal rate hike.

Interest rate increases lower demand in the economy, which can help bring down the pace of consumer price growth. But higher interest rates can also push the economy into a recession, as steeper borrowing costs curtail consumer spending and business investment, and push up unemployment.

“The overriding near-term challenge is to prevent the global economy from shifting from a low- to a high-inflation regime. In doing so, policy makers will need to limit the costs to the economy as far as possible and to safeguard financial stability. Some pain, however, will be inevitable,” the BIS said.

Getting inflation under control won’t be easy, the organization warned. The recent commodity price shock tied to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has added to multiple inflationary pressures that have been building over the past year. This resembles the oil price shocks in the 1970s that pushed the United States, Canada and other countries into a period of high inflation, high unemployment and low economic growth known as stagflation.

The situation today, however, could be even more dangerous than in earlier periods of stagflation because of the amount of debt – particularly housing market debt – that has built up over more than a decade of ultra-low interest rates, the BIS warned. It called the current combination of soaring inflation and elevated financial vulnerabilities “historically unprecedented.”

“Unlike in the past, stagflation today would occur alongside heightened financial vulnerabilities, including stretched asset prices and high debt levels, which could magnify any growth slowdown,” it said.

As they push interest rates higher, central banks are trying to engineer a soft landing – a situation where inflation comes down without a sharp slowdown in economic activity or significant rise in unemployment. Top central bankers, including Fed chair Jerome Powell and Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem, have said in recent weeks they believe a soft landing is possible, although they acknowledge that it is getting more difficult.

The BIS poured cold water on the probability of a soft landing in its report. BIS economists looked at monetary policy tightening cycles in 35 countries between 1985 and 2018, and concluded that about half of them resulted in a soft landing – that is, did not end in a recession.

However, further analysis showed that recessions were more likely if rate hikes followed a period of ultralow borrowing costs and a build-up of financial vulnerabilities. That is the situation Canada and many other advanced economies are in today.

“A hard landing may not be foreordained,” Columbia University professor Adam Tooze wrote in a newsletter commenting on the BIS report. “But what the BIS is telling us, is that central bankers have never attempted to stop an inflation as rapid as the one we have seen in the first half of 2022, with the level of debt build-up we have seen since the early 2000s.”

The BIS is not alone in its grim prognosis. Earlier this month, the World Bank cut its 2022 global growth forecast to 2.9 per cent from a 4.1-per-cent forecast in January, and said that “the danger of stagflation is considerable today.”

Much of the BIS report focused on the changing dynamics of inflation, which is surging across large parts of the globe for the first time in decades. The annual rate of inflation hit a 39-year-high of 7.7 per cent in May in Canada, the highest since 1983. It averaged 9.2 per cent in April across countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

The BIS noted that once economies shift into periods of high inflation, consumer price increases become self-reinforcing. Businesses and consumers start paying more attention to rising prices and start behaving differently, respectively setting higher prices and demanding higher wages to protect their margins and purchasing power.

“Whether inflation becomes entrenched or not ultimately depends on whether wage-price spirals will develop. The risk should not be underestimated, owing to the inherent dynamics of transitions from low- to high-inflation regimes,” the BIS said.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

A June BoC cut 'seems unrealistic': Scotiabank's chief economist on where rates, the economy and housing prices are … – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


It’s been just over two years since the Bank of Canada began its aggressive tightening policy in March of 2022. With the Bank of Canada anticipated to soon pivot and start cutting the overnight rate, hopes and signs of an economic rebound are growing. In fact, in its April Monetary Policy Report, the bank lifted its real GDP growth forecast for 2024 to 1.5 per cent, from its prior estimate of 0.8 per cent, supported by a strong January GDP reading

Ahead of next week’s release of the February GDP data, The Globe and Mail spoke with Scotiabank’s chief economist Jean-François Perrault, who discussed his economic growth forecasts, perspectives on monetary policy, as well as key economic growth drivers and risks.

Does the U.S. Federal Reserve need to cut rates this year? When I look at the fundamentals, the economy is resilient, the labour market is strong, and inflation is still above their target.

300x250x1

We think U.S. inflation hovers around these levels this year and then gradually comes down next year, and that’s a little bit different than what we thought a few months ago when it looked like U.S. inflation was on a solid downward path. Now, the last few months it’s been the opposite issue, inflation has surprised on the upside.

As to whether or not the Fed actually does need to cut interest rates, you’ve got to think about monetary policy and the way monetary policy makers think about it, which is it takes a long time for their policies to impact activity. So, while we think the Fed cuts in the second half of this year, that’s really thinking about normalizing policy so that in 2025 and beyond inflation goes to where they need it to.

Our view assumes that U.S. growth doesn’t accelerate going forward and inflation doesn’t accelerate going forward. Now, if those things happen, if you get more surprises on the inflation side, you can easily rule out a rate cut in the U.S. this year and you might have to start thinking about rate increases.

What probability would you assign to rate increases?

Pretty low.

Your U.S. GDP growth forecast for this year is 2.4 per cent. However, in one of your notes you said you wouldn’t be surprised to see growth near 3 per cent.

The pace at which data are coming in and the revisions that we are seeing to the outlook, if we continue on this surprise pace, it doesn’t take that many surprises to bring you up closer to 3 per cent as opposed to 2.25, 2.5.

I think of it in this really simple way. One of the big shocks we have to the U.S., for instance, is retail sales, which are extremely strong and that’s the rate sensitive part of the economy. Household spending is one of the things the Fed would expect to see being weak when they’re having an impact on the economy. We’re seeing the opposite of that – a sharp pickup in retail sales. That suggests that there’s this risk going forward that growth is going to surprise to the upside again.

What’s your 2024 economic outlook for Canada?

We have been revising growth up progressively in Canada, not to the extent that we’re seeing in the U.S. We’ve got 1.5 per cent growth for Canada, in the U.S. you’re well over 2 per cent growth. But, the data are coming in stronger than expected.

On the flip side though, in Canada, is the inflation data have been coming in and surprising to the downside. There is this different inflation dynamic between Canada and the U.S. Canadian inflation is slowing, U.S. inflation is accelerating. So even though growth is being revised up in Canada, it does suggest that there is more likeliness to a rate cut in Canada than in the U.S. at this point or certainly more rate cuts in Canada this year than in the U.S.

You’re anticipating 75 basis points of cuts this year by the Bank of Canada. When do you have the first rate cut occurring?

Our official call is September. We’re starting to waffle between September and July because the inflation data are a little bit better than we thought. To us, it seems unrealistic at this point for the Bank of Canada to cut in June.

I’m sure you speak to many CEO’s of companies. If my assumption is correct, what are you hearing from business leaders regarding capital spending plans, labour plans surrounding hiring and firing, costs, and supply issues. What main themes or insights into economic activity are you hearing from business executives?

We talk to CEO’s and boards pretty regularly in most sectors.

We’re at a point in time when monetary policy hurts the most as it takes 18 to 24 months for monetary policy to have a full impact on the economy. This is around the time, in principle, the economy is the weakest, maybe it was last quarter, maybe this quarter. As a result, it’s normal for businesses to be a little more cautious.

On the labour side, it’s a little bit different. You’re still seeing companies complain about labour shortages, you’re still seeing significant wage gains being offered. You’re still seeing companies hoard workers. It’s unusual in the sense that typically when the central bank raises interest rates, you get a slowdown in economic activity that lowers employment growth, in fact, lowers employment levels and you get some downward pressure on wages. We haven’t really seen that.

But, there is a certain degree of optimism with respect to how the economy responds to lower interest rates because those are coming so that’s impacting how people approach decisions. Once interest rates start to come down, it’s pretty clear that we’re going to get a significant turnaround in the economy and that will carry business investment with it and higher consumer spending, which is in part why we think the government needs to be cautious because if you do that too soon, you create a growth problem, which from a Bank of Canada perspective is an issue, from a business perspective, of course, we all want.

How great of a risk do you see rising commodity prices filtering through the supply chain and lifting inflation?

It’s 100 per cent a risk. The fact that commodity prices are by and large performing well in an environment where monetary policy is still tight around the world, where growth is being suppressed by central banks, where China is in a pretty weak economic situation – that’s the type of environment you would normally see commodity prices being pulled down in. The fact that we haven’t seen it that much really makes you question as the global economy starts to rebound, say in the second part of this year as central banks start to cut rates, what kind of a commodity price response do you get then? For us, this is a really significant issue in terms of inflation control, you’ve got to keep this in mind.

When you consider we may be in an environment of higher for longer interest rates, do investors have to lower or moderate their earnings growth expectations?

I would say no. You’ve got to keep in mind why would interest rates not come down this year and figure out what that means for the economy. Say we end up with 3 per cent growth in the U.S. this year and the Fed doesn’t cut or the Fed has to raise further. Well, that’s occurring because growth is strengthening. That means earnings are probably rising. That means there’s more business to be done. So, if rates are higher for longer because the economy is strong, it’s a different thing than rates are higher for longer for no other reason than central banks are really aggressive in bringing things down.

What about in Canada where rates may be higher for longer, but that’s not because of a strong economy but because the Fed is holding rates steady.

For Canada, it’s a little bit more tricky because you have exactly that going on.

We’ve revised our growth forecast up, but not to the extent that we’re seeing in the U.S. So, it does suggest that there’s a little bit of a differential between how Canadian and U.S. stock markets would adapt to that. But you also got to keep in mind though that if you’re revising your U.S. growth forecast up, you’ve got to revise your Canadian growth forecast up as well, three quarters of exports go to the U.S. So, if we find ourselves with an unbelievably strong U.S. economy, we’re going to have a stronger economy. So, there will be an earnings lift that comes from that in Canada.

Where it gets a little bit tricky though is higher for longer interest rates then impacts multiples because discount rates change. You’ve got the impact of higher interest rates, which depresses stock market valuations to some extent.

There’s been a lot of surprises or turn of events. Not too long ago, we were talking about the risk of a recession. At the beginning of 2023, there were talks about rate cuts but instead, after a pause, there were two rate hikes mid-year. At the start of this year, people were talking about six rate cuts by the Bank of Canada starting potentially as early as March and now those expectations have been scaled back. What do you think may be the next surprise to investors?

We’ll see if it’s a surprise or not, but I think the thing to worry about over the next several months is the result of the U.S. election. We might get some growth surprises between now and then, maybe we get some inflation surprises, which will be meaningful in terms of the timing of monetary policy. The outcome of the U.S. election, for instance, if Trump wins and he does some of the things that he says he’s going to do on the tariff side then you end up in a potentially very different economic space this time next year, or two years from now, or whenever, if he wins and he does the things that he says he wants to do. That will overhang markets for a while until we get clarity on that in November.

In the short run, what we’ve observed and the reason we’ve been scaling back rate cuts in Canada and in the U.S. has largely been because growth has been more resilient than anticipated. If you find yourself in a world where growth isn’t slowing down as much as you thought it was, there’s no recession, then you have to rethink the pace at which you were going to unwind policy because the economy is turning out to be better than you thought, better able to handle those rate increases.

You led me into my next question. Trump has pledged to impose 60 per cent or higher tariffs on goods from China, which would ignite inflation. How do you see this impacting the economy?

It’s broader than that. He’s threatened at least 60 per cent on China and 10 per cent for everybody else so that’s a trade war. That is the Americans declaring a trade war on the rest of the world. Now, would we be included in that or not? I don’t know, it depends on the range of things.

That does two really nasty things. One, it reduces economic activity in the U.S. because you’re paying more for inputs, it’s a supply shock so it reduces growth a little bit or a lot depending on what exactly he does, but also boosts inflation because the cost of goods is rising. So, you have this awful situation where you’re revising your growth forecast down, you’re revising your inflation forecast up and you’re probably raising your rate forecast as well because at the end of the day, central banks have got to manage the inflation side of things. Now, that’s true in the U.S. and it’s also true elsewhere.

What do you see as significant tailwinds and headwinds for the Canadian economy?

Obviously, the commodity sector has been beneficial to us. We’re going to have the Trans Mountain start operating very soon as well so we’re going to benefit from that. There still are relatively strong household and corporate balance sheets in Canada. And then there’s the population dimension, which has been a really powerful tailwind the last couple of years that seems to still be a very powerful tailwind.

On the headwind side, setting aside the election, politics, I think by far the most important is low productivity. It hits our standard of living, it hits our competitiveness, which makes it even more important, say in a Trump tariff world. If we cannot improve productivity in any meaningful way then you have a gradual erosion of competitiveness, a gradual erosion of standard of living, a gradual erosion of well-being in the country and that is a big deal.

Speaking about erosion, I was thinking about housing affordability when you were talking about that. What’s your outlook for home prices?

The market is so undersupplied pretty well across the country. There’s such a large imbalance between supply and demand that it’s very difficult to believe that house prices are going to do anything but rise over the next several years. It’s very difficult to see affordability improving in the next five years.

Will Bitcoin ever be included in your currency analysis?

No. It’s honestly a very difficult thing to analyze. It’s not a currency. There’s no intrinsic value to it. It’s just a financial asset whose value moves up and down on the basis of how many people want to buy and sell it.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Japanese government maintains view that economy is in moderate recovery – ForexLive

Published

 on


300x250x1

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Can falling interest rates improve fairness in the economy? – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


The ‘poor borrower’ narrative rules in media coverage of the Bank of Canada and high interest rates, and that’s appropriate.

A lot of people have been financially slammed by the rate hikes of the past couple of years, which have made it much more expensive to carry a mortgage, lines of credit and other borrowing. The latest from the Bank of Canada suggests rate cuts will come as soon as this summer, which on the whole would be a welcome development. It’s not just borrowers who need relief – the boarder economy has slowed to a crawl because of high borrowing costs.

But high rates are also a big win for some people. Specifically, those who have little or no debt and who have a significant amount of money sitting in savings products and guaranteed investment certificates. The country’s most well-off people, in other words.

300x250x1

Lower rates will mean diminished returns for savers and less interest paid by borrowers. It’s a stretch to say lower rates will improve financial inequality, but they do add a little more fairness to our financial system.

Wealth inequality is often presented as the chasm between well-off people able to pay for houses, vehicles, trips and high-end restaurant meals and those who are driving record use of food banks and living in tent cities. High interest rates and inflation have given us more nuance in wealth inequality. People fortunate enough to have bought houses in recent years are staggering as they try to manage mortgage payments that have risen by hundreds of dollars a month. You can see their struggles in rising numbers of late payments and debt defaults.

Rates are expected to fall in a measured, gradual way, which means their impact on financial inequality won’t be an instant gamechanger. But if the Bank of Canada cuts 0.25 of a percentage point off the overnight rate in June and again in July, many borrowers will start noticing how much less interest they’re paying, and savers will find themselves earning less.


Subscribe to Carrick on Money

Are you reading this newsletter on the web or did someone forward the e-mail version to you? If so, you can sign up for Carrick on Money here.


Rob’s personal finance reading list

Snowballs and avalanches

A look at two strategies for paying off debt – the debt avalanche and the debt snowball. I’ll go with the avalanche.

How not to ruin your kitchen countertop

Anyone who has renovated a kitchen lately knows how expensive stone countertops can be. Look after yours by protecting it from a few common kitchen items.

What you need to know about stock market corrections

A helpful explanation of stock market corrections. It seems an opportune time to look at corrections, given how volatile stocks have been lately. Like scouts, investors should always be prepared.

Put that snack back

Food inflation requires more careful grocery shopping. Here’s a roundup of food products – cookies, snacks, ice cream – that don’t taste as good as they used to. Food companies have always adjusted their recipes from time to time. Is this happening more because of inflation’s impact on raw material prices? A U.S. list – most products are available are familiar to Canadians, too.


Ask Rob

Q: I have Tangerine children’s accounts for my kids. Can you suggest a better alternative?

A: The rate on the Tangerine children’s account is 0.8 per cent, which actually compares well to the big banks and their comparable accounts. For kids aged 13 and up, check out something new called the JA Money Card.

Do you have a question for me? Send it my way. Sorry I can’t answer every one personally. Questions and answers are edited for length and clarity.


Tools and guides

A comprehensive guide on how to build a good credit score.


In the social sphere

Social Media: An offbeat way of fighting high food costs

Watch: Is now the hardest time ever to buy a home?

Money-Free Zone: Singer-songwriter Maggie Rogers has a new album called Don’t Forget Me and it’s generating some buzz because it’s a great listen. Smooth vocals and a laid back countryish vibe that hits a faster pace on one of my favourite cuts, Drunk.


More PF from The Globe

– He keeps ‘a few thousand in crisp new bills’ at home – is that a good idea?

– The pension pivot: Employers recognizing that workers need help with debt as much as retirement

– Her bond ETF is ‘a dud and not promising at all’ – should she sell?

– Despite high fees, Canadians remain perplexingly loyal to mutual funds. Here’s why


More Rob Carrick and money coverage

Subscribe to Stress Test on Apple podcasts or Spotify. For more money stories, follow me on Instagram and Twitter, and join the discussion on my Facebook page. Millennial readers, join our Gen Y Money Facebook group.

Even more coverage from Rob Carrick:

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending