Black Lives Matter spreads to a place where politics is verboten: Stadiums - Politico | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Black Lives Matter spreads to a place where politics is verboten: Stadiums – Politico

Published

 on


.cms-textAlign-lefttext-align:left;.cms-textAlign-centertext-align:center;.cms-textAlign-righttext-align:right;.cms-magazineStyles-smallCapsfont-variant:small-caps;

As anti-racism protests sweep across the world, sports are finding they can’t stay out of politics.

Sporting venues have not traditionally welcomed political displays by athletes on any topic, including racism. Mixing politics with sport, the argument goes, is a distraction from the purity of human endeavor on the pitch or track — not to mention giving sponsors heart palpitations.

But such is the reach of the Black Lives Matter protests — sparked by the killing of unarmed black man George Floyd under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer — and the depth of feeling over festering injustice that, instead of clamping down, some sports are making allowance for on-field protests.

In the German Bundesliga, the first major European football league to resume action in the coronavirus era, players and teams have repeatedly paid tributes to the Black Lives Matter movement — to applause from senior figures in the sport.

“For the avoidance of doubt, in a FIFA competition the recent demonstrations of players in Bundesliga matches would deserve an applause and not a punishment,” said Gianni Infantino, the president of FIFA, world football’s governing body, in response to the political messaging.

Jadon Sancho, the Borussia Dortmund star, was shown a yellow card in a match at the end of May for removing his shirt to display a “Justice For George Floyd” T-shirt. But senior German football officials later clarified that the caution was standard for removing his shirt and “did not have anything to do with the political message.”

A top German official later issued more full-throated backing for protesting players. “These are targeted anti-racism campaigns by the players, which are committed to values for which the DFB also stands and always stands for,” said Anton Nachreiner, chairman of German football’s control committee. “Therefore, no proceedings will be initiated, even with comparable anti-racism campaigns, in the next few weeks.”

For Germany, this marks a change in sporting race relations. In 2018, footballer Mesut Özil retired from the national team, accusing German football chief Reinhard Grindel of failing to back him when he suffered racist abuse after posing for a photograph with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

“In the eyes of Grindel and his supporters, I am German when we win, but I am an immigrant when we lose,” Özil said at the time.

“I find it very good when someone sets an example and shows that the topic [of racism] is not irrelevant,” Karamba Diaby, a German MP of Senegalese descent, told the RND network earlier this month. He said that while there were clear cases of racism in football, clubs and fan associations were also standing against abuse.

In England, where football’s Premier League is due to restart next week, authorities have said they will take a “common sense approach” to any anti-racism displays by players, indicating that they would not issue sanctions for political protests — as has been the case with NFL players in the U.S.

But for some commentators, a separation of stadium and state is usually preferable.

“I hope that sports return and give us the ability to remember the sense of community and escape they have always provided,” said Shane Owens, a psychologist. “Sports should be a place where we focus on the rivalries that bind us more than they drive us apart.”

That sentiment is still the guiding principle for the Olympics. The yearlong delay to the Tokyo Games due to the coronavirus has not shielded the event’s organizing body, the International Olympic Committee, from questions about its own hard-line position on athlete protests.

The event has a long history of political gestures, including possibly the most famous sporting protest in history at the Mexico City Games in 1968, where U.S. sprinters Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their fists on the medal podium in a Black Power salute.

Nevertheless, the IOC endorsed guidelines in January that ban competitors at the summer 2021 Games from kneeling, fist-raising or other forms of demonstration. Despite a new report that the IOC may be preparing to row back on that stance, the policy remains in place for now.

An IOC spokesperson denied that there were plans for blanket punishments for protesting athletes. He confirmed that any disciplinary action by the Olympic body against rule-breakers will be taken on a “case-by-case basis.”

That has angered athletes. Tianna Bartoletta, an American three-time track and field Olympic gold medalist, accused the IOC of double standards.

“They say sport is a human right but oppose sport being a vehicle to fight for human rights or other pertinent global issues,” Bartoletta told POLITICO. “They tell us it’s a celebration of human accomplishment while telling us to shut up and know our place after fighting our way to the podium. They are hypocrites and I’ve had enough of the lip service.”

Gwen Berry, a hammer-thrower who was sanctioned by a U.S. body for protesting at the Pan American Games last summer, accused the IOC of being a “dictatorship” whose instinct is to keep corporate sponsors happy. The sporting utopia of the Olympics is a mirage that papers over the problems athletes face when they come home, she said.

Jules Boykoff, professor at Pacific University and the author of multiple books on the Olympics, accused the IOC of hypocrisy. “The way the International Olympic Committee organizes the Games is political to the core, just in ways that reinforce the status quo and benefit the IOC itself. By publicly proclaiming inflexibility, the IOC is choosing one side of history, and it’s not the right one,” he said.

Rob Koehler, director general of the Global Athlete movement, said that the public profile of competitors gave them the power to encourage positive change. “Silencing athletes should never be tolerated,” he said.

“Athletes are influencers and they can only help with social injustice and assist in making the world a better place,” he added.

Joshua Posaner contributed reporting.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version