Border-town mayors call for end to Canada's COVID-19 test requirement for travellers - CBC.ca | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

Border-town mayors call for end to Canada's COVID-19 test requirement for travellers – CBC.ca

Published

 on


Several border-town mayors on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border held a virtual news conference on Monday morning to call on Canada to nix its pricey COVID-19 test requirement for fully vaccinated travellers. 

The event was held on the same day the U.S. finally reopened its land border to fully vaccinated recreational travellers, after 19 months of closure. 

But the border-town mayors said they aren’t fully celebrating just yet, because a big obstacle for travellers still remains: when entering Canada, they must take a molecular test — such as a PCR test — which can cost hundreds of dollars. 

“Now there’s a pathway to cross, yet that pathway is dampened by an unreasonable and costly requirement for a PCR test to return to Canada,” said Drew Dilkens, the mayor of Windsor, Ont., which borders Detroit. 

“This PCR test requirement is a hard stop barrier for families to reunite except for the wealthiest of Canadians, and that is unfair.”

Test cost will hamper tourism, group says

Dilkens was joined at the news conference by the mayors of Niagara Falls, Ont., Niagara Falls, N.Y., and Sarnia, Ont., as well as U.S. Congressman Brian Higgins and a representative for the Hotel Association of Canada. 

They argued that while the U.S. land border is now open, the cost of Canada’s test requirement will continue to hamper a return to tourism on both sides of the border.

“When you tell a family it’s going to cost you another $1,000 to visit us and you won’t have any more to eat or a nicer place to stay, they choose not to [come],” said Mayor Jim Diodati of Niagara Falls, Ont. 

Mayor Jim Diodati of Niagara Falls, Ont., said Canada’s pricey COVID-19 test requirement deters some travellers from visiting the city. (Zoom/CBC)

When entering Canada, no matter how short their trip, travellers must take a pre-arrival molecular COVID-19 test — such as a PCR test — which can cost anywhere from $150 to $300. Sometimes travellers can get free or discounted tests, but they aren’t available in all parts of the U.S., and might not provide results within a traveller’s time frame. 

To help ease logistical problems for Canadians taking short trips, Canada now allows people crossing into the U.S. to take their test in Canada and then use it upon their return — as long as it’s less than 72 hours old.

But that accommodation doesn’t solve the cost problem, and Dilkens argues the 72-hour window defeats the purpose of the test requirement. That’s because, he said, a Canadian could take their test in Canada, be exposed to COVID-19 while in the U.S., and then return home with no further testing.

“The current system would allow someone to take a PCR test in Canada, cross into Detroit to cheer on the [Detroit Lions football team] with 65,000 other fans in the stadium, and then return to Canada using the test they took before leaving,” he said. 

“How is that test of any use to anyone?”

Mayor Drew Dilkens of Windsor, Ont., attended a virtual news conference with three other border town mayors to call for an end to Canada’s COVID-19 test requirement for travellers. (Zoom/CBC)

Travellers staying home

Canada’s test requirement first sparked complaints earlier this month when the U.S. announced it would reopen its land border to fully vaccinated travellers on Nov. 8, and not require them to take a pre-arrival COVID-19 test. 

Although many Canadians are planning to go to the U.S. now that the land border is open, others say they’re staying put until the test requirement is dropped.

“It’s like a big wall has been put up there and I’m just not able to climb over it,” said Ted Hilton of Ingersoll, Ont. He’s yearning to drive to nearby Portage, Mich., to visit family, but says he can’t afford the potential cost of the test to re-enter Canada. 

“I’m 80 years old, living off of pension income, and it’s just not there in the budget.”

Ted Hilton of Ingersoll, Ont., says he’s not travelling to the U.S. until he’s assured he won’t have to pay big bucks to take a COVID-19 test to return home. (submitted by Ted Hilton)

 

In pre-pandemic times, John Roberts and his wife, Linda, would go on day trips from their Toronto home to the U.S. about four times a year.

The couple had planned to drive to Niagara Falls, N.Y., on Saturday to do some shopping, but cancelled their trip after realizing they’d have to take a COVID-19 test to return to Canada. 

“You’ve got to pay $150 each approximately for a six hour trip,” said Roberts. “The added cost for the trip doesn’t make sense. It’s going to stop people [from] going across.”

He said the couple also backed out of the trip because his wife finds the PCR tests uncomfortable.

“The swab up the nose, she hates it.”

WATCH | Travel cost rise as restrictions ease: 

Travel costs rise as borders reopen to international travel

6 days ago

As borders reopen to international travel, Canadians planning trips are being hit with sticker shock, with the high prices for mandatory PCR tests, the end of discounted airfare and rising rental car rates. 2:01

Canada reviewing test requirement

At a news conference on Friday, Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam said the government is reviewing the test requirement. 

“I do think that all of this needs to be re-examined as we are doing with all the border measures,” she said. “We wanted to take a cautious, phased approach.”

Tam offered no timeline for when the government would finish its review of its border rules. 

Some medical experts say the Canadian government should consider replacing its molecular test requirement with a more convenient and cheaper antigen test. These types of tests are generally less reliable but can be done shortly before a traveller enters Canada. 

“Doing an antigen test at the airport is probably even more accurate than a 72-hour-ago PCR test, because you’re catching people that are infectious at that moment as they enter Canada,” said Dr. Zain Chagla, an infectious diseases physician at St. Joseph’s Healthcare in Hamilton.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Testy B.C. election campaign sees leaders attacking each other more than policy

Published

 on

VANCOUVER – British Columbia’s election campaign enters its final day in what is viewed as a too-close-to-call contest where David Eby’s New Democrats and the B.C. Conservatives led by John Rustad debated big issues of housing, health care, affordability and the overdose crisis, but also tangled over plastic straws and a billionaire’s billboards.

The two main party leaders spent a lot of time telling voters why they shouldn’t vote for the other rather than presenting their own case for support.

The NDP’s election platform document mentioned Rustad more than 50 times while Eby only received 29 mentions.

The B.C. Conservative platform, delivered in the final week of the campaign, included more than 50 Eby references, while Rustad’s name was highlighted 11 times.

“I hope we never see another election like this,” Eby said this week in Nanaimo, describing the tone of the campaign where he has felt compelled to tell voters about controversial public statements made by Rustad and several of his candidates.

“We don’t call people who are gay groomers,” he said. “We don’t tell Indigenous people that what they experienced in residential schools wasn’t real. We don’t propose that health-care professionals be put in front of an international tribunal similar to the trial of the Nazis called Nuremberg 2.0.”

Rustad dropped several previously nominated B.C. Conservative candidates prior to the start of the election campaign last month for their extreme views posted on social media.

But during the campaign he continued to support Surrey-South candidate Brent Chapman who made an anti-Palestinian post on social media in 2015 and North Coast-Haida Gwaii candidate Chris Sankey, who posted on social media about concerns of what he called vaccine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Rustad, who campaigned in Nanaimo on the same day Eby visited the Vancouver Island city, said the NDP leader has consistently attempted to shift focus away from the real issues facing the province, which are the mismanagement of the economy, the crumbling health-care system and the ongoing drug overdose crisis that has resulted in thousands of deaths.

“I don’t know why, I guess as premier he think’s it’s OK to be lying to the people of B.C.,” said Rustad. “The premier of a province like B.C. should be able to be out, being straight up with people and telling them the truth as opposed to lies.”

The campaign’s only televised debate saw Green Party Leader Sonia Furstenau, who has said the Greens will not receive enough votes to win the election, tell voters that Eby and Rustad are more closely aligned than people may believe on supporting the fossil fuel industry and placing people with mental health and addiction issues into involuntary care rather than increasing voluntary care.

Vancouver billionaire Chip Wilson, co-founder of the Lululemon athletic clothing line, also became a fixture in the campaign.

Large billboards with changing messages were posted outside Wilson’s waterfront home, located in Eby’s Vancouver-Point Grey riding.

Both Eby and Rustad cited the message throughout the campaign.

Wilson called the NDP “communist,” prompting Eby to say he is on the side of ordinary people in B.C. struggling to make ends meet and not the owner of a home assessed at more than $81 million.

Rustad said he supports entrepreneurs like Wilson, but they can’t expect a break on their property taxes.

“Let’s leave John Rustad and Chip Wilson to vote for each other,” Eby said in Vancouver Thursday.

Rustad’s campaign promise to reverse the ban on plastic straws prompted Eby to begrudgingly agree “paper straws suck,” but he suggested the B.C. Conservative leader was trying to stir up controversy by diverting attention from major issues facing the province, including affordable housing.

The vote comes as an atmospheric river, expected to dump as much as 100 millimetres of rain in parts of B.C., is forecast for voting day, with wind and heavy rainfall warnings covering the central and south coast.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Housing, health, and plastic straws: Here’s how B.C. politicians are wooing voters

Published

 on

VANCOUVER – British Columbia’s political party leaders have spent the 28-day provincial election campaign wooing voters with promises on critical issues including health care, housing, the cost of living and the environment.

Here is a look at some of the top promises made by each major party ahead of election day on Saturday:

NDP

— Leader David Eby says his party’s housing plan will build 300,000 more homes for the middle class. There’s also a pledge to increase the speculation and vacancy tax on empty homes to one per cent for residents of Canada and three per cent for foreign owners starting in 2025. The NDP says they will prioritize building homes on public land.

— On the campaign trail, Eby has promised that the NDP will exempt $10,000 of individual income from taxes every year, which translates to an annual tax reduction of about $1,000 for most households and $500 for individuals.

— Eby has promised a re-elected NDP government will open involuntary-care facilities for those with overlapping addictions, mental illness, and brain injuries.

— Eby also promised the NDP will scrap B.C.’s long-standing consumer carbon tax if the federal government drops its requirement for the tax, and will instead shift the burden to “big polluters.”

— The NDP says they will increase job-protected leave to 27 weeks from the current eight days for people with a major medical diagnosis such as cancer.

— The NDP aims to attract more health-care workers with a new program forgiving the tuition loans of health professionals in return for a long-term B.C. residency guarantee. They’ve also promised immediate provisional licences for Canadian-trained care providers and licences within six weeks for qualified foreign applicants from other approved places.

B.C. Conservatives

— Leader John Rustad is promising the “Rustad Rebate,” a plan to exempt rent or mortgage interest costs from income taxes, beginning at $1,500 per month in the 2026 budget and increasing to $3,000 by 2029. His party is calling it the “largest housing tax cut in B.C.’s history.”

— The Conservatives are pledging publicly funded “partnerships” with non-governmental health clinics and a wait time guarantee for some surgical procedures that would see patients sent outside the province for faster care. They are also promising to build a new children’s hospital in Surrey, featuring a pediatric emergency room and intensive care unit, a maternity ward and a women’s health centre.

— Rustad has promised to end the Insurance Corporation of B.C.’s monopoly on car insurance and open the market to other providers to lower prices for consumers, while modifying ICBC’s no-fault insurance model to make it easier for people with life-altering injuries to seek redress in the courts.

— Rustad promised to scrap the provincial carbon tax completely.

— Rustad said he will return 20 per cent of B.C.’s forests to First Nations, replace the current stumpage system with an end-product tax, and streamline the permitting process for the forest sector.

— The Conservatives have pledged to bring back plastic straws and cutlery, and eliminate mandatory fees for grocery bags.

Green Party

— The party, under leader Sonia Furstenau, is promising to maintain the carbon tax with or without a federal mandate. Furstenau has also vowed to introduce a “windfall profits tax” on oil and gas companies, and redirect revenue from industrial carbon pricing to fund community climate action.

— The Greens’ health plans include up to six visits to a mental health professional, such as a psychologist, under the Medical Services Plan. They promise to regulate the psychotherapy professions.

— The Greens are promising to provide $1.5 billion annually to construct 26,000 new units of non-market housing each year.

— Furstenau says her party’s platform is aimed at people’s “well-being” and includes a promise to create frameworks to measure B.C.’s social and environmental performance instead of using GDP as the standard measurement.

— Furstenau says her party will increase social and disability insurance and “wraparound support” for youth aging out of care to combat poverty.

— The Greens promise to invest in climate action, renewable energy and infrastructure, including $650 million annually for municipal infrastructure to support new housing and $250 million to expand child care.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

More details expected on proposed deal that would see tobacco giants pay billions

Published

 on

More details are expected today on a proposed deal that would see the three major companies pay out billions of dollars to provinces and territories as well as smokers and their loved ones.

The companies — JTI-Macdonald Corp., Rothmans, Benson & Hedges and Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. — sought creditor protection in Ontario in 2019 after Quebec’s highest court upheld a ruling ordering them to pay nearly $15 billion in two class-action lawsuits.

All legal proceedings against the companies were then put on hold so the three could continue to operate as they worked towards a global settlement with their creditors, which include the Quebec plaintiffs and provincial governments looking to recoup smoking-related health-care costs.

A proposed plan of arrangement developed through mediation was filed in court Thursday, and includes nearly $25 billion for provincial and territorial governments as well as more than $4 billion for the Quebec class-action members.

It also includes more than $2.5 billion for smokers in other provinces and territories who were diagnosed with lung cancer, throat cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease between March 2015 and March 2019.

Lawyers involved in the Quebec lawsuits and those representing a group of provinces and territories in the proceedings are expected to discuss the proposal in separate media events today.

The proposal must be approved by creditors and the court before it can be implemented.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version