Article content
With one Windsor councillor weighing a run for mayor and another hoping to run in the June provincial election, a rundown of who on council intends to seek re-election on Oct. 24 remains — at this point — imprecise.
With one Windsor councillor weighing a run for mayor and another hoping to run in the June provincial election, a rundown of who on council intends to seek re-election on Oct. 24 remains — at this point — imprecise.
What is clear following a survey of all 10 councillors and Mayor Drew Dilkens is: No one is saying they’re NOT running. Ward 3 Coun. Rino Bortolin intends to run but hasn’t yet determined whether it will be for mayor or his current seat. Ward 8 Coun. Gary Kaschak has put his name in to run provincially in Windsor-Tecumseh but would otherwise seek council re-election. Four or five say they’re still undecided and a similar number say they intend to run again barring any major roadblock such as a health issue.
“Yes, I do plan to run for another term, I’m not keeping it any kind of secret,” Ward 10 Coun. Jim Morrison said this week in the most definitive comment from an incumbent councillor. In his first term, Morrison said he found the workload more than he expected, but “very gratifying.”
Other councillors answering in the affirmative or almost-certain affirmative included Ward 5’s Ed Sleiman, who suffered a serious health setback two years ago (a brain bleed) and says he’s thought hard and consulted with constituents about whether to run again. First elected in 2010, he said he’s been invigorated by the ongoing revitalization of areas within his ward like Ford City.
“I thought about it and I really would like to be part of the revitalization,” he said. “And as of this minute, I say yes, I’m running.”
Bortolin also said he can “confidently” say he’s running, but is yet to decide whether to run again for the downtown councillor seat he’s held since 2014, or for mayor, which could set up a major battle with Dilkens, a high-profile incumbent who has yet to say whether he’ll seek re-election.
“I’m telling you I’m considering (running for mayor),” Bortolin said. “This is not an ‘I’m running,’ because there are still a lot of boxes to check.”
Some of those factors include whether Dilkens seeks re-election and the prospect being off council for the next four-year term if he were to lose. Other considerations involve the mood of the electorate, he said. He said after more than seven years on council, people know what he stands for — making the city a more desirable, walkable, prosperous place to live, as opposed to delivering a “hold the line on taxes” budget every year. He’s in the process of finding out if voters believe in his vision.
“It’s really doing a scan of the landscape and seeing if there’s an appetite for change to a different vision of the city,” he said.
Kaschak said he is awaiting word from the Ontario Liberal Party on whether he’ll be its candidate for Windsor-Tecumseh in the June 2 provincial election. It’s a seat without an incumbent with the retirement of longtime MPP Percy Hatfield (NDP).
“If I don’t do that, I’d certainly be running again for city council, sure,” Kaschak said.
“I’m torn. I really like being on city council, I think I’ve really come into my own over the last 18 months or so.”
But the prospect of representing the interests of people in Ward 8 as well as people all around Windsor-Tecumseh at the provincial level is “intriguing,” he said.
Kaschak said if he runs provincially and loses, he’d still “absolutely” be able to run for city council re-election in the fall.
According to council watcher and campaign manager Paul Synnott, Windsor is a “real incumbent town” meaning incumbents’ name recognition and high profile gives them a tremendous advantage over challengers.
“To really seriously challenge an incumbent you really have to spend the limit,” he said, referring to the maximum dollars allowed for campaign expenses. “You’re talking $17,000 to $18,000, which is really hard to raise at the municipal level.”
Because of that incumbent advantage, when a seat becomes open there tends to be close to a dozen candidates vying for it. That was the case in the Ward 7 by-election in 2020, when Jeewen Gill defeated 11 other candidates with less than 20 per cent of the vote. Reached this week, Gill said he’s “most probably going to run” again.
Synnott is managing Morrison’s campaign as well as Darcy Renaud’s, who is challenging incumbent Fred Francis in Ward 1 for the second time. In 2018, Francis received 53 per cent of the votes compared to 33 per cent for Renaud.
Francis appears to be grappling with whether to run for a third term in the South Windsor ward. He was recently announced as the new executive director of the Multicultural Council, and he said running would be a mutual decision with his new wife Carolyn.
“I’m not being political, I don’t know,” he said when asked this week. He also expressed his frustration during this 2018-2022 term, when he said a changed council makeup weakened the influence of the “fiscally responsible” councillors like him, whose priorities centre on low taxes, paying off debt and keeping Windsor affordable.
“It’s been hard, it’s been frustrating to deal with that,” he said. “That is going to go into my decision-making. If I run and if I win, do I want to be part of the next term that is like this term?”
At the same time, he said he feels compelled to run again to push for the new acute care hospital. In 2020, council voted 7-4 in support of the proposed location on County Road 42. Francis said fears what would happen to the ongoing campaign to get the $2-billion hospital built if two more opponents were elected and council support for the hospital location collapsed.
“A big motivation to put my name back in the ring is the hospital — that frightens me where we’re at with that.”
Ward 6’s Jo-Anne Gignac, one of the other fiscal conservatives on council, agreed with Francis that the hospital project is one of the “scary issues” moving into the next term. Windsor’s longest-serving councillor at 19 years, she remains undecided on whether to run again.
“I generally don’t focus on the election until it gets closer to the date where you have to file those papers (nominations open May 2 and close Aug. 19 at 2 p.m.), because I like to give residents an opportunity to think about it a little bit and then I speak to them,” said Gignac, who usually wins her Riverside ward by wide margins. “If I get a strong indication that they’re strongly supporting me as I have in the past then I throw my hat in the ring.”
Another undecided is Ward 4 Coun. Chris Holt, who works full-time at Ford, co-owns a business and has one of the busiest schedules among councillors. He told the Star this week it’s still too early to say.
First-term councillors Kieran McKenzie in Ward 9 and Fabio Costante in Ward 2 were sounding pretty positive about running again. McKenzie was effusive in how much he loves the job.
“It’s been a dream come true to serve in this role and it would take a lot for me to walk away at this point because I think there are a lot of great things this council has been able to achieve in the last four years,” said McKenzie, who previously worked as MP Brian Masse’s constituency assistant. “I don’t think I’ve ever had in my professional endeavours a greater opportunity to serve the community.”
Costante said he’s still undecided, but then talked about the “ton of advocacy” still needed for such issues as the upcoming rental licencing regime, rat control bylaw, vacant home tax and redevelopment of the Adie Knox Recreation Complex. The dilemma of the boarded-up homes in his west-side ward is also a big issue that still needs tackling, he said.
“I’ll turn my mind to the ‘yes’ or ‘no’ closer to springtime,” Costante said. “But there’s a lot of work I’m excited about.”
The mayor, meanwhile, is not yet saying whether he’s running for re-election. “I’m not focused on running for mayor,” he said in a statement. “There will be plenty of time later this year to contemplate the future — including my potential candidacy in the 2022 municipal election.”
Dilkens, mayor since 2014, took the same approach leading up to the 2018 election. He declared his candidacy on July 24.
“I love what I do. I care deeply about the City of Windsor, its residents and our collective future,” he said last week. “I’m focused on being mayor and delivering on the commitments I made to residents in 2018.”
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Democrats who control both chambers of the Virginia legislature are hoping to make good on promises made on the campaign trail, including becoming the first Southern state to expand constitutional protections for abortion access.
The House Privileges and Elections Committee advanced three proposed constitutional amendments Wednesday, including a measure to protect reproductive rights. Its members also discussed measures to repeal a now-defunct state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and ways to revise Virginia’s process to restore voting rights for people who served time for felony crimes.
“This meeting was an important next step considering the moment in history we find ourselves in,” Democratic Del. Cia Price, the committee chair, said during a news conference. “We have urgent threats to our freedoms that could impact constituents in all of the districts we serve.”
The at-times raucous meeting will pave the way for the House and Senate to take up the resolutions early next year after lawmakers tabled the measures last January. Democrats previously said the move was standard practice, given that amendments are typically introduced in odd-numbered years. But Republican Minority Leader Todd Gilbert said Wednesday the committee should not have delved into the amendments before next year’s legislative session. He said the resolutions, particularly the abortion amendment, need further vetting.
“No one who is still serving remembers it being done in this way ever,” Gilbert said after the meeting. “Certainly not for something this important. This is as big and weighty an issue as it gets.”
The Democrats’ legislative lineup comes after Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin, to the dismay of voting-rights advocates, rolled back a process to restore people’s civil rights after they completed sentences for felonies. Virginia is the only state that permanently bans anyone convicted of a felony from voting unless a governor restores their rights.
“This amendment creates a process that is bounded by transparent rules and criteria that will apply to everybody — it’s not left to the discretion of a single individual,” Del. Elizabeth Bennett-Parker, the patron of the voting rights resolution, which passed along party lines, said at the news conference.
Though Democrats have sparred with the governor over their legislative agenda, constitutional amendments put forth by lawmakers do not require his signature, allowing the Democrat-led House and Senate to bypass Youngkin’s blessing.
Instead, the General Assembly must pass proposed amendments twice in at least two years, with a legislative election sandwiched between each statehouse session. After that, the public can vote by referendum on the issues. The cumbersome process will likely hinge upon the success of all three amendments on Democrats’ ability to preserve their edge in the House and Senate, where they hold razor-thin majorities.
It’s not the first time lawmakers have attempted to champion the three amendments. Republicans in a House subcommittee killed a constitutional amendment to restore voting rights in 2022, a year after the measure passed in a Democrat-led House. The same subcommittee also struck down legislation supporting a constitutional amendment to repeal an amendment from 2006 banning marriage equality.
On Wednesday, a bipartisan group of lawmakers voted 16-5 in favor of legislation protecting same-sex marriage, with four Republicans supporting the resolution.
“To say the least, voters enacted this (amendment) in 2006, and we have had 100,000 voters a year become of voting age since then,” said Del. Mark Sickles, who sponsored the amendment as one of the first openly gay men serving in the General Assembly. “Many people have changed their opinions of this as the years have passed.”
A constitutional amendment protecting abortion previously passed the Senate in 2023 but died in a Republican-led House. On Wednesday, the amendment passed on party lines.
If successful, the resolution proposed by House Majority Leader Charniele Herring would be part of a growing trend of reproductive rights-related ballot questions given to voters. Since 2022, 18 questions have gone before voters across the U.S., and they have sided with abortion rights advocates 14 times.
The voters have approved constitutional amendments ensuring the right to abortion until fetal viability in nine states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Ohio and Vermont. Voters also passed a right-to-abortion measure in Nevada in 2024, but it must be passed again in 2026 to be added to the state constitution.
As lawmakers debated the measure, roughly 18 members spoke. Mercedes Perkins, at 38 weeks pregnant, described the importance of women making decisions about their own bodies. Rhea Simon, another Virginia resident, anecdotally described how reproductive health care shaped her life.
Then all at once, more than 50 people lined up to speak against the abortion amendment.
“Let’s do the compassionate thing and care for mothers and all unborn children,” resident Sheila Furey said.
The audience gave a collective “Amen,” followed by a round of applause.
___
Associated Press writer Geoff Mulvihill in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, contributed to this report.
___
Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative.
NEW YORK (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump says he will nominate anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, putting him in charge of a massive agency that oversees everything from drug, vaccine and food safety to medical research and the social safety net programs Medicare and Medicaid.
“For too long, Americans have been crushed by the industrial food complex and drug companies who have engaged in deception, misinformation, and disinformation when it comes to Public Health,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site announcing the appointment. Kennedy, he said, would “Make America Great and Healthy Again!”
Kennedy, a former Democrat who ran as an independent in this year’s presidential race, abandoned his bid after striking a deal to give Trump his endorsement with a promise to have a role in health policy in the administration.
He and Trump have since become good friends, with Kennedy frequently receiving loud applause at Trump’s rallies.
The expected appointment was first reported by Politico Thursday.
A longtime vaccine skeptic, Kennedy is an attorney who has built a loyal following over several decades of people who admire his lawsuits against major pesticide and pharmaceutical companies. He has pushed for tighter regulations around the ingredients in foods.
With the Trump campaign, he worked to shore up support among young mothers in particular, with his message of making food healthier in the U.S., promising to model regulations imposed in Europe. In a nod to Trump’s original campaign slogan, he named the effort “Make America Healthy Again.”
It remains unclear how that will square with Trump’s history of deregulation of big industries, including food. Trump pushed for fewer inspections of the meat industry, for example.
Kennedy’s stance on vaccines has also made him a controversial figure among Democrats and some Republicans, raising question about his ability to get confirmed, even in a GOP-controlled Senate. Kennedy has espoused misinformation around the safety of vaccines, including pushing a totally discredited theory that childhood vaccines cause autism.
He also has said he would recommend removing fluoride from drinking water. The addition of the material has been cited as leading to improved dental health.
HHS has more than 80,000 employees across the country. It houses the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the National Institutes of Health.
Kennedy’s anti-vaccine nonprofit group, Children’s Health Defense, currently has a lawsuit pending against a number of news organizations, among them The Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by taking action to identify misinformation, including about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy took leave from the group when he announced his run for president but is listed as one of its attorneys in the lawsuit.
__ Seitz reported from Washington.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
NICOSIA, Cyprus (AP) — In a Cypriot National Guard camp, Ukrainians are being trained on how to identify, locate and dispose of landmines and other unexploded munitions that litter huge swaths of their country, killing and maiming hundreds of people, including children.
Analysts say Ukraine is among the countries that are the most affected by landmines and discarded explosives, as a result of Russia’s ongoing war.
According to U.N. figures, some 399 people have been killed and 915 wounded from landmines and other munitions since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, equal to the number of casualties reported from 2014-2021. More than 1 in 10 of those casualties have been children.
The economic impact is costing billions to the Ukrainian economy. Landmines and other munitions are preventing the sowing of 5 million hectares, or 10%, of the country’s agricultural land.
Cyprus stepped up to offer its facilities as part of the European Union’s Military Assistance Mission to Ukraine. So far, almost 100 Ukrainian armed forces personnel have taken part in three training cycles over the last two years, said Cyprus Foreign Ministry spokesperson Theodoros Gotsis.
“We are committed to continuing this support for as long as it takes,” Gotsis told the Associated Press, adding that the Cyprus government has covered the 250,000 euro ($262,600) training cost.
Cyprus opted to offer such training owing to its own landmine issues dating back five decades when the island nation was ethnically divided when Turkey invaded following a coup that sought union with Greece. The United Nations has removed some 27,000 landmines from a buffer zone that cuts across the island, but minefields remain on either side. The Cypriot government says it has disposed of all anti-personnel mines in line with its obligations under an international treaty that bans the use of such munitions.
In Cyprus, Ukrainians undergo rigorous theoretical and practical training over a five-week Basic Demining and Clearance course that includes instruction on distinguishing and safely handling landmines and other explosive munitions, such as rockets, 155 mm artillery shells, rocket-propelled grenades and mortar shells.
Theoretical training uses inert munitions identical to the actual explosives.
Most of the course is comprised of hands-on training focusing on the on-site destruction of unexploded munitions using explosives, the chief training officer told the Associated Press. The officer spoke on condition of anonymity because he’s not authorized to disclose his identity for security reasons.
“They’re trained on ordnance disposal using real explosives,” the officer said. “That will be the trainees’ primary task when they return.”
Cypriot officials said the Ukrainian trainees did not want to be either interviewed or photographed.
Defusing discarded munitions or landmines in areas where explosive charges can’t be used — for instance, near a hospital — is not part of this course because that’s the task of highly trained teams of disposal experts whose training can last as long as eight months, the officer said.
Trainees, divided into groups of eight, are taught how to operate metal detectors and other tools for detecting munitions like prodders — long, thin rods which are used to gently probe beneath the ground’s surface in search of landmines and other explosive ordnance.
Another tool is a feeler, a rod that’s used to detect booby-trapped munitions. There are many ways to booby-trap such munitions, unlike landmines which require direct pressure to detonate.
“Booby-trapped munitions are a widespread phenomenon in Ukraine,” the chief training officer explained.
Training, primarily conducted by experts from other European Union countries, takes place both in forested and urban areas at different army camps and follows strict safety protocols.
The short, intense training period keeps the Ukrainians focused.
“You see the interest they show during instruction: they ask questions, they want to know what mistakes they’ve made and the correct way of doing it,” the officer said.
Humanitarian data and analysis group ACAPS said in a Jan. 2024 report that 174,000 sq. kilometers (67,182 sq. miles) or nearly 29% of Ukraine’s territory needs to be surveyed for landmines and other explosive ordnance.
More than 10 million people are said to live in areas where demining action is needed.
Since 2022, Russian forces have used at least 13 types of anti-personnel mines, which target people. Russia never signed the 1997 Ottawa Convention banning the use of anti-personnel mines, but the use of such mines is nonetheless considered a violation of its obligations under international law.
Russia also uses 13 types of anti-tank mines.
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines said in its 2023 Landmine Monitor report that Ukrainian government forces may have also used antipersonnel landmines in contravention of the Mine Ban Treaty in and around the city of Izium during 2022, when the city was under Russian control.
Virginia Democrats advance efforts to protect abortion, voting rights, marriage equality
Abbotsford, B.C., man pleads guilty to trafficking in black bear paws
In Cyprus, Ukrainians learn how to dispose of landmines that kill and maim hundreds
Trump chooses anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health secretary
Only 8 monkeys remain free after more than a week outside a South Carolina compound
Vancouver Canucks winger Joshua set for season debut after cancer treatment
Energy experts think Donald Trump will make tariff exemptions for Canadian oil
AI could help scale humanitarian responses. But it could also have big downsides