Braid: UCP's Al Browne blasts 'vile' politics and Kenney's leadership - Calgary Herald | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Braid: UCP's Al Browne blasts 'vile' politics and Kenney's leadership – Calgary Herald

Published

 on


Al Browne, former riding president for Calgary-Hays, is fed up with ‘vile’ legislature behaviour

Article content

Veteran conservative activist Al Browne is fed up with “vile” legislature behaviour, Premier Jason Kenney’s leadership and the divisive mood in the UCP during the leadership review campaign.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Browne recently quit as riding president for Calgary-Hays, the seat held by Municipal Affairs Minister Ric McIver, so he can finally speak his mind publicly.

That he does.

“I’ve tried to make excuses to people who ask me why the government is doing this stuff, but after a while you just get worn out,” says Browne, a loyal PC and UCP volunteer for nearly four decades.

He was in the hospitality business, served six years on the board of SAIT during its expansion, and has been involved in countless campaigns.

“So many promises were made at the beginning, and it’s turned out to be anything but that,” he said in an interview. “This government is not transparent and it’s not grassroots.”

“We were promised civility, no more shouting across the aisle, and now our MLAs in the legislature aren’t just shouting at the Opposition, they’re shouting at each other. I have never seen anything like this in all my days.

Advertisement 3

Article content

“It’s such a vile atmosphere. Who would want to step into that?”

Recently government house leader Jason Nixon used the F-bomb when addressing the Speaker in anger at Independent MLA Todd Loewen. In another incident, a minister’s chief of staff called Kenney’s critics “clowns.”

Government louse leader Jason Nixon has used the F-bomb when addressing the speaker. Photo by Postmedia file

Browne says the political staffer should have been fired on the spot. And he was appalled that Nixon would use that word in the house.

Browne knew the premier’s family personally and was an ardent Kenney backer in both the UCP leadership campaign and the 2019 election.


  1. ‘Culture of fear’: MLA says Kenney reaping results of divisive leadership


  2. Braid: Kenney says he’ll quit if he loses, but pleads for UCP unity


  3. Braid: The tiny, tightly controlled event that launched the Kenney leadership vote

But like many other party insiders — including former ultra-loyalist Blaise Boehmer, who literally rode Kenney’s blue pickup for months during the unity drive — Browne is now sharply and openly critical.

Advertisement 4

Article content

He has chaired a group of 33 riding presidents who meet online frequently to talk about problems and plead with the party executive for solutions.

Out of this group came the 26 ridings that approved identically worded motions calling for a leadership review vote before March 1.

That seemed to clear the bar for forcing a vote under the UCP constitution, but the presidents say they never got a formal reply from the party.

Instead, the executive group picked April 9 for a special in-person leadership meeting and then changed that to mail-in balloting with results coming May 18.

As the struggle intensified, activists like Browne became as angry at the party they created as they are at Kenney himself.

“Constituency association presidents represent their local members and we’ve tried for many months to find constructive, positive ways of doing things and resolving problems,” says Browne.

Advertisement 5

Article content

“But the party executive just doesn’t listen to anything we say. Of all the many letters we sent to the party over the past year, we only got one response, after we asked for the resignations of the party president and executive director.” (Respectively, Cynthia Moore and Dustin van Vugt. Neither quit.)

Browne thinks that Kenney, with his long experience, is skilled enough at government.

Premier Jason Kenney speaks to UCP members at the party’s special general meeting on April 9, 2022. Photo by Postmedia file

“He knows how that works, but on the management side, Jason has never had experience as a leader. It’s crucial how you manage your staff and caucus, how you listen to people. If you’re not a good listener, you’re not a good manager.

“The premier’s job as manager is to correct the intimidation, the name-calling that is going on.

“We all want to be pleased with our government. We all wanted to support Jason, and we did. I was one of them.

Advertisement 6

Article content

“So am I disappointed? Yes, I am very disappointed. I could not stay on as a riding president and represent and excuse something I am disappointed in.”

To UCP members who still back Kenney, Browne says, “go ahead and support him. That’s your decision.

“If he was to change — really change — I think he would even get the support of the riding presidents.

“But he’s the one who has to change. We have to get back to truth and fairness, and treating people with respect, instead of all this name-calling.”

No matter what the result on May 18, Browne doesn’t see much chance for UCP harmony.

“How do you even sell the fact that he won?” Browne asks. “And if you can’t sell it, how does Jason pull everything back together?

“You don’t do it by saying, ‘If I win, I’m going to get rid of people.’ That’s a hell of a first step. We need fairness and co-operation.”

Don Braid’s column appears regularly in the Calgary Herald.

Twitter: @DonBraid

Facebook: Don Braid Politics

Advertisement 1

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Trump is consistently inconsistent on abortion and reproductive rights

Published

 on

 

CHICAGO (AP) — Donald Trump has had a tough time finding a consistent message to questions about abortion and reproductive rights.

The former president has constantly shifted his stances or offered vague, contradictory and at times nonsensical answers to questions on an issue that has become a major vulnerability for Republicans in this year’s election. Trump has been trying to win over voters, especially women, skeptical about his views, especially after he nominated three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn the nationwide right to abortion two years ago.

The latest example came this week when the Republican presidential nominee said some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

“It’s going to be redone,” he said during a Fox News town hall that aired Wednesday. “They’re going to, you’re going to, you end up with a vote of the people. They’re too tough, too tough. And those are going to be redone because already there’s a movement in those states.”

Trump did not specify if he meant he would take some kind of action if he wins in November, and he did not say which states or laws he was talking about. He did not elaborate on what he meant by “redone.”

He also seemed to be contradicting his own stand when referencing the strict abortion bans passed in Republican-controlled states since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Trump recently said he would vote against a constitutional amendment on the Florida ballot that is aimed at overturning the state’s six-week abortion ban. That decision came after he had criticized the law as too harsh.

Trump has shifted between boasting about nominating the justices who helped strike down federal protections for abortion and trying to appear more neutral. It’s been an attempt to thread the divide between his base of anti-abortion supporters and the majority of Americans who support abortion rights.

About 6 in 10 Americans think their state should generally allow a person to obtain a legal abortion if they don’t want to be pregnant for any reason, according to a July poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Voters in seven states, including some conservative ones, have either protected abortion rights or defeated attempts to restrict them in statewide votes over the past two years.

Trump also has been repeating the narrative that he returned the question of abortion rights to states, even though voters do not have a direct say on that or any other issue in about half the states. This is particularly true for those living in the South, where Republican-controlled legislatures, many of which have been gerrymandered to give the GOP disproportionate power, have enacted some of the strictest abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Currently, 13 states have banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy, while four more ban it after six weeks — before many women know they’re pregnant.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion groups and their Republican allies in state governments are using an array of strategies to counter proposed ballot initiatives in at least eight states this year.

Here’s a breakdown of Trump’s fluctuating stances on reproductive rights.

Flip-flopping on Florida

On Tuesday, Trump claimed some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

But in August, Trump said he would vote against a state ballot measure that is attempting to repeal the six-week abortion ban passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

That came a day after he seemed to indicate he would vote in favor of the measure. Trump previously called Florida’s six-week ban a “terrible mistake” and too extreme. In an April Time magazine interview, Trump repeated that he “thought six weeks is too severe.”

Trump on vetoing a national ban

Trump’s latest flip-flopping has involved his views on a national abortion ban.

During the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he would veto a national abortion ban: “Everyone knows I would not support a federal abortion ban, under any circumstances, and would, in fact, veto it.”

This came just weeks after Trump repeatedly declined to say during the presidential debate with Democrat Kamala Harris whether he would veto a national abortion ban if he were elected.

Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, said in an interview with NBC News before the presidential debate that Trump would veto a ban. In response to debate moderators prompting him about Vance’s statement, Trump said: “I didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don’t mind if he has a certain view, but I don’t think he was speaking for me.”

‘Pro-choice’ to 15-week ban

Trump’s shifting abortion policy stances began when the former reality TV star and developer started flirting with running for office.

He once called himself “very pro-choice.” But before becoming president, Trump said he “would indeed support a ban,” according to his book “The America We Deserve,” which was published in 2000.

In his first year as president, he said he was “pro-life with exceptions” but also said “there has to be some form of punishment” for women seeking abortions — a position he quickly reversed.

At the 2018 annual March for Life, Trump voiced support for a federal ban on abortion on or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

More recently, Trump suggested in March that he might support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks before announcing that he instead would leave the matter to the states.

Views on abortion pills, prosecuting women

In the Time interview, Trump said it should be left up to the states to decide whether to prosecute women for abortions or to monitor women’s pregnancies.

“The states are going to make that decision,” Trump said. “The states are going to have to be comfortable or uncomfortable, not me.”

Democrats have seized on the comments he made in 2016, saying “there has to be some form of punishment” for women who have abortions.

Trump also declined to comment on access to the abortion pill mifepristone, claiming that he has “pretty strong views” on the matter. He said he would make a statement on the issue, but it never came.

Trump responded similarly when asked about his views on the Comstock Act, a 19th century law that has been revived by anti-abortion groups seeking to block the mailing of mifepristone.

IVF and contraception

In May, Trump said during an interview with a Pittsburgh television station that he was open to supporting regulations on contraception and that his campaign would release a policy on the issue “very shortly.” He later said his comments were misinterpreted.

In the KDKA interview, Trump was asked, “Do you support any restrictions on a person’s right to contraception?”

“We’re looking at that and I’m going to have a policy on that very shortly,” Trump responded.

Trump has not since released a policy statement on contraception.

Trump also has offered contradictory statements on in vitro fertilization.

During the Fox News town hall, which was taped Tuesday, Trump declared that he is “the father of IVF,” despite acknowledging during his answer that he needed an explanation of IVF in February after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.

Trump said he instructed Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to “explain IVF very quickly” to him in the aftermath of the ruling.

As concerns over access to fertility treatments rose, Trump pledged to promote IVF by requiring health insurance companies or the federal government to pay for it. Such a move would be at odds with the actions of much of his own party.

Even as the Republican Party has tried to create a national narrative that it is receptive to IVF, these messaging efforts have been undercut by GOP state lawmakers, Republican-dominated courts and anti-abortion leaders within the party’s ranks, as well as opposition to legislative attempts to protect IVF access.

___

The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan Party’s Scott Moe, NDP’s Carla Beck react to debate |

Published

 on

 

Saskatchewan‘s two main political party leaders faced off in the only televised debate in the lead up to the provincial election on Oct. 28. Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe and NDP Leader Carla Beck say voters got a chance to see their platforms. (Oct. 17, 2024)

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan political leaders back on campaign trail after election debate

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan‘s main political leaders are back on the campaign trail today after hammering each other in a televised debate.

Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe is set to make an announcement in Moose Jaw.

Saskatchewan NDP Leader Carla Beck is to make stops in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert.

During Wednesday night’s debate, Beck emphasized her plan to make life more affordable and said people deserve better than an out-of-touch Saskatchewan Party government.

Moe said his party wants to lower taxes and put money back into people’s pockets.

Election day is Oct. 28.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version