Brazilian infrastructure auctions clouded by pandemic, politics, minister says - Financial Post | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Brazilian infrastructure auctions clouded by pandemic, politics, minister says – Financial Post

Published

 on


Article content

SAO PAULO — The COVID-19 pandemic and domestic political concerns may hurt the ability and willingness of firms to bid for major infrastructure concessions in Brazil, Infrastructure Minister Tarcísio Freitas said.

The remarks by Freitas, one of the most high-profile ministers in right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro’s cabinet, could mean trouble for key concession auctions this year and in 2022. That includes the proposed Ferrograo railway, which would connect Brazil’s midwestern soy belt to northern ports.

Advertisement

Article content

“We’re going through a pandemic and many companies are having difficulties with cash,” he said in an interview with Reuters on Thursday. “With some projects, it’s natural that interest is restricted to just a few groups. It’s important to bring in those who are qualified.”

Brazil is entering a crucial phase of its 2019-2022 concession plan, which the government has forecast will bring in some 250 billion reais ($47.7 billion) in investment.

Among the major concessions on that list is the right to operate the Via Dutra, the main highway linking Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, for 30 years. The number of candidates interested in that concession will be limited, Freitas said, given the high costs involved. The winner will be expected to invest some 15 billion reais in the roadway over that period.

Advertisement

Article content

By far the most ambitious project on the government’s agenda, the 933-kilometer (578-mile) Ferrograo, which would link the top grains state Mato Grosso with the northern state of Para, is facing serious headwinds, Freitas said.

Activists inside and outside Brazil have criticized the impact it may have on the environment and indigenous groups. Currently, the project is being held up by Brazil’s Supreme Court and the federal audit court, known as the TCU.

Bolsonaro has clashed with some members of the Supreme Court over a range of issues, including his government’s handling of the pandemic.

“The environment (for the Ferrograo) isn’t among the best. In normal conditions, it already wouldn’t be a favorable scenario,” Freitas said. “The Ferrograo will happen, but we’re losing time with the ideological, commercial and political components.”

Advertisement

Article content

TRUCKER THREATS

Along with overseeing Brazil’s infrastructure plans, Freitas has been the point man in Bolsonaro’s cabinet for relations with the nation’s fractious truckers.

A strike by truckers in 2018 brought the economy to a standstill for weeks and undercut then-President Michel Temer’s political support.

Diesel prices have already risen some 40% in 2021, raising fears of a repeat of the crisis three years ago, but Freitas said that, for several reasons, another crippling strike is unlikely.

“In recent years, a part of the market was taken over by big logistics companies and, if they don’t support (a strike), it’s not going to happen,” he said.

He was emphatic that the government will not intervene to set freight prices, as had occurred under previous governments.

“They’re used to being patronized by the state,” he said of Brazil’s truckers. “The government is not going to get into freight prices. The state has nothing to do with that.” (Reporting by Aluísio Alves; Writing by Gram Slattery; Editing by Brad Haynes and Paul Simao)

Advertisement

In-depth reporting on the innovation economy from The Logic, brought to you in partnership with the Financial Post.

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Politics

America’s Election: What it Means to Canadians

Published

 on

Americans and Canadians are cousins that is true. Allies today but long ago people were at loggerheads mostly because of the British Empire and American ambitions.

Canadians appreciate our cousins down south enough to visit them many millions of times over the year. America is Canada’s largest and most important trading partner. As a manufacturer, I can attest to this personally. My American clients have allowed our firm to grow and prosper over the past few decades. There is a problem we have been seeing, a problem where nationalism, both political and economic has been creating a roadblock to our trade relationship.

Both Democrats and Republicans have shown a willingness to play the “buy only American Made product” card, a sounding board for all things isolationist, nationalistic and small-mindedness. We all live on this small planet, and purchase items made from all over the world. Preferences as to what to buy and where it is made are personal choices, never should they become a platform of national pride and thuggery. This has brought fear into the hearts of many Canadians who manufacture for and service the American Economy in some way. This fear will be apparent when the election is over next week.

Canadians are not enemies of America, but allies and friends with a long tradition of supporting our cousins back when bad sh*t happens. We have had enough of the American claim that they want free trade, only to realize that they do so long as it is to their benefit. Tariffs, and undue regulations applied to exporters into America are applied, yet American industry complains when other nations do the very same to them. Seriously! Democrats have said they would place a preference upon doing business with American firms before foreign ones, and Republicans wish to tariff many foreign nations into oblivion. Rhetoric perhaps, but we need to take these threats seriously. As to you the repercussions that will come should America close its doors to us.

Tit for tat neighbors. Tariff for tariff, true selfish competition with no fear of the American Giant. Do you want to build homes in America? Over 33% of all wood comes from Canada. Tit for tat. Canada’s mineral wealth can be sold to others and place preference upon the highest bidder always. You know who will win there don’t you America, the deep-pocketed Chinese.

Reshaping our alliances with others. If America responds as has been threatened, Canadians will find ways to entertain themselves elsewhere. Imagine no Canadian dollars flowing into the Northern States, Florida or California? The Big Apple without its friendly Maple Syrup dip. Canadians will realize just how significant their spending is to America and use it to our benefit, not theirs.

Clearly we will know if you prefer Canadian friendship to Donald Trumps Bravado.

China, Saudi Arabia & Russia are not your friends in America. Canada, Japan, Taiwan the EU and many other nations most definitely are. Stop playing politics, and carry out business in an unethical fashion. Treat allies as they should be treated.

Steven Kaszab
Bradford, Ontario
skaszab@yahoo.ca

Continue Reading

Politics

N.S. election: NDP promises to end fixed-term leases, impose rent-control system

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia’s temporary rent cap and a loophole that allows landlords to avoid it were the targets of the provincial New Democrats on Thursday, as they promised to protect tenants from evictions and excessive hikes if elected Nov. 26.

An NDP government would ban fixed-term leases, establish rent control, and immediately slash the province’s temporary rent cap in half to 2.5 per cent, leader Claudia Chender said on the fifth day of the provincial election campaign.

“For too many people, the cost of rent is driving people out of the communities they love,” she said. “These protections will save renters money, keep our communities affordable, and most importantly help people plan their futures.”

Chender criticized the Progressive Conservative government’s record on housing, saying the average one-bedroom apartment in the province costs $2,000 a month, while rent overall has increased by 18 per cent in the last year.

The government’s decision to extend the temporary cap on rent increases to the end of 2027 is insufficient, she said, because landlords can use fixed-term leases to jack up the rent higher.

A fixed-term lease does not automatically renew when its term ends, after which landlords can raise the rent as much as they want if they rent to someone new. Critics of fixed-term leases say they encourage landlords to evict tenants in order to raise the rent past the cap.

Though there’s no way to know exactly how many renters in Nova Scotia are on fixed-term leases — that type of residency data is not tracked — Chender told reporters that at every door her party has knocked on, residents have cited anxiety over affording and keeping a place to live.

Meanwhile, a separate affordability issue was the focus of Liberal Leader Zach Churchill on Thursday, as he announced his party would cut provincial income taxes by raising the basic personal exemption amount to $15,705 — at a cost to the government of $348 million.

Churchill said something has to be done to reduce taxes in the province, which he said are among the highest in Canada at a time when people are struggling with the cost of living.

“We know that over the last three years Nova Scotia has gone from being one of the most affordable places to live in our country to one of the most expensive,” he said. “This has created a real affordability crisis for seniors, for families and for young people.”

The existing exemption is $8,744, and for people making less than $25,000 a year, the province gives an “adjustment,” which increases the basic personal amount by $3,000; the adjustment decreases gradually and ends for people earning more than $75,000.

Churchill said a Liberal government would double the adjustment for people who earn less than $75,000, at a cost of $55 million per year.

The Liberal leader said his party will respect its promise to cut income taxes — and respect its pledge made in February to cut the harmonized sales tax by two points — even if doing so will lead to a “short-term” budget deficit.

Earlier this week, the Progressive Conservatives pledged a tax cut that would increase the basic personal exemption to $11,744, while just prior to the election call the party promised a one percentage point cut to the HST — commitments Churchill characterized as “half measures.”

In an interview Thursday, Tory Leader Tim Houston scoffed at his opponent’s suggestion.

“We are putting a plan forward that is reasonable that we can do while maintaining a level of services,” Houston said. “Mr. Churchill can just say whatever he wants, I have to be reasonable.”

Houston travelled to Sydney, N.S., on Thursday where he announced his party would establish a provincially run travel nurse team to help areas with nursing shortages.

Houston said the team would eliminate the need to hire travel nurses from private companies, and would be composed of Nova Scotia Health employees who will have access to the same pay and benefits as other nurses in the public system.

The program would begin as a pilot project by the end of the year, involving a 30-member team of nurses who would staff hospital emergency departments at an estimated cost of $5.3 million.

“We have to be smart and systematic as we roll it out,” Houston said. “There will probably be some learning and we will take that and if we need to modify it (the program) we will.”

At dissolution, the Progressive Conservatives held 34 seats in the 55-seat legislature, the Liberals held 14 seats, the NDP had six and there was one Independent.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 31, 2024.

— With files by Cassidy McMackon in Halifax.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Liberals look to move past leadership drama with eye on next campaign

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The Liberal caucus turned its attention to the party’s plan for the next election on Wednesday, after an unsuccessful attempt by some MPs to oust Prime Minister Justin Trudeau last week.

Longtime Liberal operative Andrew Bevan was named the new national campaign director two weeks ago and made his first presentation to the full caucus during the weekly meeting.

The next election must be held by Oct. 20, 2025, but it could come much sooner. The Conservatives and Bloc Québécois have pledged to try to bring down the minority government this fall.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said Wednesday that his party wouldn’t help them topple the Liberals. The Conservatives and Bloc don’t have enough MPs between them to defeat the government if the Liberals and NDP vote together.

The presentation was initially scheduled to happen last Wednesday, but that nearly three-hour meeting was instead dominated by discussions of Trudeau’s leadership.

Toronto-area MP Nate Erskine-Smith said the party’s leadership was not the focus of caucus this week, and the priority was hearing from Bevan.

“It was very much focused on: these are the next steps from a party perspective, and people were able to weigh in with their own feedback as far as it goes,” Erskine-Smith said following the meeting.

“That question from last week to what’s the finality, that wasn’t part of it.”

MPs were not able to share specific details of what was discussed in the meeting due to caucus confidentiality.

At last week’s meeting, a group of around two dozen MPs presented a letter to Trudeau calling on him to step aside. The dissenters gave him until Monday to make a decision — but he made it clear he plans to lead the party in the next election.

Several MPs have since said they want to hold a secret ballot vote to decide on whether Trudeau should stay on as leader. However, the Liberal party chose after the last election not to use Reform Act rules that would have allowed a caucus to hold a secret vote to oust the leader.

British Columbia MP Patrick Weiler said he thinks the leadership concerns are not over.

“I think we had a very good meeting last week, and I think there are a lot of unresolved questions from that, that still need to be addressed,” Weiler said while heading to question period on Wednesday.

“I think there are a lot of people that are still looking for some answers to those things and until that’s addressed, that’s going to be lingering.”

But several other MPs and cabinet ministers said they feel the matter is resolved and it’s time to move on to planning for the next campaign.

Judy Sgro, a veteran Ontario MP of nearly 25 years, said even though the Liberals are trailing the Conservatives in the polls, she believes they can pull off a victory.

“I’ve been through five leaders, this is my fifth leader. Most of the time they’re unpopular, but we still manage to win,” she said.

Erskine-Smith said the “overwhelming focus” for now is on what comes next, but he could see leadership troubles come up again depending on the results of two upcoming votes.

Byelections are pending in former Liberal ridings on both coasts: a vote must happen in Cloverdale—Langley City by Jan. 13 and in Halifax by April 14.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 30, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version