'Broken trust': Inside the political battle for a $27 billion COVID-19 spending bill - National Post | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

'Broken trust': Inside the political battle for a $27 billion COVID-19 spending bill – National Post

Published

 on


OTTAWA – Government House Leader Pablo Rodriguez betrayed little of what was going on in the back rooms when he strode into the House of Commons at noon Tuesday and asked for proceedings to be suspended.

What was supposed to be a relatively quick debate and vote on a series of sweeping financial measures — more than $27 billion — to keep the Canadian economy on life support and respond to COVID-19 was knocked off course.

Opposition parties balked as the Liberals tried to give themselves far reaching financial authority to tax, spend and borrow as much as they wanted to deal with the crisis all the way until 2022.

It would be 15 hours of negotiations, ending around 3 a.m. on Wednesday, before the House actually sat down to review the bill that was supposed to be debated at noon.

It was agreed upon that there couldn’t be any surprises

The historic sitting of Parliament, with just 32 members of the 338-seat House, was called on Sunday, designed to give the Liberals room to respond to the crisis while also not bringing back all MPs and turning the House of Commons into a public health threat.

The idea was to have the MPs present give unanimous consent for the bill’s passage, allowing the government to move quickly through the legislative process. The opposition was on board, but Conservative House Leader Candice Bergen said she made it clear to Rodriguez he shouldn’t push the envelope.

“Pablo, you want to get it done but there can be no surprises,” she said she told Rodriguez. “We were told we’d get the bill in advance and it was agreed upon that there couldn’t be any surprises.”

Bergen and Conservative leader Andrew Scheer were brought to Ottawa for the special session by government aircraft. She said the no surprises pledge ended on Sunday night when they received the draft legislation.

“We got the bill on Sunday night and it was full of bombs,” she said. “I let Pablo know he had a big problem. I told him we had agreed to what the prime minister had announced.”


Conservative House leader Candice Bergen.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press/File

Bergen said she did not know what happened, but Rodriguez had always been direct with her before. She did not know if he was misinformed or not being straight with her, but she felt betrayed by the government’s actions.

“It was so unnecessary and it has broken trust. There are no personal hard feelings but there is damage to working relationships.”

Rodriguez rejected the notion the opposition parties were blindsided saying they had the bill 48 hours before it was tabled in parliament, a unique step he made to smooth the process.

He said the special powers to spend had to be in the bill.

“The government in times of crisis, such as this one, has to have the capacity to move forward to move quickly and respond to challenges that evolve by the minute,” he said. “Last week was a different Canada, the way things evolved, today is a different Canada than it will be a week from now.”

When the House adjourned on March 13, NDP whip Rachel Blaney stayed behind in Ottawa for a few days to deal with some issues. By early the next week it was clear she would have to stay.

“Before I was about to fly out it came down that there were discussions and that Parliament was going to have to come back,” she said.

There are no personal hard feelings but there is damage to working relationships

Blaney said when she saw the bill on Sunday she saw overreach on the government. She said the NDP understood the government had to move fast, but that did not mean Parliament should be on the sidelines.

“All of us see what is happening across the country and across the world. We want to provide the flexibility to address issues as they arise, but there are ways of doing that that also have parliamentary oversight,” she said.

The overreaches in the bill included a provision that would have allowed Finance Minister Bill Morneau to raise, lower or eliminate taxes through to Dec. 31, 2022. He also could have borrowed and spent endlessly on the crisis over the same time frame.

The contents of the bill leaked to several political reporters Monday night and opposition parties made it clear it was going too far. On Tuesday morning, the prime minister said he would remove the controversial tax section, but Bergen said the there was still far too much unchecked authority for the government.

“It was still chock full of power grabs. Everyone was talking about section two, that would give them what they wanted on tax until 2022. But there was more in the bill that didn’t provide accountability. We needed sunset clauses.”


Finance Minister Bill Morneau speaks during a special session of Parliament on March 25, 2020.

Blair Gable/Reuters

She said it was not until the Conservatives made it clear they wouldn’t support the bill as is was that things started to change.

“At noon, the House was suspended and finally they took us seriously,” she said.

Alain Therrien, parliamentary leader of the Bloc Québécois, said the Conservatives were the main barrier to the process. He said the Liberals had agreed to remove the tax authority by late Monday night, and sunset their spending and borrowing powers in September.

He said the Bloc were prepared to agree to the deal on Monday night. He said on Tuesday afternoon with the House suspended Morneau painted a dark picture of the economic situation.

“Morneau then came to give us the financial portrait for all of us. And it wasn’t pretty at all. And that comforted me that we had a good deal on Monday night,” he said.

Rodriguez said he thought there was a good level of oversight in the original bill, but the government was fine with the additional layers added Tuesday. He said much of the issues were settled before the House was sitting.

He also pointed out that when the House of Commons came back, the opposition have levers they could pull.

“It is still a minority government, so once Parliament is recalled, the opposition can do what they want,” he said. “That is another layer of security that they have.”

After the Tuesday afternoon negotiations, the Liberals went back to their corner for a few hours and presented new legislation to the opposition around 1 a.m. Wednesday, which was then put up for debate around 3 a.m. and finally voted on around 6 a.m.

It included the sunset clauses as well as regular updates to House committees.

Rodriquez said he hadn’t expected to be negotiating the agreement until the wee hours, but he was also determined the bill pass.

“Families are asking themselves how they’re going to pay the rent, how they are going to put food on the table for their kids, so there was no way we are leaving here without that bill.”

The bill had a much quicker passage in the Senate Wednesday morning and was signed by the Governor General in the afternoon.

— With files from John Ivison and Chris Nardi

• Email: rtumilty@postmedia.com | Twitter:

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version