Building and investment key to fixing Yellowknife rental market, experts say - CBC.ca | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Investment

Building and investment key to fixing Yellowknife rental market, experts say – CBC.ca

Published

 on


This is part four of a series on Northview, the North’s biggest landlord. You can read Part One here, Part Two here and Part Three here.

Full disclosure: One of the reporters involved in the creation of this series lived in Northview housing.


In Yellowknife, the rental apartment building’s days are numbered.

Take a tour through its existing multi-family rental housing, and you’ll find that many of the buildings are aging fast.

According to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, just one in four rental buildings in Yellowknife were built this millennium — and of rental structures built before that, more than 40 per cent are in need of repair.

But construction of new rental units has slowed to a crawl — in fact, in the last five years, Yellowknife has added only 20 new rental units, compared with nearly 600 in Whitehorse over the same period.

That’s contributed to the city’s hostile rental market, where rental housing is often in a state of disrepair and is largely controlled by one company.

Read the other pieces in this series:

To an outsider, this might seem puzzling. Yellowknife has some of the lowest vacancies and highest rents in the country — surely that should be attractive to investors.

And its rental market is certainly profitable to some — the city’s biggest landlord, the Northview Canadian High-Yield Residential Fund, isn’t called “high-yield” for nothing.

“In most markets, like in Calgary or Edmonton or whatever, you would just build more stuff,” said Rob Warburton, co-founder of CloudWorks, a Yellowknife real estate investment company. “There’s high demand, which we generally have, and rental rates are high.”

“But you can’t here…. You can’t because construction’s too high, costs are too high and access to land is challenging.”

The good old days

It wasn’t always thus. Gordon Van Tighem, mayor of Yellowknife from 2000 to 2012, says he remembers a time when Yellowknife families were buying new plots and developing new properties every year.

“What you really need are young people that are upcoming, looking at how they can invest in the local marketplace, and doing such things,” he said.

But for today’s developers, it isn’t quite so simple.

Yellowknife’s Lanky Court townhouses under construction in 1973. Up until the mid-2000s, new construction by local landlords was common, local politicians say. (NWT Archives/YK Photo fonds/N-2019-001: 1018)

“The economics is such that it’s really hard to replace that old housing stock when … you’re paying 2021 construction [costs],” said Wayne Guy, a Yellowknife architect.

In the 1970s and ’80s, Guy said, construction costs were “anywhere from $80 to $90 a square foot.”

“Now you’re dealing with construction costs, for new, anywhere up to $450 dollars a square foot,” he said. “It’s a whole different ball game.”

That makes the math much harder for rental properties, which need to be able to ask enough in rent to cover the costs of buying land, construction, and financing.

“You can’t build it cheaply enough,” said Guy. “That’s why the housing market has sort of gravitated towards condominiums.”

High costs concentrate ownership

That financial reality is one reason the housing market has grown more concentrated over time.

Adrian Bell, a Yellowknife realtor, explained that most developers plan to sell their buildings to rental companies after a decade or so.

“When local developers, back in the day, built their … buildings … that was their exit strategy, because the [real estate investment trusts] are the only ones buying,” Bell said.

But in the North, only one REIT was buying: Northview.

When northern landlords sold their properties, local realtor Adrian Bell said, only one company was buying: Northview. It’s now achieved a near-monopoly in the northern rental market. (Walter Strong/CBC)

“We have a very hard time attracting anybody to invest in real estate in the North, in commercial and multi-family residential,” he said. “If they don’t understand a place, if they’re not in the habit of doing business there … they want nothing to do with it. It’s an unknown. It’s risky.”

Taken together with Yellowknife’s high construction costs, it’s one reason why Bell and others think government intervention is the only thing that will disrupt Yellowknife’s rental monopoly.

“It’s not realistic to say we want somebody to build shiny, new, and affordable [buildings] unless the government is involved,” Bell said. “It’s important to be realistic that the math just doesn’t work.”

Where is the government?

In part three of this series, we explored how the government was largely uninvolved during Northview’s rapid expansion in the North, and how many politicians today are reluctant to comment on its market dominance.

Housing Minister Paulie Chinna, Infrastructure Minister Diane Archie and officials from the Northwest Territories Housing Corporation, for example, all declined to comment for this series.

But in an interview with CBC, N.W.T. Finance Minister Caroline Wawzonek did suggest that “there can often be ways to use government dollars to influence the market.”

“There can be opportunities to … use your [tax] dollars in a way that can support, say, a local landlord or other local company,” Wawzonek said.

Finance Minister Wawzonek, pictured here in 2020, was the only N.W.T. government official willing to comment for this series. (Alex Brockman/CBC )

If the government does want to get involved in encouraging competition in the rental market, observers say there is a lot they can do.

For Guy, any level of government could step in to make it more affordable to build, offering subsidies and tax abatements to those willing to add to the housing stock.

Reassessing the value of expensive but “underutilized” downtown lots could also make it more attractive to build, he said.

Yellowknife Mayor Rebecca Alty suggested the city could also revisit zoning bylaws that require seas of parking for multi-residential buildings, which often force developers to buy adjacent plots at high cost. 

Be a choosier tenant

But perhaps the most effective intervention would be if the government was simply more selective about who they rent from.

As we explored in part three of this series, the territorial government is actually one of the biggest contributors to Northview’s coffers, paying tens of millions each year in rent for office space and public housing.

To Yellowknife North MLA Rylund Johnson, “that is millions of dollars that should be going to local landlords, to Indigenous development corporations, and to anyone willing to make sure that our government’s rent money stays in this territory.”

Housing under construction in Florida. MLA Rylund Johnson suggests that building housing stock may be cheaper and more effective than renting from southern companies, and an internal report cited by housing corporation officials in committee hearings supports that conclusion. (Octavio Jones/Reuters)

Critics like Johnson say instead of signing leases with massive southern landlords, the government should build its own housing — which a 2017 housing corporation report found was actually cheaper most of the time. (CBC was denied access to that report.)

Where it can’t build, Johnson wants the government to adopt a procurement process that gives a leg up to local and small-scale owners when looking for space.

“I think the [territorial government] has really been lazy in looking at leasing both commercial and residential,” Johnson told CBC. “[It] could really break down some of its office space requirements [and lease from] smaller landlords.”

‘Not the same planet’

In places where the government has partnered with local landlords, the benefits are clear.

On its ground floor, Yellowknife’s Northern United Place hosts a church, a community hall, and the Yellowknife campus of Aurora College.

Above, it offers subsidized rental housing and student accommodation geared to residents’ incomes.

Lloyd Hamilton, president of the N.W.T. Community Services Corporation, which owns NUP, says that regular rental income from the territorial government is the only thing that makes its subsidized housing possible.

“It’s critical to it,” he said. “There’s no question about it.”

Aurora College’s government-backed lease of the ground floor of Yellowknife’s Northern United Place, pictured here, provides the guaranteed revenue necessary to provide geared-to-income housing on the upper floors. (Andrew Pacey/CBC)

But when other local landlords try to strike a similar deal, they find they must compete with a massive southern landlord that can offer dozens of units and thousands of square feet of commercial space while taking on significant financial risks.

Warburton says, in effect, that means the city has “two unique markets”: Northview, and everyone else.

“The territorial government and federal government who lease all spaces, they don’t differentiate between those two models,” Warburton said. “They treat it like it’s all the same.”

“This is very solvable … but it requires a hard conversation where you’ve got to acknowledge that it’s not the same planet,” he said. “It just doesn’t work for locals the way it’s currently set up.”

Times are a-changin’

There are signs that all levels of government are taking notice of the issues in Yellowknife’s rental market.

On May 31, the federal government made its first investments in new multi-family housing in the Yellowknife area in years, announcing nearly $19 million for the Yellowknives Dene First Nation to build 19 units of made-in-the-North affordable housing.

The City of Yellowknife committed $800,000 of its own federal funding for a local non-governmental organization to buy a building for affordable or transitional housing. 

A new inter-government committee has been struck to examine the housing issue. And recognizing the territory’s sway in the rental market, Wawzonek said she was open to revisiting how leases were arranged as part of an ongoing review of the government’s procurement practices.

“There may be a way to influence the local real estate market in a positive direction and to deliver better value,” she said.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Tesla shares soar more than 14% as Trump win is seen boosting Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — Shares of Tesla soared Wednesday as investors bet that the electric vehicle maker and its CEO Elon Musk will benefit from Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

Tesla stands to make significant gains under a Trump administration with the threat of diminished subsidies for alternative energy and electric vehicles doing the most harm to smaller competitors. Trump’s plans for extensive tariffs on Chinese imports make it less likely that Chinese EVs will be sold in bulk in the U.S. anytime soon.

“Tesla has the scale and scope that is unmatched,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, in a note to investors. “This dynamic could give Musk and Tesla a clear competitive advantage in a non-EV subsidy environment, coupled by likely higher China tariffs that would continue to push away cheaper Chinese EV players.”

Tesla shares jumped 14.8% Wednesday while shares of rival electric vehicle makers tumbled. Nio, based in Shanghai, fell 5.3%. Shares of electric truck maker Rivian dropped 8.3% and Lucid Group fell 5.3%.

Tesla dominates sales of electric vehicles in the U.S, with 48.9% in market share through the middle of 2024, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Subsidies for clean energy are part of the Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022. It included tax credits for manufacturing, along with tax credits for consumers of electric vehicles.

Musk was one of Trump’s biggest donors, spending at least $119 million mobilizing Trump’s supporters to back the Republican nominee. He also pledged to give away $1 million a day to voters signing a petition for his political action committee.

In some ways, it has been a rocky year for Tesla, with sales and profit declining through the first half of the year. Profit did rise 17.3% in the third quarter.

The U.S. opened an investigation into the company’s “Full Self-Driving” system after reports of crashes in low-visibility conditions, including one that killed a pedestrian. The investigation covers roughly 2.4 million Teslas from the 2016 through 2024 model years.

And investors sent company shares tumbling last month after Tesla unveiled its long-awaited robotaxi at a Hollywood studio Thursday night, seeing not much progress at Tesla on autonomous vehicles while other companies have been making notable progress.

Tesla began selling the software, which is called “Full Self-Driving,” nine years ago. But there are doubts about its reliability.

The stock is now showing a 16.1% gain for the year after rising the past two days.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

S&P/TSX composite up more than 100 points, U.S. stock markets mixed

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 100 points in late-morning trading, helped by strength in base metal and utility stocks, while U.S. stock markets were mixed.

The S&P/TSX composite index was up 103.40 points at 24,542.48.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 192.31 points at 42,932.73. The S&P 500 index was up 7.14 points at 5,822.40, while the Nasdaq composite was down 9.03 points at 18,306.56.

The Canadian dollar traded for 72.61 cents US compared with 72.44 cents US on Tuesday.

The November crude oil contract was down 71 cents at US$69.87 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was down eight cents at US$2.42 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was up US$7.20 at US$2,686.10 an ounce and the December copper contract was up a penny at US$4.35 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 16, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

S&P/TSX up more than 200 points, U.S. markets also higher

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 200 points in late-morning trading, while U.S. stock markets were also headed higher.

The S&P/TSX composite index was up 205.86 points at 24,508.12.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 336.62 points at 42,790.74. The S&P 500 index was up 34.19 points at 5,814.24, while the Nasdaq composite was up 60.27 points at 18.342.32.

The Canadian dollar traded for 72.61 cents US compared with 72.71 cents US on Thursday.

The November crude oil contract was down 15 cents at US$75.70 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was down two cents at US$2.65 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was down US$29.60 at US$2,668.90 an ounce and the December copper contract was up four cents at US$4.47 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version