Canada to drop negative PCR test requirement for shorter cross-border trips - Globalnews.ca | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

Canada to drop negative PCR test requirement for shorter cross-border trips – Globalnews.ca

Published

 on


The federal government is expected to announce later this week it is dropping the negative PCR test requirement for Canadians returning from the U.S. for any trip less than 72 hours.

The policy change will cover both citizens and permanent residents. It is expected the new rules will come into effect at the end of November or early December.

Any trips longer than 72 hours outside of Canada will still need a negative PCR test upon return.

Read more:
COVID-19 booster shots now recommended for long-term care residents: NACI






2:19
Expected flood of Canadians using land crossing into U.S. border towns failed to materialize


Expected flood of Canadians using land crossing into U.S. border towns failed to materialize – Nov 8, 2021

“We are very happy to hear that the PCR testing rules that were in place for short visits will no longer apply for those who want to travel to the United States for a day or two,” said B.C. Premier John Horgan in a Wednesday press conference.

“I raised this issue through interventions by people here in British Columbia some weeks ago, and I’m grateful that the federal government has responded.”

The United States reopened its land border to Canadians who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 on Nov. 8.

But the requirement of a negative PCR test kept many Canadians home, concerned about the additional cost to come back to Canada.






1:17
Land border re-opens


Land border re-opens – Nov 8, 2021

The United States does not have a testing requirement to cross the land border. Travellers both to the United States and into Canada must prove they are fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Right now, any traveller trying to enter Canada must provide a negative PCR test taken at their own expense, and taken no more than 72 hours before their arrival at the border.

Earlier this month, Horgan described the fact travellers could get a test done in B.C., travel to the United States, and then use the test to return less than 72 hours later as “stupidity.”

“If we have double immunized traffic going back and forth across the border, then why would we need a testing regime? I think it’s excessive and I’m going to make that case to the prime minister,” he said.






2:10
Ottawa set to drop PCR test requirements for shorter trips to the U.S.


Ottawa set to drop PCR test requirements for shorter trips to the U.S.

Read more:
B.C. tourism industry calls for end of PCR test policy at Canada-U.S. border

The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has been calling for the federal government to amend the PCR requirements.

Chamber CEO Perrin Beatty has been advocating to scrap the PCR requirement entirely arguing it is not necessary considering the proof of vaccination.

Beatty has not heard from the federal government about the pending changes yet but supports any adjustment to the PCR testing requirement.

“Anything that reduces the level of requirement here is good, so it’s a step forward,” Beatty said.

“What it does is to get rid of one absurdity. But it leaves in place another absurdity. And that is the expert task force, when they looked at it, said the decisions on the border should be based on vaccination status.”






2:55
B.C. tourism industry calling for end of border PCR test requirement


B.C. tourism industry calling for end of border PCR test requirement – Nov 10, 2021

U.S. businesses told Global News the reopening of the land border to non-essential travel did not bring the flood of Canadian visitors they hoped.

Brant Baron, the owner of Mail Boxes International in Blaine, Wash., said on Nov. 8 they had been open for about an hour and only had four customers so far.

And they have packages to be picked up that have been there since the border shut down to non-essential traffic in March 2020.

Read more:
B.C. visitors to Blaine say a PCR test costs about $150 and it seems to be a deterrent for most

“The border opening really hasn’t made any impact for us,” he said. “The ones that have come even, continue to talk about the $150, $200 PCR test. So, as you can see, the impact has been minimal.”

Further details on the change to the negative PCR test requirement have not been confirmed at this time, but more information is expected to be announced later this week.

— With files from David Baxter






2:11
Feds to drop PCR test requirement for Canadians making short cross-border trips


Feds to drop PCR test requirement for Canadians making short cross-border trips

© 2021 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

News

B.C. court allows police to apply to dispose of evidence from Robert Pickton’s farm

Published

 on

VANCOUVER – A B.C. Supreme Court judge says it has jurisdiction to order the disposal of thousands of pieces of evidence seized from serial killer Robert Pickton’s pig farm decades ago, whether it was used in his murder trial or not.

A ruling issued online Wednesday said the RCMP can apply to dispose of some 15,000 pieces of evidence collected from the search of Pickton’s property in Port Coquitlam, including “items determined to belong to victims.”

Police asked the court for directions last year to be allowed to dispose of the mountain of evidence gathered in the case against Pickton, who was convicted of the second-degree murder of six women, although he was originally charged with first-degree murder of 27 women.

Pickton died in May after being attacked in a Quebec prison.

Some family members of victims disputed the disposal because they have a pending civil lawsuit against Pickton’s estate and his brother, David Pickton, Yand want to ensure that the evidence they need to prove their case is not dispersed or destroyed.

The court dismissed their bid to intervene in July this year, and the court has now ruled it has the authority to order the disposal of the evidence whether it was used at Pickton’s trial or not.

The ruling says police plan to “bring a series of applications” for court orders allowing them to get rid of the evidence because they are “legally obligated to dispose of the property” since it’s no longer needed in any investigation or criminal proceeding.

Justice Frits Verhoeven says in his ruling that there may be reason to doubt if the court has jurisdiction over items seized from the farm that had not be made exhibits.

But he said that will be a decision for later, noting “the question as to whether the court retains inherent jurisdiction to order disposal of seized items may remain to be considered, if necessary, in some other case.”

Jason Gratl, the lawyer representing family members of victims in the civil cases against the Pickton brothers, said in an interview Wednesday that the latest court decision doesn’t mean exhibits will be destroyed.

“Any concern about the destruction of the evidence is premature. Just because the court will hear the application to allow the RCMP to destroy the evidence does not mean that the court would grant the application,” he said.

Gratl said that if the RCMP brings an application to get rid of evidence that could be useful in proving the civil cases, he would ask the court for the evidence.

“We would be seeking to take possession of any evidence that the RCMP no longer wants in order to prove that civil claim,” he said.

Gratl said no date has been set for when the civil cases will be heard.

The court’s earlier ruling says the RCMP has agreed to allow some of the civil case plaintiffs “limited participation” in the disposal application process, agreeing to notify them if police identify an “ownership or property interest in the items” that they’re applying to destroy.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Democrats devastated by Vice-President Kamala Harris’ defeat |

Published

 on

Supporters of Vice-President Kamala Harris say they are devastated the Democratic party leader lost the United States presidential election. Harris was set to address Democrats at her alma mater Howard University in Washington, D.C. after conceding the race in a phone call with Donald Trump. (Nov. 6, 2024)



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Democrat Elissa Slotkin wins Michigan’s open Senate seat, defeating the GOP’s Mike Rogers

Published

 on

DETROIT (AP) — Democratic U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin has won Michigan’s open U.S. Senate seat, giving Democrats a bittersweet victory in a swing state that also backed Republican President-elect Donald Trump in his successful bid to return to the White House.

Slotkin, a third-term representative, defeated former Republican congressman Mike Rogers. Democrats have held both Senate seats in Michigan for decades, but this year were left without retiring incumbent Sen. Debbie Stabenow.

Michigan’s was among a handful of Senate races Democrats struggled to defend. They lost their U.S. Senate majority despite Slotkin’s narrow win.

The race was incredibly close. Just minutes before it was called for Slotkin, she addressed supporters in Detroit, acknowledging that many voters may have cast their ballots for her while also supporting Trump, who won the state’s electoral votes over Democrat Kamala Harris.

“It’s my responsibility to get things done for Michiganders. No matter who’s in office, just as I did in President Trump’s first term,” said Slotkin. “I’m a problem solver and I will work with anyone who is actually here to work.”

Slotkin’s win provides some solace for Democrats in the state, many of whom entered Election Day with high confidence following sweeping victories in the 2022 midterms. Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer still controls the executive branch and Democrats held onto the Senate, but their state House majority was in peril.

And Republicans also captured a mid-Michigan seat vacated by Slotkin, considered one of the most competitive races in the country.

Slotkin, a former CIA analyst and third-term representative, launched her Senate campaign shortly after Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow announced her retirement in early 2023. With a largely uncontested primary, Slotkin built a significant fundraising advantage and poured it into advertising. Her high-profile supporters included former President Barack Obama and Stabenow, who helped her on the campaign trail.

On the Republican side, Rogers faced multiple challengers for the party’s nomination, including former Reps. Justin Amash and Peter Meijer, the latter of whom withdrew before the Aug. 6 primary. Rogers served in the U.S. House from 2001 to 2015 and chaired the House Intelligence Committee.

Trump won Michigan in 2016 by just over 10,000 votes, marking the first time a Republican presidential candidate had secured the state in nearly three decades. This time, he expanded that margin to about 80,000 votes.

Slotkin and other Michigan Democrats focused much of their campaigns on reproductive rights, arguing that Republican opponents would back a national abortion ban, although Rogers said he wouldn’t. How effectively the issue motivated voting in a state where reproductive rights were enshrined in the constitution by Michigan voters in 2022 remained to be seen on Election Day.

About 4 in 10 Michigan voters said the economy and jobs is the top issue facing the country, according to AP VoteCast, a sweeping survey of more than 110,000 voters nationally, including about 3,700 voters in Michigan. About 2 in 10 Michigan voters said immigration is the most pressing issue, and roughly 1 in 10 named abortion.

Slotkin used her funding advantage to establish her narrative early, aiming to connect both with her base and disillusioned Republicans.

“For the Republicans who feel like their party has left them over the last few years, you will always have an open door in my office,” Slotkin said during their only debate.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version