TORONTO — Former prime minister John Turner, whose odyssey from a “Liberal dream in motion” to a political anachronism spanned 30 years, has died at the age of 91.
Marc Kealey, a former aide speaking on behalf of Turner’s relatives as a family friend, says Turner died peacefully in his sleep at home in Toronto on Friday night.
“He’s in a much better place, and I can say on behalf of the family there was no struggle and it was very, very peaceful,” Kealey said.
Politicians and other public figures immediately began sharing memories of Turner and expressing condolences to his family.
“A gifted politician, lawyer, and athlete, Mr. Turner became Canada’s 17th Prime Minister after having served in numerous other capacities,” Prime Minister Justin Trudea said in a written statement.
“Mr. Turner was a humble man with a strong social conscience. He supported many charitable organizations, including Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto. He was also an honorary director of World Wildlife Fund Canada and an ardent advocate for the protection of Canada’s lakes and rivers.”
Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole also offered his condolences, writing on Facebook, “Track star, lawyer, parliamentarian, but most importantly father and patriot, his contributions to Canada are profound and his legacy assured.”
Former prime ministers Jean Chretien and Paul Martin both spoke of their one-time colleague’s love of Parliament.
“More than anything, John was a House of Commons man and an outstanding public servant. He revered our democratic institutions like no other and served his constituents and Canada with great distinction. He will be greatly missed. My sincere condolences go out to his wife Geills and to his family,” Chretien wrote.
Smart, athletic and blessed with movie-star good looks, Turner was dubbed “Canada’s Kennedy” when he first arrived in Ottawa in the 1960s. But he failed to live up to the great expectations of his early career, governing for just 79 days after a difficult, decades-long climb to the top job.
“The most unfortunate thing to happen to anybody is to come in at the top in politics,” Turner said in 1967.
“The apprenticeship is absolutely vital. And yet, the longer the apprenticeship, the more the young politician risks tiring the public. So that by the time he’s ready, the public may be tired of him.”
His words were prophetic.
Despite his missteps, Turner guided the Liberals through some of their darkest days in the 1980s. His right-of-centre contribution to party policy would help pave the way for fiscally conservative prime ministers Chretien — his longtime rival — and Martin.
Turner’s journey began as a dashing young politician with the world at his feet and ended nearly 30 years later when he could no longer overcome his image as a relic of the past.
There was a dichotomy to Turner’s life. He was a jock who studied at Oxford and the Sorbonne, a staunch Catholic who defended the decriminalization of abortion and homosexuality and a Bay Street lawyer who campaigned against free trade — describing it as the fight of his life.
“There were two Turners. There was the thoughtful, intelligent John Turner who was kind of an intellectual,” former aide Ray Heard said in an interview several years ago.
“But there was another side to him. … There was John the jock, who used to love watching NFL football with us, who sometimes drank too much, who used to put on his red cardigan and sit in his office having a good time,” he said.
“So there was these two Turners, and sometimes these two Turners were in conflict with each other.”
Born in England, John Napier Wyndham Turner emigrated to Canada in 1932 after the premature death of his father Leonard.
His young, well-educated and driven mother, Phyllis Gregory, moved the family to her hometown of Rossland, B.C., and then to Ottawa a year later, where she climbed to the top ranks of the civil service.
She married wealthy businessman Frank Mackenzie Ross, who later was lieutenant-governor of British Columbia.
An Olympic-calibre track star, Turner graduated from the University of British Columbia in 1949, winning the Rhodes scholarship to Oxford University. After studying law, he went to Paris to work on a doctorate at the Sorbonne.
The young lawyer caused a stir when he danced with Princess Margaret at a party in 1959, giving rise to speculation that the two would become a couple. Heard said the two remained friends for life.
Turner moved to Montreal to practice law but was lured into politics by Liberal cabinet minister C.D. Howe, who asked him to help in an election campaign. Turner won a seat in 1962, representing the Quebec riding of St-Laurent-St-Georges.
He would later hold seats in two other provinces, Ontario and British Columbia, a feat unmatched since William Lyon Mackenzie King.
In 1965, he was named to cabinet by Lester Pearson, as a minister without portfolio. Two years later, Chretien and Pierre Trudeau joined cabinet, with Trudeau landing the plum post of attorney general and minister of justice. Turner toiled in the unglamorous job of registrar general, while Chretien languished with no portfolio.
It foreshadowed a rivalry that would divide the men in the years to come.
A few months later, Turner finally landed Consumer and Corporate Affairs, a ministry he convinced Pearson to create.
He once compared his job to that of a hockey star.
“Tonight you scored a goal and you’re a hero, tomorrow you let a goal in and you’re a bum,” he said in 1967. “And that’s politics.”
But Turner was well-liked on Parliament Hill, playing squash with opposition members and once, walking across the House of Commons to comfort a New Democrat who had just confessed to having a serious criminal record.
He saved then-Opposition leader John Diefenbaker from drowning while on vacation in Barbados, having unintentionally booked a stay at the same resort.
He married Geills McCrae Kilgour, the great-niece of Col. John McCrae who wrote “In Flanders Fields” and the sister of longtime MP David Kilgour, in 1963.
The two had a daughter, Elizabeth, and three sons, David, Michael and Andrew.
Turner ran to succeed Pearson in 1968, but lost to Pierre Trudeau. Even when it was all but certain he would lose, Turner stubbornly stayed in the race until the fourth and final ballot.
As justice minister in Trudeau’s cabinet between 1968 and 1972, Turner proposed a national legal aid system — an issue close to his heart — and created the Federal Court, among other reforms. But he was also put in difficult positions that sometimes challenged his personal beliefs.
He defended martial law and the suspension of civil liberties during the October Crisis of 1970, as well as the decriminalization of homosexuality and abortion in the 1960s.
“Those of us who support the bill recognize that there are areas of private behaviour which, however repugnant, however immoral, if they do not directly involve public order, should not properly be within the criminal law of Canada,” he said at the time.
He was named finance minister in 1972 and held the job for three turbulent years, marked by high unemployment and high rates of inflation. He left politics in 1975, which some believed was over his opposition to Trudeau’s decision to implement wage and price controls after the 1974 election.
Turner spent nearly a decade as a corporate lawyer on Bay Street before returning to politics after Trudeau resigned.
He won the 1984 Liberal leadership race, a divisive contest that pitted Turner against Chretien. The rift their rivalry created within the Liberal ranks plagued Turner for the rest of his career.
“Chretien and his people launched, almost from Day 1, a war of attrition against John Turner,” said Heard.
“Chretien’s people kept stabbing him in the back. They had coups and counter-coups going on. I spent more time dealing with caucus revolts inspired by the Chretien people than I spent opposing Brian Mulroney and his government. It was a ludicrous situation.”
Turner triggered an election just nine days after being sworn into office, forgoing the chance — some say foolishly — to host a visit by the Queen and another by the Pope that would have given the new prime minister golden opportunities for glowing, wall-to-wall media coverage.
The campaign was a disaster. The party wasn’t prepared to run a campaign and was mired in organizational problems. Chretien’s supporters were staging caucus revolts. And Trudeau’s parting gift — patronage appointments — would be Turner’s undoing.
But his outdated sensibilities landed him in trouble too, when he was filmed patting the rear end of Liberal party president Iona Campagnolo, who patted his bottom right back.
However, it made Turner look sexist and out of touch, and his unrepentant defence — calling himself a “tactile politician” and dismissing it as a joke — didn’t help matters.
The breaking point came during the 1984 election debate, when Turner was forced to defend Trudeau’s appointments, saying he had no option but approve them.
“You had an option, sir — to say no,” Mulroney said.
Turner, an expert debater, never recovered.
But he won a seat in Vancouver and led the Opposition Liberals for six more years.
The 1988 election provided a rematch with Mulroney over the Canada-U.S. free trade agreement, which Turner vehemently opposed, later calling it the fight of his life.
He triumphed in the debates, eloquently turning free trade into a referendum on Canadian sovereignty. But he faced mutiny from senior Liberals who wanted to dump him mid-campaign and choose another leader.
Turner didn’t win, but the Liberals recovered, doubling their seats in the House of Commons. He resigned in 1990 and quit politics three years later, joining a Toronto law firm.
Despite his declining health, he was a mainstay at many Liberal events. He gave speeches reminding the party of its golden years, sprinkled with wild stories about life on the political trail.
Throughout his political career, he stuck to his convictions, took up unexpected causes — like legal aid and free trade — and kept the Liberals together during some of their darkest days.
Bad timing stopped Turner from realizing his full potential as a great prime minister. In the end, the public tired of him before he reached the top.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2020.
TORONTO – The Toronto Transit Commission is ending free public Wi-Fi at its subway stations at the end of the year, citing a steep drop in rider usage along with reliability, security and cost concerns.
The decision, first reported by the Toronto Star, comes as Rogers Communications Inc. continues its installation of 5G cellular service throughout the subway network, enabling passengers to call, text or browse the internet using their data.
TTC spokesman Stuart Green said the transit agency has seen a 65 per cent drop in use of the TConnect Wi-Fi system since 5G connectivity for all carriers was introduced. He added there are “concerns about the age of the technology and infrastructure” related to performance and security.
“When comparing subway trips to total logins, we know TConnect is only being used on two per cent of trips,” Green said in an email.
“We continue to work with Rogers to get the 5G network fully built out and we’ll explore opportunities to enhance connectivity on the TTC and improve the customer experience in the process.”
Rogers spokeswoman Sarah Schmidt said the company had proposed options to the TTC to update or replace the Wi-Fi equipment last year when it acquired the Canadian operations of BAI Communications, the company originally contracted to develop a wireless network in the subway system.
But the transit agency “decided not to expand the agreement to maintain, modernize or rebuild the Wi-Fi infrastructure at its end of life,” she said in a statement.
“This is a TTC decision. The Wi-Fi infrastructure at subway stations has reached its end of life and usage has dropped dramatically since we started rolling out 5G in the subway system.”
Schmidt added that when BAI Canada launched the Wi-Fi service at subway stations in December 2013, the service was not part of its contract with the TTC. She said BAI planned to manage and fund the Wi-Fi service through advertising “but there was a chronic under-investment over the years.”
Green said it would have cost $17 million to upgrade the infrastructure to improve performance and security issues which “does not feel like a wise investment.”
“We think our customers would rather see that money spent on our core business — safe and reliable transit service,” he said, adding the TTC plans to inform riders about the change over the coming months.
“Given these reasons, we are comfortable with the decision to let the service expire by the end of the year.”
Since late last year, Rogers’ cellular network has been available to passengers regardless of their carrier in every subway station, along with tunnels mostly concentrated downtown between St. George, Bloor-Yonge and Union stations.
Tunnel service is also available between Sheppard West and Vaughan Metropolitan Centre stations.
In May, the company announced it had launched the next phase of the build in the remaining 36 kilometres of unconnected TTC subway tunnels. Schmidt said Rogers expects to share an update on progress of that work later this fall.
Despite fewer riders using TConnect as the 5G build ramps up, the public Wi-Fi network still had immense value to low-income transit customers, said Shelagh Pizey-Allen, executive director of the TTCriders advocacy group.
She called it a “very disappointing” decision to wind down the service.
“People can’t afford cellphone plans and rely on public Wi-Fi to communicate on really long TTC trips,” Pizey-Allen said.
“We know that most TTC users are lower income, shift workers and women … and so we have to make sure that this public service is available for people who need it the most.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.
OTTAWA – The Federal Court has denied Ottawa’s bid to quash a case in which advocates for Israel are asking for a reversal of Canada’s temporary freeze on the main United Nations agency supporting Palestinians.
In April, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs joined Canadians whose relatives were killed in the Hamas attack last October in asking Ottawa to stop funding UNRWA.
They cited Israel’s argument that UNRWA has collaborated with Hamas in recent years, which the agency rejects, while claiming that Canadian funds are illegally benefiting a terrorist organization.
A judge ruled Wednesday that those filing the case and the questions they raised fit within the jurisdiction of the Federal Court, while not weighing in on the evidence they presented.
Ottawa had unsuccessfully argued that the case fell outside the scope of the Federal Court’s role of adjudicating the laws surrounding the use of Canada’s aid dollars.
The case will therefore proceed to the next step before Federal Court.
Canada suspended aid to the agency, whose full name is the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, in January. The decision followed UNRWA declaring it was investigating whether some of its staff took part in the last October’s attack by Hamas.
The Liberals restored the funding in March, citing the dire humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip and the suspension of all staff under investigation.
In August, the United Nations announced the firing of nine of the 19 UNRWA staff members it investigated, saying they “may have been involved” in the attacks.
The lawsuit cited media reports that rely on Israeli government sources and reports alleging vast ties between UNRWA staff members and Hamas, which Canada deems a terrorist group.
The case argues Canada could have found other ways to fund humanitarian relief for Palestinians, despite statements from cabinet ministers that UNRWA is the only agency that can help dent widespread hunger and disease in Gaza.
The complainants say that UNRWA falls short of Canada’s law on foreign aid, which requires that aid be provided “in a manner that is consistent with Canadian values.” A judge ruled Wednesday that this clause can be adjudicated by Federal Court.
Ottawa had argued that the court was being asked to reverse a decision that falls within cabinet’s duty to make political decisions.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.
RICHMOND, B.C. – Poor weather and modifications to a passenger boat led to its capsizing and sinking off the coast of Haida Gwaii two years ago.
A Transportation Safety Board report about the sinking of the 10-metre-long Island Bay on Sept. 10, 2022, says a combination of wind, waves and the tide caused the vessel to capsize, forcing seven people aboard to abandon ship.
One person was swept away, but was rescued, while the other passengers and crew were taken on an inflatable boat to the nearby shore where they were later saved.
The board’s report says its investigation found the vessel had been extended at the stern and on the deckhouse, with added storage, equipment and gear all raising the Island Bay’s centre of gravity.
The report says the modifications compromised the vessel’s ability to right itself when it was hit by the poor weather, initiating the capsize.
It says the TSB has made several previous recommendations about the dangers of modifications to fishing vessels, along with the need for regulatory surveillance and stability information, which would also apply in this situation.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.
