Canada’s quarterly gross domestic product report has confirmed that the economy roared back to life over the summer months, but economists are now more concerned that the resurgence of the COVID-19 virus could stall a recovery that’s still far from complete.
Statistics Canada reported Tuesday that real GDP surged 8.9 per cent quarter-over-quarter (or 40.5 per cent in annualized terms) in the period ended Sept. 30, reversing much of the 11.3-per-cent slump in the previous quarter, as the economy reopened following the widespread lockdowns of the spring. But the economy ended September still running about 5 per cent below pre-pandemic levels, as the global health crisis kept some segments of the economy closed.
Statscan said GDP rose a strong 0.8 per cent in September, about in line with its preliminary estimate of a month ago and the fifth consecutive month-to-month increase. However, it estimated that growth slowed to about 0.2 per cent in October – by far the slowest since the post-lockdown recovery began – as the gains from reopenings faded and the second wave of the pandemic began to weigh on business and consumer activity.
Story continues below advertisement
With the growing pace of COVID-19 infections throughout November forcing many regions to tighten containment measures and reimpose closures of high-contact businesses, economists say the October slowdown marks the start of a much slower final quarter, with little if any growth.
“The next several months are not going to be pretty,” Toronto-Dominion Bank senior economist Sri Thanabalasingam said in a research report.
“There is a good chance that the economic recovery doesn’t just stall but shifts into reverse this winter.”
Third-quarter growth was actually a bit smaller than the roughly 10 per cent economists had anticipated, both in the private sector and at the Bank of Canada. This was due mainly to a major set of revisions of Statscan’s GDP data going back to the start of 2016, which resulted in a lowering of growth for both July (to 2.5 per cent from the previously reported 3.1 per cent) and August (to 0.9 per cent from 1.2 per cent). But the revisions also reduced the estimated GDP declines in the first two quarters.
Economists said the economy remains on track for a 5.5-per-cent contraction for 2020 as a whole – the worst year since the Great Depression of the 1930s.
The third-quarter data spoke to the uneven nature of the recovery, as some sectors roared back while others remained handcuffed by health restrictions.
Household consumption of goods rose 17 per cent, including a 38-per-cent surge in durable-goods purchases, fuelled by the rapid rebound in employment and by the federal government’s substantial emergency income-support programs. The gains lifted goods consumption to well above pre-crisis levels. Housing investment jumped 30 per cent, putting it 10 per cent higher than at the end of 2019.
Story continues below advertisement
But consumption of services, which remains seriously impeded by virus-containment measures, saw a much more modest 10-per-cent gain and remained more than 12 per cent below end-of-2019 levels. And non-residential business investment, despite bouncing back 7 per cent, was still down 11 per cent from the end of last year.
Economists have mixed views on how severely the second-wave containment measures will impede growth in the fourth quarter and into the new year, with some predicting small gains but others worrying the economy may dip slightly into negative territory again – though nowhere near the deep slump of last spring’s lockdowns. The Bank of Canada’s latest economic outlook, issued at the end of October, projected growth of just 0.2 per cent in the fourth quarter.
Still, economists noted that continuing government supports will help households weather the slowdowns and will provide stimulus to expedite a recovery next year, when eagerly awaited vaccines look likely to bring the pandemic under control. On Monday, the federal government presented an economic update that pledged to continue financial supports for workers and businesses affected by the pandemic and unveiled a commitment to spend as much as $100-billion in additional stimulus over three years to aid the recovery once the pandemic subsides.
Economists also noted that the high rate of savings among Canadian households during the pandemic – almost 15 per cent in the third quarter, up from 2 per cent at the end of 2019 – provides considerable fuel to keep domestic consumption rolling through the second-wave slowdown and to kick-start the economy once pandemic conditions improve.
In new global economic forecasts Tuesday, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development estimated that Canada’s economy will have shrunk 5.4 per cent in 2020 but predicted it will grow 3.5 per cent next year. Canada’s private-sector economists are more optimistic about 2021, with projections ranging from about 4 per cent to 5.5 per cent.
“Some of the growth rates seen in [the third quarter] could be a taste of what could lie ahead later in 2021,” Bank of Montreal chief economist Doug Porter said.
Story continues below advertisement
Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.
(Bloomberg) — The head of the International Monetary Fund warned the US that the global economy is closely watching interest rates and industrial policies given the potential spillovers from the world’s biggest economy and reserve currency.
“All eyes are on the US,” Kristalina Georgieva said in an interview on Bloomberg’s Surveillance on Thursday.
The two biggest issues, she said, are “what is going to happen with inflation and interest rates” and “how is the US going to navigate this world of more intrusive government policies.”
The sustained strength of the US dollar is “concerning” for other currencies, particularly the lack of clarity on how long that may last.
“That’s what I hear from countries,” said the leader of the fund, which has about 190 members. “How long will the Fed be stuck with higher interest rates?”
Georgieva was speaking on the sidelines of the IMF and World Bank’s spring meetings in Washington, where policymakers have been debating the impacts of Washington and Beijing’s policies and their geopolitical rivalry.
Read More: A Resilient Global Economy Masks Growing Debt and Inequality
Georgieva said the IMF is optimistic that the conditions will be right for the Federal Reserve to start cutting rates this year.
“The Fed is not yet prepared, and rightly so, to cut,” she said. “How fast? I don’t think we should gear up for a rapid decline in interest rates.”
The IMF chief also repeated her concerns about China devoting too much capital and labor toward export-oriented manufacturing, causing other countries, including the US, to retaliate with protectionist policies.
China Overcapacity
“If China builds overcapacity and pushes exports that create reciprocity of action, then we are in a world of more fragmentation not less, and that ultimately is not good for China,” Georgieva said.
“What I want to see China doing is get serious about reforms, get serious about demand and consumption,” she added.
A number of countries have recently criticized China for what they see as excessive state subsidies for manufacturers, particularly in clean energy sectors, that might flood global markets with cheap goods and threaten competing firms.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen hammered at the theme during a recent trip to China, repeatedly calling on Beijing to shift its economic policy toward stimulating domestic demand.
Chinese officials have acknowledged the risk of overcapacity in some areas, but have largely portrayed the criticism as overblown and hypocritical, coming from countries that are also ramping up clean energy subsidies.
(Updates with additional Georgieva comments from eighth paragraph.)
The head of the International Monetary Fund warned the US that the global economy is closely watching interest rates and industrial policies given the potential spillovers from the world’s biggest economy and reserve currency.
Author of the article:
Bloomberg News
Jonathan Ferro and Christopher Condon
Published Apr 18, 2024 • 2 minute read
Article content
(Bloomberg) — The head of the International Monetary Fund warned the US that the global economy is closely watching interest rates and industrial policies given the potential spillovers from the world’s biggest economy and reserve currency.
“All eyes are on the US,” Kristalina Georgieva said in an interview on Bloomberg’s Surveillance on Thursday.
Article content
The two biggest issues, she said, are “what is going to happen with inflation and interest rates” and “how is the US going to navigate this world of more intrusive government policies.”
Advertisement 2
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, Victoria Wells and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, Victoria Wells and others.
Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
The sustained strength of the US dollar is “concerning” for other currencies, particularly the lack of clarity on how long that may last.
“That’s what I hear from countries,” said the leader of the fund, which has about 190 members. “How long will the Fed be stuck with higher interest rates?”
Georgieva was speaking on the sidelines of the IMF and World Bank’s spring meetings in Washington, where policymakers have been debating the impacts of Washington and Beijing’s policies and their geopolitical rivalry.
Read More: A Resilient Global Economy Masks Growing Debt and Inequality
Georgieva said the IMF is optimistic that the conditions will be right for the Federal Reserve to start cutting rates this year.
“The Fed is not yet prepared, and rightly so, to cut,” she said. “How fast? I don’t think we should gear up for a rapid decline in interest rates.”
The IMF chief also repeated her concerns about China devoting too much capital and labor toward export-oriented manufacturing, causing other countries, including the US, to retaliate with protectionist policies.
China Overcapacity
Advertisement 3
Article content
“If China builds overcapacity and pushes exports that create reciprocity of action, then we are in a world of more fragmentation not less, and that ultimately is not good for China,” Georgieva said.
“What I want to see China doing is get serious about reforms, get serious about demand and consumption,” she added.
A number of countries have recently criticized China for what they see as excessive state subsidies for manufacturers, particularly in clean energy sectors, that might flood global markets with cheap goods and threaten competing firms.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen hammered at the theme during a recent trip to China, repeatedly calling on Beijing to shift its economic policy toward stimulating domestic demand.
Chinese officials have acknowledged the risk of overcapacity in some areas, but have largely portrayed the criticism as overblown and hypocritical, coming from countries that are also ramping up clean energy subsidies.
(Updates with additional Georgieva comments from eighth paragraph.)
Comments