adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Canadian Economy to Pick Up Steam – Morningstar.ca

Published

 on


Canadian fixed income funds benefitted from central bank easing when the coronavirus pandemic struck in March 2020. Indeed, funds like the $934 million, 5-star Renaissance Canadian Bond Class F returned 9.22% for the calendar year, versus 8.28% for the Canadian Fixed Income category. But 2021 may prove more challenging and returns are likely to be in the lower single digits, says portfolio manager Adam Ditkofsky, a member of the three-person team that oversees the fund on behalf of Toronto-based CIBC Asset Management (CAMI).

“The start of 2021 is very similar to how 2020 began,” says Ditkofsky, vice-president at CAMI, who joined the firm in September 2008, after working for two years as a credit analyst for CIBC World Markets. “Yields are very low and corporate spreads, or the extra yield for holding corporate bonds, are also very low. This doesn’t look like a great backdrop for bonds going into 2021. But we know that 2020 played out extremely well—because corporate spreads recovered in the back half of the year due to aggressive stimuli and a favorable outlook, thanks to the vaccines. But looking ahead for 2021, our expectations are different.”

Ditkofsky notes that his firm’s expectations for the economy changed mid-way through 2020. “The stimuli were more than enough to offset the pandemic. We predicted a V-shaped recovery in the latter half of 2020. This year we expect growth to exceed consensus. We are forecasting growth for Canada in 2021 in excess of 6%,” says Ditkofsky, who works alongside Patrick O’Toole, vice-president, global fixed income, and Jean Gauthier, managing director and chief investment officer. “That [growth rate] has not been seen since 1973—it’s a big number.”

300x250x1

Eye on Interest Rates
The economy will pick up steam thanks to increased household savings and pent-up demand by consumers. But it will also lead to slightly higher interest rates. “We believe there will be better entry points mid-year to enter the bond market and have better returns,” says Ditkofsky, who earned an MBA at University of Western Ontario and a bachelor of commerce at Concordia University. “But barring any unforeseen circumstances, it will be difficult for bond market returns. They will likely be in the low single digits—which we said last year, too. But it won’t be the same as 2020, given the expectations for the economy.”

Currently, the Fed funds rate is 0%, and the Bank of Canada’s overnight rate is 0.25%. Moreover, both central banks have stated they will keep their rates unchanged until 2023. “We don’t see any rate hikes priced into the market in the near term. And the central banks’ tone is unlikely to change given that the economy remains fragile,” says Ditkofsky, adding that millions are out of work and many people are dependent on government transfers and low interest rates. “Stimulus is the key to keeping the economy stable for now.”

Moreover, he notes that the Federal Reserve’s new policy of using averages for measuring inflation will also act as a brake on raising rates. “They [central banks] want to avoid taking their foot off the gas pedal too early.” In addition, he believes that central bank purchases of government bonds will also have an impact on keeping bond yields from rising too much, and it’s important to monitor policy statements to determine if there is any change in outlook which might lead to higher rates and lower bond prices.

Risks to Watch
On the other side of the coin, there are a couple of risks that need watching carefully. First, elevated COVID-19 infection rates could lead to further lock-downs. “That could see lower interest rates, which means higher bond prices. But corporate bond yields would perform poorly as credit spreads would also rise in that type of environment,” observes Ditkofsky, adding that equities would also get hurt. “But I believe governments would step in again to support the economy, and the market. The damage would be contained.”

The second risk is higher-than-expected inflation which would push interest rates much higher, and send bond prices lower. Still, he notes that both Canada and the U.S. have run significant deficits to support their economies.

Areas of Interest
From a strategic viewpoint, Ditkofsky and his colleagues are favouring corporate bonds, since they account for about 60% of the portfolio, or almost double the weight in the benchmark FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. The balance is split between 23% federal, 14.5% provincial bonds and 2.5% cash.

The bulk of the corporate bond weight is in investment-grade bonds, plus 8.5% high yield bonds. “Given our strong outlook for the economy, we believe this makes sense. Corporate bonds will continue to outperform government bonds over the next 12 months.” Ditkofsky notes that although the benchmark has a yield of about 1.2%, his fund generates yield that is 0.7% higher because of the emphasis on investment grade corporate and high-yield bonds.

As for duration, the managers are maintaining a fairly neutral duration of 8.5 years. “But we tend to be tactical and see duration as a tool to drive active returns. It’s not uncommon to be plus or minus a half year relative to the benchmark, to take advantage of short-term interest rate movements and if we see opportunities in a technical situation where bond yields move sharply in a short period.” Currently, from a tactical standpoint, the portfolio is over-weighted to the mid-term area of the yield curve.

Running a portfolio with about 250 individual corporate bonds from about 150 issuers, Ditkofsky likes securities such as Granite REIT. “It has a solid portfolio that is focused on e-commerce and has been fairly resilient during the pandemic. Historically, it was very exposed to Magna International, but it has diversified away from them. Among their largest tenants is Amazon.” The bond, which matures in 2031, has a yield of 2.35%.

Another favourite is Mattamy Homes Ltd., a privately-held real estate developer, which has a bond maturing in 2027 that is yielding 3.5%. “It’s one of Canada’s largest home builders and has significant land holdings in the Greater Toronto Area. It has a fairly stable credit profile.”

Year-to-date (Feb. 12), the fund is down 1.86%, versus the Canadian Fixed Income category which is down 1.66%. This is largely attributable to yields creeping higher. “It’s not surprising given the economic backdrop. But we believe the market will offer better entry points in the next quarter that will support better returns,” says Ditkofsky, adding that investors should lower their expectations for this year.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Climate Change Will Cost Global Economy $38 Trillion Every Year Within 25 Years, Scientists Warn – Forbes

Published

 on


Topline

Climate change is on track to cost the global economy $38 trillion a year in damages within the next 25 years, researchers warned on Wednesday, a baseline that underscores the mounting economic costs of climate change and continued inaction as nations bicker over who will pick up the tab.

Key Facts

Damages from climate change will set the global economy back an estimated $38 trillion a year by 2049, with a likely range of between $19 trillion and $59 trillion, warned a trio of researchers from Potsdam and Berlin in Germany in a peer reviewed study published in the journal Nature.

300x250x1

To obtain the figure, researchers analyzed data on how climate change impacted the economy in more than 1,600 regions around the world over the past 40 years, using this to build a model to project future damages compared to a baseline world economy where there are no damages from human-driven climate change.

The model primarily considers the climate damages stemming from changes in temperature and rainfall, the researchers said, with first author Maximilian Kotz, a researcher at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, noting these can impact numerous areas relevant to economic growth like “agricultural yields, labor productivity or infrastructure.”

Importantly, as the model only factored in data from previous emissions, these costs can be considered something of a floor and the researchers noted the world economy is already “committed to an income reduction of 19% within the next 26 years,” regardless of what society now does to address the climate crisis.

Global costs are likely to rise even further once other costly extremes like weather disasters, storms and wildfires that are exacerbated by climate change are considered, Kotz said.

The researchers said their findings underscore the need for swift and drastic action to mitigate climate change and avoid even higher costs in the future, stressing that a failure to adapt could lead to average global economic losses as high as 60% by 2100.

!function(n) if(!window.cnxps) window.cnxps=,window.cnxps.cmd=[]; var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’); t.display=’none’,t.onload=function() var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’); c.src=’//cd.connatix.com/connatix.playspace.js’,c.setAttribute(‘defer’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c) ,n.head.appendChild(t) (document);

(function()
function createUniqueId()
return ‘xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx’.replace(/[xy]/g, function(c) 0,
v = c == ‘x’ ? r : (r & 0x3 );

const randId = createUniqueId();
document.getElementsByClassName(‘fbs-cnx’)[0].setAttribute(‘id’, randId);
document.getElementById(randId).removeAttribute(‘class’);
(new Image()).src = ‘https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=546f0bce-b219-41ac-b691-07d0ec3e3fe1’;
cnxps.cmd.push(function ()
cnxps(
playerId: ‘546f0bce-b219-41ac-b691-07d0ec3e3fe1’,
storyId: ”
).render(randId);
);
)();

How Do The Costs Of Inaction Compare To Taking Action?

Cost is a major sticking point when it comes to concrete action on climate change and money has become a key lever in making climate a “culture war” issue. The costs and logistics involved in transitioning towards a greener, more sustainable economy and moving to net zero are immense and there are significant vested interests such as the fossil fuel industry, which is keen to retain as much of the profitable status quo for as long as possible. The researchers acknowledged the sizable costs of adapting to climate change but said inaction comes with a cost as well. The damages estimated already dwarf the costs associated with the money needed to keep climate change in line with the limits set out in the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement, the researchers said, referencing the globally agreed upon goalpost set to minimize damage and slash emissions. The $38 trillion estimate for damages is already six times the $6 trillion thought needed to meet that threshold, the researchers said.

Crucial Quote

“We find damages almost everywhere, but countries in the tropics will suffer the most because they are already warmer,” said study author Anders Levermann. The researcher, also of the Potsdam Institute, explained there is a “considerable inequity of climate impacts” around the world and that “further temperature increases will therefore be most harmful” in tropical countries. “The countries least responsible for climate change” are expected to suffer greater losses, Levermann added, and they are “also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts.”

What To Watch For

The fundamental inequality over who is impacted most by climate change and who has benefited most from the polluting practices responsible for the climate crisis—who also have more resources to mitigate future damages—has become one of the most difficult political sticking points when it comes to negotiating global action to reduce emissions. Less affluent countries bearing the brunt of climate change argue wealthy nations like the U.S. and Western Europe have already reaped the benefits from fossil fuels and should pay more to cover the losses and damages poorer countries face, as well as to help them with the costs of adapting to greener sources of energy. Other countries, notably big polluters India and China, stymie negotiations by arguing they should have longer to wean themselves off of fossil fuels as their emissions actually pale in comparison to those of more developed countries when considered in historical context and on a per capita basis. Climate financing is expected to be key to upcoming negotiations at the United Nations’s next climate summit in November. The COP29 summit will be held in Baku, the capital city of oil-rich Azerbaijan.

Further Reading

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada's budget 2024 and what it means for the economy – Financial Post

Published

 on


THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, Victoria Wells and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

300x250x1

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O’Connor, Gabriel Friedman, Victoria Wells and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world’s leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Opinion: Canada's economy has stagnated despite Trudeau government spin – Financial Post

Published

 on


Article content

Growth in gross domestic product (GDP), the total value of all goods and services produced in the economy annually, is one of the most frequently cited indicators of economic performance. To assess Canadian living standards and the current health of the economy, journalists, politicians and analysts often compare Canada’s GDP growth to growth in other countries or in Canada’s past. But GDP is misleading as a measure of living standards when population growth rates vary greatly across countries or over time.

Article content

Federal Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland recently boasted that Canada had experienced the “strongest economic growth in the G7” in 2022. In this she echoes then-prime minister Stephen Harper, who said in 2015 that Canada’s GDP growth was “head and shoulders above all our G7 partners over the long term.”

300x250x1

Article content

Unfortunately, such statements do more to obscure public understanding of Canada’s economic performance than enlighten it. Lately, our aggregate GDP growth has been driven primarily by population and labour force growth, not productivity improvements. It is not mainly the result of Canadians becoming better at producing goods and services and thus generating more real income for their families. Instead, it is a result of there simply being more people working. That increases the total amount of goods and services produced but doesn’t translate into increased living standards.

Let’s look at the numbers. From 2000 to 2023 Canada’s annual average growth in real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) GDP growth was the second highest in the G7 at 1.8 per cent, just behind the United States at 1.9 per cent. That sounds good — until you adjust for population. Then a completely different story emerges.

Article content

Over the same period, the growth rate of Canada’s real per person GDP (0.7 per cent) was meaningfully worse than the G7 average (1.0 per cent). The gap with the U.S. (1.2 per cent) was even larger. Only Italy performed worse than Canada.

Why the inversion of results from good to bad? Because Canada has had by far the fastest population growth rate in the G7, an average of 1.1 per cent per year — more than twice the 0.5 per cent experienced in the G7 as a whole. In aggregate, Canada’s population increased by 29.8 per cent during this period, compared to just 11.5 per cent in the entire G7.

Starting in 2016, sharply higher rates of immigration have led to a pronounced increase in Canada’s population growth. This increase has obscured historically weak economic growth per person over the same period. From 2015 to 2023, under the Trudeau government, real per person economic growth averaged just 0.3 per cent. That compares with 0.8 per cent annually under Brian Mulroney, 2.4 per cent under Jean Chrétien and 2.0 per cent under Paul Martin.

Recommended from Editorial

  1. inflation

    Opinion: Taming inflation won’t bring prices back down

  2. Senior Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada Carolyn Rogers, seen here in 2023. “You’ve seen those signs that say, ‘in emergency, break glass.’ Well, it’s time to break the glass,” she said.

    Philip Cross: Bank of Canada is right. Weak productivity is a national crisis

  3. Marc Miller, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, waits to appear before the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration in Ottawa, on Wednesday, March 20, 2024.

    Terence Corcoran: Immigration is all about freedom

Canada is neither leading the G7 nor doing well in historical terms when it comes to economic growth measures that make simple adjustments for our rapidly growing population. In reality, we’ve become a growth laggard and our living standards have largely stagnated for the better part of a decade.

Ben Eisen, Milagros Palacios and Lawrence Schembri are analysts at the Fraser Institute.

Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.

Share this article in your social network

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending