adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Sports

Canucks Post Game: Green's call is gold, Hughes aims higher, Crawford's new credo – The Province

Published

 on


Adam Gaudette celebrates his game-winning goal Thursday in wild 7-5 decision over the Blackhawks.

THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayw / PNG

Points to ponder on an eventful day and night at Rogers Arena that ended with the Canucks rallying from a 4-2 deficit and then snapping a 5-5 draw to post a wild and crazy 7-5 win over the Blackhawks on Thursday that extended the club’s win streak to six games:

GREEN’S CALL IS GOLD:‘Sometimes you’ve got to push your group in a hard way, too’

It’s the timeout and it’s called Rule 87. And it reads like this:

300x250x1

Each team is allowed one 30 second timeout per game. Only one team is allowed to use the timeout during a single stoppage of play. There are three 120 second commercial timeouts per period during NHL games.

It sounds simple enough in deployment theory, but it can be the difference between losing your way or finding your game on any night. And, of course, the timing has to be right because it’s a one-shot deal. The Canucks were trailing 4-2 when the coach made a crucial decision to rally the troops.

“I actually used the goal before that and thought about calling it,” said Green. “When they scored the fourth goal and we called the timeout, it was more about telling them I liked the two or three shifts before that. And that (fourth) goal was a bit of a lucky goal and we’ve got to get back to what we did before.

“It might not have been calmly said, but that was about it.”

The result was Antoine Roussel doing Antoine Roussel things on the next draw for his own version of a Gordie Howe Hat Trick. He chirped the Blackhawks. He crosschecked rookie Kirby Dach. He went to the attack and his shot hit iron.

On the next power play, and with Bo Horvat providing the screen, Quinn Hughes beat Robin Lehner with a slapper from the point. Then, just 1:25 later, it was Elias Pettersson with a quick release from the slot that went through a maze and found the short side to make it 4-4.

Adam Gaudette would get the 6-5 winner at 15:40 of the third period before Horvat added an empty-netter.

Tanner Pearson said at some point the veteran contingent has to be better at taking the temperature of the game and settle the club down between whistles or during a TV timeout.

“We’ve got a young team and hopefully we get to the point where we do it ourselves and amongst ourselves,” said the Canucks winger. “It was a good call. It settled the guys down and we regrouped and started playing good hockey.”

Added Green: “Sometimes (as a coach) you’ve got to push your group in a hard way, too. When we’re good with the puck our game is a lot better and we weren’t good with it early and when we’re not it looks the way it was.

“After the timeout, we started to get physical and get pucks to the net.”

HUGHES RAISING THE BAR:‘I’ve got a lot of chances and obviously put up some pretty good numbers, but I can even do better’

You expect a level of self-satisfaction when you’ve already proved a number of points.

Quinn Hughes has made those endless size, defensive awareness and durability questions seem rather moot and even laughable. The quick-moving, quick-thinking, precise passing and prime-time playmaking defenceman is in the Calder Trophy conversation for the right reasons.

He triggers the transition with sublime skating and laser passes. He can pivot his way out of trouble, angle off opposition forwards and turn the power play into a potent force as a true No.1 quarterback. And, yet, Hughes wants more. Much more.

And it’s not cockiness. It’s confidence.

He believes his 29 points (4-25) in 40 games are a product of simply shifting the NHL transition gears. Not sure which one he’s in right now, but the 20-year-old doesn’t sound like somebody about to go into cruise control — even though the second half grind is going to bring up all those same questions.

“I had a good first half but I can even elevate even more and that goes along with our team,” said Hughes. “We’re just starting to get really good. I can’t speak to the second half because I haven’t been there yet, but it’s going to be about getting your rest, getting to bed early and eating well. It’s something I haven’t focused as much on in the past.

“If I want to be healthy in the second half and make the impact I want to make, that’s something I need to focus on. I’ve learned where to exert my energy and where not to on the ice if I’m playing a lot. Sometimes, when I’m skating, I’m just going to move it (puck) and let it do the work.

“Last year, I skated every shift and now I’ve got good players around me and that’s just learning — especially on back-to-backs — and maybe the first game I’m just moving it (puck) a bit more. It’s capitalizing more. I’ve got a lot of chances and obviously put up some pretty good numbers but I can even do even better.”

Run all this by Patrick Kane and it doesn’t surprise the Blackhawks sniper.

He saw firsthand at the 2018 world championship how an 18-year-old kid — the youngest player in the event with Team USA — could make the most of limited minutes in 10 games and also look like a veteran. Kane also played with Hughes in the 2019 tournament.

“What I really liked is he wasn’t playing much the first worlds, but every time he got out there, he made something happen,” recalled Kane. “He’s an unbelievable skater — he and his brother (Jack). They way they are on their edges and the way they can pick up speed from in-tight turns is probably the most impressive thing.

“You could tell he (Quinn) was going to be a good player and a high pick. I’m sure Van is happy to have him and I’m sure some other teams probably wished they would have taken him.”

CRAWFORD’S NEW CREDO: ‘If you want to stay in the game, you’ve got to adjust and shape you’re methodology to fit the times’

Marc Crawford did the damage, has done the work and on Thursday he went one better.

The former Canucks coach, who left his position as a Chicago Blackhawks assistant Dec. 3 while the club investigated allegations of an antagonistic history with former players, returned to the bench at Rogers Arena.

In an earlier statement, the Blackhawks said they don’t condone Crawford’s past behaviour, but believe he “has learned from his past actions” because he has been striving to reform himself the past decade with professional counselling that dates back to 2010.

And in an attempt to put some closure to his bad behaviour, he did the right thing and went beyond his broad release statement to offer person-to-person remorse. Crawford didn’t name names, but said he has reached out to players he had wronged in the past.

“I’m not going to get into any conversations about conversations that I’ve had, or anything that I’ve done with players, but I have reached out to many, many players,” he said. “And I’ve heard from many players but I’m going to leave it at that.

“This is an ongoing process and, as I said in my statement, I’m all about making sure that I do the right thing and that I listen and understand and that’s what I hope comes from this — that I understand how anybody is feeling — and hopefully become better for it, they become better for it and the game becomes better for it.”

The investigation started when Sean Avery commented on Crawford’s decorum during the 2006-07 season in Los Angeles in which he was allegedly kicked after taking a penalty. Former Canucks defenceman Brent Sopel alleged that he was kicked and attacked verbally by Crawford. He offered offended players, including O’Sullivan and Harold Druken “sincere apologies” in his response to being re-instated before reaching out players.

To his credit, Crawford commenced counselling nine years ago because the game, its players and society in general was changing. What may have been tolerated by players in the past as the tough-love rite of passage to the pro game was no longer acceptable. The behaviour was going to be exposed sooner or later.

“Whenever you lose jobs, you always reflect on why that happens and that happened here in Vancouver and in Los Angeles and again in Dallas,” added Crawford. “But after the job in L.A., I was not liking where my coaching was and felt from that point that the game was changing and I needed to change along with it.

“It was a changing culture and I was evolving and players were evolving and if you want to stay in the game, you’ve got to adjust and shape you’re methodology to fit the times.

“That was one of the main reasons for it (counselling). On a personal level, I thought I was apologizing too much. I didn’t like that feeling and I still don’t like it — it’s a very uncomfortable feeling. And finding out why I am takes a lot.

“But it’s been good. I continue to put the work in to be a more complete person.”

bkuzma@postmedia.com
twitter.com/benkuzma

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Need to Know: Bruins at Maple Leafs | Game 3 | Boston Bruins – NHL.com

Published

 on


Familiar Territory

James van Riemsdyk has played his fair share of playoff contests here in Toronto – but all of them have come in blue and white. On Wednesday night, he would be on the other side for the first time if he indeed makes his Bruins postseason debut, which appeared to be a strong possibility based on the Black & Gold’s morning skate.

“It’s always special to play in this building,” said van Riemsdyk, who played in 20 postseason games with Toronto, including nine at Scotiabank Arena. “In this rivalry, it’s always a lot of fun. This time of year is always amazing, no matter where you’re at – if you’re at a 500-seat arena or a rink with all the tradition and history like this. It’s always fun and always a great opportunity to get in there.”

van Riemsdyk was a healthy scratch for the first two games of this series, following a trend across the second half of the regular season, during which he sat out several games.

300x250x1

“Playoff time of year is always the best time of year,” said van Riemsdyk, who has 20 goals and 31 points in 71 career playoff games between Philadelphia and Toronto. “Obviously, in this rivalry, it’s always a lot of fun – two fun buildings to play in. You cherish every opportunity you get.

“This time of year, you learn that along the way, it’s all about the team. Whatever the team’s asking you to do, that’s always got to be your mindset and approach…you stay at it every day and just take it one day at a time.”

Montgomery said that if van Riemsdyk does re-enter the lineup, he’ll be looking for the veteran winger to help the Bruins’ offensive game. He also complimented van Riemsdyk’s professionalism throughout a trying second half.

“I guess getting his stick on more pucks,” Montgomery said on what he wants to see from van Riemsdyk. “We’ve talked about it a lot of times internally. Him and [Kevin] Shattenkirk have been great. They’re true pros. Every day come to work, come to get better. It’s not an easy situation, but he’s been great.”

van Riemsdyk concurred with his coach’s sentiments about helping Boston’s offensive attack, saying that he’ll be aiming to be around the net as much as possible.

“I think you’ve got to stay true to who you are as a player and play with good details and manage the game well and play to your strengths as a player,” he said. “This time of year, being around the net is always an important trait. You see all the goals being scored, it’s all within 5-10 feet of the net. That’s an area that I pride myself on, so going to be doing my best to get there and have an impact there.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

NHL teams, take note: Alexandar Georgiev is proof that anything can happen in the playoffs

Published

 on

It’s hard to say when, exactly, Alexandar Georgiev truly began to win some hearts and change some minds on Tuesday night.

Maybe it was in the back half of the second period; that was when the Colorado Avalanche, for the first time in their first-round Stanley Cup playoff series against the Winnipeg Jets, actually managed to hold a lead for more than, oh, two minutes or thereabouts. Maybe it was when the Avs walked into the locker room up 4-2 with 20 minutes to play.

Maybe it was midway through the third, when a series of saves by the Avalanche’s beleaguered starting goaltender helped preserve their two-goal buffer. Maybe it was when the buzzer sounded after their 5-2 win. Maybe it didn’t happen until the Avs made it into their locker room at Canada Life Centre, tied 1-1 with the Jets and headed for Denver.

At some point, though, it should’ve happened. If you were watching, you should’ve realized that Colorado — after a 7-6 Game 1 loss that had us all talking not just about all those goals, but at least one of the guys who’d allowed them — had squared things up, thanks in part to … well, that same guy.

300x250x1

Georgiev, indeed, was the story of Game 2, stopping 28 of 30 shots, improving as the game progressed and providing a lesson on how quickly things can change in the playoffs — series to series, game to game, period to period, moment to moment. The narrative doesn’t always hold. Facts don’t always cooperate. Alexandar Georgiev, for one night and counting, was not a problem for the Colorado Avalanche. He was, in direct opposition to the way he played in Game 1, a solution. How could we view him as anything else?

He had a few big-moment saves, and most of them came midway through the third period with his team up 4-2. There he was with 12:44 remaining, stopping a puck that had awkwardly rolled off Nino Niederreiter’s stick; two missed posts by the Avs at the other end had helped spring Niederreiter for a breakaway. Game 1 Georgiev doesn’t make that save.

There he was, stopping Nikolaj Ehlers from the circle a few minutes later. There wasn’t an Avs defender within five feet, and there was nothing awkward about the puck Ehlers fired at his shoulder. Game 1 Georgiev gets scored on twice.

(That one might’ve been poetic justice. It was Ehlers who’d put the first puck of the night on Georgiev — a chip from center ice that he stopped, and that the crowd in Winnipeg greeted with the ol’ mock cheer. Whoops.)

By the end of it all, Georgiev had stared down Connor Hellebuyck and won, saving nearly 0.5 goals more than expected according to Natural Stat Trick, giving the Avalanche precisely what they needed and looking almost nothing like the guy we’d seen a couple days before. Conventional wisdom coming into this series was twofold: That the Avs have firepower, high-end talent and an overall edge — slight as it may be — on Winnipeg, and that Georgiev is shaky enough to nuke the whole thing.

That wasn’t without merit, either. Georgiev’s .897 save percentage in the regular season was six percentage points below the league average, and he hadn’t broken even in expected goals allowed (minus-0.21). He’d been even worse down the stretch, putting up an .856 save percentage in his final eight appearances, and worse still in Game 1, allowing seven goals on 23 shots and more than five goals more than expected. That’s not bad; that’s an oil spill. Writing him off would’ve been understandable. Writing off Jared Bednar for rolling him out there in Game 2 would’ve been understandable. Writing the Avs off — for all of Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar’s greatness — would’ve been understandable.

It just wouldn’t have been correct.

The fact that this all went down now, four days into a two-month ordeal, is a gift — because the postseason thus far has been short on surprises, almost as a rule. The Rangers and Oilers are overwhelming the Capitals and Kings. The Hurricanes are halfway done with the Islanders. The Canucks are struggling with the Predators. PanthersLightning is tight, but one team is clearly better than the other. BruinsMaple Leafs is a close matchup featuring psychic baggage that we don’t have time to unpack. In Golden KnightsStars, Mark Stone came back and scored a huge goal.

None of that should shock you. None of that should make you blink.

Georgiev being good enough for Colorado, though? After what we saw in Game 1? Strange, surprising and completely true. For now.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

"Laugh it off": Evander Kane says Oilers won’t take the bait against Kings | Offside

Published

 on

The LA Kings tried every trick in the book to get the Edmonton Oilers off their game last night.

Hacks after the whistle, punches to the face, and interference with line changes were just some of the things that the Oilers had to endure, and throughout it all, there was not an ounce of retaliation.

All that badgering by the Kings resulted in at least two penalties against them and fuelled a red-hot Oilers power play that made them pay with three goals on four chances. That was by design for Edmonton, who knew that LA was going to try to pester them as much as they could.

That may have worked on past Oilers teams, but not this one.

300x250x1

“We’ve been in a series now for the third year in a row with these guys,” Kane said after practice this morning. “We know them, they know us… it’s one of those things where maybe it makes it a little easier to kind of laugh it off, walk away, or take a shot.

“That type of stuff isn’t gonna affect us.”

Once upon a time, this type of play would get under the Oilers’ skin and result in retaliatory penalties. Yet, with a few hard-knock lessons handed down to them in the past few seasons, it seems like the team is as determined as ever to cut the extracurriculars and focus on getting revenge on the scoreboard.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, the longest-tenured player on this Oilers team, had to keep his emotions in check with Kings defender Vladislav Gavrikov, who punched him in the face early in the game. The easy reaction would be to punch back, but the veteran Nugen-Hopkins took his licks and wound up scoring later in the game.

“It’s going to be physical, the emotions are high, and there’s probably going to be some stuff after the whistle,” Nugent-Hopkins told reporters this morning. “I think it’s important to stay poised out there and not retaliate and just play through the whistles and let the other stuff just kind of happen.”

Oilers head coach Kris Knoblauch also noticed his team’s discipline. Playoff hockey is full of emotion, and keeping those in check to focus on the larger goal is difficult. He was happy with how his team set the tone.

“It’s not necessarily easy to do,” Knoblauch said. “You get punched in the face and sometimes the referees feel it’s enough to call a penalty, sometimes it’s not… You just have to take them, and sometimes, you get rewarded with the power play.

“I liked our guy’s response and we want to be sticking up for each other, we want to have that pack mentality, but it’s really important that we’re not the ones taking that extra penalty.”

There is no doubt that the Kings will continue to poke and prod at the Oilers as the series continues. Keeping those retaliations in check will only get more difficult, but if the team can continue to succeed on the scoreboard, it could get easier.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending