CBC paid more than $18 million in bonuses in 2024 after eliminating hundreds of jobs | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

CBC paid more than $18 million in bonuses in 2024 after eliminating hundreds of jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The Canadian Broadcasting Corp. paid $18.4 million in bonuses this year after hundreds of jobs at the public broadcaster were eliminated.

Documents obtained through access-to-information laws show CBC/Radio-Canada paid out bonuses to 1,194 employees for the 2023-24 fiscal year.

More than $3.3 million of that was paid to 45 executives.

That means those executives got an average bonus of over $73,000, which is more than the median family income after taxes in 2022, according to Statistics Canada.

More than $10.4 million was paid out to 631 managers, and over $4.6 million was paid to 518 other employees.

The Conservatives said the bonuses are “beyond insulting and frankly sickening,” adding they come at a time when many Canadians are starving and facing homelessness.

This year’s amount is an increase from the $14.9 million paid out to 1,143 employees in the 2022-23 fiscal year.

The board approved this year’s bonuses in June, but it had been refusing to disclose how much was paid out.

Members of Parliament have been asking for the figure since last December, when CBC announced it would be laying off employees to help balance its budget.

Ultimately, 141 employees were laid off and 205 vacant positions were eliminated at CBC/Radio-Canada.

The public broadcaster has said the money is performance pay and counts toward some employees’ total compensation, as stipulated by contracts that promise payouts when certain company goals are met.

Government departments, Crown corporations and most private companies use performance pay, also called ‘at-risk pay,’ as a portion of compensation for non-union employees to help ensure delivery on specific targets, a spokesman for CBC said in a statement Monday.

“While the term ‘bonuses’ has been used to describe performance pay, it is in fact a contractual obligation owing to eligible employees,” said spokesman Leon Mar.

In May, CEO Catherine Tait said it brings her “great frustration” that MPs refer to the payouts as a “bonus.”

Nonetheless, the broadcaster’s board publicly acknowledged the negative optics of giving out bonuses during the same fiscal year that it made cuts, and has since launched a review of its compensation regime for future years.

Tait was called twice to the House of Commons heritage committee in the last year to answer for cuts at CBC/Radio-Canada, and was interrogated by MPs over whether she would accept a bonus for the fiscal year that ended March 31.

It remains unclear if Tait is among those who received a bonus.

It’s up to the Liberal government, not the board of directors, to approve any bonus for the CEO, unlike other CBC employees. Canadian Heritage did not immediately respond to questions about that on Monday.

“It is the height of smugness to see the CBC has awarded itself $18 million in bonuses with the $1.4 billion a year they receive from taxpayers to act as the mouthpiece for the Liberal party,” Conservative MP and Opposition heritage critic Rachael Thomas said in a statement.

Thomas said CBC is “not worth the cost,” while repeating the Conservative promise to defund the public broadcaster and pledging to “turn the CBC headquarters into beautiful homes for Canadian families.”

The CBC’s editorial independence from government is enshrined in law.

MPs on the Heritage committee unanimously concluded in a report to the House earlier this year that given the job cuts, it would be inappropriate for CBC to grant bonuses to executive members.

The public broadcaster has said its financial situation is looking better because of the recent layoffs, cuts to operational costs and an extra $42-million injection from this year’s federal budget.

Tait told the heritage committee in May that the estimated $125-million shortfall for 2024-25 had shrunk to $20 million.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 12, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Nova Scotia election: Tory leader won’t invite Pierre Poilievre to join campaign

Published

 on

HALIFAX – Federal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is riding a wave of popularity in most parts of Canada these days, but you wouldn’t know it if you asked the leader of Nova Scotia’s incumbent Progressive Conservatives.

Tim Houston, who is seeking a second term in the premier’s office, said Monday he had no plans to invite Poilievre to join him on the campaign ahead of the Nov. 26 provincial election.

“No, because … I’m not a member of any federal party,” Houston told reporters during a campaign event in Halifax.

“There is no federal equivalent to the Nova Scotia PC party … there is a Conservative Party of Canada. That’s a completely different party with a different leader. I am not a member of that party. I have no intention of inviting the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada to campaign with me.”

He did not mention Poilievre by name.

Houston went on to explain that no real division exists between the federal and provincial wings of the New Democratic Party and the Liberal party.

“I am not beholden to any federal leader like my counterparts in this election are,” the 54-year-old accountant said, referring to provincial NDP Leader Claudia Chender and Liberal Leader Zach Churchill, both of whom are contesting their first election as party leaders.

“It would be a welcome sight if either Mr. Churchill or Ms. Chender would put Nova Scotians before their party politics.”

For the past week, however, Houston has frequently taken partisan shots at Churchill, trying to link him with the flagging popularity of Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

But that strategy — a favourite among conservative premiers — can be risky, said Erin Crandall, a politics professor at Acadia University in Wolfville, N.S.

“If you’re framing the attachment between a federal and provincial party as a detriment … it would be contradictory to go ahead and campaign with what would be the equivalent party leader at the federal level,” Crandall said.

More importantly, Crandall said the latest polls suggest Atlantic Canadians are not that impressed with Poilievre.

Last month, Abacus Data released the results of a national survey of 1,900 people, showing that 40 per cent of committed voters surveyed in Atlantic Canada would support Poilievre, but that figure was the second lowest in the country, with Quebec voters showing the least interest in the Tory leader at 24 per cent.

On Saturday, Abacus CEO David Colletto released a Nova Scotia poll showing Houston’s party was well ahead in voter support, but it was clear that finding had little if nothing to do with Poilievre.

“One of the important findings from our … survey is the relative unpopularity of both Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poilievre in Nova Scotia,” Colletto said Sunday in a social media post. “As in other provincial elections, Trudeau will be a factor, but in (Nova Scotia), so too could Poilievre.”

While 56 per cent of those surveyed in Nova Scotia held a negative view of Trudeau, Poilievre wasn’t far behind at 45 per cent, the provincial poll indicated.

Crandall suggested Poilievre, well known for his combative, hardline approach to politics, is probably facing the same kind of pushback that led to the defeat last month of New Brunswick’s Progressive Conservative government led by Blaine Higgs.

Under Higgs, the Progressive Conservatives adopted a socially conservative approach that included championing, among other things, a decision to order teachers to seek parental consent before using the preferred pronouns of transgender students under 16 years of age.

“What we found in New Brunswick was that ended up alienating some traditionally conservative voters, those who view themselves as fiscally conservative but not socially conservative,” Crandall said. “There does seem to be less tolerance for that type of approach to politics.”

Poilievre did not take part in the New Brunswick election campaign.

And it’s almost certain Trudeau will not campaign in Nova Scotia.

Churchill, a 40-year-old former policy analyst and student organizer, said as much on Monday during a campaign event at the provincial Liberals’ campaign headquarters in Halifax.

“We’re running our own campaign,” said Churchill, who was first elected to the legislature when he was 26. “Tim Houston is trying to trick and fool people that this provincial election has something to do with whose governing the country. It doesn’t. So, no, we don’t plan (on inviting Trudeau).”

As for Nova Scotia’s NDP, which the Abacus provincial poll said was in a tight race with the Liberals for second place, Chender was joined on the campaign trail by federal NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh on Friday and Saturday, marking the end of the first week of the campaign.

“Jagmeet is our federal leader and a friend,” Chender, a 48-year-old lawyer and former consultant, said Monday during a campaign event in Halifax.

“We heard on the doorsteps how happy people are about things like the (federal NDP’s) dental care program … people are so excited to finally get dental care when they couldn’t afford to before.”

Crandall said the federal NDP’s decision to support Trudeau’s minority government for about three years through a now-defunct confidence and supply agreement probably won’t have much of an impact on the outcome of the Nova Scotia election.

“In comparison to the Liberals right now, the NDP federal leader is relatively popular,” Crandall said. “I don’t think (the federal NDP/Liberal alliance) is going to have much of an impact in the eyes of (Nova Scotia) voters.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. A previous version said Premier Tim Houston is a former accountant. In fact, he still has his accounting certification.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Nova Scotia monument honours eight brothers who fought in Second World War

Published

 on

HALIFAX – A new memorial recently dedicated in a small Nova Scotia community honours eight brothers whose story of service in the Second World War had been all but lost to local memory.

The Harvie brothers from Gormanville, N.S., all served in Europe — six returned home, while two died and are buried overseas.

A black granite monument is now inscribed with the names and photos of Avard, Burrell, Edmund, Ernest, Ervin, Garnet, Marven and Victor Harvie. It stands in a small memorial park just up the road from their hometown, beside the Royal Canadian Legion branch in Noel, N.S.

The number eight is inscribed prominently in the middle of the memorial.

The monument in the town about 70 kilometres north of Halifax is the brainchild of legion president Jeff Thurber, who only became aware of the Harvie brothers’ remarkable story around the time of his branch’s Remembrance Day service last year. That was when he happened to see them mentioned in a memorial book kept by the legion.

Thurber was fascinated by his find but said it became apparent to him that over the years the brothers’ story had “just been lost in the dark.” Garnet, the last of the surviving brothers, died in 2000.

“There wasn’t even as much as a plaque to commemorate them,” he said in a recent interview. “I’m sure everyone in the area was aware of them at the time they served, but then of course (their story) just disappeared.”

Victor Harvie, 83, whose father Ernest served with the North Nova Scotia Highlanders during the war, said in an interview that he was only aware of scant details about his family’s wartime service.

“None of them ever told us anything,” Harvie said recently, adding that even his uncle Victor’s wife knew very little about her husband’s experiences serving in the tank corps. His uncle had told her simply, “You don’t have to know about that.”

Harvie, who is named after his uncle, also served in the military, enlisting in 1959, and he said it was his experience that many war veterans simply didn’t talk about their experience on the battlefield.

“When I joined there were still a lot of guys that had been in the war,” he said. “I never heard one of them say anything about what they did or what happened. It was very hush, hush. I guess they didn’t want to bring back any memories.”

Harvie said that while stationed in Germany he was able to visit “quite a few times” the grave of his uncle Marven at the Canadian War Cemetery in Groesbeek, Holland.

Marven Harvie, the youngest of the eight brothers who served, was killed in March 1945 at the age of 19 while fighting with the North Nova Scotia Highlanders in Germany. Burrell Harvie, who was injured while serving in the Canadian Forestry Corps, died at the age of 32 and was buried in Surrey in the United Kingdom in 1942.

In addition to Ernest and Victor, the other brothers who returned to Canada after the war were Garnet, who also served in the North Nova Scotia Highlanders and was wounded in Normandy following the D-Day landings; Ervin, who was a member of the tank corps; Avard, who was in the ordnance corps; and Edmund who served in an artillery regiment.

The monument in Noel — built thanks to $30,000 in local fundraising, including a $5,000 donation from the local fire department — was dedicated in a ceremony last month attended by Harvie family members from across Canada.

Thurber said it will stand as a fitting tribute to ensure one family’s service is not forgotten.

“This should have happened 75 years ago, and now it’s something that the next generation is going to remember,” he said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

‘Be ready for both’: Canadians prepare for any outcome as Americans head to the polls

Published

 on

WASHINGTON – Millions of Americans are heading to the polls Tuesday as a chaotic presidential campaign reaches its peak in a deeply divided United States, where voters in only a handful of battleground states will choose the country’s path forward.

Vice-President Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump have presented starkly different visions for America’s future, but polling shows the two remain in a dead heat.

“Any election in the U.S. is important and impactful for us,” said Kirsten Hillman, Canada’s ambassador to the United States. “They are central to our economic prosperity. They are a vital security partner.”

Hillman has been travelling across America meeting with key members of the Republican and Democrat teams to prepare for any outcome. On election night, after her embassy duties are finished, she’ll be watching the results with her husband and friends — and said she’s leaning toward ordering pizza.

While the gathering with loved ones may bring solace amid the anxious anticipation, Hillman knows more than anyone the immense stakes at play for Canada.

“Whoever is sitting in the Oval Office and populating Congress is making decisions that may affect Canada, either decisions that provide us with opportunities or decisions that pose challenges for us,” Hillman said. “The job is to be ready for both.”

A shared history and 8,891-kilometre border will not shield Canada from the election’s outcome. Both candidates have proposed protectionist policies, but experts warn if the Republican leader prevails the relationship between the neighbours could be much more difficult.

“Trump and some of the key people around him, including (former trade representative) Robert Lighthizer, really want to stick it to Canada,” said Fen Hampson, a professor of international affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa.

Trump’s first administration demonstrated how vulnerable Canada is to America’s whims when the former president scrapped the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Negotiating its successor, the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, was a key test for Ottawa after Trump’s victory. Whoever takes over the White House this time will be in charge during the agreement’s review in 2026.

A cause for concern in Canada and around the world is Trump’s proposed 10 per cent across-the-board tariff. A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report suggests those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

American economists warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation, and possibly a recession, which would almost certainly have ripple effects in Canada. More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S and trade comprises 60 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product.

“When the American economy is growing, it’s generally good for us,” Hampson said. “If they take a deep dive under Trump … that will have a knock-on effect on us, on top of tariffs.”

The election outcome could also redefine America’s role in the world. Trump is critical of giving aid to Ukraine in its war against Russia, has attacked the United Nations and repeatedly claimed he would not defend NATO members that don’t meet defence spending targets — something Canada is not doing, and won’t for years.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau promised to meet the target of spending the equivalent of two per cent of GDP on defence by 2032.

Trump’s first tenure also saw the Republican leader withdraw from the Paris Agreement, an international treaty to cut greenhouse gases.

Hampson said the Republicans’ push against international institutions and treaties will have “a profound impact” on Canada, but also key allies and the world order itself.

If Harris wins, it’s widely expected that there will be more normal relations based on established patterns and rules, but it does not necessarily mean smooth sailing for Canada.

It’s expected the vice-president would follow the path laid by President Joe Biden on foreign policy and trade with Canada.

Biden signed an executive order to revoke the permit for the Keystone XL pipeline, which would have transferred oil from Alberta to Nebraska. The administration’s Buy America procurement rules also caused concern in Canada.

Laura Dawson, an expert on Canada-U.S. relations and the executive director of the Future Borders Coalition, said she expects a Harris administration would continue nationalist and protectionist policies.

Harris has spoken on the campaign trail about the fact that she voted against the trilateral trade agreement and said she will return manufacturing jobs to the U.S.

It’s a great slogan and bumper sticker, Dawson said, “but it’s terrible if you are Canada.”

Dawson warned Trudeau’s team during a cabinet retreat in August that no matter who is the next president, Canada will have to work harder to maintain existing benefits of integrated trade and travel.

Meanwhile, many Americans are caught between anxiety and excitement. Sixteen-year-old Gavin Kupcho attended his first Trump rally in Wisconsin last week.

“I’ve never felt more enthused in my life,” he said. “I need lower gas prices since I just got my licence.”

The situation feels more dire for Antonio White, who travelled from Miami to Milwaukee to knock on doors for Harris in the crucial battleground state. The 63-year-old said America is at a critical point “where people are no longer recognizing fascism when they see it.”

“This is an election we must win for the sanctity of everybody, for the country itself,” he said.

“Democracy is on the ballot this time.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version