‘CDC Says’ Jokes Trend After New Covid-19 Isolation, Quarantine Guideline Changes - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Health

‘CDC Says’ Jokes Trend After New Covid-19 Isolation, Quarantine Guideline Changes – Forbes

Published

 on


This past Monday, the Centers Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended reducing how long someone has to stay isolated after testing positive for the Covd-19 coronavirus. This seemed to elicit quite a few “say whats?” The concern was this and the CDC decreasing recommended quarantine times might be premature relaxations. The “say what” reactions may have, in turn, spawned a “CDC says” trend on Twitter. Many of these “CDC says” tweets weren’t quite the same as “Simon says,” though.

It used to be that those infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had to remain isolated for at least 10 days. The recommended length of quarantine after being potentially exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 was similar: 10 to 14 days. That was based on scientific studies that showed how long those infected may shed the virus as I covered previously for Forbes.

Yet, on December 27, the CDC announced that “people with COVID-19 should isolate for 5 days and if they are asymptomatic or their symptoms are resolving (without fever for 24 hours), follow that by 5 days of wearing a mask when around others to minimize the risk of infecting people they encounter.”  

They applied this same recommendation to those who are unvaccinated and quarantining because of possible exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Those who are vaccinated and boosted against Covid-19 now don’t even have to quarantine and just have to wear a face mask for 10 days after the exposure. Nicholas Reimann covered these changes for Forbes on December 27. Telling someone who still remains unvaccinated to wear a face mask properly for 10 days? Gee, what could possibly go wrong there?

The CDC announcement indicated that these changes are “motivated by science demonstrating that the majority of SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs early in the course of illness, generally in the 1-2 days prior to onset of symptoms and the 2-3 days after.” However, majority only means more than 50%. It doesn’t mean all. Plus, studies have shown that people can shed the virus well beyond five days. Some have wondered whether these changes were prompted by large employers wanting to get their employees back on the job sooner. For example:

There was also some shall we say more sarcastic responses to the changes in CDC guidance such as:

And an arrangement that may leave you breathless:

As well as a quarantine when convenient for your workplace tweet:

There was also this “I’m dead” suggestion:

The concern is that the shorter isolation and quarantine periods could let more infectious people slip through and expose themselves to others. In this case, expose themselves means expose the viruses that they are carrying to others. Plus, is this really the best time to make such changes, in the middle of a Winter Covid-19 surge, further fueled by the Omicron variant?

As you can see, the latter three tweets included the words “CDC says.” One of them even had a hashtag #cdcsays. Soon after the CDC announcement, the Twittersphere began offering such “CDC says” tweets. For example, the following tweet suggested that other types of risky behavior might be OK now:

Naturally, texting your ex while drunk is almost always a bad idea. A possible exception might be when you are on fire and your ex happens to be the only one with a fire extinguisher. In that case, though, make sure that your text doesn’t just say, “I’m on fire.” It should include the word “really” or “I now realize that saying ‘in your pants’ too often can have its consequences especially at your workplace, so I am truly sorry, but for Pete’s sake bring me the fire extinguisher” as well.

Speaking of “on fire,” take a look at this tweet:

Again, it’s important to clarify what “on fire” really means.

The CDC, of course, did not say that you can text your ex when you’re drunk. And the CDC didn’t say that going into an inferno at work is OK. If you haven’t realized it yet, many of these “CDC says” tweets were a bit tongue in cheek, as opposed to tongue in pocket, which would be a medical emergency.

Speaking of tongue:

To be fair, the CDC never officially said not to lick random people. Typically, though, it’s not a good idea to lick people unless you actually know them, they’re fully vaccinated and boosted, and they have actually asked you to lick them. People are not ice cream cones. And licking would be another way of transmitting the SARS-CoV-2, no matter how many disinfecting wipes people may have available.

Speaking of wipes:

Is this a swipe left or swipe right on Tinder thing? This tweet didn’t specify where exactly you would be wiping. But presumably it doesn’t refer to the Karate Kid movie.

This tweet may have been referring to directions near the end of a toilet trip. You may have heard the axiom “always wipe front-to-back.” That’s because your butt tends to constitute your backside and your vagina tends to be more towards your front. If this direction on your body is somehow reversed, either stop looking backwards constantly or contact your doctor as soon as you can.

Despite what the tweet above said, “always wipe front-to-back” should continue to apply since what happens in your butt should stay in your butt as far as bacteria is concerned. Wiping it forward could transfer the bacteria from your anus up into your vagina or your urethra. That could cause some nasty infections.

Speaking of nasty infections:

Umm, wearing a condom during sex is not like wearing knight’s armor during sex. A condom is not going to spoil the mood like the clanging of metal armor might. No, a condom is designed to allow good sex while preventing the transmission of sexually transmitted infections and pregnancy. Assuming that you’ve had real sex-ed, this information shouldn’t be a shock to you.

Speaking of shock:

Yeah, don’t do this. You may love your avocado toast but wait until you are done with your bath before preparing any such thing.

And here’s some trashy advice:

Umm, the CDC didn’t actually say this either. And neither did the TV show Sesame Street, regardless of what Oscar the Grouch may be doing.

The Twittersphere blowback, so to speak, included this “CDC says” tweet as well:

This certainly ain’t true. You can still end up in the can if you were to put cocaine in soda.

So for now, be a bit careful when you search for “CDC says”, “CDC recommends”, #CDCsays, or #CDCrecommends on social media. You may get something like this:

Take all such advice with 10 days worth of salt. The word “password” is not a good password since everyone know that “wherearemypants” is the best one.

It’s certainly not easy being in the CDC’s position. Undoubtedly, many politicians, companies, and other organizations continue to lobby for what they want. But not everyone lobbying will be able to see what is better for everyone in the long run. During such a public health emergency, the number one goal should be to prevent the virus from hurting people. This in the long run will end up helping nearly all sectors and society.

Consistency is important as well. Some pointed out how the isolation and quarantine guidelines have gotten shorter and shorter even though the Covid-19 cases and deaths have kept piling up since early 2020:

And this tweet pointed out how isolation guidance hadn’t yet changed for cats:

This could create a rather tense situation if many of your co-workers happen to be cats. The discrepancies in guidance have gotten some to wonder whether guidelines have become a bit too situational:

Plus, there are solutions to current problems that don’t involve messing with the virus. Take potential employee shortages, for example. Rather than shortening isolation and quarantine times, maybe it would be better to find ways to, you know, hire more employees. That can be more of an issue for someone to address besides the CDC such as the Department of Labor. After all, the CDC can’t change the fact that someone infected with the virus can shed the virus for longer than five days. The viruses are not going to say, “oh since you need people to return to work, we are going to cool it on this replicating thing and not reproduce for so long.” No, that’s not what virus says.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

What’s the greatest holiday gift: lips, hair, skin? Give the gift of great skin this holiday season

Published

 on

Give the gift of great skin this holiday season

Skinstitut Holiday Gift Kits take the stress out of gifting

Toronto, October 31, 2024 – Beauty gifts are at the top of holiday wish lists this year, and Laser Clinics Canada, a leader in advanced beauty treatments and skincare, is taking the pressure out of seasonal shopping. Today, Laser Clincs Canada announces the arrival of its 2024 Holiday Gift Kits, courtesy of Skinstitut, the exclusive skincare line of Laser Clinics Group.

In time for the busy shopping season, the limited-edition Holiday Gifts Kits are available in Laser Clinics locations in the GTA and Ottawa. Clinics are conveniently located in popular shopping centers, including Hillcrest Mall, Square One, CF Sherway Gardens, Scarborough Town Centre, Rideau Centre, Union Station and CF Markville. These limited-edition Kits are available on a first come, first served basis.

“These kits combine our best-selling products, bundled to address the most relevant skin concerns we’re seeing among our clients,” says Christina Ho, Senior Brand & LAM Manager at Laser Clinics Canada. “With several price points available, the kits offer excellent value and suit a variety of gift-giving needs, from those new to cosmeceuticals to those looking to level up their skincare routine. What’s more, these kits are priced with a savings of up to 33 per cent so gift givers can save during the holiday season.

There are two kits to select from, each designed to address key skin concerns and each with a unique theme — Brightening Basics and Hydration Heroes.

Brightening Basics is a mix of everyday essentials for glowing skin for all skin types. The bundle comes in a sleek pink, reusable case and includes three full-sized products: 200ml gentle cleanser, 50ml Moisture Defence (normal skin) and 30ml1% Hyaluronic Complex Serum. The Brightening Basics kit is available at $129, a saving of 33 per cent.

Hydration Heroes is a mix of hydration essentials and active heroes that cater to a wide variety of clients. A perfect stocking stuffer, this bundle includes four deluxe products: Moisture 15 15 ml Defence for normal skin, 10 ml 1% Hyaluronic Complex Serum, 10 ml Retinol Serum and 50 ml Expert Squalane Cleansing Oil. The kit retails at $59.

In addition to the 2024 Holiday Gifts Kits, gift givers can easily add a Laser Clinic Canada gift card to the mix. Offering flexibility, recipients can choose from a wide range of treatments offered by Laser Clinics Canada, or they can expand their collection of exclusive Skinstitut products.

 

Brightening Basics 2024 Holiday Gift Kit by Skinstitut, available exclusively at Laser Clincs Canada clinics and online at skinstitut.ca.

Hydration Heroes 2024 Holiday Gift Kit by Skinstitut – available exclusively at Laser Clincs Canada clinics and online at skinstitut.ca.

Continue Reading

Health

Here is how to prepare your online accounts for when you die

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — Most people have accumulated a pile of data — selfies, emails, videos and more — on their social media and digital accounts over their lifetimes. What happens to it when we die?

It’s wise to draft a will spelling out who inherits your physical assets after you’re gone, but don’t forget to take care of your digital estate too. Friends and family might treasure files and posts you’ve left behind, but they could get lost in digital purgatory after you pass away unless you take some simple steps.

Here’s how you can prepare your digital life for your survivors:

Apple

The iPhone maker lets you nominate a “ legacy contact ” who can access your Apple account’s data after you die. The company says it’s a secure way to give trusted people access to photos, files and messages. To set it up you’ll need an Apple device with a fairly recent operating system — iPhones and iPads need iOS or iPadOS 15.2 and MacBooks needs macOS Monterey 12.1.

For iPhones, go to settings, tap Sign-in & Security and then Legacy Contact. You can name one or more people, and they don’t need an Apple ID or device.

You’ll have to share an access key with your contact. It can be a digital version sent electronically, or you can print a copy or save it as a screenshot or PDF.

Take note that there are some types of files you won’t be able to pass on — including digital rights-protected music, movies and passwords stored in Apple’s password manager. Legacy contacts can only access a deceased user’s account for three years before Apple deletes the account.

Google

Google takes a different approach with its Inactive Account Manager, which allows you to share your data with someone if it notices that you’ve stopped using your account.

When setting it up, you need to decide how long Google should wait — from three to 18 months — before considering your account inactive. Once that time is up, Google can notify up to 10 people.

You can write a message informing them you’ve stopped using the account, and, optionally, include a link to download your data. You can choose what types of data they can access — including emails, photos, calendar entries and YouTube videos.

There’s also an option to automatically delete your account after three months of inactivity, so your contacts will have to download any data before that deadline.

Facebook and Instagram

Some social media platforms can preserve accounts for people who have died so that friends and family can honor their memories.

When users of Facebook or Instagram die, parent company Meta says it can memorialize the account if it gets a “valid request” from a friend or family member. Requests can be submitted through an online form.

The social media company strongly recommends Facebook users add a legacy contact to look after their memorial accounts. Legacy contacts can do things like respond to new friend requests and update pinned posts, but they can’t read private messages or remove or alter previous posts. You can only choose one person, who also has to have a Facebook account.

You can also ask Facebook or Instagram to delete a deceased user’s account if you’re a close family member or an executor. You’ll need to send in documents like a death certificate.

TikTok

The video-sharing platform says that if a user has died, people can submit a request to memorialize the account through the settings menu. Go to the Report a Problem section, then Account and profile, then Manage account, where you can report a deceased user.

Once an account has been memorialized, it will be labeled “Remembering.” No one will be able to log into the account, which prevents anyone from editing the profile or using the account to post new content or send messages.

X

It’s not possible to nominate a legacy contact on Elon Musk’s social media site. But family members or an authorized person can submit a request to deactivate a deceased user’s account.

Passwords

Besides the major online services, you’ll probably have dozens if not hundreds of other digital accounts that your survivors might need to access. You could just write all your login credentials down in a notebook and put it somewhere safe. But making a physical copy presents its own vulnerabilities. What if you lose track of it? What if someone finds it?

Instead, consider a password manager that has an emergency access feature. Password managers are digital vaults that you can use to store all your credentials. Some, like Keeper,Bitwarden and NordPass, allow users to nominate one or more trusted contacts who can access their keys in case of an emergency such as a death.

But there are a few catches: Those contacts also need to use the same password manager and you might have to pay for the service.

___

Is there a tech challenge you need help figuring out? Write to us at onetechtip@ap.org with your questions.

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Pediatric group says doctors should regularly screen kids for reading difficulties

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Paediatric Society says doctors should regularly screen children for reading difficulties and dyslexia, calling low literacy a “serious public health concern” that can increase the risk of other problems including anxiety, low self-esteem and behavioural issues, with lifelong consequences.

New guidance issued Wednesday says family doctors, nurses, pediatricians and other medical professionals who care for school-aged kids are in a unique position to help struggling readers access educational and specialty supports, noting that identifying problems early couldhelp kids sooner — when it’s more effective — as well as reveal other possible learning or developmental issues.

The 10 recommendations include regular screening for kids aged four to seven, especially if they belong to groups at higher risk of low literacy, including newcomers to Canada, racialized Canadians and Indigenous Peoples. The society says this can be done in a two-to-three-minute office-based assessment.

Other tips encourage doctors to look for conditions often seen among poor readers such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; to advocate for early literacy training for pediatric and family medicine residents; to liaise with schools on behalf of families seeking help; and to push provincial and territorial education ministries to integrate evidence-based phonics instruction into curriculums, starting in kindergarten.

Dr. Scott McLeod, one of the authors and chair of the society’s mental health and developmental disabilities committee, said a key goal is to catch kids who may be falling through the cracks and to better connect families to resources, including quicker targeted help from schools.

“Collaboration in this area is so key because we need to move away from the silos of: everything educational must exist within the educational portfolio,” McLeod said in an interview from Calgary, where he is a developmental pediatrician at Alberta Children’s Hospital.

“Reading, yes, it’s education, but it’s also health because we know that literacy impacts health. So I think that a statement like this opens the window to say: Yes, parents can come to their health-care provider to get advice, get recommendations, hopefully start a collaboration with school teachers.”

McLeod noted that pediatricians already look for signs of low literacy in young children by way of a commonly used tool known as the Rourke Baby Record, which offers a checklist of key topics, such as nutrition and developmental benchmarks, to cover in a well-child appointment.

But he said questions about reading could be “a standing item” in checkups and he hoped the society’s statement to medical professionals who care for children “enhances their confidence in being a strong advocate for the child” while spurring partnerships with others involved in a child’s life such as teachers and psychologists.

The guidance said pediatricians also play a key role in detecting and monitoring conditions that often coexist with difficulty reading such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, but McLeod noted that getting such specific diagnoses typically involves a referral to a specialist, during which time a child continues to struggle.

He also acknowledged that some schools can be slow to act without a specific diagnosis from a specialist, and even then a child may end up on a wait list for school interventions.

“Evidence-based reading instruction shouldn’t have to wait for some of that access to specialized assessments to occur,” he said.

“My hope is that (by) having an existing statement or document written by the Canadian Paediatric Society … we’re able to skip a few steps or have some of the early interventions present,” he said.

McLeod added that obtaining specific assessments from medical specialists is “definitely beneficial and advantageous” to know where a child is at, “but having that sort of clear, thorough assessment shouldn’t be a barrier to intervention starting.”

McLeod said the society was partly spurred to act by 2022’s “Right to Read Inquiry Report” from the Ontario Human Rights Commission, which made 157 recommendations to address inequities related to reading instruction in that province.

He called the new guidelines “a big reminder” to pediatric providers, family doctors, school teachers and psychologists of the importance of literacy.

“Early identification of reading difficulty can truly change the trajectory of a child’s life.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 23, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version