Chris Selley: The grocery wars are unmasking Canadian politics, and it's a great thing - National Post | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Chris Selley: The grocery wars are unmasking Canadian politics, and it's a great thing – National Post

Published

 on


People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones — but it’s quite enlightening when they do

Get the latest from Chris Selley straight to your inbox

Article content

Last week, pollster David Coletto wondered aloud whether the Ottawa establishment might come to regret the Great Loblaw Wars of 2023 — the altogether idiotic fight, spurred by rising food costs, to determine who supposedly loathes Galen Weston and his business practices most.

“Kinda feel that this is opening a Pandora’s box that GR (government relations) pros (i.e., lobbyists) from all sides won’t like,” Coletto wrote on X. “Ottawa is a small town with … many connections — family, spouses, etc. — who work in politics and lobby on behalf of organizations,” he noted.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Article content

Do any of the parties, sitting in their glass houses, really want to start accusing the others?

Hell yeah they do.

Coletto issued his prediction after the Liberals tried to deflect allegations of their excessive genuflection toward the Westons. (One can understand the Liberals’ motivation, at least. They did after all give Loblaw $12 million for new refrigerators for no damn reason.)

In the House of Commons, Housing Minister Sean Fraser noted that arch-Conservative strategist Jenni Byrne, Pierre Poilievre’s presumed campaign director, is “actually a registered lobbyist for Loblaw in Ontario.” (She isn’t, actually, but her eponymous lobbying firm and several of its principals certainly are and have been.)

The battle has only intensified since, perhaps coming to a head in the House on Wednesday.

Recommended from Editorial

  1. These Metrolinx ads shame people for complaining about transit construction delays in Toronto

  2. NDP bill would prescribe jail terms for speaking well of fossil fuels

Confronted with the notion that Byrne is “a high-priced consultant for Loblaws,” Poilievre shot back: “The prime minister’s new marketing director, Max Valiquette, did marketing for Loblaws for four years. Don Guy, the prime minister’s chief pollster, works for GT and Company, which collects cheques from Loblaws. Dan Arnold, his other pollster, also get cheques from Loblaws. Are they the ones who forced him to quadruple the carbon tax on our food?”

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

Trudeau returned fire: “(Byrne) is actively on the Loblaws payroll while at the same time feeding lines to the leader of the Opposition about food prices and concocting a theory around carbon pricing and grocery prices.”

Poilievre: “The Prime Minister had someone who is his director of caucus services, named Julie DeWolfe, who is now a lobbyist for Loblaws.”

Trudeau: “The Conservatives would rather listen to their lobbyist buddy who works for Loblaw and defend the interests of major grocery retailers, instead of fighting on behalf of Canadians to bring down grocery prices.”

And so on, and so on. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh got in on the act too with a recent post on X accusing Poilievre and Trudeau of accepting campaign donations from Big Grocery. It’s unclear whether he didn’t realize that what he’s alleging is illegal — presumably he would present evidence if he had any — or just doesn’t care. (In a bizarre diversion from the anti-plutocrat campaign, the NDP also decided this week to attack Conservative MP Scott Reid for sitting on the board of Giant Tiger, his family’s discount grocery and department-store chain.)

Advertisement 4

Article content

This, as Coletto implied, is a game of mutually assured destruction. Because when you start digging around in lobbyist registries, you quickly learn (if you weren’t aware before) that all this partisan mudslinging is mostly just pantomime from a class of multitalented strategists-cum-lobbyists-cum-staffers who all mostly get along in real life, and who are fat and happy no matter who wins the next election.

DeWolfe, whom Poilievre mentioned, is indeed listed as a principal on the GT and Company website, and is indeed registered federally to lobby for Loblaw. And the G in GT is indeed Liberal strategist and pollster Don Guy, as Poilievre said. But the T is NDP uber-strategist Brian Topp.

GT principals include veterans of many federal and provincial campaigns and ministers’ offices: Conservatives including Shir Barzilay, Julie O’Driscoll and Laryssa Waler; New Democrats including Cheryl Oates and Michelle Mungall; and Liberals including Andrew Teliszewsky and Genevieve Tomney. (None lobbied for Loblaw, it seems, but remember: Poilievre went after the company itself, not the individuals.)

Advertisement 5

Article content

Others who have lobbied in recent years for Loblaw include Andrew Steele, former senior adviser to Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty, who’s now vice-president of Strategy Corp. Those who have lobbied for Metro include Christine McMillan, a partner at Crestview Strategy, who was a senior staffer in McGuinty’s office; Nicolas Descroix from Mongeau Pellerin, who was a senior adviser to Quebec’s justice and higher-education ministers under the CAQ government; and Andrew Brander, also out of Crestview, whose bio notes he was “acknowledged in The Hill Times Terrific 25 survey of top parliamentary staffers on various occasions” for his work with different ministers under the Harper government.

Melissa Lantsman, deputy leader of the Conservatives, lobbied for Walmart while she was at Enterprise Canada.

It’s insane that any of these parties should feel confident attacking others on things like this — unless they’re hopelessly deluded, or they take us all for idiots, or both.

The curtain is being lifted here, and Canadians ought to be paying attention to it. At best, it invites us not to believe the hyper-torqued nonsense coming out of politicians’ mouths. If they’re spectacular hypocrites on the question of big grocery chains, they’re only slightly less spectacular hypocrites on many other questions.

At worst, it invites us to conclude of every party, the Conservatives in particular, what has always been true of the Liberals: Partisans believe that when their leaders, ministers and siblings-in-arms do a Supposedly Bad Thing, it’s literally not the same as when the other guys did the same Supposedly Bad Thing. Because they mean well, while the others mean evil.

Either way, it’s past time to open Pandora’s box and keep it open.

National Post

cselley@postmedia.com

Article content

Get the latest from Chris Selley straight to your inbox

Comments

Join the Conversation

This Week in Flyers

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version