Conflicts that Divide Us from Our Senses. (Common and Practical) | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

Conflicts that Divide Us from Our Senses. (Common and Practical)

Published

 on

Gaza, Israel, Lebanon, Ukraine and the Middle East are experiencing historic events, a culmination of cultural, political, social and religious differences that have created problems with no reasonable solutions. As observers we tend to pick sides, those who are right and wrong, those who appear to be acting in a defensive manner, and those aggressors needing to face righteous justice-vengeance. Whose right and whose wrong? Ethically both sides to these horrible events have the right and responsibility to take action against the other. Injustices have been felt by all involved. We need to make sense of their gut instincts and reactions and try to understand why they do what they do.

Understanding what aggression and defensive postures do will help. Knowing that these events are not simply acts of individuals but something coming from the very essence of their cultural, political and religious roots. Sure killing innocents is wrong, but the other side did so often, so justification is placed. A doctrine of justification has been set ever since Israel was born. Remember Palestine, as part of the British Empire was shared by all involved, often in a peaceful environment. Then European and North American Shame and guilt allowed this territory to be taken by the future Israelis. Jewish terrorism against Britain forced the issue without any consideration of the non-Jews who resided in this land. Ideas of theft and expropriation of lands and property became the basis for future mistrust, jealousy and hate toward the Israelis. Well-founded if you think about it. Someone takes your home away and drives you off. You’ll be pissed right? From that moment onward Israel’s people became surrounded by various nations both jealous and angered because the wealthiest nations in the world supported Israel but not them. Israel has been in defensive mode ever since with a well-trained and armed national force ready at a drop of the dime to go into action.

Palestinians have been middlemen lying between their foe and their allies and other superpowers ready to inflict chaos in Israel and their ally’s lands whenever possible. Both sides see their cause to be just, moral and supported by their Deity. Each side knows what is right and wrong. Both sides see peace, and unity of their people and community as a prize worth fighting for, and the old adage remains “The ends justify the means”. So mini invasions happen, rockets fly and strike civilian targets, snipers shoot children, nations allow thousands to die unnecessarily and pagers explode killing many innocents.

Amoral behaviour is widespread among all combatants and every tool to strike at the other is used. Reporters are killed, hospitals, schools, and places of worship are bombed, and people standing in line for food are machinegunned. Immorality is a powerful byproduct of conflict. Being virtuous is left to victims and bystanders outside of the conflict. Citizens on both sides attempt to bring about peace only to be ignored, arrested and often killed by their own side. The dichotomy of being right or wrong is not considered as the singular goal of winning the conflict lingers. The ultimate choice between doing right or wrong lies within all their hands, and it is their responsibility to make ethical decisions that align with their values and principles.

All those involved be they Israeli, Palestinian, Arab, Egyptian, Saudi, Lebanese, Iranian or the Super Powers must make a choice that will truly challenge them to the core. They need to set aside their mistrust, greed, hatred and jealousy and be what they always claim themselves to be, peace loving, democratic, religious, moral and civilized nations and special interest groups. Never has there been a time when a group of people can achieve the unachievable. To be selfless, forgiving, tolerant and charitable to others, even those they oppose. Socrates said, “The greatest way to live with honour in this world is to be what we pretend and claim to be”. We all know that hypocrisy is prejudice with a halo. Each group player’s cause is seen to be the right one.

“Everyone thinks about changing the world, but no one seems to think about changing themselves” Yes this was said by a great writer and thinker, Leo Tolstoy. A simple equation right? Cannot change the other guy, their goals and expectations, so change yours. Be true to yourself. If you are a democratic-minded person, who supports the rights of individuals to their life, home, land and ultimately happiness, be that person. Set aside all anger, historical and practical hate. After all, only those who build and create are close to God and Divine Mercy.

Steven Kaszab
Bradford, Ontario
skaszab@yahoo.ca

News

Canada’s response to Trump deportation plan a key focus of revived cabinet committee

Published

 on

OTTAWA, W.Va. – U.S. president-elect Donald Trump’s promise launch a mass deportation of millions of undocumented immigrants has the Canadian government looking at its own border.

Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said Friday the issue is one of two “points of focus” for a recently revived cabinet committee on Canada-U.S. relations.

Freeland said she has also been speaking to premiers about the issue this week.

“I do want Canadians to know it is one of our two central points of focus. Ministers are working hard on it, and we absolutely believe that it’s an issue that Canadians are concerned about, Canadians are right to be concerned about it,” Freeland said, after the committee met for the first time since Trump left office in 2021.

She did not provide any details of the plan ministers are working on.

Public Safety Minister Dominic Leblanc, whose portfolio includes responsibility for the Canada Border Services Agency, co-chairs the committee. Freeland said that highlights the importance of border security to Canada-U.S. relations.

There was a significant increase in the number of irregular border crossings between 2016 and 2023, which the RCMP attributed in part to the policies of the first Trump administration.

The national police service said it has been working through multiple scenarios in case there is a change in irregular migration after Trump takes office once again, and any response to a “sudden increase in irregular migration” will be co-ordinated with border security and immigration officials.

However, Syed Hussan with the Migrant Rights Network said he does not anticipate a massive influx of people coming into Canada, chalking the current discussion up to anti-migrant panic.

“I’m not saying there won’t be some exceptions, that people will continue to cross. But here’s the thing, if you look at the people crossing currently into the U.S. from the Mexico border, these are mostly people who are recrossing post-deportation. The reason for that is, is that people have families and communities and jobs. So it seems very unlikely that people are going to move here,” he said.

Since the Safe Third Country Agreement was modified last year, far fewer people are making refugee claims in Canada through irregular border crossings.

The agreement between Canada and the U.S. acknowledges that both countries are safe places for refugees, and stipulates that asylum seekers must make a refugee claim in the country where they first arrive.

The number of people claiming asylum in Canada after coming through an irregular border crossing from the U.S. peaked at 14,000 between January and March 2023.

At that time, the rule was changed to only allow for refugee claims at regular ports of entry, with some specific exemptions.

This closed a loophole that had seen tens of thousands of people enter Canada at Roxham Road in Quebec between 2017 and 2023.

In the first six months of 2024, fewer than 700 people made refugee claims at irregular crossings.

There are 34,000 people waiting to have their refugee claims processed in Canada, according to government data.

In the first 10 months of this year, U.S. border officials recorded nearly 200,000 encounters with people making irregular crossings from Canada. Around 27,000 encounters took place at the border during the first 10 months of 2021.

Hussan said the change to the Safe Third Country Agreement made it less likely people will risk potentially dangerous crossings into Canada.

“Trying to make a life in Canada, it’s actually really difficult. It’s more difficult to be an undocumented person in Canada than the U.S. There’s actually more services in the U.S. currently, more access to jobs,” Hussan said.

Toronto-based immigration lawyer Robert Blanshay said he is receiving “tons and tons” of emails from Americans looking at possibly relocating to Canada since Trump won the election early Wednesday.

He estimates that about half are coming from members of the LGBTQ+ community.

“I spoke to a guy yesterday, he and his partner from Kansas City. And he said to me, ‘You know, things weren’t so hunky-dory here in Kansas City being gay to begin with. The entire political climate is just too scary for us,'” Blanshay said.

Blanshay said he advised the man he would likely not be eligible for express entry into Canada because he is at retirement age.

He also said many Americans contacted him to inquire about moving north of the border after Trump’s first electoral victory, but like last time, he does not anticipate many will actually follow through.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Surrey recount confirms B.C. New Democrats win election majority

Published

 on

VANCOUVER – The British Columbia New Democrats have a majority government of 47 seats after a recount in the riding of Surrey-Guildford gave the party’s candidate 22 more votes than the provincial Conservatives.

Confirmation of victory for Premier David Eby’s party comes nearly three weeks after election night when no majority could be declared.

Garry Begg of the NDP had officially gone into the recount yesterday with a 27-vote lead, although British Columbia’s chief electoral officer had said on Tuesday there were 28 unreported votes and these had reduced the margin to 21.

There are ongoing recounts in Kelowna Centre and Prince George-Mackenzie, but these races are led by John Rustad’s B.C. Conservatives and the outcomes will not change the majority status for the New Democrats.

The Election Act says the deadline to appeal results after a judicial recount must be filed with the court within two days after they are declared, but Andrew Watson with Elections BC says that due to Remembrance Day on Monday, that period ends at 4 p.m. Tuesday.

Eby has said his new cabinet will be announced on Nov. 18, with the 44 members of the Opposition caucus and two members from the B.C. Greens to be sworn in Nov. 12 and the New Democrat members of the legislature to be sworn in the next day.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Port of Montreal employer submits ‘final’ offer to dockworkers, threatens lockout

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – The employers association at the Port of Montreal has issued the dockworkers’ union a “final, comprehensive offer,” threatening to lock out workers at 9 p.m. Sunday if a deal isn’t reached.

The Maritime Employers Association says its new offer includes a three per cent salary increase per year for four years and a 3.5 per cent increase for the two subsequent years. It says the offer would bring the total average compensation package of a longshore worker at the Port of Montreal to more than $200,000 per year at the end of the contract.

“The MEA agrees to this significant compensation increase in view of the availability required from its employees,” it wrote Thursday evening in a news release.

The association added that it is asking longshore workers to provide at least one hour’s notice when they will be absent from a shift — instead of one minute — to help reduce management issues “which have a major effect on daily operations.”

Syndicat des débardeurs du port de Montréal, which represents nearly 1,200 longshore workers, launched a partial unlimited strike on Oct. 31, which has paralyzed two terminals that represent 40 per cent of the port’s total container handling capacity.

A complete strike on overtime, affecting the whole port, began on Oct. 10.

The union has said it will accept the same increases that were granted to its counterparts in Halifax or Vancouver — 20 per cent over four years. It is also concerned with scheduling and work-life balance. Workers have been without a collective agreement since Dec. 31, 2023.

Only essential services and activities unrelated to longshoring will continue at the port after 9 p.m. Sunday in the event of a lockout, the employer said.

The ongoing dispute has had major impacts at Canada’s second-biggest port, which moves some $400 million in goods every day.

On Thursday, Montreal port authority CEO Julie Gascon reiterated her call for federal intervention to end the dispute, which has left all container handling capacity at international terminals at “a standstill.”

“I believe that the best agreements are negotiated at the table,” she said in a news release. “But let’s face it, there are no negotiations, and the government must act by offering both sides a path to true industrial peace.”

Federal Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon issued a statement Thursday, prior to the lockout notice, in which he criticized the slow pace of talks at the ports in Montreal and British Columbia, where more than 700 unionized port workers have been locked out since Nov. 4.

“Both sets of talks are progressing at an insufficient pace, indicating a concerning absence of urgency from the parties involved,” he wrote on the X social media platform.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version