Connect with us

Media

Connor McDavid Deserves More Respect From Hockey Media – The Hockey Writers

Published

 on


The NHL announced the first tranche of its 2020-21 award winners from Sept. 6-13. We still have to wait until Sept. 21 to find out the rest of the winners, almost a month altogether. If you don’t remember what awards were already announced or who won them, don’t worry. You’re excused. After superbly handling the management of this year’s playoffs in Edmonton and Toronto bubbles, the NHL has made this year’s awards forgettable.

McDavid Not Even Nominated

What’s not forgettable is the disrespect shown to Connor McDavid. Of the multiple awards being given, the acknowledged best hockey player in the world will win none of them. We know this because he wasn’t even in the top three for nominations for any. This, of course, isn’t the NHL’s fault. It’s the Professional Hockey Writers Association’s (PHWA). Some NHL awards — like the Maurice Richard, Art Ross, and William Jennings – for top goal-scorer, top points leader and goalies with the best team goals-against total, respectively, are purely statistical.

Edmonton Oilers center Connor McDavid (THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP-Ross D. Franklin)

Of the awards related to players exclusively – i.e. not executives or coaches — the PHWA does the voting for most. The exceptions are for the Ted Lindsay Award for Most Outstanding Player and the Mark Messier Leadership Award. Those are decided by the National Hockey League Players Association (NHLPA) and Mark Messier himself, respectively.

Historical Bias by Hockey Media

This oversight and lack of respect is not limited to this year. McDavid has been in the NHL since 2015, or five seasons. In that time, he has won the following NHL awards:

2016-17: Art Ross, Hart and Ted Lindsay

2017-18: Art Ross and Ted Lindsay

The Hart Trophy (Dave Kuhn/Flickr)

Do you notice a pattern? Combined with no chance of winning an award this year, only one of the five awards McDavid has won over his career – the Hart, for Most Valuable Player to his team, in 2016-17 — was awarded to him by the media.

No Calder Trophy in 2015

Despite coming into the NHL in 2015 with a reputation as a “phenom,” and a “generational player,” the PHWA has shown McDavid a lack of appreciation and respect from the beginning.

Related: Connor McDavid & The Revival Of The Erie Otters

Artemi Panarin won the Calder Trophy for best rookie in a year when it stretched imagination to regard him as a rookie. In 2015, McDavid had just three years of amateur, major-junior hockey in Canada under his belt. He entered the NHL as an 18-year-old and had never played professional hockey before. Panarin, 24 years old, had already played nine years of professional hockey in the European and Asian-based Kontinental Hockey League, generally considered the top league in the world outside of the NHL.

Artemi Panarin Blackhawks
Artemi Panarin, while playing for the Blackhawks (Amy Irvin / The Hockey Writers)

In 2015-16, the seasoned pro, Panarin, scored 77 points in 80 games as a “rookie” with the Chicago Blackhawks. McDavid, never having played professional hockey, scored 48 points in an injury-shortened, 45-game season. Panarin won. McDavid came in third.

Letter vs. Spirit of the Law

By the NHL’s definition of “rookie,” Panarin was eligible to win the award:

To be considered a rookie, a player must not have played in more than 25 NHL games in any preceding seasons, nor in six or more NHL games in each of any two preceding seasons. Any player at least 26 years of age (by September 15th of that season) is not considered a rookie.

The NHL’s current definition of rookie

The NHL has tweaked its definition of rookie, however, six times since the league was formed in 1917. The reason for this has been to ensure fairness, that players without substantial professional playing experience didn’t unfairly compete against other, seasoned players.

The 1991 changes for the definition of “rookie” came about after Russian superstar and Hall of Famer Sergei Makarov won the Calder playing for the Calgary Flames at the age of 31 after playing 13 professional seasons, and years of elite international competitions. He clearly wasn’t a rookie by the general understanding of the term.

Sergei Makarov
Sergei Makarov won the Calder despite years of success on the famed Soviet “KLM” line, one of the most famous ever in hockey (THW Archives)

Panarin, with nine years of pro experience, comparable to Makharov’s 13, is also the second-oldest winner in the years since the age limit was changed in 1991. Of the 28 winners in that time period, two were 25 years old (both goalies), one was 23 (another goalie), three were 22, four were 21, and the rest were all 20 or under. By giving the Calder to Panarin, with his substantial pro experience at the age of 24, the PHWA was within the letter of the rules, but many observers thought it stretched the spirit of the award.

History Repeats Itself

Many scholars have observed that history repeats itself. Karl Marx added the caveat, “the first time as tragedy, the second as farce.” The reasons some members of the PHWA have given for not honouring McDavid’s accomplishments go beyond disrespect to the farcical.

McDavid, the argument goes, didn’t deserve to win the Hart Trophy in seasons 2017-18 or 2018-19 because he wasn’t good enough to help the Oilers make the playoffs. Those years, he placed fifth and third in Hart voting, with Taylor Hall and Nikita Kucherov winning, respectively.

Is the 2019-20 season somehow different than those years? When the NHL shut down on March 11, the Oilers were in a playoff position. The New York Rangers weren’t. McDavid had 97 points in 64 games at that point. Panarin had only 95 points in 69 games. Read that again. Panarin scored two fewer points than McDavid did in five more games. McDavid’s team was in a playoff position. Panarin’s wasn’t.

Edmonton Oilers' Connor McDavid
A happy Connor McDavid (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson))

The Hart Trophy is based solely on performance in the regular season. Hart voting should have been based only on what happened up to the end of the abbreviated season. By the PHWA’s own previous reckoning, Panarin should have been penalized for not being good enough to take his team into the playoffs, like McDavid had been the previous two seasons. 

COVID-19 changed many things and the Stanley Cup playoffs were one of them. The NHL decided to change their playoff format and add a qualifying round, making 24 teams eligible for the postseason instead of 16. The Rangers were suddenly no longer out of the playoffs and were promoted to the qualifying round. The Oilers were just as suddenly demoted from being playoff eligible to the qualifying round. To illustrate how unfair this was, consider that the Oilers had more points when league play stopped than the Stanley Cup-finalist Dallas Stars did. Both the Oilers and Rangers lost in the qualifying round, and neither team officially made the 2020 playoffs.

Related: 2020 NHL Playoffs Qualifying Round Upsets Described in One Word

Somehow, the PHWA’s “we-have-to-penalise-players-on-non-playoff-teams” reasoning changed this season. Their members gave enough votes to the non-playoff Panarin to put him in the final three nominees for this year’s Hart Trophy, but not McDavid.

Some writers are justifying their votes by saying that they already placed fellow Oiler Leon Draisaitl high on their ballot and couldn’t vote for two players on the same team for the Hart. Why not?

The Hart Memorial Trophy is given “to the player adjudged to be the most valuable to his team.” There is nothing in the letter of the eligibility rules prohibiting two players from the same team reaching the top three in nominations. Indeed, in the 2000-01 season, Mario Lemieux and Jaromir Jagr did just that (Joe Sakic won it).

Joe Sakic (THW Archives)

2019-20 is another year when two of the most valuable players played on the same team. Consider that Draisaitl and McDavid had the league’s two best points per game averages, 1.55 and 1.52, respectively. Panarin averaged only 1.38. Both Draisaitl (10) and McDavid (6) had more game-winning goals than Panarin (4). Both averaged more time on ice per game – a clear indication of which players coaches value most – than Panarin did.

2019-20 Nominations McDavid Should Be Higher In

What awards should the PWHA have voted McDavid higher for in this year? As shown, you can certainly make a case for the Hart. If you honestly feel you can’t place him higher on the ballot because you already put Draisaitl there, then McDavid (only 28 total penalty minutes) should have been in the top three for the “consolation” Lady Byng for gentlemanly conduct. That’s what the PHWA did by awarding it to Nathan MacKinnon. Why not have McDavid at least third in nominations for the Lady Byng also then?

Nathan MacKinnon Colorado Avalanche
Nathan MacKinnon, Colorado Avalanche (Amy Irvin / The Hockey Writers)

But the main award the PHWA should have given McDavid more consideration for this year was the Masterton Trophy. Not to slight any of the three finalists for this year’s award won by Bobby Ryan, but how can you not consider McDavid in the top three given the devastating and debilitating injury he suffered in the last game of the 2018-19 season? No one who watched the NHL’s documentary “Whatever It Takes” can possibly doubt he fully demonstrated all three of “perseverance, sportsmanship and dedication” in spades over the offseason to make it back in time for the first game of 2019-20. All he did after that was immediately perform as well as if not better than he did before the injury.

Does McDavid Himself Feel Disrespected?

Ever the gentleman, he’ll never say so, but one only has to read between the lines from the comments he made regarding his teammate Draisaitl’s chances of winning the Hart and Ted Lindsay awards this year to know how McDavid feels:

“I don’t have a lot of faith in the media voting so I don’t know who’s going to win, but it should be Leon,” McDavid said, according to TSN. “I think the players will get it right and vote Leon [the Ted Lindsay], but you never know about the media [the Hart].”



Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Media

Obama says Trump is 'jealous' of COVID-19's media coverage – CTV News

Published

 on


Former U.S. President Barack Obama on Tuesday harshly criticized President Donald Trump’s response to the coronavirus pandemic and faulted him for turning the White House into a “hot zone.”

“More than 225,000 people in this country are dead. More than 100,000 small businesses have closed. Half a million jobs are gone in Florida alone. Think about that,” Obama said, speaking from Orlando as he campaigned for Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

He continued, “And what’s his closing argument? That people are too focused on Covid. He said this at one of his rallies. COVID, COVID, COVID, he’s complaining. He’s jealous of COVID’s media coverage. If he had been focused on COVID from the beginning, cases wouldn’t be reaching new record highs across the country this week.”

Obama, an important surrogate for Biden, campaigned for his former vice president for the second time in four days in Florida. The key battleground state could play a decisive role in the outcome of the election, and recent polls show a tight race between Trump and Biden.

Obama’s Orlando speech built on a blistering rebuke of Trump he delivered last week in Pennsylvania, his first foray onto the campaign trail since a speech to the Democratic National Convention earlier in the year, and over the weekend in Florida.

Obama’s speeches have shown how he is keeping tabs on the day-to-day news about Trump, and how the Biden campaign is deploying him to deliver some of its harshest attacks on the current President and his administration.

Former presidents usually avoid directly attacking their successor in the White House, but Obama has delivered full-throated criticisms of Trump while campaigning for Biden. But Trump, with the way he has continually attacked Obama, even suggesting he should be indicted, has changed the calculus, thrusting the former president onto the campaign trail.

Democrats hope Obama can help gin up enthusiasm among the Democratic base and encourage Black men, Latinos and younger voters in battleground states to turn out and vote.

He accused Trump of failing to take preventative measures to contain the virus across the nation and in the White House. He also pointed to the second recent outbreak among White House staff, which infected several aides including Vice President Mike Pence’s chief of staff, Marc Short.

“Let me say this: I lived in the White House for a while,” Obama said. “You know, it’s a controlled environment. You can take some preventive measures in the White House to avoid getting sick. Except, this guy can’t seem to do it. He’s turned the White House into a hot zone.”

Obama criticized the comments made over the weekend by White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, who told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union,” “We are not going to control the pandemic. We are going to control the fact that we get vaccines, therapeutics and other mitigation areas.”

“Listen, winter is coming,” Obama said. “They’re waving the white flag of surrender. Florida, we can’t afford four more years of this.” He added, “We cannot afford this kind of incompetence and disinterest.”

The former president also criticized senior White House adviser Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, for recent comments he made about Black Americans. Kushner said Monday on Fox News, “One thing we’ve seen in a lot of the Black community, which is mostly Democrat, is that President Trump’s policies are the policies that can help people break out of the problems that they’re complaining about. But he can’t want them to be successful more than they want to be successful.”

Obama seized on the comments, saying, “(Trump’s) son-in-law says Black folks have to want to be successful. That’s the problem.” After a short pause, an incredulous-sounding Obama continued, “Who are these folks? What history books do they read? Who do they talk to?”

Trump responded to Obama’s speech on Twitter, noting that the remarks were airing on Fox News and claiming his predecessor was drawing a small crowd and giving a “fake speech” for Biden.

“Listen, you’ve got a president right now, he wants full credit for an economy that he inherited, he wants zero blame for the pandemic he ignored. But you know what, the job doesn’t work that way. You’ve got to be responsible 24/7. You’ve got to pay attention 24/7. Tweeting at the TV doesn’t fix things. Watching TV all day doesn’t fix things. Making stuff up doesn’t fix things,” Obama said.

One week from Election Day, Obama encouraged Floridians to vote early in-person or by mail. “Don’t wait. Put it in the mail or drop it off at a dropbox location today. Don’t take any chances, just get it done,” Obama said.

“We have to turn out like never before, Orlando. We have to leave no doubt. We can’t be complacent. We were complacent last time. Folks got a little lazy. Folks took things for granted. And look what happened. Not this time,” Obama said.

Obama praised his former vice president, describing Biden as a man of “principle and character” and highlighting his empathy and decency.

“He made me a better president, and he’s got the character and the experience to make us a better country,” Obama said.

Obama laid out the ways Biden has said he would get the pandemic under control, including making coronavirus tests free and widely available, distributing a vaccine to every American at no cost and providing enough personal protective equipment to all front-line workers.

“He’s going to make sure that small businesses that hold our communities together and employ millions of Americans can reopen safely, and he understands that we’re not going to rebuild the economy and put people back to work until we get this pandemic under control,” Obama said.

He lambasted Trump and Republicans for attempting to overhaul the Affordable Care Act, Obama’s landmark health care plan.

“Last week, Trump flat out said he hopes the Supreme Court takes your health insurance away. Said it out loud,” Obama said. “Don’t boo, vote,” he said, repeating a favorite line of his when the crowd booed. The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on the future of the ACA, also known as Obamacare, next month.

Obama said if elected, Biden and his running mate Sen. Kamala Harris of California would “protect your health care, they will expand Medicare, they’ll make insurance more affordable for everybody, because Joe knows that a president’s first job is to keep us safe from all threats, foreign, domestic, and microscopic.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Nigeria considers social media regulation in wake of deadly shooting – National Post

Published

 on


Article content

ABUJA/LAGOS — Nigeria’s information minister said “some form of regulation” could be imposed on social media just a week after protesters spread images and videos of a deadly shooting using Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

Images, video and an Instagram live feed from a popular DJ spread news of shootings in Lagos on Oct. 20, when witnesses and rights groups said the military fired on peaceful protesters.

The protesters had been demonstrating for nearly two weeks to demand an end to police brutality. The army denied its soldiers were there.

Social media helped spread word of the shootings worldwide, and international celebrities from Beyonce and Lewis Hamilton to Pope Francis since called on the country to resolve the conflict peacefully.

Information Minister Lai Mohammed told a panel at the National Assembly on Tuesday that “fake news” is one of the biggest challenges facing Nigeria.

A spokesman for the minister confirmed the comments, and said “the use of the social media to spread fake news and disinformation means there is the need to do something about it.”

Officials have said some videos and photos posted during the protests were fake news but have not said that about the shootings.

In the weeks before the shootings, protesters had also used social media to organize, raise money and share what they said was proof of police harassment, which increased pressure on authorities to respond to their demands.

Twitter Inc CEO Jack Dorsey Tweeted to encouraged his followers to contribute, and the hashtag #EndSARS was trending for several days, referencing the widely feared Special Anti-Robbery Squad that they successfully demanded be abolished. (Reporting by Felix Onuah in Abuja and Libby George in Lagos; Editing by Giles Elgood)

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

3 social media CEOs face grilling by GOP senators on bias – CTV News

Published

 on


WASHINGTON —
The CEOs of Twitter, Facebook and Google are facing a grilling by Republican senators making unfounded allegations that the tech giants show anti-conservative bias.

The Senate Commerce Committee has summoned Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and Google’s Sundar Pichai to testify for a hearing Wednesday. The executives agreed to appear remotely after being threatened with subpoenas.

With the presidential election looming, Republicans led by U.S. President Donald Trump have thrown a barrage of grievances at Big Tech’s social media platforms, which they accuse without evidence of deliberately suppressing conservative, religious and anti-abortion views.

The chorus of protest rose this month after Facebook and Twitter acted to limit dissemination of an unverified political story from the conservative-leaning New York Post about Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, an unprecedented action against a major media outlet. The story, which was not confirmed by other publications, cited unverified emails from Biden’s son Hunter that were reportedly disclosed by Trump allies.

Beyond questioning the CEOs, senators are expected to examine proposals to revise long-held legal protections for online speech, an immunity that critics in both parties say enables the companies to abdicate their responsibility to impartially moderate content.

The Justice Department has asked Congress to strip some of the bedrock protections that have generally shielded the tech companies from legal responsibility for what people post on their platforms. Trump signed an executive order challenging the protections from lawsuits under the 1996 telecommunications law.

“For too long, social media platforms have hidden behind Section 230 protections to censor content that deviates from their beliefs,” Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., the Commerce Committee chairman, said recently.

In their opening statements prepared for the hearing, Dorsey, Zuckerberg and Pichai addressed the proposals for changes to so-called Section 230, a provision of a 1996 law that has served as the foundation for unfettered speech on the internet. Zuckerberg said Congress “should update the law to make sure it’s working as intended.”

“We don’t think tech companies should be making so many decisions about these important issues alone,” he said, approving an active role for government regulators.

Dorsey and Pichai, however, urged caution in making any changes. “Undermining Section 230 will result in far more removal of online speech and impose severe limitations on our collective ability to address harmful content and protect people online,” Dorsey said.

Pichai urged lawmakers “to be very thoughtful about any changes to Section 230 and to be very aware of the consequences those changes might have on businesses and consumers.”

Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd told congressional leaders in a letter Tuesday that recent events have made the changes more urgent. He cited the action by Twitter and Facebook regarding the New York Post story, calling the companies’ limitations “quite concerning.”

The head of the Federal Communications Commission, an independent agency, recently announced plans to reexamine the legal protections, potentially putting meat on the bones of Trump’s order by opening the way to new rules. The move by FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Trump appointee, marked an about-face from the agency’s previous position.

Social media giants are also under heavy scrutiny for their efforts to police misinformation about the election. Twitter and Facebook have slapped a misinformation label on content from the president, who has around 80 million followers. Trump has raised the baseless prospect of mass fraud in the vote-by-mail process.

Starting Tuesday, Facebook was not accepting any new political advertising. Previously booked political ads will be able to run until the polls close next Tuesday, when all political advertising will temporarily be banned. Google, which owns YouTube, also is halting political ads after the polls close. Twitter banned all political ads last year.

Democrats have focused their criticism of social media mainly on hate speech, misinformation and other content that can incite violence or keep people from voting. They have criticized Big Tech CEOs for failing to police content, homing in on the platforms’ role in hate crimes and the rise of white nationalism in the U.S.

Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have scrambled to stem the tide of material that incites violence and spreads lies and baseless conspiracy theories.

The companies reject accusations of bias but have wrestled with how strongly they should intervene. They have often gone out of their way not to appear biased against conservative views — a posture that some say effectively tilts them toward those viewpoints. The effort has been especially strained for Facebook, which was caught off-guard in 2016, when it was used as a conduit by Russian agents to spread misinformation benefiting Trump’s presidential campaign.

The unwelcome attention to the three companies piles onto the anxieties in the tech industry, which also faces scrutiny from the Justice Department, federal regulators, Congress and state attorneys general around the country.

Last week, the Justice Department sued Google for abusing its dominance in online search and advertising — the government’s most significant attempt to protect competition since its groundbreaking case against Microsoft more than 20 years ago.

With antitrust in the spotlight, Facebook, Apple and Amazon also are under investigation at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending