Connect with us

News

Coronavirus: Canadians fear COVID-19 will hurt their finances, poll says – Global News

Published

 on


A growing number of Canadians expect their personal finances to be affected as cases of COVID-19 spread, according to a new Ipsos poll.

The poll, which was conducted between Feb. 28 and 29, found that 37 per cent of Canadians believe the coronavirus will hit their personal financial situation.


READ MORE:
Bank of Canada cuts rates by half a percentage point to 1.25% amid coronavirus concerns

That’s an increase of 20 percentage point from Feb. 14 and 15, when Canadians were asked the same question.

Darrell Bricker, the Global CEO of Ipsos Public Affairs, explained that such a dramatic jump in numbers over roughly two weeks doesn’t happen often.

“This is kind of unprecedented,” Bricker said.

“Sometimes thing get out there and there are more short-term issues and they fade away quickly. This one seems to be more fundamental.”

Story continues below advertisement






1:50
Coronavirus outbreak: World Bank looking to provide solutions for developing countries


Coronavirus outbreak: World Bank looking to provide solutions for developing countries

Bricker noted that Canada’s jump of 20 percentage points is higher than the increase seen in most other countries where the poll was also conducted.

“Where we’ve really seen movement [in Canada] is not necessarily in the fears about the infection itself, although that has moved up. Where the real jump has been is the question the relates to financial impact.”

The majority of Canadians, at 67 per cent, also said they believe the virus reached the country because it’s “impossible to forecast.” Another 33 per cent said that the virus reached Canada due to a lack of preventative measures enforced by officials.


READ MORE:
Coronavirus — Do Canadians really need to stockpile household items?

That means Canadians aren’t “hammering the government” over its spread, Bricker said.

“What it means is that it’s seen as something that is kind of out of control, which in many ways is even more scary,” he noted.

The rise in anxiety over COVID-19’s impact on finances is being noted around the world, the poll noted. The same questions were posed to respondents in 10 other countries dealing with coronavirus cases. individuals in all countries were more fearful of a financial impact than they were earlier in February.

In Japan, 56 per cent of people said they expected a negative effect on their wallet. Japan’s prime minister, who ordered schools closed nationwide last week, has been pressing for legal backing to declare a state of emergency if needed.

Story continues below advertisement

Fear over finances was also reported in Italy, where 41 per cent said they were wary of the situation. More than 3,000 people have tested positive in Italy and 107 of them have died — the largest number of deaths outside of China.

Individuals in other countries, such as Australia and Russia, also reported higher levels of financial anxiety over the illness, both at 40 per cent.






1:24
Coronavirus outbreak: Global supply and demand impacted by COVID-19, IMF managing director says


Coronavirus outbreak: Global supply and demand impacted by COVID-19, IMF managing director says

Since December 2019, there have been 94,000 cases of the infection and 3,200 deaths. The large majority of them have been in China.

Respondents to the survey aren’t the only ones keeping a close eye on finances amid the spread of coronavirus, though.

The Bank of Canada cut its trend-setting interest rate by half a percentage point to 1.25 per cent down from 1.75 per cent on Wednesday, in an effort to soften the economic impact of the COVID-19 outbreak.

The decision came after the U.S. Federal Reserve implemented a similar cut on Tuesday, acting before its next scheduled policy meeting on March 17-18.


READ MORE:
Coronavirus is driving down stock prices — but experts say not to panic

“While Canada’s economy has been operating close to potential with inflation on target, the COVID-19 virus is a material negative shock to the Canadian and global outlooks, and monetary and fiscal authorities are responding,” the central bank said in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

While the traders and analysts had widely anticipated that Canada’s central bank would follow the U.S. lead, it’s unclear to what extent the rate cut will shore up sentiment among investors, markets and consumers.

Global stock markets have also been closely watched in the past weeks over coronavirus outbreak uncertainties. Markets turned higher Wednesday, extending days of volatility, as investors weighed the economic impact of COVID-19.






3:54
Covid-19: We asked an infectious disease expert your coronavirus questions


Covid-19: We asked an infectious disease expert your coronavirus questions

Rubina Ahmed-Haq, a personal finance expert, explained that Canadians hoping for long-term investment gains shouldn’t change their course of action due to coronavirus outbreak fears.

Ahmed-Haq noted that the stock market fluctuates with different political, social and economic events.

“This is an event just like the financial meltdown in 2008 and 2009, or the SARS outbreak in 2003,” she said.

“If you constantly follow headlines, you’re never going to be able to keep your money invested over the long term.”

She said those looking to invest in the long term — anything more than five years — should not be worried. Ahmed-Haq said those with questions or concerns should speak with a financial advisor.

This Ipsos survey was conducted between Feb. 28 and 29 on the Global Advisor online platform among 10,000 adults aged 18-74 in Canada and the United States and 16-74 in Australia, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, United Kingdom and Vietnam. The sample consists of approximately 1,000 individuals in each country, which are considered accurate +/- 3.5 percentage points.

Story continues below advertisement

— With files from Global News reporter Erica Alini, The Associated Press

© 2020 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

News

Prince Charles and Camilla wrap up Platinum Jubilee visit in Northwest Territories

Published

 on

YELLOWKNIFE — Prince Charles and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, took part in ceremonies and learned about Indigenous language in the Northwest Territories Thursday as their royal visit wrapped up.

They were greeted by a large group at the Yellowknives Dene First Nation community of Dettah. The First Nation east of Yellowknife has a population of just over 200 people and dozens came out to shake hands with the couple and take part in a ceremonial lighting of a fire.

The prince also took part in a round dance with community members and learned about traditional tools.

“It’s very emotional for me,” said 53-year-old Eileen Drygeese.

Drygeese said her parents and grandparents would tell stories about when they met the royals during a tour in the 1970s when Prince Charles was a teenager. She gave Camilla a medicine bundle to represent the women of her family and their history together.

Some members did not support the visit, Drygeese said, but added they understand the power of showcasing their community and culture.

Many of those who came were wearing orange clothing and other items with the words “every child matters” representing the legacy of residential schools.

Charles was given a pair of moosehide moccasins before he joined Dettah Chief Edward Sangris, Ndilo Chief Fred Sangris and other Indigenous leaders for a private meeting.

The trip has been shaped by Canada’s reckoning with its relationship and history with Indigenous people as possible graves continue to be found at the sites of former residential schools across the country.

The three-day tour began Tuesday in Newfoundland and Labrador, where Prince Charles recognized the visit came at an important moment.

“We must find new ways to come to terms with the darker and more difficult aspects of the past, acknowledging, reconciling and striving to do better,” he said.

During a Platinum Jubilee reception at Rideau Hall on Wednesday, Gov. Gen. Mary Simon encouraged the couple to listen to Indigenous leaders, elders and community members in the North.

RoseAnne Archibald, the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, said during the reception that she asked the prince for a formal apology from the Queen, as head of the Church of England.

Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller said Thursday that while all effective power rests with the government, not with the Queen, he understands comments from the royals could be important to some Indigenous people.

“It’s nuanced,” he said. “There are some Indigenous Peoples ⁠ — much like non-Indigenous people ⁠ — who couldn’t care less. There are many who have a profound deep connection to the Royal Family.”

The couple were greeted earlier Thursday on the tarmac by Yellowknife Mayor Rebecca Alty and Margaret Thom, the commissioner of the Northwest Territories.

They were also presented with flowers wrapped in birch tree bark by a young student from the K’alemi Dene School,

While Charles met with leaders, the duchess stopped at a school to hear about programs aimed at preserving Indigenous languages. There, she took part in a demonstration with a greenscreen and puppets, as well as stop-motion animation.

“Very clever,” Camilla said about the animation project.

Later, Charles was made an honorary Canadian Ranger at an event in Yellowknife. Rangers are a part of the Canadian Army Reserve in northern and isolated areas.

The prince also met with local experts to discuss climate change and permafrost.

The last royal visit to Northwest Territories was in 2011, when Prince William and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, were welcomed by large crowds during a one-day stop in the North during a whirlwind first royal tour for the newlyweds.

This royal visit was to culminate with a celebration in Yellowknife in honour of the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 19, 2022.

 

Morgan Lowrie, The Canadian Press

Continue Reading

News

Liberals revive bill to create watchdog for Canada Border Services Agency

Published

 on

OTTAWA — The federal Liberals are rekindling a plan to allow travellers, immigration detainees and others who feel they have been mistreated by Canada’s border agency to complain to an independent body.

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino introduced legislation Thursday to give the RCMP watchdog the additional responsibility of handling public complaints about the Canada Border Services Agency.

The bill to create the Public Complaints and Review Commission comes after previous versions died on the order paper.

Border officers can stop travellers for questioning, take blood and breath samples and search, detain and arrest people without warrants.

An internal agency unit handles complaints from the public, while other bodies, including the courts, the federal privacy commissioner and the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency, examine various concerns.

But the border agency is not overseen by a dedicated, independent complaints and review body, prompting civil liberties advocates, refugee lawyers and parliamentary committees to call for stronger monitoring.

The government proposes spending $112 million over five years, and more than $19 million a year ongoing, to establish the new body, which would replace the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP.

Michelaine Lahaie, chairperson of the existing RCMP complaints commission, told a news conference she was pleased to see many of her key recommendations had been included in the bill.

The legislation would require both the RCMP and border agency to respond to interim reports from the new watchdog within six months — addressing a long-standing sore point.

The RCMP commissioner was taken to court over chronic foot-dragging in providing feedback on interim reports from the current complaints commission. The problem has led to lengthy delays in the public release of final reports and recommendations.

“Codifying the timelines is a way to ensure that we remain vigilant going forward,” Mendicino said.

The RCMP and border agency would also have to report annually to the public safety minister on progress in implementing commission recommendations.

In addition, there would be race-based data collection and publication to increase knowledge of systemic racism in law enforcement and guide responses.

The new Public Complaints and Review Commission would carry out specified reviews of any non-national-security activities of the RCMP and border services agency, either on the commission’s own initiative or at the request of the minister.

It would also conduct complaint-related investigations concerning both agencies, which include:

— receiving complaints from the public about conduct and level of service;

— reviews when complainants are not satisfied with the RCMP or border agency’s handling of their concerns; and

— initiating complaints and investigations into conduct when it is in the public interest to do so.

“Ultimately, this legislation is about strengthening our law enforcement agencies by strengthening accountability, transparency and in our trust in them, and it will lead to a safer country for everyone,” Mendicino said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 19, 2022.

 

Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press

Continue Reading

News

Five reasons Quebec’s language law reform is stirring controversy

Published

 on

MONTREAL — A protest against Quebec’s proposed overhaul of its language law drew a large crowd in Montreal on Saturday. The government says Bill 96 is a moderate reform that will improve protection for French while preserving English services, but critics say the bill will limit access to health care and justice, cost college teachers their jobs and increase red tape for small businesses.

Here are five reasons the bill, expected to be passed before the summer, is under fire:

Health care

Marlene Jennings, president of the Quebec Community Groups Network, an anglophone advocacy group, says the law could prevent hundreds of thousands of English speakers from accessing health care in their language. The bill requires government agencies, including health services, to communicate with the public in French except “where health, public safety or the principles of natural justice so require.”

There are also exceptions for people who have the right to English education in Quebec, those who have previously communicated with the government in English and immigrants who have lived in the province for less than six months.

On Tuesday, Premier François Legault offered assurances that the law won’t affect access to health services in English, but Jennings is skeptical. “We already have problems, when language hasn’t been made an issue, to access quality health-care services in a timely fashion. Bill 96 is going to compound those problems,” she said in an interview.

Education

The bill would require all students at English junior colleges to take three additional courses in French. Students with English education rights — those who have a parent or sibling who was educated in English in Canada — will be allowed to take courses on the French language, but other students will have to take other subjects, such as history or biology, in French.

Adding French-language classes in English institutions will be a challenge, said Adam Bright, an English literature teacher at Dawson College in Montreal. Because the law would require students without English education rights to take a French exit exam, Bright predicts few of those students will choose English literature courses, making it more difficult for them to succeed in their other classes.

He said his union expects the changes would lead to staffing cuts in the English department. “My wife is also an English literature teacher at Dawson, so if this bill goes through, both of us are going to lose our jobs,” he said in an interview.

Red tape for businesses 

The bill would expand provisions of the province’s language laws, which previously only applied to businesses with 50 or more employees, to those with 25 or more.

François Vincent, Quebec vice-president of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, estimates that complying with the law after it comes into effect will involve 20 to 50 hours of paperwork for business owners. Some businesses may have to hire consultants to help. While Vincent said it’s important to help people learn French, he doesn’t think that additional red tape will do that.

“Asking a small garage or a small restaurant in Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean that’s working 100 per cent in French to fill out paperwork so that the Office québécois de la langue française will say ‘Congratulations, you work in French,’ will not change anything,” he said in an interview.

Access to justice

The bill would require all court filings by businesses to be in French or translated into French and empower the minister of justice and the minister responsible for the French language to decide which provincial court judges need to be bilingual.

It calls for amending pieces of legislation — including Quebec’s Charter of the French Language, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Consumer Protection Act and Montreal’s city charter.

Pearl Eliadis, a Montreal human rights lawyer, said that complexity can make it hard to see the extent of the changes being proposed. “Access to justice isn’t just going to court and being able to get there, it’s also being able to understand the law,” she said.

Warrantless search and seizure

The bill would proactively invoke the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian Constitution to protect it from charter challenges.

Among the elements of the bill that would be shielded is a provision granting language inspectors the power to engage in search and seizure operations without a warrant. Eliadis said inspectors are not required to show reasonable grounds or reasonable suspicion before conducting a search related to the law.

“It’s more than a group of administrative rules designed to bolster French, because they’ve deliberately gone into each part of the act where constitutional rights can be invoked and essentially, with one sweep of the brush … disappeared an entire swath of our constitutional protections, leaving us with no remedy,” she said. “I worry the rule of law is being diminished.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 19, 2022.

 

Jacob Serebrin, The Canadian Press

Continue Reading

Trending