Covid Recession Hurting State And Local Budgets, And The Economy - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Covid Recession Hurting State And Local Budgets, And The Economy – Forbes

Published

 on


As President Trump golfs in Florida after disrupting the Congressionally-authorized Covid relief package, state and local budgets continue suffering from the Covid pandemic.  And even if signed, this package contains little direct aid for them.  It will not be any easier for Joe Biden to get adequate funding from a divided Congress, with Republicans arguing that states and cities are mismanaged, not suffering from an extraordinary pandemic and recession.

We are halfway through fiscal year 2021 for states, which for almost all of them began on July 1.  The National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) tells us this is the first year since the Great Recession where state general fund spending is declining, “1.1 percent compared to fiscal 2020 and…5.5 percent compared to governors’ budgets proposed before the pandemic.”

States so far have avoided even deeper cuts by using their rainy-day funds, built up after the Great Recession.  But those funds are being spent, so they will be less and less available for additional cushioning.  Without budget aid, they will cut spending and jobs, making the economic recovery slower and more painful than it should be. 

In several states, revenues have done better than originally feared, in part because wealthier people have not suffered as much from the pandemic.  This is the so-called “K-shaped recovery”—people with higher incomes, higher education, and white-collar jobs didn’t suffer the lasting damages hitting lower-income workers.

Higher income people often own homes and stocks.  And both of those assets have risen in value.  In spite of dramatic stories about falling prices in New York City, house prices have risen substantially across the nation.  Driven by low interest rates and a lack of housing supply, in September the Case-Shiller national home price index saw an annual increase of 6.9%, with a 6.6% rise in the twenty largest metropolitan areas. And stock indexes have risen so high that some observers worry about an unsustainable bubble.   

For states with progressive taxes, this unequal income and wealth has helped their budgets or at least prevented the worst-case forecasts from coming true.  States that depend more on specific industries and often more regressive taxes—tourism in Florida, Nevada and Hawaii or oil and gas revenues in Texas, North Dakota, and Louisiana—are seeing bigger budget gaps.

Some politicians claim higher-than-predicted tax collections eliminate the need for federal aid.  In rejecting further federal budget aid, Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) says “We’re seeing data now that clearly shows state and local governments’ projected revenue shortfalls from the coronavirus didn’t happen.”  This is in spite of Scott’s state of Florida having an 18 percent revenue gap from last year, fourth-worst in the nation.

These Republicans don’t—or won’t—understand the real picture.  True, revenues didn’t fall as far as first feared.  When the virus first hit, budget forecasters saw the abrupt drop in jobs and the economy and feared the worst.  But we didn’t get the worst case, because the federal government disbursed trillions of dollars in small business relief, expanded unemployment insurance, one-time direct household payments, and other spending.   

But avoiding the absolute worst case isn’t the same as achieving fiscal health.  Scholars at the Urban Institute tell us that although states had “better than expected tax collections,” the “actual revenue losses experienced by the states are deep and widespread, if not universal.”  

So even if Trump signs the relief bill, it isn’t enough, especially for hard-hit states and cities, and especially lower income and non-white workers, households, and children.  And his refusal to sign the bill as of Saturday means “millions of Americans will lose their jobless benefits” because the extension passed earlier this year expires at the end of 2020.

 Thea Lee, President of the Economic Policy Institute, says “the package is a fraction of what is required to address the monumental economic damage caused by inadequate response to the COVID-19 pandemic.”  There’s no real state and local budget aid and the unemployment insurance provisions are too weak.

But the difficulties in getting even this inadequate relief package through the Republican-controlled Senate with an (admittedly erratic and divisive) Republican President doesn’t bode well for the Biden Administration.  Republican legislators continue arguing that state and local budget problems are the fault of poorly managed governments, mostly (and falsely) by Democrats in their telling.

If they keep that narrative when a Democratic president takes office in January, prospects for adequate budgetary relief are not very promising.  And state and local budgets and the economy—and all of us, but especially low-income families—will pay the price.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version