Credit Suisse to tap emergency funding from Swiss central bank to shore up finances | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Business

Credit Suisse to tap emergency funding from Swiss central bank to shore up finances

Published

 on

People walk by the New York headquarters of Credit Suisse on March 15, in New York City. After its largest shareholder said it could not provide further support, Credit Suisse shares fell by as much as 30 per cent on Wednesday as global concerns over the stability of major banks continued to spread.Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Credit Suisse will borrow up to 50 billion Swiss francs ($74-billion) from the Swiss central bank under emergency credit lines, following a sharp drop in the lender’s share price Wednesday that added to concerns about the health of the financial system on both sides of the Atlantic.

Earlier in the day, the central bank had promised to provide Credit Suisse, Switzerland’s second-largest bank, with liquidity “if necessary,” essentially guaranteeing the lender would have access to cash in the event of a bank run. The move is reminiscent of the central bank supports provided to major global banks during the 2008 financial crisis.

At this point it is unclear how much Credit Suisse will actually borrow of the 50 billion Swiss francs made available. The bank also announced plans late Wednesday to buy back U.S.-dollar and Euro-denominated bonds worth up to US$2.5-billion and €500-million, respectively. Buying back debt will ease the bank’s financial burden as it completes a previously announced restructuring.

Global investors are on edge after two U.S. regional banks – Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank – failed in the past week. The fear is that rapidly rising interest rates have irreparably damaged certain corners of the global financial system. Because there is so much uncertainty, every new development is scrutinized and fretted over, even when problems have been publicly known for years, which is the case at Credit Suisse.

Before Wednesday’s woes, which resulted in the bank’s shares plummeting by as much as 30 per cent, they were already down 98 per cent from their record high in 2007, owing to never-ending scandals, financial losses and restructurings.

Investors are dumping shares in even the biggest banks, which have the largest capital backstops. JP Morgan Chase & Co.’s JPM-N shares fell 5 per cent Wednesday, and are now down slightly this year. Shares of Royal Bank of Canada RY-T, the largest Canadian lender, are down 5 per cent over the past week – but are still up 2 per cent this year.

In a joint statement, the Swiss central bank and the country’s financial regulator asserted that “the problems of certain banks in the USA do not pose a direct risk of contagion for the Swiss financial markets.”

“Credit Suisse meets the capital and liquidity requirements imposed on systemically important banks,” they said in explaining the decision to backstop the lender if need be.

Wednesday’s sell-off began after Ammar Al Khudairy, chair of Saudi National Bank, which is Credit Suisse’s largest shareholder, said he would not boost his organization’s ownership stake. He later clarified that boosting the stake above 10 per cent would impose extra regulatory burdens.

Credit Suisse has struggled for years, plagued by scandal after scandal. It was damaged by massive trading losses after the implosion of Archegos Capital, and by links to the collapsed finance firm Greensill Capital. Once a dominant name in global finance, the bank’s stature has plunged with its market share. Its shares hit a record high of US$74 each in New York in 2007. The stock closed at US$2.16 Wednesday.

The key question for regulators and investors is whether the failures of the two U.S. banks stemmed from idiosyncratic factors, such as poor risk management decisions, or whether they auger deeper problems in the financial system.

With everyone on edge, one saving grace is that global banking watchdogs have forced systemically important banks to beef up their capital reserves – that is, cash and other liquid securities that serve as buffers when things go bad. Canada’s banking watchdog, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, has been at the forefront of this effort, and Canada’s banks are praised globally for their stability and risk management.

But those buffers could now be tested.

“We don’t know yet whether the consequences of easy money and regulatory changes will cascade throughout the US regional banking sector … with more seizures and shutdowns coming,” BlackRock chief executive Larry Fink wrote Wednesday in his annual public letter. He described Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse as the “price we’re paying for decades of easy money.”

The rapid rise in interest rates has cratered bond prices, leaving large unrealized losses on the balance sheets of many financial institutions. This proved to be a landmine for Silicon Valley Bank, which was forced to sell a portion of its bond portfolio at a loss, sparking a bank run. The U.S. Federal Reserve announced a $25-billion liquidity facility on Sunday, giving regional banks the ability to swap their illiquid assets for cash in the event of bank runs.

In its funding announcement late Wednesday, Credit Suisse hoped to differentiate itself from Silicon Valley Bank by noting that its bond portfolio is “fully hedged for moves in interest rates.” In other words, if anything has to be sold, Credit Suisse should not incur losses.

Concerns about a broader financial crisis have quickly changed market expectations for future interest rate hikes. A week ago, markets were pricing in another percentage point of rate hikes from the U.S. Federal Reserve in the coming months, and no rate cuts until 2024. On Wednesday, markets were pricing in only a 50-per-cent chance the Fed would raise rates again at its next meeting, on March 22, and a high probability that it would start cutting rates this summer.

Banking sector woes have made bond prices swing at their fastest rate in decades. The yield on two-year U.S. Treasuries has fallen 120 basis points in the past five trading days.

Stock markets fell sharply Wednesday morning, although they recovered some ground through the trading day. The S&P 500 ended down 0.7 per cent, while the TSX Index dropped 1.6 per cent, dragged down by plummeting oil prices. The EURO STOXX 50, an index of large European companies, fell 3.46 per cent.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The #1 Skill I Look For When Hiring

Published

 on

File this column under “for what it’s worth.”

“Communication is one of the most important skills you require for a successful life.” — Catherine Pulsifer, author.

I’m one hundred percent in agreement with Pulsifer, which is why my evaluation of candidates begins with their writing skills. If a candidate’s writing skills and verbal communication skills, which I’ll assess when interviewing, aren’t well above average, I’ll pass on them regardless of their skills and experience.

 

Why?

 

Because business is fundamentally about getting other people to do things—getting employees to be productive, getting customers to buy your products or services, and getting vendors to agree to a counteroffer price. In business, as in life in general, you can’t make anything happen without effective communication; this is especially true when job searching when your writing is often an employer’s first impression of you.

 

Think of all the writing you engage in during a job search (resumes, cover letters, emails, texts) and all your other writing (LinkedIn profile, as well as posts and comments, blogs, articles, tweets, etc.) employers will read when they Google you to determine if you’re interview-worthy.

 

With so much of our communication today taking place via writing (email, text, collaboration platforms such as Microsoft Teams, Slack, ClickUp, WhatsApp and Rocket.Chat), the importance of proficient writing skills can’t be overstated.

 

When assessing a candidate’s writing skills, you probably think I’m looking for grammar and spelling errors. Although error-free writing is important—it shows professionalism and attention to detail—it’s not the primary reason I look at a candidate’s writing skills.

 

The way someone writes reveals how they think.

 

  • Clear writing = Clear thinking
  • Structured paragraphs = Structured mind
  • Impactful sentences = Impactful ideas

 

Effective writing isn’t about using sophisticated vocabulary. Hemingway demonstrated that deceptively simple, stripped-down prose can captivate readers. Effective writing takes intricate thoughts and presents them in a way that makes the reader think, “Damn! Why didn’t I see it that way?” A good writer is a dead giveaway for a good thinker. More than ever, the business world needs “good thinkers.”

 

Therefore, when I come across a candidate who’s a good writer, hence a good thinker, I know they’re likely to be able to write:

 

  • Emails that don’t get deleted immediately and are responded to
  • Simple, concise, and unambiguous instructions
  • Pitches that are likely to get read
  • Social media content that stops thumbs
  • Human-sounding website copy
  • Persuasively, while attuned to the reader’s possible sensitivities

 

Now, let’s talk about the elephant in the room: AI, which job seekers are using en masse. Earlier this year, I wrote that AI’s ability to hyper-increase an employee’s productivity—AI is still in its infancy; we’ve seen nothing yet—in certain professions, such as writing, sales and marketing, computer programming, office and admin, and customer service, makes it a “fewer employees needed” tool, which understandably greatly appeals to employers. In my opinion, the recent layoffs aren’t related to the economy; they’re due to employers adopting AI. Additionally, companies are trying to balance investing in AI with cost-cutting measures. CEOs who’ve previously said, “Our people are everything,” have arguably created today’s job market by obsessively focusing on AI to gain competitive advantages and reduce their largest expense, their payroll.

 

It wouldn’t be a stretch to assume that most AI usage involves generating written content, content that’s obvious to me, and likely to you as well, to have been written by AI. However, here’s the twist: I don’t particularly care.

 

Why?

 

Because the fundamental skill I’m looking for is the ability to organize thoughts and communicate effectively. What I care about is whether the candidate can take AI-generated content and transform it into something uniquely valuable. If they can, they’re demonstrating the skills of being a good thinker and communicator. It’s like being a great DJ; anyone can push play, but it takes skill to read a room and mix music that gets people pumped.

 

Using AI requires prompting effectively, which requires good writing skills to write clear and precise instructions that guide the AI to produce desired outcomes. Prompting AI effectively requires understanding structure, flow and impact. You need to know how to shape raw information, such as milestones throughout your career when you achieved quantitative results, into a compelling narrative.

So, what’s the best way to gain and enhance your writing skills? As with any skill, you’ve got to work at it.

Two rules guide my writing:

 

  • Use strong verbs and nouns instead of relying on adverbs, such as “She dashed to the store.” instead of “She ran quickly to the store.” or “He whispered to the child.” instead of “He spoke softly to the child.”
  • Avoid using long words when a shorter one will do, such as “use” instead of “utilize” or “ask” instead of “inquire.” As attention spans get shorter, I aim for clarity, simplicity and, most importantly, brevity in my writing.

 

Don’t just string words together; learn to organize your thoughts, think critically, and communicate clearly. Solid writing skills will significantly set you apart from your competition, giving you an advantage in your job search and career.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers “unsweetened” job search advice. You can send Nick your questions to artoffindingwork@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Business

Politics likely pushed Air Canada toward deal with ‘unheard of’ gains for pilots

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – Politics, public opinion and salary hikes south of the border helped push Air Canada toward a deal that secures major pay gains for pilots, experts say.

Hammered out over the weekend, the would-be agreement includes a cumulative wage hike of nearly 42 per cent over four years — an enormous bump by historical standards — according to one source who was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter. The previous 10-year contract granted increases of just two per cent annually.

The federal government’s stated unwillingness to step in paved the way for a deal, noted John Gradek, after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made it plain the two sides should hash one out themselves.

“Public opinion basically pressed the federal cabinet, including the prime minister, to keep their hands clear of negotiations and looking at imposing a settlement,” said Gradek, who teaches aviation management at McGill University.

After late-night talks at a hotel near Toronto’s Pearson airport, the country’s biggest airline and the union representing 5,200-plus aviators announced early Sunday morning they had reached a tentative agreement, averting a strike that would have grounded flights and affected some 110,000 passengers daily.

The relative precariousness of the Liberal minority government as well as a push to appear more pro-labour underlay the prime minister’s hands-off approach to the negotiations.

Trudeau said Friday the government would not step in to fix the impasse — unlike during a massive railway work stoppage last month and a strike by WestJet mechanics over the Canada Day long weekend that workers claimed road roughshod over their constitutional right to collective bargaining. Trudeau said the government respects the right to strike and would only intervene if it became apparent no negotiated deal was possible.

“They felt that they really didn’t want to try for a third attempt at intervention and basically said, ‘Let’s let the airline decide how they want to deal with this one,'” said Gradek.

“Air Canada ran out of support as the week wore on, and by the time they got to Friday night, Saturday morning, there was nothing left for them to do but to basically try to get a deal set up and accepted by ALPA (Air Line Pilots Association).”

Trudeau’s government was also unlikely to consider back-to-work legislation after the NDP tore up its agreement to support the Liberal minority in Parliament, Gradek said. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, whose party has traditionally toed a more pro-business line, also said last week that Tories “stand with the pilots” and swore off “pre-empting” the negotiations.

Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau had asked Ottawa on Thursday to impose binding arbitration pre-emptively — “before any travel disruption starts” — if talks failed. Backed by business leaders, he’d hoped for an effective repeat of the Conservatives’ move to head off a strike in 2012 by legislating Air Canada pilots and ground crew to stick to their posts before any work stoppage could start.

The request may have fallen flat, however. Gradek said he believes there was less anxiety over the fallout from an airline strike than from the countrywide railway shutdown.

He also speculated that public frustration over thousands of cancelled flights would have flowed toward Air Canada rather than Ottawa, prompting the carrier to concede to a deal yielding “unheard of” gains for employees.

“It really was a total collapse of the Air Canada bargaining position,” he said.

Pilots are slated to vote in the coming weeks on the four-year contract.

Last year, pilots at Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and American Airlines secured agreements that included four-year pay boosts ranging from 34 per cent to 40 per cent, ramping up pressure on other carriers to raise wages.

After more than a year of bargaining, Air Canada put forward an offer in August centred around a 30 per cent wage hike over four years.

But the final deal, should union members approve it, grants a 26 per cent increase in the first year alone, retroactive to September 2023, according to the source. Three wage bumps of four per cent would follow in 2024 through 2026.

Passengers may wind up shouldering some of that financial load, one expert noted.

“At the end of the day, it’s all us consumers who are paying,” said Barry Prentice, who heads the University of Manitoba’s transport institute.

Higher fares may be mitigated by the persistence of budget carrier Flair Airlines and the rapid expansion of Porter Airlines — a growing Air Canada rival — as well as waning demand for leisure trips. Corporate travel also remains below pre-COVID-19 levels.

Air Canada said Sunday the tentative contract “recognizes the contributions and professionalism of Air Canada’s pilot group, while providing a framework for the future growth of the airline.”

The union issued a statement saying that, if ratified, the agreement will generate about $1.9 billion of additional value for Air Canada pilots over the course of the deal.

Meanwhile, labour tension with cabin crew looms on the horizon. Air Canada is poised to kick off negotiations with the union representing more than 10,000 flight attendants this year before the contract expires on March 31.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:AC)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Federal $500M bailout for Muskrat Falls power delays to keep N.S. rate hikes in check

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Ottawa is negotiating a $500-million bailout for Nova Scotia’s privately owned electric utility, saying the money will be used to prevent a big spike in electricity rates.

Federal Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson made the announcement today in Halifax, saying Nova Scotia Power Inc. needs the money to cover higher costs resulting from the delayed delivery of electricity from the Muskrat Falls hydroelectric plant in Labrador.

Wilkinson says that without the money, the subsidiary of Emera Inc. would have had to increase rates by 19 per cent over “the short term.”

Nova Scotia Power CEO Peter Gregg says the deal, once approved by the province’s energy regulator, will keep rate increases limited “to be around the rate of inflation,” as costs are spread over a number of years.

The utility helped pay for construction of an underwater transmission link between Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, but the Muskrat Falls project has not been consistent in delivering electricity over the past five years.

Those delays forced Nova Scotia Power to spend more on generating its own electricity.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version