Credit Suisse will borrow up to 50 billion Swiss francs ($74-billion) from the Swiss central bank under emergency credit lines, following a sharp drop in the lender’s share price Wednesday that added to concerns about the health of the financial system on both sides of the Atlantic.
Earlier in the day,the central bank had promised to provide Credit Suisse, Switzerland’s second-largest bank, with liquidity “if necessary,” essentially guaranteeing the lender would have access to cash in the event of a bank run. The move is reminiscent of the central bank supports provided to major global banks during the 2008 financial crisis.
At this point it is unclear how much Credit Suisse will actually borrow of the 50 billion Swiss francs made available. The bankalso announced plans late Wednesday to buy back U.S.-dollar and Euro-denominated bonds worth up to US$2.5-billion and €500-million, respectively. Buying back debt will ease the bank’s financial burden as it completes apreviously announced restructuring.
Global investors are on edge after two U.S. regional banks – Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank – failed in the past week. The fear is thatrapidly rising interest rates have irreparably damaged certain corners of the global financial system. Because there is so much uncertainty, every new development is scrutinized and fretted over, even when problems have been publicly known for years, which is the case at Credit Suisse.
Before Wednesday’s woes, which resulted in the bank’s shares plummeting by as much as 30 per cent, they were already down 98 per cent from their record high in 2007, owing to never-ending scandals, financial losses and restructurings.
Investors are dumping shares in even the biggest banks, which have the largest capital backstops. JP Morgan Chase & Co.’s JPM-N shares fell 5 per cent Wednesday, and are now down slightly this year. Shares of Royal Bank of Canada RY-T, the largest Canadian lender, are down 5 per cent over the past week – but are still up 2 per cent this year.
In a joint statement, the Swiss central bank and the country’s financial regulator asserted that “the problems of certain banks in the USA do not pose a direct risk of contagion for the Swiss financial markets.”
“Credit Suisse meets the capital and liquidity requirements imposed on systemically important banks,” they said in explaining the decision to backstop the lender if need be.
Wednesday’s sell-off began afterAmmar Al Khudairy, chair of Saudi National Bank, which is Credit Suisse’s largest shareholder, said he would not boost his organization’s ownership stake. He later clarified that boosting the stake above 10 per cent would impose extra regulatory burdens.
Credit Suisse has struggled for years, plagued by scandal after scandal. It was damaged by massive trading losses after the implosion of Archegos Capital, and by links to the collapsed finance firm Greensill Capital. Once a dominant name in global finance, the bank’s stature has plunged with its market share.Its shares hit a record high of US$74 each in New York in 2007. The stock closed at US$2.16 Wednesday.
The key question for regulators and investors is whether the failures of the two U.S. banks stemmed from idiosyncratic factors, such as poor risk management decisions, or whether they auger deeper problems in the financial system.
With everyone on edge, one saving grace is that global banking watchdogs have forced systemically important banks to beef up their capital reserves – that is, cash and other liquid securities that serve as buffers when things go bad. Canada’s banking watchdog, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, has been at the forefront of this effort, and Canada’s banks are praised globally for their stability and risk management.
But those buffers could now be tested.
“We don’t know yet whether the consequences of easy money and regulatory changes will cascade throughout the US regional banking sector … with more seizures and shutdowns coming,” BlackRock chief executive Larry Fink wrote Wednesday in his annual public letter. He described Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse as the “price we’re paying for decades of easy money.”
The rapid rise in interest rates has cratered bond prices, leaving large unrealized losses on the balance sheets of many financial institutions. This proved to be a landmine for Silicon Valley Bank, which was forced to sell a portion of its bond portfolio at a loss, sparking a bank run. The U.S. Federal Reserve announced a $25-billion liquidity facility on Sunday, giving regional banks the ability to swap their illiquid assets for cash in the event of bank runs.
In its funding announcement late Wednesday, Credit Suisse hoped to differentiate itself from Silicon Valley Bank by noting that its bond portfolio is “fully hedged for moves in interest rates.” In other words, if anything has to be sold, Credit Suisse should not incur losses.
Concerns about a broader financial crisis have quickly changed market expectations for future interest rate hikes. A week ago, markets were pricing in another percentage point of rate hikes from the U.S. Federal Reserve in the coming months, and no rate cuts until 2024. On Wednesday, markets were pricing in only a 50-per-cent chance the Fed would raise rates again at its next meeting, on March 22, and a high probability that it would start cutting rates this summer.
Banking sector woes have made bond prices swing at their fastest rate in decades. The yield on two-year U.S. Treasuries has fallen 120 basis points in the past five trading days.
Stock markets fell sharply Wednesday morning, although they recovered some ground through the trading day. The S&P 500 ended down 0.7 per cent, while the TSX Index dropped 1.6 per cent, dragged down by plummeting oil prices. The EURO STOXX 50, an index of large European companies, fell 3.46 per cent.
Most job search advice is cookie-cutter. The advice you’re following is almost certainly the same advice other job seekers follow, making you just another candidate following the same script.
In today’s hyper-competitive job market, standing out is critical, a challenge most job seekers struggle with. Instead of relying on generic questions recommended by self-proclaimed career coaches, which often lead to a forgettable interview, ask unique, thought-provoking questions that’ll spark engaging conversations and leave a lasting impression.
Your level of interest in the company and the role.
Contributing to your employer’s success is essential.
You desire a cultural fit.
Here are the top four questions experts recommend candidates ask; hence, they’ve become cliché questions you should avoid asking:
“What are the key responsibilities of this position?”
Most likely, the job description answers this question. Therefore, asking this question indicates you didn’t read the job description. If you require clarification, ask, “How many outbound calls will I be required to make daily?” “What will be my monthly revenue target?”
“What does a typical day look like?”
Although it’s important to understand day-to-day expectations, this question tends to elicit vague responses and rarely leads to a deeper conversation. Don’t focus on what your day will look like; instead, focus on being clear on the results you need to deliver. Nobody I know has ever been fired for not following a “typical day.” However, I know several people who were fired for failing to meet expectations. Before accepting a job offer, ensure you’re capable of meeting the employer’s expectations.
“How would you describe the company culture?”
Asking this question screams, “I read somewhere to ask this question.” There are much better ways to research a company’s culture, such as speaking to current and former employees, reading online reviews and news articles. Furthermore, since your interviewer works for the company, they’re presumably comfortable with the culture. Do you expect your interviewer to give you the brutal truth? “Be careful of Craig; get on his bad side, and he’ll make your life miserable.” “Bob is close to retirement. I give him lots of slack, which the rest of the team needs to pick up.”
Truism: No matter how much due diligence you do, only when you start working for the employer will you experience and, therefore, know their culture firsthand.
“What opportunities are there for professional development?”
When asked this question, I immediately think the candidate cares more about gaining than contributing, a showstopper. Managing your career is your responsibility, not your employer’s.
Cliché questions don’t impress hiring managers, nor will they differentiate you from your competition. To transform your interaction with your interviewer from a Q&A session into a dynamic discussion, ask unique, insightful questions.
Here are my four go-to questions—I have many more—to accomplish this:
“Describe your management style. How will you manage me?”
This question gives your interviewer the opportunity to talk about themselves, which we all love doing. As well, being in sync with my boss is extremely important to me. The management style of who’ll be my boss is a determining factor in whether or not I’ll accept the job.
“What is the one thing I should never do that’ll piss you off and possibly damage our working relationship beyond repair?”
This question also allows me to determine whether I and my to-be boss would be in sync. Sometimes I ask, “What are your pet peeves?”
“When I join the team, what would be the most important contribution you’d want to see from me in the first six months?”
Setting myself up for failure is the last thing I want. As I mentioned, focus on the results you need to produce and timelines. How realistic are the expectations? It’s never about the question; it’s about what you want to know. It’s important to know whether you’ll be able to meet or even exceed your new boss’s expectations.
“If I wanted to sell you on an idea or suggestion, what do you need to know?”
Years ago, a candidate asked me this question. I was impressed he wasn’t looking just to put in time; he was looking for how he could be a contributing employee. Every time I ask this question, it leads to an in-depth discussion.
Other questions I’ve asked:
“What keeps you up at night?”
“If you were to leave this company, who would follow?”
“How do you handle an employee making a mistake?”
“If you were to give a Ted Talk, what topic would you talk about?”
“What are three highly valued skills at [company] that I should master to advance?”
“What are the informal expectations of the role?”
“What is one misconception people have about you [or the company]?”
Your questions reveal a great deal about your motivations, drive to make a meaningful impact on the business, and a chance to morph the questioning into a conversation. Cliché questions don’t lead to meaningful discussions, whereas unique, thought-provoking questions do and, in turn, make you memorable.
Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers “unsweetened” job search advice. You can send Nick your questions to artoffindingwork@gmail.com.
CALGARY – Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. reported a third-quarter profit of $2.27 billion, down from $2.34 billion in the same quarter last year.
The company says the profit amounted to $1.06 per diluted share for the quarter that ended Sept. 30 compared with $1.06 per diluted share a year earlier.
Product sales totalled $10.40 billion, down from $11.76 billion in the same quarter last year.
Daily production for the quarter averaged 1,363,086 barrels of oil equivalent per day, down from 1,393,614 a year ago.
On an adjusted basis, Canadian Natural says it earned 97 cents per diluted share for the quarter, down from an adjusted profit of $1.30 per diluted share in the same quarter last year.
The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 90 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 31, 2024.
CALGARY – Cenovus Energy Inc. reported its third-quarter profit fell compared with a year as its revenue edged lower.
The company says it earned $820 million or 42 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30, down from $1.86 billion or 97 cents per diluted share a year earlier.
Revenue for the quarter totalled $14.25 billion, down from $14.58 billion in the same quarter last year.
Total upstream production in the quarter amounted to 771,300 barrels of oil equivalent per day, down from 797,000 a year earlier.
Total downstream throughput was 642,900 barrels per day compared with 664,300 in the same quarter last year.
On an adjusted basis, Cenovus says its funds flow amounted to $1.05 per diluted share in its latest quarter, down from adjusted funds flow of $1.81 per diluted share a year earlier.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 31, 2024.