CSA Publishes Proposed Amendments On Offering Memorandum Disclosure Requirements For Real Estate Activities - Real Estate and Construction - Canada - Mondaq News Alerts | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Real eState

CSA Publishes Proposed Amendments On Offering Memorandum Disclosure Requirements For Real Estate Activities – Real Estate and Construction – Canada – Mondaq News Alerts

Published

 on


Canada:

CSA Publishes Proposed Amendments On Offering Memorandum Disclosure Requirements For Real Estate Activities

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On September 17, 2020, the Canadian Securities Administrators
(“CSA“) published proposed amendments
(“Proposed Amendments“) to National
Instrument 45-106 – Prospectus
Exemptions
 (“NI 45-106“),
which  investors who wish to rely on the Offering Memorandum
(“OM“) exemption set out in section 2.9
of NI-45-106 (“OM Exemption“).
 

In particular, the Proposed Amendments set out new disclosure
requirements for issuers engaged in “real estate
activities”, and those operating “collective investment
vehicles”. A discussion of the amendments relating to
“collective investment vehicles” is the subject of a
separate paper.

According to the CSA, the OM Exemption was originally designed
to be used by small, less sophisticated businesses, to raise early
stage capital from a large pool of investors without having to
comply with the costlier prospectus regime.

In practice, however, the CSA has found that the OM Exemption is
being used by large sophisticated issuers in specific industries,
such as real property ownership or development. In 2017, for
example, roughly 40% of the issuers relying on the OM Exemption had
assets of $100 million or more, with 17% of issuers being engaged
in “real estate activities” (as such term is defined
below).

Issuers Engaged in Real Estate Activities

Real Estate Activities” is defined
in the Proposed Amendments as an undertaking, the purpose of which
is primarily to generate income for shareholders, or other gains
from the lease, sale or other disposition of real property, but
does not include, mining activities, oil and gas
activities, and in Quebec, certain contracts and rights relating to
immovables.[1]

Under the Proposed Amendments, an issuer engaged in Real Estate
Activities would be subject to new disclosure requirements,
including:

  • providing an independent appraisal in
    circumstances where (i) the issuer has acquired or proposes to
    acquire an interest in real property from a Related Party (as such
    term is defined in NI-45-106); (ii) the OM discloses a value for an
    interest in real property (other than in its financial statements);
    or (iii) the issuer intends to spend a material amount of the
    proceeds of the offering to acquire an interest in real
    property;
  • providing a general description of
    the real property, including the nature of the interest held,
    whether there are any encumbrances on the property, any
    environmental liabilities, hazards or contamination, any tax
    arrears, how the property is serviced by utilities, the current and
    proposed use of the property and a statement why the issuer
    considers the real property to be suitable for its plans, and if
    there are any buildings on real property, the type of construction,
    age and condition, and a description of any units for sale or
    rental, and occupancy rates therein;
  • if the issuer will be developing the
    real property, it will be required to provide comprehensive
    disclosure on such development, including the estimated costs to
    complete the development, any significant assumptions that underlie
    the cost estimates, when the costs will be incurred, and the
    milestones and objectives of the project, including the expected
    timeline, the costs for completing each objective, and the
    consequences of failing to meet one or more objectives;
  • disclosure of penalties, sanctions,
    bankruptcy, insolvency and criminal or quasi-criminal convictions
    for parties other than the issuer, such as a developer or
    manager;
  • disclosure of any historical
    transactions involving the issuer and any Related Party, so
    investors can better evaluate transactions involving Related
    Parties;
  • disclosure of any future cash calls
    required by the investors; and
  • disclosure of the terms and
    conditions of any Rental Poll or Rental Management Agreement.

These disclosure obligations would not apply to real property
that when taken together would not be significant to a reasonable
investor. This exception is intended to ensure that issuers are not
subject to an undue disclosure burden.

Compliance reviews conducted by the CSA on issuers engaging in
Real Estate Activities indicate that these issuers are often unsure
of the disclosure required in an OM.   The Proposed
Amendments appear to set out a clear disclosure framework for these
issuers, giving them greater certainty as to what they must
disclose.  Given the complexity of these entities, the
proposals appear reasonable in the circumstances, and will
hopefully lead to investors making more informed investment
decisions.

Comment Period

The Comment Period for the Proposed Amendments will be open
until December 16, 2020. If you are interested in submitting
comments or for further information on navigating NI 45-106, please
contact: James
Leech
 at (416) 643-8819 or jleech@torkinmanes.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Real Estate and Construction from Canada

Asserting Privilege In The Condominium Context

Field LLP

The issue of asserting solicitor-client privilege in the condominium context is an interesting one, especially as between the condominium corporation and the individual unit owners

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Here are some facts about British Columbia’s housing market

Published

 on

 

Housing affordability is a key issue in the provincial election campaign in British Columbia, particularly in major centres.

Here are some statistics about housing in B.C. from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s 2024 Rental Market Report, issued in January, and the B.C. Real Estate Association’s August 2024 report.

Average residential home price in B.C.: $938,500

Average price in greater Vancouver (2024 year to date): $1,304,438

Average price in greater Victoria (2024 year to date): $979,103

Average price in the Okanagan (2024 year to date): $748,015

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Vancouver: $2,181

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Victoria: $1,839

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Canada: $1,359

Rental vacancy rate in Vancouver: 0.9 per cent

How much more do new renters in Vancouver pay compared with renters who have occupied their home for at least a year: 27 per cent

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

B.C. voters face atmospheric river with heavy rain, high winds on election day

Published

 on

 

VANCOUVER – Voters along the south coast of British Columbia who have not cast their ballots yet will have to contend with heavy rain and high winds from an incoming atmospheric river weather system on election day.

Environment Canada says the weather system will bring prolonged heavy rain to Metro Vancouver, the Sunshine Coast, Fraser Valley, Howe Sound, Whistler and Vancouver Island starting Friday.

The agency says strong winds with gusts up to 80 kilometres an hour will also develop on Saturday — the day thousands are expected to go to the polls across B.C. — in parts of Vancouver Island and Metro Vancouver.

Wednesday was the last day for advance voting, which started on Oct. 10.

More than 180,000 voters cast their votes Wednesday — the most ever on an advance voting day in B.C., beating the record set just days earlier on Oct. 10 of more than 170,000 votes.

Environment Canada says voters in the area of the atmospheric river can expect around 70 millimetres of precipitation generally and up to 100 millimetres along the coastal mountains, while parts of Vancouver Island could see as much as 200 millimetres of rainfall for the weekend.

An atmospheric river system in November 2021 created severe flooding and landslides that at one point severed most rail links between Vancouver’s port and the rest of Canada while inundating communities in the Fraser Valley and B.C. Interior.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

No shortage when it comes to B.C. housing policies, as Eby, Rustad offer clear choice

Published

 on

 

British Columbia voters face no shortage of policies when it comes to tackling the province’s housing woes in the run-up to Saturday’s election, with a clear choice for the next government’s approach.

David Eby’s New Democrats say the housing market on its own will not deliver the homes people need, while B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad saysgovernment is part of the problem and B.C. needs to “unleash” the potential of the private sector.

But Andy Yan, director of the City Program at Simon Fraser University, said the “punchline” was that neither would have a hand in regulating interest rates, the “giant X-factor” in housing affordability.

“The one policy that controls it all just happens to be a policy that the province, whoever wins, has absolutely no control over,” said Yan, who made a name for himself scrutinizing B.C.’s chronic affordability problems.

Some metrics have shown those problems easing, with Eby pointing to what he said was a seven per cent drop in rent prices in Vancouver.

But Statistics Canada says 2021 census data shows that 25.5 per cent of B.C. households were paying at least 30 per cent of their income on shelter costs, the worst for any province or territory.

Yan said government had “access to a few levers” aimed at boosting housing affordability, and Eby has been pulling several.

Yet a host of other factors are at play, rates in particular, Yan said.

“This is what makes housing so frustrating, right? It takes time. It takes decades through which solutions and policies play out,” Yan said.

Rustad, meanwhile, is running on a “deregulation” platform.

He has pledged to scrap key NDP housing initiatives, including the speculation and vacancy tax, restrictions on short-term rentals,and legislation aimed at boosting small-scale density in single-family neighbourhoods.

Green Leader Sonia Furstenau, meanwhile, says “commodification” of housing by large investors is a major factor driving up costs, and her party would prioritize people most vulnerable in the housing market.

Yan said it was too soon to fully assess the impact of the NDP government’s housing measures, but there was a risk housing challenges could get worse if certain safeguards were removed, such as policies that preserve existing rental homes.

If interest rates were to drop, spurring a surge of redevelopment, Yan said the new homes with higher rents could wipe the older, cheaper units off the map.

“There is this element of change and redevelopment that needs to occur as a city grows, yet the loss of that stock is part of really, the ongoing challenges,” Yan said.

Given the external forces buffeting the housing market, Yan said the question before voters this month was more about “narrative” than numbers.

“Who do you believe will deliver a better tomorrow?”

Yan said the market has limits, and governments play an important role in providing safeguards for those most vulnerable.

The market “won’t by itself deal with their housing needs,” Yan said, especially given what he described as B.C.’s “30-year deficit of non-market housing.”

IS HOUSING THE ‘GOVERNMENT’S JOB’?

Craig Jones, associate director of the Housing Research Collaborative at the University of British Columbia, echoed Yan, saying people are in “housing distress” and in urgent need of help in the form of social or non-market housing.

“The amount of housing that it’s going to take through straight-up supply to arrive at affordability, it’s more than the system can actually produce,” he said.

Among the three leaders, Yan said it was Furstenau who had focused on the role of the “financialization” of housing, or large investors using housing for profit.

“It really squeezes renters,” he said of the trend. “It captures those units that would ordinarily become affordable and moves (them) into an investment product.”

The Greens’ platform includes a pledge to advocate for federal legislation banning the sale of residential units toreal estate investment trusts, known as REITs.

The party has also proposed a two per cent tax on homes valued at $3 million or higher, while committing $1.5 billion to build 26,000 non-market units each year.

Eby’s NDP government has enacted a suite of policies aimed at speeding up the development and availability of middle-income housing and affordable rentals.

They include the Rental Protection Fund, which Jones described as a “cutting-edge” policy. The $500-million fund enables non-profit organizations to purchase and manage existing rental buildings with the goal of preserving their affordability.

Another flagship NDP housing initiative, dubbed BC Builds, uses $2 billion in government financingto offer low-interest loans for the development of rental buildings on low-cost, underutilized land. Under the program, operators must offer at least 20 per cent of their units at 20 per cent below the market value.

Ravi Kahlon, the NDP candidate for Delta North who serves as Eby’s housing minister,said BC Builds was designed to navigate “huge headwinds” in housing development, including high interest rates, global inflation and the cost of land.

Boosting supply is one piece of the larger housing puzzle, Kahlon said in an interview before the start of the election campaign.

“We also need governments to invest and … come up with innovative programs to be able to get more affordability than the market can deliver,” he said.

The NDP is also pledging to help more middle-class, first-time buyers into the housing market with a plan to finance 40 per cent of the price on certain projects, with the money repayable as a loan and carrying an interest rate of 1.5 per cent. The government’s contribution would have to be repaid upon resale, plus 40 per cent of any increase in value.

The Canadian Press reached out several times requesting a housing-focused interview with Rustad or another Conservative representative, but received no followup.

At a press conference officially launching the Conservatives’ campaign, Rustad said Eby “seems to think that (housing) is government’s job.”

A key element of the Conservatives’ housing plans is a provincial tax exemption dubbed the “Rustad Rebate.” It would start in 2026 with residents able to deduct up to $1,500 per month for rent and mortgage costs, increasing to $3,000 in 2029.

Rustad also wants Ottawa to reintroduce a 1970s federal program that offered tax incentives to spur multi-unit residential building construction.

“It’s critical to bring that back and get the rental stock that we need built,” Rustad said of the so-called MURB program during the recent televised leaders’ debate.

Rustad also wants to axe B.C.’s speculation and vacancy tax, which Eby says has added 20,000 units to the long-term rental market, and repeal rules restricting short-term rentals on platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo to an operator’s principal residence or one secondary suite.

“(First) of all it was foreigners, and then it was speculators, and then it was vacant properties, and then it was Airbnbs, instead of pointing at the real problem, which is government, and government is getting in the way,” Rustad said during the televised leaders’ debate.

Rustad has also promised to speed up approvals for rezoning and development applications, and to step in if a city fails to meet the six-month target.

Eby’s approach to clearing zoning and regulatory hurdles includes legislation passed last fall that requires municipalities with more than 5,000 residents to allow small-scale, multi-unit housing on lots previously zoned for single family homes.

The New Democrats have also recently announced a series of free, standardized building designs and a plan to fast-track prefabricated homes in the province.

A statement from B.C.’s Housing Ministry said more than 90 per cent of 188 local governments had adopted the New Democrats’ small-scale, multi-unit housing legislation as of last month, while 21 had received extensions allowing more time.

Rustad has pledged to repeal that law too, describing Eby’s approach as “authoritarian.”

The Greens are meanwhile pledging to spend $650 million in annual infrastructure funding for communities, increase subsidies for elderly renters, and bring in vacancy control measures to prevent landlords from drastically raising rents for new tenants.

Yan likened the Oct. 19 election to a “referendum about the course that David Eby has set” for housing, with Rustad “offering a completely different direction.”

Regardless of which party and leader emerges victorious, Yan said B.C.’s next government will be working against the clock, as well as cost pressures.

Yan said failing to deliver affordable homes for everyone, particularly people living on B.C. streets and young, working families, came at a cost to the whole province.

“It diminishes us as a society, but then also as an economy.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version