China’s reopening was no doubt an important trigger for the recent global stock market surge. Buoyed by the easing of mobility restrictions, this year’s growth in China will bounce back after a disastrous 2022, and the normalization of supply chains will add to global disinflationary pressures, both good news for the world economy.
Economy
David Rosenberg: China won’t be able save the global economy this time
The uptick in travel will boost not just China (for example, the demand for luxury goods), but also tourist destinations in neighbouring countries, while the jump in output should be supportive of commodities such as oil and industrial metals.
We’re cautious, however, about the longer-term outlook because increased mobility, further inflated this month by travel related to the Chinese New Year, combined with poor vaccine efficacy do not bode well for the fight against COVID-19. As such, self-regulation by citizens amid rising infection risks, coupled with negative wealth effects tied to ongoing real estate woes, could limit consumption and, hence, overall growth.
Mobility is on the rise
After a dreadful 2022, when its economy was hammered by a real estate meltdown and COVID-19-related lockdowns, China is now making a comeback thanks to the easing of government restrictions. Mobility is on the rise, with investors seemingly enticed by positive growth implications, as evidenced by the global stock market surge of the past few weeks.
This massive pent-up demand for travel should come as no surprise after severe restrictions to mobility over the past couple of years, courtesy of COVID-19. This is supportive of demand for luxury goods (Europe is a big beneficiary) and output (positive for commodities such as oil and industrial metals).
Demand for freight has also significantly increased. According to the Ministry of Transportation, while there were decreases in goods transportation during the Spring Festival in prior years, this year is expected to be different amid increased demand particularly for medical supplies, food and energy.
Real estate and consumption woes
That’s not to say China is in the clear. Given the government’s previous stop-and-go approach with regards to COVID-19 restrictions, there’s always the possibility of lockdowns making a comeback if fatalities climb to unacceptable levels.
The surge in travel related to the Spring Festival, coupled with poor efficacy of domestically produced vaccines — which explains in part why new infections remain elevated despite a nearly 90 per cent full vaccination rate — may lead to an increase in COVID-19-related deaths (although it’s unclear if that will be reflected in government-controlled data releases).
Even if Beijing refrains from bringing back lockdowns, odds are that citizens will self-regulate amid the rise in fatalities and distrust of official government data/reassurances. That translates to less money being spent than would otherwise be the case. The reputable Peterson Institute for International Economics also seems cautious about China’s consumption outlook.
In any case, aside from travel, it’s unclear if pent-up demand can be fulfilled given that household wealth has been decimated by the real estate meltdown — note that roughly two-thirds of household savings is tied up in real estate. It’s no wonder the National Bureau of Statistics’ measure of consumer confidence sank last November to a meagre 85.5, the lowest ever recorded (data goes back to 1990).
Trade outlook is not great
Perhaps that explains why the Ministry of Finance vowed to boost this year’s growth through “appropriate” fiscal expansion. Beijing is reportedly seeking to increase the debt quota of local governments (to encourage investment) and to target a larger budget deficit.
Still, without a turnaround in real estate and consumption, it’s difficult to envisage this year’s uptick in domestic demand, after last year’s awful performance, will be sustainable.
The contribution of trade to growth is also uncertain amid a looming global recession. The latter does not bode well for China’s export volumes, while real imports have limited downside after last year’s collapse. In other words, for the first time in years, trade could potentially subtract from China’s annual growth in 2023.
Simply put, China’s uptick won’t be enough to steer the global economy away from a downturn.
David Rosenberg is founder of independent research firm Rosenberg Research & Associates Inc. Krishen Rangasamy is a senior economist there. You can sign up for a free, one-month trial on Rosenberg’s website.
Economy
Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs
OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.
Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.
Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.
Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.
Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.
Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.
Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.
According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.
That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.
People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.
That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.
Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.
That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Economy
Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI
The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.
The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.
CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.
This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.
While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.
Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.
The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.
Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Economy
Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy
As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.
Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.
A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.
More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.
Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.
“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.
“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”
American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.
It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.
“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.
“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”
A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.
Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.
“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.
Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.
With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”
“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.
“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
-
News21 hours ago
Freeland says she’s ready to deal with Trump |
-
News21 hours ago
NASA astronauts won’t say which one of them got sick after almost eight months in space
-
News21 hours ago
43 monkeys remain on the run from South Carolina lab. CEO thinks they’re having an adventure
-
News22 hours ago
Freeland rallies a united front ahead of Trump’s return to White House
-
News22 hours ago
Deputy minister appointed interim CEO of AIMCo after Alberta government fires board
-
News22 hours ago
Montreal says Quebec-Canada dispute stalling much-needed funding to help homeless
-
News22 hours ago
S&P/TSX composite index down Friday, Wall St. extends post-election gains
-
News21 hours ago
Mitch Marner powers Matthews-less Maple Leafs over Red Wings