Tech
‘Dead Island 2’ is a Mindlessly Gory Slog Better Left in the Grave
After 10 years in development, Dead Island 2 is finally here. The zombie-themed action role-playing game underwent four studio changeovers before being dragged across the finish line by Dambuster Studios. With a development cycle about as long as vaporware legend Duke Nukem Forever, a title with a similarly troubled and chaotic history whose result was widely panned by critics, I went into this review wondering if this one would fare any better.
The story casts you as one of six playable characters, boarding the last evacuation plane out of Los Angeles to escape the undead apocalypse. Obviously, one of the infected manages to board the aircraft, and you narrowly escape death the collision only to be immediately attacked by zombies. In the foray, you are bitten, but instead of becoming one of the undead, you discover you are one of the few individuals immune to the disease.
As is the norm in modern game design, there are all sorts of quasi-RPG elements and skills for you to learn. Each of the six survivors has specialty and unique abilities to discover but, honestly, it’s all such a generic hodgepodge that I barely paid attention to the progression tree. There are some slightly more interesting capabilities available later in the game, but for the most part, you’re adding menial percentage increases to one skill or the other.
Even if your character is immune to infection, they can be ripped apart by the vicious hordes roaming the streets of “Hell-A.” The combat is the meat and potatoes of this game. Fortunately, it’s quite good. The FLESH system is introduced in Dead Island 2, allowing enemies to take visible damage across their bodies. If you hit a zombie in the head with a hammer, it will rip off a nasty strip of flesh or break its teeth. It’s not just a gory good time, but actually has an effect on gameplay. If you manage to slice a zombie’s leg enough times, you’ll hit (and eventually break) bone, limiting their mobility. Each enemy type has different weaknesses, and knowing where to attack can make a difficult fight easier.
There are also some unique environmental interactions that spice up combat. For instance, if you come across some zombies milling around in a swimming pool, heaving in a car battery will electrocute them all. Fire is a reliable ally, and enemies who are set ablaze suffer tick damage and can spread the fire to others. There’s even acid, which when mixed with zombie flesh produces a truly putrid and horrifying effect. Not only can you interact with these elements in the wild, but you can also upgrade and create weapons with them using the crafting system.
With a game this shallow, the way the weapons feel and impact the combat is a major factor that can make or break the experience. Creating a convincing sledgehammer in a video game requires a great deal of effort. You must feel the weight of the object, the momentum of the swing, and the impact of the blow. Dead Island 2 does a solid job of making melee combat satisfying, which is essential as it’s all you get for roughly the first five hours. Although California’s gun laws are fairly stringent, it seemed odd that you had to travel quite a way before obtaining a firearm in a zombie-infested hell scape.
Unfortunately, exploration is underwhelming given its importance to the game loop. There’s tons of reused assets and visuals, and you’ll quickly notice that the house you’re currently looting has the exact same structural layout as the one you raided an hour ago. It’s yet another recent game where unique mechanics or set pieces have been replaced by a constant hunt and peck for crafting items in bland, generic environments. This isn’t as noticeable when playing in co-op mode with friends to chat with, but it gets quickly stale in single-player mode.
While the basic premise of fighting through a zombie-infested Los Angeles could be intriguing, the execution falls short. Even though this is a zombie game, there is little to no tension or horror on display. Sure, there’s gore and viscera, but it’s all done in a cartoonish manner. The dialogue is packed with quippy nonsense that neither matches the chintzy style or manages to be clever enough to elevate it, amounting to little more than a conceptual cop-out that’s unfunny and unbalanced in both gameplay and tone. The developers have opted for broad zaniness over melding story, gameplay, and environments into a believable world. Dead Island 2’s hollow, lighthearted tone if it hadn’t already been dead on arrival and done better elsewhere. Original Dead Island creators, Techland, have already ditched this franchise to deliver the Dying Light series, which is essentially the same thing attempted here, but successful — with a larger open world, better and more fluid movement, and general sense of production value.
Dead Island 2 is not bad per se. Aside from the gory implementation of the FLESH system, however, it does nothing new. It was originally scheduled for release in 2015, and it feels exactly like a seven-year-old title. If this were a budget release aiming for a pseudo-throwback vibe, it would be acceptable, but alas. Deep Silver is charging a full $70 (or $100 for the collector’s edition) premium for it, which is $10 more than what Capcom is asking for its infinitely better remake of Resident Evil 4.
If you’re looking for a game with a satisfying single-player experience, serviceable narrative, or any original ideas, I wouldn’t recommend spending your money here. But if you bring a friend or three along to play, Dead Island 2 is at its best when you’re mindlessly drop-kicking zombies into puddles of gore. At least you’ll be able to entertain yourselves together as lulls between crazy fights can be pretty boring otherwise.
News
The Internet is Littered in ‘Educated Guesses’ Without the ‘Education’
Although no one likes a know-it-all, they dominate the Internet.
The Internet began as a vast repository of information. It quickly became a breeding ground for self-proclaimed experts seeking what most people desire: recognition and money.
Today, anyone with an Internet connection and some typing skills can position themselves, regardless of their education or experience, as a subject matter expert (SME). From relationship advice, career coaching, and health and nutrition tips to citizen journalists practicing pseudo-journalism, the Internet is awash with individuals—Internet talking heads—sharing their “insights,” which are, in large part, essentially educated guesses without the education or experience.
The Internet has become a 24/7/365 sitcom where armchair experts think they’re the star.
Not long ago, years, sometimes decades, of dedicated work and acquiring education in one’s field was once required to be recognized as an expert. The knowledge and opinions of doctors, scientists, historians, et al. were respected due to their education and experience. Today, a social media account and a knack for hyperbole are all it takes to present oneself as an “expert” to achieve Internet fame that can be monetized.
On the Internet, nearly every piece of content is self-serving in some way.
The line between actual expertise and self-professed knowledge has become blurry as an out-of-focus selfie. Inadvertently, social media platforms have created an informal degree program where likes and shares are equivalent to degrees. After reading selective articles, they’ve found via and watching some TikTok videos, a person can post a video claiming they’re an herbal medicine expert. Their new “knowledge,” which their followers will absorb, claims that Panda dung tea—one of the most expensive teas in the world and isn’t what its name implies—cures everything from hypertension to existential crisis. Meanwhile, registered dietitians are shaking their heads, wondering how to compete against all the misinformation their clients are exposed to.
More disturbing are individuals obsessed with evangelizing their beliefs or conspiracy theories. These people write in-depth blog posts, such as Elvis Is Alive and the Moon Landings Were Staged, with links to obscure YouTube videos, websites, social media accounts, and blogs. Regardless of your beliefs, someone or a group on the Internet shares them, thus confirming your beliefs.
Misinformation is the Internet’s currency used to get likes, shares, and engagement; thus, it often spreads like a cosmic joke. Consider the prevalence of clickbait headlines:
- You Won’t Believe What Taylor Swift Says About Climate Change!
- This Bedtime Drink Melts Belly Fat While You Sleep!
- In One Week, I Turned $10 Into $1 Million!
Titles that make outrageous claims are how the content creator gets reads and views, which generates revenue via affiliate marketing, product placement, and pay-per-click (PPC) ads. Clickbait headlines are how you end up watching a TikTok video by a purported nutrition expert adamantly asserting you can lose belly fat while you sleep by drinking, for 14 consecutive days, a concoction of raw eggs, cinnamon, and apple cider vinegar 15 minutes before going to bed.
Our constant search for answers that’ll explain our convoluted world and our desire for shortcuts to success is how Internet talking heads achieve influencer status. Because we tend to seek low-hanging fruits, we listen to those with little experience or knowledge of the topics they discuss yet are astute enough to know what most people want to hear.
There’s a trend, more disturbing than spreading misinformation, that needs to be called out: individuals who’ve never achieved significant wealth or traded stocks giving how-to-make-easy-money advice, the appeal of which is undeniable. Several people I know have lost substantial money by following the “advice” of Internet talking heads.
Anyone on social media claiming to have a foolproof money-making strategy is lying. They wouldn’t be peddling their money-making strategy if they could make easy money.
Successful people tend to be secretive.
Social media companies design their respective algorithms to serve their advertisers—their source of revenue—interest; hence, content from Internet talking heads appears most prominent in your feeds. When a video of a self-professed expert goes viral, likely because it pressed an emotional button, the more people see it, the more engagement it receives, such as likes, shares and comments, creating a cycle akin to a tornado.
Imagine scrolling through your TikTok feed and stumbling upon a “scientist” who claims they can predict the weather using only aluminum foil, copper wire, sea salt and baking soda. You chuckle, but you notice his video got over 7,000 likes, has been shared over 600 times and received over 400 comments. You think to yourself, “Maybe this guy is onto something.” What started as a quest to achieve Internet fame evolved into an Internet-wide belief that weather forecasting can be as easy as DIY crafts.
Since anyone can call themselves “an expert,” you must cultivate critical thinking skills to distinguish genuine expertise from self-professed experts’ self-promoting nonsense. While the absurdity of the Internet can be entertaining, misinformation has serious consequences. The next time you read a headline that sounds too good to be true, it’s probably an Internet talking head making an educated guess; without the education seeking Internet fame, they can monetize.
______________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a self-described connoisseur of human psychology, writes about what’s
on his mind from Toronto. You can follow Nick on Twitter and Instagram @NKossovan.
Tech
Tight deadlines on software projects can put safety at risk: survey
TORONTO – A new survey says a majority of software engineers and developers feel tight project deadlines can put safety at risk.
Seventy-five per cent of the 1,000 global workers who responded to the survey released Tuesday say pressure to deliver projects on time and on budget could be compromising critical aspects like safety.
The concern is even higher among engineers and developers in North America, with 77 per cent of those surveyed on the continent reporting the urgency of projects could be straining safety.
The study was conducted between July and September by research agency Coleman Parkes and commissioned by BlackBerry Ltd.’s QNX division, which builds connected-car technology.
The results reflect a timeless tug of war engineers and developers grapple with as they balance the need to meet project deadlines with regulations and safety checks that can slow down the process.
Finding that balance is an issue that developers of even the simplest appliances face because of advancements in technology, said John Wall, a senior vice-president at BlackBerry and head of QNX.
“The software is getting more complicated and there is more software whether it’s in a vehicle, robotics, a toaster, you name it… so being able to patch vulnerabilities, to prevent bad actors from doing malicious acts is becoming more and more important,” he said.
The medical, industrial and automotive industries have standardized safety measures and anything they produce undergoes rigorous testing, but that work doesn’t happen overnight. It has to be carried out from the start and then at every step of the development process.
“What makes safety and security difficult is it’s an ongoing thing,” Wall said. “It’s not something where you’ve done it, and you are finished.”
The Waterloo, Ont.-based business found 90 per cent of its survey respondents reported that organizations are prioritizing safety.
However, when asked about why safety may not be a priority for their organization, 46 per cent of those surveyed answered cost pressures and 35 per cent said a lack of resources.
That doesn’t surprise Wall. Delays have become rampant in the development of tech, and in some cases, stand to push back the launch of vehicle lines by two years, he said.
“We have to make sure that people don’t compromise on safety and security to be able to get products out quicker,” he said.
“What we don’t want to see is people cutting corners and creating unsafe situations.”
The survey also took a peek at security breaches, which have hit major companies like London Drugs, Indigo Books & Music, Giant Tiger and Ticketmaster in recent years.
About 40 per cent of the survey’s respondents said they have encountered a security breach in their employer’s operating system. Those breaches resulted in major impacts for 27 per cent of respondents, moderate impacts for 42 per cent and minor impacts for 27 per cent.
“There are vulnerabilities all the time and this is what makes the job very difficult because when you ship the software, presumably the software has no security vulnerabilities, but things get discovered after the fact,” Wall said.
Security issues, he added, have really come to the forefront of the problems developers face, so “really without security, you have no safety.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2024.
Companies in this story: (TSX:BB)
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Tech
Beware of scams during Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days sales event: cybersecurity firm
As online shoppers hunt for bargains offered by Amazon during its annual fall sale this week, cybersecurity researchers are warning Canadians to beware of an influx of scammers posing as the tech giant.
In the 30 days leading up to Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days, taking place Tuesday and Wednesday, there were more than 1,000 newly registered Amazon-related web domains, according to Check Point Software Technologies, a company that offers cybersecurity solutions.
The company said it deemed 88 per cent of those domains malicious or suspicious, suggesting they could have been set up by scammers to prey on vulnerable consumers. One in every 54 newly created Amazon-related domain included the phrase “Amazon Prime.”
“They’re almost indiscernible from the real Amazon domain,” said Robert Falzon, head of engineering at Check Point in Canada.
“With all these domains registered that look so similar, it’s tricking a lot of people. And that’s the whole intent here.”
Falzon said Check Point Research sees an uptick in attempted scams around big online shopping days throughout the year, including Prime Days.
Scams often come in the form of phishing emails, which are deceptive messages that appear to be from a reputable source in attempt to steal sensitive information.
In this case, he said scammers posing as Amazon commonly offer “outrageous” deals that appear to be associated with Prime Days, in order to trick recipients into clicking on a malicious link.
The cybersecurity firm said it has identified and blocked 100 unique Amazon Prime-themed scam emails targeting organizations and consumers over the past two weeks.
Scammers also target Prime members with unsolicited calls, claiming urgent account issues and requesting payment information.
“It’s like Christmas for them,” said Falzon.
“People expect there to be significant savings on Prime Day, so they’re not shocked that they see something of significant value. Usually, the old adage applies: If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.”
Amazon’s website lists a number of red flags that it recommends customers watch for to identify a potential impersonation scam.
Those include false urgency, requests for personal information, or indications that the sender prefers to complete the purchase outside of the Amazon website or mobile app.
Scammers may also request that customers exclusively pay with gift cards, a claim code or PIN. Any notifications about an order or delivery for an unexpected item should also raise alarm bells, the company says.
“During busy shopping moments, we tend to see a rise in impersonation scams reported by customers,” said Amazon spokeswoman Octavia Roufogalis in a statement.
“We will continue to invest in protecting consumers and educating the public on scam avoidance. We encourage consumers to report suspected scams to us so that we can protect their accounts and refer bad actors to law enforcement to help keep consumers safe.”
Falzon added that these scams are more successful than people might think.
As of June 30, the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre said there had been $284 million lost to fraud so far this year, affecting 15,941 victims.
But Falzon said many incidents go unreported, as some Canadians who are targeted do not know how or where to flag a scam, or may choose not to out of embarrassment.
Check Point recommends Amazon customers take precautions while shopping on Prime Days, including by checking URLs carefully, creating strong passwords on their accounts, and avoiding personal information being shared such as their birthday or social security number.
The cybersecurity company said consumers should also look for “https” at the beginning of a website URL, which indicates a secure connection, and use credit cards rather than debit cards for online shopping, which offer better protection and less liability if stolen.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2024.
-
News16 hours ago
Canadanewsmedia news October 18, 2024: Testy B.C. election campaign reaches final day
-
News15 hours ago
US to probe Tesla’s ‘Full Self-Driving’ system after pedestrian killed in low visibility conditions
-
News15 hours ago
Advocates urge Ontario to change funding for breast prostheses, ostomy supplies
-
News16 hours ago
More details expected on proposed deal that would see tobacco giants pay billions
-
News16 hours ago
‘Kindness’ influencers on TikTok give money to strangers. Why is that controversial?
-
News16 hours ago
Housing, health, and plastic straws: Here’s how B.C. politicians are wooing voters
-
News16 hours ago
Testy B.C. election campaign sees leaders attacking each other more than policy
-
News15 hours ago
Rwanda shrugs off ‘sportswashing’ criticism in pursuit of a winning development formula