Connect with us


Despite Lunch with Sun, Buffett Still Denies Bitcoin's Legitimacy – Crypto Briefing



Warren Buffett remains skeptical about cryptocurrencies despite on-chain analytics revealing parabolic growth and industry leaders’ best attempts.

Cryptocurrencies Have “Zero” Value, Says Buffett

Justin Sun, the CEO of TRON and BitTorrent, spent $4.6 million in a charity auction to have lunch with the head of Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett. 

The main idea behind winning the charity auction was to persuade the legendary investor to reconsider his bearish take on cryptocurrencies. 

During the meal, Sun reportedly gave Buffett his first Bitcoin and a smartphone with over 1.9 million TRON tokens, as well as other digital assets, including BitTorrent, WINK, and USDT-TRC20—all projects on the TRON blockchain. 

Despite the massive sum of money that Sun spent, it now appears that the effort was in vain. 

In a recent interview with CNBC, Buffett described the meet up as a “very friendly exchange of ideas.” Buffett explained that Sun was not able to change his perception and affirmed that “cryptocurrencies basically have no value.” 

“Cryptocurrencies do not produce anything. You can look at your little ledger item for the next 20 years and it says that you have X of this cryptocurrency, or that. It does not reproduce, it does not deliver, it cannot mail you a check, it cannot do anything. And, what you hope is that somebody else comes along and pays you more money for it later on, but then that person has the problem. But, in terms of value, you know zero,” said Buffett. 

The American business magnate also denied owning any cryptocurrency when asked multiple times about the tokens that Sun gave him and asserted that he will never own any. According to Buffett, cryptocurrencies were invented to make it easier to “move around a fair amount of money illegally.” 

Although the sage of Omaha remains skeptical about the future of cryptocurrencies, there are others who seem overwhelmingly bullish. 

Mass Adoption Is Happening “Now” 

On-chain analyst Willy Woo, recently stated that Bitcoin is going through exponential growth.

Due to human nature’s instinct to look at “things in a linear stance,” it is difficult to understand what the flagship cryptocurrency is doing outside of this perspective.

“If you were to look at where we are on the adoption curve, we are at 1% of the world population holding this asset class. And, if you look at the rate in which that is growing, which is 2x every year… and 4x on a bull market. If you run those numbers, we are going to have half of the world using [cryptocurrencies] within the next seven years,” said Woo. 

While it is unknown what the future holds for cryptocurrencies, Woo maintains that mass adoption is happening now based on on-chain data. Only time will tell whether cryptos will triumph or fail as a speculative bubble. 

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link


TD faces public scrutiny, support, of First Horizon takeover in public meeting – Business News –



TD Bank Group’s proposed takeover of Memphis-based First Horizon Bank is the issue before a public meeting Thursday where community members are being given a forum to voice their opinions on the deal.

The virtual meeting is being convened jointly by the Federal Reserve Board and the U.S.Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which are reviewing the proposed US$13.4 billion deal.

The meeting comes as TD has faced renewed criticism in recent months for allegedly aggressive sales tactics in the U.S., including from Senator Elizabeth Warren who has called for the merger to be blocked until the bank is “held responsible for its abusive practices.”

TD agreed to a US$122 million settlement with U.S. regulators in 2021 stemming from illegal overdraft practices, while an investigative report released in May alleged that problematic practices continue at the bank, something the bank had strenuously denied.

The federal agencies also held a public meeting in mid-July for BMO’s proposed US$16.3 billion takeover of Bank of the West, where numerous community groups urged the deal be blocked until a strong community benefits agreement can be reached.

The bank also faced criticism for the proportionately low number of mortgages granted to Black and Latino borrowers, while numerous community groups that have received funding from BMO voiced their support of the deal.

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


Judge sides with Enbridge Inc. in Michigan’s latest effort to halt Line 5 pipeline



WASHINGTON — The international dispute over Line 5 belongs in federal court, a Michigan judge declared Thursday, dealing a critical blow to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s bid to shut down the controversial cross-border pipeline.

It’s the second time in nine months that District Court Judge Janet Neff ruled in favour of pipeline owner Enbridge Inc., which wanted the dispute elevated to the federal level.

That first decision prompted Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel — believing her only path to victory to be in state court — to abandon the original case, turning instead to a separate, dormant, nearly identical circuit court case to try again.

Neff’s disdain for that tactic was palpable throughout Thursday’s ruling.

“The court concludes that (the) plaintiff’s motion must fail, based on …(the) plaintiff’s attempt to gain an unfair advantage through the improper use of judicial machinery,” Neff wrote.

“The court’s decision … is undergirded by (the) plaintiff’s desire to engage in procedural fencing and forum manipulation.”

A spokesperson for Nessel did not immediately respond to media inquiries.

Whitmer is a Democrat and close ally of President Joe Biden whose political fortunes depending on the support of environmental groups in the state. She ordered the shutdown of Line 5 in November 2020.

She cited the risk of an ecological disaster in the Straits of Mackinac, the environmentally sensitive passage between Lake Michigan and Lake Huron where the pipeline runs underwater between the state’s upper and lower peninsulas.

They went to circuit court, where Enbridge pushed back hard, arguing that Whitmer and Nessel had overstepped their jurisdiction and that the case needed to be heard in federal court.

Late last year, Neff sided with Enbridge, prompting Whitmer and Nessel to abandon the complaint and try again, this time with a similar circuit court case that had been dormant since 2019.

Nessel had hoped to head off Enbridge’s jurisdictional argument on a technicality: that under federal law, cases can only be removed to federal jurisdiction within 30 days of a complaint being filed.

But Neff wasn’t buying it, citing the precedent she herself established in 2021 when she ruled for Enbridge the first time.

“It would be an absurd result for the court to remand the present case and sanction a forum battle,” Neff wrote.

“The 30-day rule in the removal statute is intended to assist in the equitable administration of justice and prevent gamesmanship over federal jurisdiction, but here, it is clear to the court that (the) plaintiff is the one engaging in gamesmanship.”

The Line 5 pipeline ferries upwards of 540,000 barrels per day of crude oil and natural gas liquids across the Canada-U. S. border and the Great Lakes by way of a twin line that runs along the lake bed.

Critics want the line shut down, arguing it’s only a matter of time before an anchor strike or technical failure triggers a catastrophe in one of the area’s most important watersheds.

Proponents of Line 5 call it a vital and indispensable source of energy, especially propane, for several Midwestern states, including Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania. It is also a key source of feedstock for refineries in Canada, including those that supply jet fuel to some of Canada’s busiest airports.

In a statement, Enbridge described Thursday’s decision as “consistent with the court’s November 2021 ruling that the state’s prior suit against Line 5 belonged in federal court.”

That, the company said, is the correct forum for “important federal questions” about interstate commerce, pipeline safety, energy security and foreign relations.

The statement goes on to say that shutting down Line 5 would “defy an international treaty with Canada that has been in place since 1977.”

Line 5 talks between the two countries under that treaty, which deals specifically with the question of cross-border pipelines, have been ongoing since late last year.

“Enbridge looks forward to a prompt resolution of this case in federal court.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 18, 2022.


James McCarten, The Canadian Press

Continue Reading


Bed Bath & Beyond shares fall after investor Ryan Cohen files intent to sell stake – CNBC Television



Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading