adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Sports

Detroit Lions Week 4 report card: Entire team takes step back vs. Bears – prideofdetroit.com

Published

 on


It was an ugly day all around for the Detroit Lions in their Week 4 matchup against the Chicago Bears. Once again, the offense showed promise, but they couldn’t perform for an entire four quarters and they made some critical errors in key moments. The defense lost another key piece of the roster, and they simply do not have enough talent to hang in the NFL right now, even when it’s against one of the worst offenses in the league.

Coaching took center stage late in the game, but Dan Campbell’s decisions were the least of Detroit’s worries on Sunday. Here are my Week 4 positional grades for the Lions.

Quarterback: D+

It’s another week in which box-score scavengers would believe Jared Goff had an excellent day against a good Bears defense. 24-of-38 for 299 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs, and a 105 passer rating!

300x250x1

Unfortunately, that is not representative of the day Goff actually had. The Lions quarterback overthrew his receivers far too often in this game and in the contest’s most critical moments. He overthrew Kalif Raymond down the seam on a play that would’ve resulted in an early touchdown—and likely would have changed the trajectory of the first half. Worst of all, on a critical fourth-and-1 late in the game, he overthrew Amon-Ra St. Brown on an almost identical play as the one on fourth-and-1 against the Packers.

As always, we need to put this performance in context. His receivers are rarely getting open, St. Brown hesitated at the beginning of his route, and his offensive line play was not good in this game. But Goff still had his chances and he missed on far too many of them.

Running backs: C

Jamaal Williams was likely the best player on offense for the Lions on Sunday. He ran with authority and decisiveness, almost always finding the designed hole on the play. He battled out some tough yardage, too. Unfortunately, the game script called to move away from him and he finished with just 14 rushes and 66 yards.

Unfortunately, his good performance was erased by D’Andre Swift’s struggles against the Bears. Swift had eight carries that went for just 16 yards, and he continues to struggle—in the run game—at creating any extra yards after contract. He was a little better in the receiving game (four catches, 33 yards), but this is a team that is relying on Swift to be a centerpiece of the offense, 49 total yards ain’t going to cut it. Also, Swift really struggled in pass protection and allowed at least one sack.

Wide receivers: C-

In the first half, the Lions receiving corps was invisible. Again, they were really struggling to find any separation from Chicago’s secondary, and Goff was forced time and time again to try and extend the play and to create time for this receiving corps to get open. In the first half, Goff completed a total of four passes to receivers.

However, things changed in the second half and we saw some life out of the receiving corps. Now, some of that undoubtedly had to do with the Bears playing off a little more after going up 21-0 in this game. Still, it was nice to see Quintez Cephus set a career-high with 83 receiving yards, and Amon-Ra St. Brown finally get involved with 70 yards of his own.

Tight ends: D

For the second straight game, T.J. Hockenson was held below 50 yards receiving, and it wasn’t for a lack of trying. Goff completed just four of eight passes to Hockenson, as the Lions’ tight end joined the crowd in struggling to find separation. Worse yet, he had his worst blocking day of the season, causing at least one pressure in pass protection and allowing a tackle for loss in the run game.

Offensive line: D+

It was another rough game for rookie right left tackle Penei Sewell. He had a tough time dealing with Robert Quinn’s speed, which resulted in one of the Lions’ many turnovers in the red zone when Quinn slipped by him for a strip sack. Matt Nelson didn’t look a whole lot better opposite Khalil Mack, who notched a sack and two quarterback hits.

However, Detroit did still manage to create rushing lanes in the first half, which would have kept them in games had the Lions finished those early drives into the red zone.

Defensive line: F

Grading on a curve here, because the Bears’ offensive line came into this game hailed as one of the worst units in the league. Granted they had shown flashed of being able to run the ball, but considering Detroit was coming off a game in which they successfully stop the Ravens rushing attack, their performance on Sunday was unacceptable.

Detroit was gashed on the ground to the tune of 188 yards, 4.8 yards per carry, and three touchdowns.

The Lions also failed to generate much of any pressure on Justin Fields with their defensive front, although they didn’t seem to ever get themselves into favorable down and distances to really come at Chicago with pressure. It also doesn’t help when you’re missing your two best edge defenders in Trey Flowers and Romeo Okwara.

Linebackers: C-

The good news: the Lions linebackers were not exposed in coverage like they had been in the first three games of the season. Tight end Cole Kmet caught just one pass for 6 yards, while running back Damien Williams had just two catches for 15 yards. In fact, Jalen Reeves-Maybin tipped a Justin Fields pass that led to an Amani Oruwariye interception. So there was significant progress in the passing game.

The bad news: tackling was bad. Run fits were bad. And because the linebackers struggled so badly in the run game, it allowed the Bears to pretty much do whatever they wanted all game.

Secondary: D-

The only reason this isn’t an F is because of the interception—and that had more to do with the linebacking crew.

It’s hard to blame a secondary that is so bereft of talent because of injury, but these defensive backs are just killing the team right now. Don’t take my word for it, here’s Dan Campbell after the game:

“This is what we can’t allow anymore. I said this before, but we need these young guys to grow at a drastic rate, you know. And as long as you’re not making the same mistakes and not playing scared, but the same mistakes are showing up now a little bit. We’ve got to find a way or we’ve got to find somebody else that can do them. And whether that’s in the building, which we’ve got a couple other guys, or — you know, you go from there. But it’s not from lack of effort. It’s not from want to. It’s none of those things. But we just — they’re hurting us a little bit right now.”

Bobby Price is supposed to be a special teamer. Jerry Jacobs is probably best used on the practice squad right now. But these guys are being forced into starting roles right now, because of the Lions’ situation, and the results speak for themselves. Broken coverages, wide-open receivers, and career days for quarterbacks.

Detroit has played around with different players at safety already, but based on Campbell’s comments it sounds like more changes could be coming.

Special teams: C+

Nothing too notable from the Lions’ special teams group. Jack Fox continues to be pretty darn good. Detroit’s kick coverage teams were fine, but they haven’t really gotten any spark out of their own returners yet.

Coaching: C+

I spoke at length on Dan Campbell’s in-game aggressive here, but let me quickly summarize here.

Decision 1: Go for it on fourth-and-goal from the 5.

This was the more questionable of the two decisions simply because it was so early in the game. However, I get where Campbell is coming from when he said at that point in the game—with the Bears having scored touchdowns on both of their two drives—it looked like field goals weren’t going to win this one.

“I just think in a game like that where they get up a couple scores, kicking field goals may not be the game,” Campbell said. “Whereas last week it could’ve been a little more of that game. You take it as it comes.”

Fourth-and-goal from the 5-yard line, however, is a low-percentage play. You can’t really run the ball from there, and there is not a lot of room for the receivers to work with. So I could’ve gone either way on this one. But given how bad this team is right now, you’ve got to take some risks, so tie goes to the aggressor, in my opinion.

Decision 2: Go for it on fourth-and-inches instead of kicking a field goal down 10 points with four minutes remaining

I have no problem with this decision. None. At some point, you’re going to have to get a touchdown, and you’ve got a pretty damn good shot at it when you’re already at the Bears 8-yard line with a favorable down-and-distance. Fourth-and-inches is heavily in the offense’s favor, and the play was there. Goff just missed the throw.

Now, there are plenty of reasons to blame the coaching staff for execution there. Instead of taking their time to call a good play and convert on this critical play, the Lions hurried to the line, snapped the ball quickly, and didn’t even appear to consider running the ball.

That’s a choice that deserves real criticism. But the good news here is that Campbell admitted that error and will hopefully learn from that mistake.

“That’s on me,” Campbell said. “I just think we need to huddle and give them a play call that’s a little more fourth-down oriented, fourth-and-short, fourth-and-a-yard.”

Outside of those decisions, I think Campbell made the right call in challenging a deep pass to Allen Robinson. Although the replay eventually showed a clear catch, FOX didn’t provide a good angle in time before Chicago’s snap, and it was a big enough play that it was worth the blind risk.

Additionally, I thought Detroit’s offensive game plan worked, yet again. Anthony Lynn found creative ways to utilize Kalif Raymond’s speed, they’re using a ton of pre-snap motion that is working. Execution was simply the issue on Sunday.

Defensively, I don’t know how it’s possible to fairly grade Aaron Glenn in this game. The roster is just a disaster with injury after injury.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Raptors' Jontay Porter banned from NBA for betting on games – CBC Sports

Published

 on


Toronto Raptors two-way player Jontay Porter was banned from the NBA on Wednesday after a league probe found he disclosed confidential information to sports bettors and wagered on games, even betting on the Raptors to lose.

Porter is the second person to be banned by commissioner Adam Silver for violating league rules. The other was now-former Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling in 2014, shortly after Silver took office.

In making the announcement, Silver called Porter’s actions “blatant.”

300x250x1

“There is nothing more important than protecting the integrity of NBA competition for our fans, our teams and everyone associated with our sport, which is why Jontay Porter’s blatant violations of our gaming rules are being met with the most severe punishment,” Silver said.

WATCH | CBC Sports’ Myles Dichter discusses NBA’s ban of Porter:

Toronto Raptors centre Jontay Porter banned from NBA after betting on games

5 hours ago

Duration 5:19

Myles Dichter of CBC Sports speaks to Andrew Nichols after Raptors centre Jontay Porter was banned by the NBA, after a league probe found he disclosed information to sports bettors and bet on games.

The investigation started once the league learned from “licensed sports betting operators and an organization that monitors legal betting markets” about unusual gambling patterns surrounding Porter’s performance in a game on March 20 against Sacramento. The league determined that Porter gave a bettor information about his own health status prior that game and said that another individual — known to be an NBA bettor — placed an $80,000 US bet that Porter would not hit the numbers set for him in parlays through an online sports book. That bet would have won $1.1 million.

Porter took himself out of that game after less than three minutes, claiming illness, none of his stats meeting the totals set in the parlay. The $80,000 bet was frozen and not paid out, the league said, and the NBA started an investigation not long afterward.

“You don’t want this for the kid, you don’t want this for our team and we don’t want this for our league, that’s for sure,” Raptors President Masai Ujiri said Wednesday in Toronto, speaking shortly before the NBA announced Porter’s ban. “My first reaction is obviously surprise, because none of us, I don’t think anybody, saw this coming.”

The league has partnerships and other relationships with more than two dozen gaming companies, many of whom advertise during NBA games in a variety of ways. Silver himself has been a longtime proponent of legal sports wagering, but the league has very strict rules for players and employees regarding betting.

And what Porter was found to have done was in violation of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, which states: “Any Player who, directly or indirectly, wagers money or anything of value on any game or event in the Association or in the NBA G League shall, on being charged with such wagering, be given an opportunity to answer such charges after due notice, and the decision of the Commissioner shall be final, binding, and conclusive and unappealable.”

‘Cardinal sin’

Silver cautioned last week that this move was possible, saying what Porter was accused of represented “cardinal sin” in the NBA. Porter has not commented since the investigation began, and never played for the Raptors again — he was listed as out for all of Toronto’s games for the remainder of the season citing personal reasons.

The league also determined that Porter — the brother of Denver Nuggets forward Michael Porter Jr. — placed at least 13 bets on NBA games using someone else’s betting account. The bets ranged from $15 to $22,000; the total wagered was $54,094 and generated a payout of $76,059, or net winnings of $21,965.

Those wagers did not involve any game in which Porter played, the NBA said. But three of the wagers were multi-game parlays, including a bet where Porter — who was not playing in the games involved — wagered on the Raptors to lose. All three of those bets lost.

“While legal sports betting creates transparency that helps identify suspicious or abnormal activity, this matter also raises important issues about the sufficiency of the regulatory framework currently in place, including the types of bets offered on our games and players,” Silver said. “Working closely with all relevant stakeholders across the industry, we will continue to work diligently to safeguard our league and game.”

WATCH | Background on league investigation into Porter:

NBA investigates Toronto Raptors’ Jontay Porter in alleged gambling plot

22 days ago

Duration 2:36

The NBA is investigating Toronto Raptors player Jontay Porter for his alleged role in a gambling plot in a pair of games he briefly played in this season before suddenly leaving.

Pair of games in question

The 24-year-old Porter averaged 4.4 points, 3.2 rebounds and 2.3 assists in 26 games, including five starts. He also played in 11 games for Memphis in the 2020-21 season.

ESPN first reported the investigation, which it said surrounded Porter’s performance in games on Jan. 26 and March 20. In both games, Porter played briefly before leaving citing injury or illness. Porter played 4 minutes, 24 seconds against the Los Angeles Clippers in the first of those games, then 2:43 against Sacramento in the second game.

In both of those games, Porter did not come close to hitting the prop-wager lines for points, rebounds and 3-pointers that bettors could play at some sportsbooks. For example, one set of prop wagers for Porter for the Clippers game was set at 5.5 points, 4.5 rebounds and 1.5 assists; he finished with no points, three rebounds and one assist. For the Kings game, they were around 7.5 points and 5.5 rebounds; Porter finished that game with no points and two rebounds.

The league said its probe “remains open and may result in further findings,” and that those findings are being shared with federal prosecutors.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Martin St. Louis has laid a solid foundation in Montreal, and now the hard part starts

Published

 on

MONTREAL — To fully understand the complicated puzzle Montreal Canadiens coach Martin St. Louis will face heading into his third full season behind the bench, a brief synopsis of the day of his team’s final game of the 2023-24 season is necessary.

Before the game, defenceman David Savard was speaking to reporters about winning the Jacques Beauchamp Trophy, awarded to the team’s unsung hero of the season. Savard is entering the final year of his contract and will turn 34 roughly two weeks into the next season. There is an urgency for Savard that is not the same for many of his teammates.

“I believe next year we have the group to make the playoffs,” he said. “That’s my goal in September: to get here, stay in Montreal and get to the playoffs. I want to experience that once in my life, to be in the playoffs in Montreal. It would be pretty special to wear that uniform in the playoffs. I saw it as a fan, and I think the city goes pretty crazy, so it would be fun to see it from the right side of things.”

The Canadiens scored a go-ahead goal against the Detroit Red Wings in Tuesday’s third period. It was set up by Lane Hutson, who was playing his second career game, and tipped in by Juraj Slafkovský, who was playing his 121st game. It was Slafkovský’s 20th goal of the season, earning him a $250,000 bonus. Slafkovský and Hutson were drafted in 2022, the Nos. 1 and 62 picks; it was the first NHL Draft engineered by the current administration led by Jeff Gorton and Kent Hughes.

300x250x1

Logan Mailloux — the No. 31 pick in the 2021 draft, the last one of the previous administration led by Marc Bergevin — got an assist in his NHL debut. The other goals were scored by Alex Newhook and Cole Caufield, two players selected back-to-back in the middle of the first round of the 2019 draft, and Brendan Gallagher, who will turn 32 in May and has three years left on his $6.5 million contract. Hutson and Slafkovský were 6 years old when Gallagher was drafted in 2010.

All of them are at different stages of their careers, and all of them have different needs. But they will all be expected to push together to reach the goal Savard stated so emphatically before the game, the same goal captain Nick Suzuki stated with equal conviction in Ottawa on Friday. The Canadiens are definitely at a crossroads, and though much of the burden for executing that transition to having playoff aspirations falls on Gorton and Hughes, St. Louis will be the one tasked with executing it.

And in that sense, St. Louis might also be at a crossroads in his young coaching career.

Up until now, the Canadiens have had no expectations — either internally or externally — to do what Savard and Suzuki clearly stated they expect the team to do next season. At the preseason Canadiens golf tournament, Gorton wouldn’t even say the word playoffs, preferring to call them the “p-word” and stating that was not the expectation for the season. It is hard to imagine him having the same reluctance at next season’s golf tournament in September.

St. Louis was an intense competitor as a player, and he remains so as a coach, but he is more measured in that intensity because he has more information and more people to consider than just himself. Wins and losses are no longer black and white. Nuance and context go into every win or loss, and all of that is painted with the brush of the Canadiens being in the middle of a rebuild.

Well, the Canadiens will now be hoping to be coming out of a rebuild, expected to make the same kind of steps made by the Red Wings, who were eliminated from playoff contention Tuesday night despite beating the Canadiens for the second night in a row, this time 5-4 in a shootout. The Canadiens have been out of contention, essentially, for months.

How will St. Louis change as the expectations change? He doesn’t know, but he also doesn’t seem to think he needs to change all that much.

“It’s a balance,” St. Louis said. “I don’t want to lose myself with results, because you lose your sanity. You want to go back and watch the film, maybe look at a little bit of data, but have some truth of where you are. Sometimes I’m going to be positive, and sometimes I’m not going to be as positive. Do I like to win? Absolutely. But I feel like the last couple of years I’ve been OK, I guess, to lose because we rarely got outplayed. Rarely got outplayed. So it’s hard to not be positive when you don’t get outplayed. So, for me next year? I don’t know. If we’re getting outplayed, I’m probably not going to be positive much.”

It is not fair to say St. Louis has always been positive with losses because he hasn’t. When the Canadiens lost 5-2 on the road to the Boston Bruins on Nov. 18, St. Louis was disappointed in his team’s performance, and he acted in kind. He basically spent the next week working on the Canadiens’ forecheck and nothing else because that was what he identified as being the reason they were so badly outplayed in Boston.

“For me, that game, it was obvious that we didn’t touch the puck in Boston because we did not forecheck well,” St. Louis said. “And we really spent a lot of time focussing on that, and it became a big part of why we were able to play with top teams and why we were able to find more consistency in our game. That’s where it started.”

Gallagher called the Canadiens’ forechecking the team’s identity, of being tough to play against and continually sending pucks deep and forcing opposing defencemen to do something they are not all that enthusiastic about doing. But the Canadiens also needed to be willing to do something they were not enthusiastic about doing because every hockey player would prefer carrying the puck into the offensive zone and making plays offensively.

“When you’re talking about creating an identity as a group, it’s not going to be easy; it’s going to take a bit of time,” Gallagher said. “Rightfully so, he was frustrated with us because we probably weren’t picking it up as quickly as he would have liked. But we stuck with it, and eventually you get results, players understand this is the way it’s going to be to have success.”

On the other hand, St. Louis loves to say everything starts with the truth. And the Canadiens’ truth is changing. Talented young players will be taking spots on the team, the talented young players already on the team have taken steps and will take further steps, the older players on the team have an urgency to win, and management seemingly feels a similar urgency to at least put the team in a position to win.

The Canadiens, for the second year in a row, finished close to the bottom of the NHL standings and left the ice after their final game to cheers from the fans at the Bell Centre despite losing their final game. It is hard to imagine those fans reacting the same way if the same scenario presents itself for a third year in a row or if the players or management will be quite as understanding, either.

St. Louis has to manage all that and appears up to a challenge he has yet to face as an NHL coach: meeting expectations, internal and external, to guide a winning product, a playoff product.

“I would be very surprised if we didn’t improve, whether that’s internally or externally,” St. Louis said. “Our young players will be a bit older. That’s always the goal, and it will be up to Kent (Hughes) to juggle that.

“I’ll see my lineup and I’ll go with that, and I won’t make excuses.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Game in 10: Maple Leafs squander multi-goal lead to Florida, draw the Boston Bruins in the first round – Maple Leafs Hot Stove

Published

 on


A wild night in the Eastern Conference playoff race resulted in the Maple Leafs drawing the Boston Bruins in the first round.

We all know about the psychology of the Leafs vs. Bruins playoff history, the season series between the teams (4-0 Bruins), Boston’s studs on defense (Charlie McAvoy + Hampus Lindholm), their strength in goal (Linus Ullmark + Jeremy Swayman), and David Pastrnak’s career splits against the Leafs (19 goals, 36 points in 29 games). But it’s also Zacha – Coyle – Geekie down the middle for Boston instead of Barkov – Bennett – Lundell for Florida.

Just a few weeks ago, Boston’s head coach Jim Montgomery said, “We’re not ready for the playoffs,” following a loss to Philadelphia (if you’re a Leafs fan seeking some reassurance, read this doom-and-gloom Reddit thread revealing the average Bruins fans’ mindset at that time). While the Bruins went 5-1-0 after the coach’s call-out, they lost three of their last four to close the regular season (10-7-0 since the trade deadline).

300x250x1

To argue there was a clearly preferred matchup here seems unfounded. There is not much separating these teams (FLA, BOS, TOR), and after they slayed the Lightning dragon last spring, maybe it’s exactly what the Leafs need this year. Bring on Boston.

Your game in 10:

1.    The Leafs got off to a great start to this game that belied the end result. Mitch Marner was feeling it early as he weaved through the Panthers’ defense and created a great scoring chance on his first shift of the game. With Max Domi out of the lineup and Marner back in his most familiar spot next to Auston Matthews, usually an early shift like that from Marner is a promising sign of some magic to come from the pair (and possibly Matthews’ 70th, in this particular case).

Tyler Bertuzzi drew an early penalty crashing the net for a rebound. 20 seconds into the power play, the Leafs were on the board, with Marner sifting a shot from the perimeter to which John Tavares applied the slightest of deflections to make it 1-0.

The Leafs controlled play, got out to an early lead, and held a 7-2 shot advantage through the first five minutes. It’s hard to ask for a better road start against a top team.


2.   The Leafs’ recent win over Florida in Toronto was not a night particularly high on physical intensity despite the hype around the matchup. Early on tonight, there was a little more message-sending and gamesmanship (the assumption at the time was these two teams were likely round-one opponents).

Matthew Tkachuk took a few shots at John Tavares in front of the Leafs’ bench and Simon Benoit jumped into the scrum, picking up the extra penalty in the skirmish. The calls by the officials on the play were an ominous sign as far as the rest of the game was concerned; Tavares was not an equal participant to Tkachuk in the rough stuff by any stretch, but he got a roughing penalty. Benoit didn’t really throw a punch at any point or go overboard — he pushed Tkachuk away from actively punching his captain, which is pretty standard. How the Leafs got the extra two here was hard to fathom. Fortunately, the Leafs got the kill.


3.   The Leafs’ strong first period continued when, just after the midway point, Noah Gregor put the Leafs up by two after a strong third-line shift. Pontus Holmberg applied good pressure on the forecheck and went straight to the front of the net afterward. Gregor picked up the loose puck and threw a puck toward the net from just inside the blue line, which Stolarz could not track through an effective screen by Holmberg.

The physicality picked up again afterward when Jake McCabe got into a slashing match with Evan Rodrigues. Despite Tkachuk jumping in as the third man into the scrum — a similar scenario to what occurred earlier in the period, leading to a Benoit roughing call — Tkachuk escaped unpenalized. The officials then tabbed Bertuzzi for an extra slash in the scrum. The referees failed to set a consistent standard in tonight’s game, to put it mildly, and it really put a damper on what started as a competitively intense, physical, high-paced contest.

In the opening 20 minutes, the Leafs outshot the Panthers 14-6, led 2-0, and were credited with 3.72 xGF over all situations. Unlike their recent games at home vs. Detroit and New Jersey where they opened up 1-0 leads and then got carried away, they built a lead and gave Florida very little (one strange Matthews giveaway in his own zone aside).


4.   The game flipped on its head on the second period, beginning with the dreaded goal inside 30 seconds of a period starting. This was a self-inflicted wound.

Morgan Rielly initially committed a sloppy giveaway on the breakout, but the Leafs should’ve still been fine. Ilya Lyubushkin misread the play and unnecessarily stepped up in the neutral zone, scattering the Leafs’ structure off the entry and creating a fast-developing odd-man situation. Although Joseph Woll made the initial save on a wobbling shot from Carter Verhaeghe, the rebound placement off the blocker wasn’t ideal, and Verhaeghe slipped the stick check of Matthews in front to bury the second opportunity.

The Leafs pushed back with a few good shifts from the bottom-six forwards, including a great one from the fourth line where Ryan Reaves banged some bodies and they ground on the Panthers on the cycle for a long spell. At the beginning of the shift, David Kampf and Connor Dewar created a breakaway for Morgan Rielly, who was stopped blocker-side by Stolarz.

Rielly had a few big chances offensively tonight but failed to cash in. As the game wore on, he made some puzzling decisions with and without the puck en route to a big dash in the plus/minus column. He’s always been at his best when it matters (playoff time), and there is no sense in jumping on him for a sloppy game #81, assuming that will remain the case this spring, but this wasn’t his sharpest night at the office.

It’s easy to look at the shot total in the second period (29-4) and assume it was a travesty from beginning to end, but the Leafs’ initial response after Florida’s 2-1 goal was quite positive. With around 16 minutes left in the second, shots were 16-8 and it really should’ve been 3-1 Toronto.


5.   The tide turned significantly at the end of a shift of extended zone pressure from the Matthews line, who followed up the great fourth-line sequence. A goalie interference penalty was called on Tyler Bertuzzi, who attempted to skate between Stolarz and his net. The contact perhaps wasn’t as substantial as Stolarz made it appear, but it was a risky maneuver from Bertuzzi, and there was some contact made.

The Leafs were nearly done with the kill when Joel Edmundson was handed an interference penalty on Sam Bennett right at the end of it. When Bennett chipped it in deep and attempted his retrieval, Edmundson ran the kind of off-the-puck pick play on a forechecker we see defenders execute all the time; usually, it’s about running a form of “legal” interference without latching onto the attacking player for too long or getting overzealous with the contact. Whether Edmundson overstepped is debatable on this play, but Bennett definitely sold the call.


6.   By this point, the Leafs should be well and truly familiar with Florida’s renowned gamesmanship, which played a major role in this game tonight several times.

There was a play later in the game—at 4-2 in the third period—when Matthew Tkachuk did most of the work to knock off the net with a loose puck available and the Florida net empty, preventing a possible goal. John Tavares immediately skated away from the incident without a peep while Tkachuk gabbed and gesticulated at the refs in his own defense.

Those are the kinds of moments when making your case and selling a call are necessary in this league. Influencing the officials’ perception of events as best you can is a part of the game, and it’s something the Leafs—led by their captain—have to embrace against teams such as Florida (and Boston), especially.


7.  The Leafs’ PK was hanging tough, but six minutes of PK time in the period, including four minutes consecutively, seemed to really breathe life into Florida’s game and suck the life out of Toronto’s.

While the PK should feel good about the six-for-six night, it did lose six of seven draws on the PK in the middle frame. All the shorthanded time made for a lot of puck time Florida/a lot of time without the puck for the Leafs, and a lot of time on the bench for some of the Leafs’ top players.

In the second period, Florida won 68% of the draws overall. The Leafs could not find a way to dig in, win a few more battles, and reverse the momentum for the remainder of the middle frame, which ended at 29-4 in shots on goal and 3.68-0.51 in expected goals.


8.   The Panthers took the lead with two goals within 10 seconds of each other. The first was a nice tip play by Sam Bennett on a Florida point shot where Rielly was a little too puck-focused instead of engaging Bennett on the way by and disrupting his path/stick.

Immediately afterward, Joel Edmundson was not able to handle a rolling puck in his own zone, and Aleksander Barkov picked his pocket, creating a rebound that was cashed in by Sam Reinhart, with Timothy Liljegren caught in between on the play at the back post.

Before exiting the lineup a second time due to injury, Edmundson struggled in his initial return from his first injury, losing the puck in his feet a fair bit and lacking his timing and sharpness; he could use more reps to shake the rust off of his game, and there is only one game left in the regular season to do it. It seems like a no-brainer to include Edmundson among the six or seven D dressed in the lineup tomorrow while giving a few others with a lot of miles/wear and tear on their bodies (Jake McCabe comes to mind) a night off.


9.   The 4-2 dagger goal with six minutes remaining came on a rough shift from the Knies – Tavares – Nylander line. A couple of times, William Nylander didn’t make a solid play on the puck on the half wall to get it out after Tavares initially won a defensive-zone draw, and the line was then scrambling around the defensive zone. Montour seeing-eye knuckled one in from the point to make it a two-goal Panther lead, with all four goals scored inside a 13-minute span.

Joseph Woll needed to make the save, prevent the fourth goal, and help the team survive the 10-minute Panther barrage down only one. He made a nice save on Vladimir Tarasenko shortly beforehand, but there was no traffic at the top of his crease on this Montour shot, and the point shot knuckled high but did not deflect at any point.

Woll is now 4-6-0 with a .890 since returning from his injury. It’s tempting to give him more time in the net tomorrow to work his way through it—he hasn’t played a ton since his return, with Samsonov staking a pretty firm claim to the #1 job—but the injury risk probably isn’t worth it. Martin Jones could also use the game action, knowing it’s not totally inconceivable that he could be called on at some point in the playoffs.


10.  The last thing the Leafs needed as they attempted to manufacture a third-period push was another penalty in the first minute of the final frame, but during an offensive zone shift for Toronto, another highly debatable call (holding on Tavares) sent Florida to the power play. At this point in the game, the penalties were 6-2 in favour of the Panthers.

The Leafs did finally get some calls to go their way in the third period (the Bennett hook on Tavares was a really soft penalty). With a chance to get themselves back in the game with 14 minutes remaining, the power play couldn’t convert. There were a few frustrating moments where Rielly or Marner threw pucks away high in the zone to start the PP, but there was one glorious chance that would’ve changed the complexion of the final 13 minutes of the third if it went in. Rielly found Auston Matthews alone at the back post, where he outwaited Stolarz but jammed it off the bar. It trickled in the crease but somehow stayed out.

With seven minutes remaining, the Leafs went on another power play—their last real chance to make a game of it. Marner skated downhill and slipped Matthews a pass in the slot that Matthews didn’t fully connect on with his redirect attempt, with an empty net waiting. John Tavares‘ stick then shattered on a pass, ending their in-zone possession.

Alas, it wasn’t the Leafs’ night. Their push at five-on-five wasn’t overly dangerous — they only generated eight shots on goal total in the third period — and they weren’t able to bear down or catch a break on the couple of power-play chances they created.

All eyes are now watching Sheldon Keefe to see how he will manage Auston Matthews tomorrow against the Tampa Bay Lightning. The injuries to Max Domi, Bobby McMann, and Calle Jarnkrok leave the Leafs with just 12 available forwards, but they have nine available options on defense, so they could consider 11/7 if they really wanted to rest him.

This has become more of a delicate situation than is ideal; the Leafs, Keefe, and everyone with a rooting interest in the team obviously wanted Matthews to seal the deal vs. Detroit or Florida so that this decision would be brainless.

The Leafs do need to shift gears and focus on the most important priority. Notably, the team has lost three in a row and conceded 15 goals in those games, though. The goal of the team wanting to enter the playoffs feeling better about their game does align with Matthews dressing tomorrow. It actually might be trickier if the Leafs had won a few games in a row, were feeling really good about the state of their game and the recent results, and Matthews was sitting on #69. The Leafs can’t rest an unlimited number of players tomorrow, and you could just as easily argue it should be Nylander or Tavares sitting.

Ultimately, Matthews has earned the right to make the call. Ideally, if he does play, with Tampa likely to rest players (including Vaislievsky), Matthews can clinch it earlier than later in the game, and Keefe can lean on his full bench the rest of the way.

with notes from Alec Brownscombe


Game Flow: 5v5 Shot Attempts


Heat Map: 5v5 Shot Attempts


Joe Bowen & Jim Ralph Game Highlights

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending