Do You Like Tom Clancy Novels? Add Robots And Liberal Politics And You Get ‘Burn-In’ - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Do You Like Tom Clancy Novels? Add Robots And Liberal Politics And You Get ‘Burn-In’ – Forbes

Published

 on


Burn-In, the new novel from P.W. Singer and August Cole, traffics in some standard science-fiction tropes. A troubled young FBI agent teams up with a high-tech robot partner to take down a dastardly domestic terrorist.

But don’t let the seemingly cliche plot deter you. Burn-In is a gripping, surprising and fascinating peek at a possible future, where sophisticated artificial intelligence, enabled by all-encompassing social media, hardens deep political divisions in an era of climate change and societal collapse.

Imagine a lefty Tom Clancy novel with cyberpunk tropes and add footnotes—yes, footnotes. I spoke to Singer—whose previous book is LikeWar, a nonfiction history of weaponized social media—about his inspiration, his message and his weird luck in writing another prophetic book.

Q: You wrote Burn-In well before the current social unrest, but it feels like you had a sense that something like the current dystopia was coming. With that in mind, how does Burn-In comment on what we’re seeing on our streets today?

A: I knew the tech stuff would come true. The pandemic made a lot of it come true more rapidly because of rapid roll-out of A.I. and surveillance, policing ‘bots … but i did not expect the scenes with a high fence thrown up beyond an extended militarized perimeter of the White House—or what I thought would be pretty iconic dystopian scenario with police surrounding the Lincoln Memorial—to come true.

Q: Burn-In seems to me like a corollary to LikeWar.

A: The format of blending novel and nonfiction research is akin to a parent sneaking fruit and veggies into a smoothie. It’s the idea that you can share important lessons and research in a manner more effective than a white paper or a Powerpoint. 

August and I were on the China-as-a-strategic-competitor street corner [with the novel Ghost Fleet] long before it became a topic in U.S. national security circles. I’ve  got my bona fides.

LikeWar and Burn-In are also a little like the smoothie issue for the national-security community, because they’re books that touch on domestic issues and yet are interpreted by much of the national-security community as being about national-security issues. 

Both Burn-In and LikeWar explore how we actually are our own greatest threat. 

They both explore … the brittleness of everything from our critical infrastructure to now, it seems, our democratic institutions. Externally strong-looking but actually weak and prone to cracking. We explore that on the tech side but also on the political, social and economic sides.

Technology is a tool. From the very first stone to a current drone, tech has been been used by good and bad people for good and bad causes and has had good and bad ripple effects. The first stone—someone picked it up to smash nuts or to smash someone in the head. 

Take the example of facial-recognition software. Facial-recognition software has been deployed by everything from the military to police forces to schools to business. …. That facial-recognition software is being used for security reasons, used to enhance customer experience but, oh by the way, it presents incredibly challenging questions of privacy when you get Big Brother—or, in case of KFC, Big Colonel. We’re working our way through it.

There’s a fine line between utopian and dystopian futures. Much of it depends on where you are in that society. This is the part Silicon Valley keeps getting wrong.

Burn-In pushes forward this concept. What [technology] is doing is utopian but the effects of what it’s doing are dystopian. Within that we have agency. We decide how and where it’s used and under what circumstances. 

Q: I can tell you’re trying really hard in Burn-In not to frame the story in terms of our current political polarization. I know your own personal politics, so I can’t help but read the book with those politics in mind. But am I wrong in believing that you’re trying hard to be, well, “bipartisan” in your world-building? I think for instance about the military protest camp in Burn-In. It feels like a right-wing militia, but it’s not.

A: Ideologies at the extremes bend around to touch each other. That’s also how they’re manipulated by outside powers. … Traditional lines of politics fall apart in times of transition. Look at it historically, we were overdue for a political reordering.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version