Connect with us


Dodgers can win elusive World Series title if Roberts pulls right strings –



After suffering a heartbreaking defeat in the most bizarre fashion imaginable in Game 4, the Los Angeles Dodgers rebounded in Game 5 to take a 3-2 lead over the Tampa Bay Rays in the World Series.

Now the Dodgers are just one victory away from slaying their past playoff demons and finally capturing that elusive title.

But the Rays aren’t just going to roll over and hand them the crown. Tampa Bay has its ace on the mound in Blake Snell and manager Kevin Cash hinted at some lineup changes to help spark the offence.

Will the Dodgers close it out or will the Rays force a Game 7? Tune in to Sportsnet or SN Now at 8 p.m. ET to find out. In the meantime, here’s what to watch for prior to first pitch.

Watch every game of the 2020 World Series between the Tampa Bay Rays and Los Angeles Dodgers on Sportsnet and SN Now.

Roberts gets another chance to pull the right strings

The last time Tony Gonsolin started in this series, he lasted just 1.1 innings in what ended up as a bullpen day for the Dodgers in Game 2.

Manager Dave Roberts claims things will be different in Game 6, declaring Gonsolin a “starter” as opposed to an “opener.” Roberts did couch it a little, though.

“I’m going to watch him pitch and then we’ll see what we do after that,” Roberts told reporters Monday. “… I want to go as long as he possibly can, that’d be great.”

Considering Roberts pulled Clayton Kershaw after 85 pitches in Game 5 when he appeared to be cruising, it’s hard to imagine the 25-year-old Gonsolin having a long leash. The bullpen is fully rested after Monday’s off day, giving Roberts his full complement of weapons.

Game 2 didn’t go so well for Roberts as he watched a number of decisions backfire en route to a 6-4 Rays victory. Now the ever-unconventional manager has another chance to flex his strategic muscles and deliver the franchise’s first title since 1988.

Snell must be sharp from the jump

Los Angeles was aggressive from the opening pitch over the weekend, striking for at least one first-inning run in each of the past three games. It will be crucial for Snell to come out of the gate and put a zero on the board to prevent his opponents from building any quick momentum.

Snell was able to limit the Dodgers to two runs over 4.2 innings in Game 2 while striking out nine, but those numbers don’t tell the full story. The left-hander walked four batters and gave up plenty of hard contact. Five of the seven balls put in play against him came off Dodger bats at 95 m.p.h. or harder.

The 2018 Cy Young winner will need to be extra careful this time around, as it’ll be the Dodgers’ second look at him in six days.

MVP Watch

If the Dodgers do indeed take care of business in Game 6, three players stand out for World Series MVP honours, each with a different storyline attached.

The rejuvenated young star: Corey Seager

It wasn’t too long ago that Seager was considered one of the game’s rising superstars. His 2018 season was limited to just 26 games due to Tommy John surgery but his 2020 campaign has put him back in the mix with baseball’s elite.

His regular season was phenomenal — he posted a .943 OPS — and he’s been even better in the playoffs. After winning NLCS MVP, he’s still raking in the World Series with a .471/.609/.842 slash line. If not for the bizarre Rays win in Game 4, Seager would likely have already earned his second MVP trophy of the post-season. The race is Seager’s to lose at this point.

The franchise icon: Justin Turner

Turner has set a number of franchise records during this playoff run and stands as the Dodgers’ post-season leader in games played, hits, walks, RBIs and home runs. He’s been a hit machine during this World Series, as evidenced by his .364/.391/.818 batting line.

An 0-for-4 Game 6 from Seager and another big performance from Turner could easily tip the scales in the third baseman’s favour. He’s a free agent at the end of the year and winning World Series MVP in what could be his final game in a Dodger uniform would be extremely poetic.

The late-bloomer who became a hero: Max Muncy

Muncy was released by the Oakland Athletics at the end of spring training in 2017, prompting the Dodgers to sign him as a minor-league free agent. He’s become a star at the MLB level since his promotion in 2018 and finds himself entrenched in the heart of one of baseball’s best lineups.

Like Seager and Turner, Muncy has been on fire during the World Series, slashing .389/.522/.611. If he provides a clutch hit or two in Game 6 to clinch the title, it would be easy to make the case he deserves MVP.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


The Blue Jays might get a brand new ballpark to replace the Rogers Centre down the road. Fans can dream a little – Toronto Star



Reports of a plan to tear down the Rogers Centre have Blue Jays fans dreaming of a more intimate, scenic, well-stocked ballpark in its place.

But the owners of the 31-year-old stadium say an overhaul of any kind will have to wait.

“Prior to the pandemic, we were exploring options for the stadium but through this year our primary focus has been keeping our customers connected and keeping our employees safe, so there is no update on the Rogers Centre to share at this time,” Rogers spokesperson Andrew Garas said Friday.

The statement came after the Globe and Mail reported Rogers and real estate giant Brookfield Asset Management Inc. were looking to knock down the stadium as part of a larger development project.

Citing unnamed sources, the Globe reported that two companies would build a new stadium half the size on the southern part of the current site and use the remaining land for residential towers, office buildings, stores and public space. Building a new stadium on the lakefront if the initial plan falls through is also an option, the report said. Brookfield declined to comment on the matter.

Rogers owns the stadium but not the land it sits on, which is leased from the Canada Lands Company through 2088 and zoned for stadium use only, Sportsnet reported in 2018.

The City of Toronto said a formal planning application has not been submitted to redevelop the Rogers Centre, while a spokesperson for Mayor John Tory said neither he nor his office staff are involved in any discussions on the subject. Tory told city council and staff last year that he would not take part in any talks about the stadium’s future because he remains on the Rogers family trust after a previous role as a chief executive with the company.

Lobbying records show the most recent registered activity regarding the Rogers Centre came in the form of a meeting with councillor Joe Cressy, who represents Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York where the stadium is located, in July 2019 and an October 2019 meeting with Cressy’s staff.

Cressy told the Star last August that he accepted an invitation in July to meet with officials from the Blue Jays, Rogers and Brookfield to chat “in broad terms” about their plans for the domed ballpark.

At the time, Cressy said having a redeveloped stadium on the existing lands would be an important anchor for downtown and the city as a whole, and that any refurbishment must be done with private money. The group Cressy met with didn’t have a proposal to share at the time, he said.

Cressy has not heard anything further since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“If there is any ambition for a broader land revitalization, we need to work to together to ensure it adheres to good planning principles and a good public process,” he said in a statement Friday.

If and when Rogers, Brookfield and the Jays are ready to restart the discussions, Cressy said, he will ensure there is a “clear understanding that public dollars are not to be used to pay for a revitalized stadium.”

Rogers said Friday that any redevelopment project would be funded privately.

Downtown Toronto city councillor Mike Layton said he does not know details of the reported plan, but agreed that no more public money should go into the site or a new stadium.

“We’ve paid enough,” Layton (Ward 11 University-Rosedale) said in an interview Friday.

Then-Metro Council and the Ontario government were originally on the hook for a combined $60 million of the initial $225-million price tag, but ended up paying a total of $350 million after the stadium’s cost ballooned to almost $600 million.

The stadium is not in his ward, but Layton sits on the Toronto-East York community council likely to receive any redevelopment proposal before it goes to full city council.

“We paid a lot of money to build that (SkyDome) and then it was sold for $25 million. I don’t know the proposal, so I wouldn’t endeavour to give a hard ‘No’ now on whatever they want to do with the site,” he said, “but I hope we don’t see any more tax dollars going for a stadium that should be going for transit, affordable housing and parks for residents — not just a handful of major leaguers.”

Layton, who has led council’s response to climate change, also questioned any plan to demolish the current stadium, saying a tenet of carbon reduction is reusing existing infrastructure rather destroying, dumping and building anew.

Longtime sports industry executive Richard Peddie, president of the Rogers Centre between 1989 and 1994, said the idea of building a new stadium on the existing parcel of land simply isn’t practical.

“There’s no way you could do it on the same site, because it would mean the team needing to play somewhere else for three or four years. You’d need to keep this open while you built somewhere else,” said Peddie. “… There’s got to be natural grass. It should be an open air stadium which you can cover up, rather than a domed stadium where you can roll the roof back. It should be smaller. And wearing my progressive hat, there shouldn’t be money from any level of government going towards this.”



The Rogers Centre landed at No. 27 out of 30 in Ballpark Digest’s ranking of MLB stadiums this past July. Changes to the stadium no longer falls under Jays president Mark Shapiro’s purview, with Rogers now leading the file, but he told the Star in February, before the pandemic hit, that there may be more upgrades to announce in 2021.

“A lot of time, a lot of energy and a lot of focus from people — both within our ownership and even a couple of people within our building — continue to be spent exploring the next steps for a much bigger plan,” he said. “It is incredibly complex, and I think that’ll be clear once it’s announced, and so that’s why it’s taken so long.”

With files from Gregor Chisholm, Tess Kalinowski, Josh Rubin and The Canadian Press



What do you think of the idea of replacing the Rogers Centre? Leave your thoughts below.

Conversations are opinions of our readers and are subject to the Code of Conduct. The Star does not endorse these opinions.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


Stadium reno or replacement logical next step in Blue Jays' evolution as franchise – TSN



TORONTO — When Mark Shapiro talks of building a sustainable winner, most of us think about the team on the field and a roster filled with in-their-prime players competing for AL East titles on a year-in, year-out basis.

But there’s much more to the Shapiro regime’s philosophy of sustainability, and the key project all along for the 53-year-old executive has been the venue his Blue Jays call home.

While Shapiro’s Blue Jays legacy will ultimately have a lot to do with how the baseball team performs on the field, he could have a hand in changing the Toronto skyline if the club’s vision for a new — or immensely improved — stadium comes to fruition.

A Rogers Centre renovation project has been talked about on and off since Shapiro arrived in 2015.

There have been batting-cage whispers ranging from large-scale renovations — think blowing up half the building and redoing most of it — to brand new lakefront plots of land to extensive cosmetic and fan-friendly changes to the existing bones of what was formerly known as SkyDome.

Publicly, Shapiro has hinted at both when asked and he has not been shy about the need for stadium upgrades, despite declining to go into specifics of what those could ultimately look like.

After a quiet period of more than a year as the team focused on renovating its Dunedin complex and other smaller-scale restructuring, a Globe and Mail report Friday says a plan in conjunction with Brookfield Asset Management Inc. to demolish Rogers Centre as part of a privately funded multibillion-dollar redevelopment has been talked about.

According to the Globe’s Andrew Willis, citing anonymous sources, the plan would see a stadium project sit at the south end of the current site, with residential towers, office buildings, stores and public space to the north.

If plans fall through, a contingency includes building a new stadium on a different plot of lakefront land.

The project to demolish Rogers Centre and build a new stadium would have a five-to-eight-year timeline, according to the Globe, and still needs “numerous” government approvals to move forward.

In other words, it’s still in the idea stage and there may be more whispers to come as public discussion begins and the Jays continue to work through their options.

There’s no questioning where Shapiro’s work is focused these days, however, as the Jays, despite the prime downtown location, have one of the worst stadium situations in Major League Baseball at 31-year-old Rogers Centre.

On the field, the Jays are in good shape, both talent-wise and in terms of the payroll, with all of the club’s bad contracts — even Troy Tulowitzki — off the books.

The club also just completed a multi-million dollar renovation to its Dunedin player development facility and spring training stadium, leaving the ballpark at home in Toronto as the next major item on Shapiro’s checklist.

Even if the timeline of when the Jays are supposed to be a contender (pretty much now) and when a new stadium would be ready (at least a half-decade from now) doesn’t necessarily match up, it’s the clear next step in the franchise’s evolution.

Potentially in the city’s skyline, too.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


Report: Lamar Jackson tests positive; Ravens closing facility until Monday – theScore



Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson has tested positive for COVID-19, NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reports.

The Ravens are closing their team facility until Monday at the earliest, reports ESPN’s Adam Schefter.

Jackson, the 2019 NFL MVP, is the latest in a long line of Ravens players affected by the virus, and the reported developments throw the status of Sunday’s game against the undefeated Pittsburgh Steelers into doubt. Should the game proceed as scheduled, backup quarterback Robert Griffin III would likely start for Baltimore.

The matchup between the AFC North rivals was supposed to cap off the NFL’s Thanksgiving tripleheader. Instead, the league announced Wednesday the game would be moved to Sunday.

Baltimore already has 10 players on the reserve/COVID-19 list, and it appears Jackson could soon join them. The team first placed third-string quarterback Trace McSorley and defensive back Iman Marshall on the reserve list last Friday before Sunday’s loss to the Tennessee Titans.

The Ravens then placed running backs Mark Ingram and J.K. Dobbins and defensive tackle Brandon Williams on the reserve list Monday while announcing that multiple members of the organization had tested positive for COVID-19. Linebacker Pernell McPhee joined them Tuesday, while defensive end Calais Campbell and offensive linemen Matt Skura and Patrick Mekari hit the list Wednesday. Baltimore placed defensive end Jihad Ward on the list Thursday morning.

Baltimore disciplined a staff member Wednesday for reportedly failing to report his COVID-19 symptoms and failing to consistently wear a mask or tracking device inside the team facility.

Head strength and conditioning coach Steve Saunders was the staff member in question, sources told Jeff Zrebiec of The Athletic. The team has reportedly suspended Saunders.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading