Don Cherry blames the “left wing media” for Mark Donnelly’s firing, but it’s just capitalism | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Media

Don Cherry blames the “left wing media” for Mark Donnelly’s firing, but it’s just capitalism

Published

 on

Mark Donnelly’s firing wasn’t political, but you’ll have a hard time convincing Don Cherry.

The longtime Canucks anthem singer is now the former Canucks anthem singer after team owner Francesco Aquilini got wind of Donnelly preparing to perform the Canadian national anthem at an anti-mask rally on the weekend. Aquilini unceremoniously fired the singer over Twitter, but it’s a move that has been a long time coming.

Over the last few seasons, the Canucks had already shifted more of the pre-game anthem singing to Marie Hui, previously the official anthem singer for the Vancouver Whitecaps. When the Canucks needed an anthem over video for their return to the playoffs after a four-year absence, Hui was tapped instead of Donnelly.

The melodramatic circumstances of Donnelly’s dismissal made it much more than a simple shift from his operatic stylings to Hui’s more modern approach. His alliance with the conspiratorial thinking of an anti-mask group in the middle of a global pandemic gave his firing an oversized sense of importance, which is fitting for Donnelly.

It also brought out some new allies, such as Don Cherry, who was fired from his longtime role on Hockey Night in Canada one year ago.

“When you give your opinion, you better be prepared to pay the price,” said Cherry to the Toronto Sun’s Joe Warmington. “Going to a ‘no-mask rally’ was not the politically correct thing to do. You have to do what the left media want now. I should know.”

According to Cherry, the lesson to be learned is “you can’t go against left-wing media’s rules” or “be more popular than the owner.”

Both are absolutely absurd statements.

Donnelly’s firing has nothing to do with some left-versus-right political binary or the left-wing media. Neither did Cherry’s firing one year ago.

A billionaire owner of a hockey team and a multi-billion dollar corporation firing a person can’t possibly be some sort of left-wing political statement. It’s just good old-fashioned capitalism. Donnelly promoting an anti-mask agenda while explicitly connected to the Canucks was bad for business.

Likewise, Cherry making a blatantly racist statement live on the air was bad PR for Sportsnet, who finally took action after years of similarly xenophobic statements. Sportsnet likely didn’t mind that it also took Cherry’s salary off the books.

Some want to suggest that Donnelly was fired for his personal opinion, but there are a few issues with that argument.

The first is that Donnelly’s right-wing views have been known for years now. He performed the anthem at an anti-abortion rally in 2012. He wasn’t fired at the time, despite the extreme imagery used by the anti-abortion group with whom he stood.

When the lyrics to “O Canada” were updated from “in all thy sons command” to “in all of us command,” Donnelly silently protested — quite literally. While Donnelly’s go-to move was always to stop singing after the fourth bar and allow the crowd to take over singing, “With glowing hearts we see thee rise,” after the lyrics change he stopped singing a bar earlier so as not to ever sing “in all of us command.”

Donnelly wasn’t fired for expressing himself this way, even though it was literally his job to sing the anthem and he was doing less of his job than ever.

In 2018, Donnelly sought political office, pursuing the Conservative Party nomination for South Surrey-White Rock. He traded on his reputation as the self-proclaimed “Mr. O Canada,” railing against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for “running Canada off a cliff.” For this explicitly political statement, Donnelly wasn’t fired. He kept singing the anthem before Canucks games.

Clearly, Donnelly’s firing wasn’t political and it wasn’t for his conservative political views. If it was, the Canucks would have fired him long ago.

The Canucks gave him a platform to sing the national anthem, associating him with the Canucks’ brand. He used that platform in ways that connected the Canucks’ brand to something that made the Canucks look bad. Therefore, the Canucks took the platform away.

Frankly, Donnelly could have still attended the anti-mask rally as a private citizen. He would have been in violation of current provincial health orders restricting events and social gatherings, but he would have been unlikely to lose his job as a result. Instead, he both sang the anthem and spoke at the rally, explicitly using his public persona as the Canucks’ anthem singer. Capitalism did the rest.

As for left-wing media, Francesco Aquilini quote-tweeted an article from the Vancouver Sun when announcing Donnelly had been given the ax. While individual writers have many-varied political views, the Sun is owned by Postmedia, which has consistently endorsed Conservative politicians.

Then there’s Cherry’s odd claim that Donnelly was fired for being more popular than Aquilini. Even if Aquilini has his detractors — whether for business practices or being too involved in hockey operations — he’s not exactly unpopular among Canucks fans, with many even appreciating his willingness to spend to the salary cap every season.

More to the point, Donnelly quickly made himself very, very unpopular.

Eight in ten Canadians believe that masks should be mandatory in public places during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a July poll from Ipsos, with British Columbia reporting some of the highest support (83%) in Canada. That support has not waned. A petition for B.C. to adopt a mandatory mask policy reached over 21,000 signatures before Dr. Bonnie Henry put a mask mandate in place.

In other words, masks are very popular right now, and it’s not hard to understand why. They’re supported by science, we’re in a global pandemic that has seen the deaths of nearly 13,000 Canadians, and anti-mask claims are rooted in conspiratorial thinking that is easily debunked.

Far from Donnelly being more popular, by aligning himself with anti-maskers he sunk his popularity and, because of his association with the Canucks, threatened to hurt the team as well.

Firing Donnelly was certainly a popular move for Aquilini — support for the move has been overwhelming — but even that is means to an end. Good PR is good for business. And we’re back to capitalism.

Honestly, for someone who has spent so much time complaining about “left-wing pinkos,” Don Cherry should have been happy to see capitalism getting such great publicity.
 

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Trump could cash out his DJT stock within weeks. Here’s what happens if he sells

Published

 on

Former President Donald Trump is on the brink of a significant financial decision that could have far-reaching implications for both his personal wealth and the future of his fledgling social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). As the lockup period on his shares in TMTG, which owns Truth Social, nears its end, Trump could soon be free to sell his substantial stake in the company. However, the potential payday, which makes up a large portion of his net worth, comes with considerable risks for Trump and his supporters.

Trump’s stake in TMTG comprises nearly 59% of the company, amounting to 114,750,000 shares. As of now, this holding is valued at approximately $2.6 billion. These shares are currently under a lockup agreement, a common feature of initial public offerings (IPOs), designed to prevent company insiders from immediately selling their shares and potentially destabilizing the stock. The lockup, which began after TMTG’s merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), is set to expire on September 25, though it could end earlier if certain conditions are met.

Should Trump decide to sell his shares after the lockup expires, the market could respond in unpredictable ways. The sale of a substantial number of shares by a major stakeholder like Trump could flood the market, potentially driving down the stock price. Daniel Bradley, a finance professor at the University of South Florida, suggests that the market might react negatively to such a large sale, particularly if there aren’t enough buyers to absorb the supply. This could lead to a sharp decline in the stock’s value, impacting both Trump’s personal wealth and the company’s market standing.

Moreover, Trump’s involvement in Truth Social has been a key driver of investor interest. The platform, marketed as a free speech alternative to mainstream social media, has attracted a loyal user base largely due to Trump’s presence. If Trump were to sell his stake, it might signal a lack of confidence in the company, potentially shaking investor confidence and further depressing the stock price.

Trump’s decision is also influenced by his ongoing legal battles, which have already cost him over $100 million in legal fees. Selling his shares could provide a significant financial boost, helping him cover these mounting expenses. However, this move could also have political ramifications, especially as he continues his bid for the Republican nomination in the 2024 presidential race.

Trump Media’s success is closely tied to Trump’s political fortunes. The company’s stock has shown volatility in response to developments in the presidential race, with Trump’s chances of winning having a direct impact on the stock’s value. If Trump sells his stake, it could be interpreted as a lack of confidence in his own political future, potentially undermining both his campaign and the company’s prospects.

Truth Social, the flagship product of TMTG, has faced challenges in generating traffic and advertising revenue, especially compared to established social media giants like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook. Despite this, the company’s valuation has remained high, fueled by investor speculation on Trump’s political future. If Trump remains in the race and manages to secure the presidency, the value of his shares could increase. Conversely, any missteps on the campaign trail could have the opposite effect, further destabilizing the stock.

As the lockup period comes to an end, Trump faces a critical decision that could shape the future of both his personal finances and Truth Social. Whether he chooses to hold onto his shares or cash out, the outcome will likely have significant consequences for the company, its investors, and Trump’s political aspirations.

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Arizona man accused of social media threats to Trump is arrested

Published

 on

Cochise County, AZ — Law enforcement officials in Arizona have apprehended Ronald Lee Syvrud, a 66-year-old resident of Cochise County, after a manhunt was launched following alleged death threats he made against former President Donald Trump. The threats reportedly surfaced in social media posts over the past two weeks, as Trump visited the US-Mexico border in Cochise County on Thursday.

Syvrud, who hails from Benson, Arizona, located about 50 miles southeast of Tucson, was captured by the Cochise County Sheriff’s Office on Thursday afternoon. The Sheriff’s Office confirmed his arrest, stating, “This subject has been taken into custody without incident.”

In addition to the alleged threats against Trump, Syvrud is wanted for multiple offences, including failure to register as a sex offender. He also faces several warrants in both Wisconsin and Arizona, including charges for driving under the influence and a felony hit-and-run.

The timing of the arrest coincided with Trump’s visit to Cochise County, where he toured the US-Mexico border. During his visit, Trump addressed the ongoing border issues and criticized his political rival, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, for what he described as lax immigration policies. When asked by reporters about the ongoing manhunt for Syvrud, Trump responded, “No, I have not heard that, but I am not that surprised and the reason is because I want to do things that are very bad for the bad guys.”

This incident marks the latest in a series of threats against political figures during the current election cycle. Just earlier this month, a 66-year-old Virginia man was arrested on suspicion of making death threats against Vice President Kamala Harris and other public officials.

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Media & Technology Group Faces Declining Stock Amid Financial Struggles and Increased Competition

Published

 on

Trump Media & Technology Group’s stock has taken a significant hit, dropping more than 11% this week following a disappointing earnings report and the return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the rival social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This decline is part of a broader downward trend for the parent company of Truth Social, with the stock plummeting nearly 43% since mid-July. Despite the sharp decline, some investors remain unfazed, expressing continued optimism for the company’s financial future or standing by their investment as a show of political support for Trump.

One such investor, Todd Schlanger, an interior designer from West Palm Beach, explained his commitment to the stock, stating, “I’m a Republican, so I supported him. When I found out about the stock, I got involved because I support the company and believe in free speech.” Schlanger, who owns around 1,000 shares, is a regular user of Truth Social and is excited about the company’s future, particularly its plans to expand its streaming services. He believes Truth Social has the potential to be as strong as Facebook or X, despite the stock’s recent struggles.

However, Truth Social’s stock performance is deeply tied to Trump’s political influence and the company’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, which has proven challenging. An earnings report released last Friday showed the company lost over $16 million in the three-month period ending in June. Revenue dropped by 30%, down to approximately $836,000 compared to $1.2 million during the same period last year.

In response to the earnings report, Truth Social CEO Devin Nunes emphasized the company’s strong cash position, highlighting $344 million in cash reserves and no debt. He also reiterated the company’s commitment to free speech, stating, “From the beginning, it was our intention to make Truth Social an impenetrable beachhead of free speech, and by taking extraordinary steps to minimize our reliance on Big Tech, that is exactly what we are doing.”

Despite these assurances, investors reacted negatively to the quarterly report, leading to a steep drop in stock price. The situation was further complicated by Trump’s return to X, where he posted for the first time in a year. Trump’s exclusivity agreement with Trump Media & Technology Group mandates that he posts personal content first on Truth Social. However, he is allowed to make politically related posts on other social media platforms, which he did earlier this week, potentially drawing users away from Truth Social.

For investors like Teri Lynn Roberson, who purchased shares near the company’s peak after it went public in March, the decline in stock value has been disheartening. However, Roberson remains unbothered by the poor performance, saying her investment was more about supporting Trump than making money. “I’m way at a loss, but I am OK with that. I am just watching it for fun,” Roberson said, adding that she sees Trump’s return to X as a positive move that could expand his reach beyond Truth Social’s “echo chamber.”

The stock’s performance holds significant financial implications for Trump himself, as he owns a 65% stake in Trump Media & Technology Group. According to Fortune, this stake represents a substantial portion of his net worth, which could be vulnerable if the company continues to struggle financially.

Analysts have described Truth Social as a “meme stock,” similar to companies like GameStop and AMC that saw their stock prices driven by ideological investments rather than business fundamentals. Tyler Richey, an analyst at Sevens Report Research, noted that the stock has ebbed and flowed based on sentiment toward Trump. He pointed out that the recent decline coincided with the rise of U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic presidential nominee, which may have dampened perceptions of Trump’s 2024 election prospects.

Jay Ritter, a finance professor at the University of Florida, offered a grim long-term outlook for Truth Social, suggesting that the stock would likely remain volatile, but with an overall downward trend. “What’s lacking for the true believer in the company story is, ‘OK, where is the business strategy that will be generating revenue?'” Ritter said, highlighting the company’s struggle to produce a sustainable business model.

Still, for some investors, like Michael Rogers, a masonry company owner in North Carolina, their support for Trump Media & Technology Group is unwavering. Rogers, who owns over 10,000 shares, said he invested in the company both as a show of support for Trump and because of his belief in the company’s financial future. Despite concerns about the company’s revenue challenges, Rogers expressed confidence in the business, stating, “I’m in it for the long haul.”

Not all investors are as confident. Mitchell Standley, who made a significant return on his investment earlier this year by capitalizing on the hype surrounding Trump Media’s planned merger with Digital World Acquisition Corporation, has since moved on. “It was basically just a pump and dump,” Standley told ABC News. “I knew that once they merged, all of his supporters were going to dump a bunch of money into it and buy it up.” Now, Standley is staying away from the company, citing the lack of business fundamentals as the reason for his exit.

Truth Social’s future remains uncertain as it continues to struggle with financial losses and faces stiff competition from established social media platforms. While its user base and investor sentiment are bolstered by Trump’s political following, the company’s long-term viability will depend on its ability to create a sustainable revenue stream and maintain relevance in a crowded digital landscape.

As the company seeks to stabilize, the question remains whether its appeal to Trump’s supporters can translate into financial success or whether it will remain a volatile stock driven more by ideology than business fundamentals.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version