Downtown Austin's new office space is exploding, but who's moving in? | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Real eState

Downtown Austin’s new office space is exploding, but who’s moving in?

Published

 on

AUSTIN — Shooting up from the downtown skyline is a gleaming, 66-story glass behemoth, a place “where Fortune 500 companies, high-rise residents and premier retailers come together to create a community of their own,” as sleek marketing brochures put it. The tech giant Meta scooped up all 19 floors of office space as construction was underway in early 2022.

But when Austin’s tallest building officially opens later this year, all that office space will be empty. Meta has ditched its move-in plans and is now trying to sublease 589,000 square feet of offices, 1,626 parking spots, 17 private balconies and a half-acre of green space. So far: No takers.

The skyscraper known as “Sixth and Guadalupe” is the most glaring example in the city that made a huge bet on the post-pandemic commercial real estate economy. While other cities worry about a glut of office space as workers resist returning to the familiar 9-to-5 grind, Austin’s challenges are Texas-sized.

New office construction is changing Austin’s skyline, as buildings get taller.

Office space at Sixth and

Guadalupe, the tallest building in Austin, is expected to open empty this year.

DOWNTOWN

AUSTIN

Texas Capitol

The 74-story Waterline skyscraper will be the tallest building in Texas when it is completed in a few years.

EAST

AUSTIN

Sources: Cushman and Wakefield, Google Earth

JANICE KAI CHEN/THE WASHINGTON POST

New office construction is changing Austin’s skyline, as buildings get taller.

Office space at Sixth and Guadalupe, the tallest building in Austin, is expected to open empty this year.

Construction for new offices is booming. But developers are struggling to lease out the space.

87 percent of new office space is expected to open vacant.

NORTH

AUSTIN

WEST AUSTIN

EAST AUSTIN

Highpoint 2222, a 1.1 million square foot

complex of office buildings and apartments, is

currently being redeveloped on the outskirts of

Austin.

Multiple office buildings are being added

at the Domain, a development that includes

luxury shopping, restaurants and hotels.

Eight new office buildings are slated for

completion in East Austin, where pressures of

gentrification are mounting.

Sources: Cushman and Wakefield, OpenStreetMap

JANICE KAI CHEN/THE WASHINGTON POST

Construction for new offices is booming. But developers

are struggling to lease out the space.

87 percent of new office space is expected to open vacant.

Multiple office buildings are being added at the Domain,

a development that includes luxury shopping, restaurants and hotels.

NORTHWEST

AUSTIN

NORTH

AUSTIN

WEST AUSTIN

CENTRAL

AUSTIN

Highpoint 2222, a 1.1 million square foot complex of office buildings and apartments, is currently being redeveloped

on the outskirts of Austin.

EAST AUSTIN

Eight new office buildings are slated for completion in East Austin, where pressures of gentrification are mounting.

SOUTH

AUSTIN

SOUTHWEST

AUSTIN

Sources: Cushman and Wakefield, OpenStreetMap

JANICE KAI CHEN/THE WASHINGTON POST

Construction for new offices is booming. But developers are struggling to lease out the space.

87 percent of new office space is expected to open vacant.

Multiple office buildings are being added at the Domain, a development that includes luxury shopping, restaurants and hotels.

NORTHWEST

AUSTIN

NORTH

AUSTIN

WEST AUSTIN

CENTRAL

AUSTIN

Highpoint 2222, a 1.1 million square foot complex of office buildings and apartments, is currently being redeveloped

on the outskirts of Austin.

EAST AUSTIN

Eight new office buildings are slated for completion in East Austin, where pressures of gentrification are mounting.

SOUTH

AUSTIN

SOUTHWEST

AUSTIN

Sources: Cushman and Wakefield, OpenStreetMap

JANICE KAI CHEN/THE WASHINGTON POST

#g-austinoffices-overviewmap-xxsmall display: none
@media (max-width: 639px) and (min-width: 260px)
#g-austinoffices-overviewmap-xxsmall
display: block

#g-austinoffices-overviewmap-medium display: none
@media (max-width: 959px) and (min-width: 640px)
#g-austinoffices-overviewmap-medium
display: block

#g-austinoffices-overviewmap-xlarge display: none
@media (min-width: 960px)
#g-austinoffices-overviewmap-xlarge
display: block

Austin wasn’t always like this. Decades before Tesla’s headquarters and a burgeoning crypto scene arrived, the University of Texas was a major player in the local economy. The state Capitol was among the tallest landmarks, and housing was cheap. Tech had a presence starting in the 1970s and 1980s, thanks to Motorola, IBM and Dell. But a popular mantra then summed up the desire to preserve the city’s small-town feel: “If we don’t build it, they won’t come.”

But that changed as Big Tech expanded beyond San Francisco. Indeed, the job search site, was co-founded in Austin in 2004. Apple, Google, Facebook and Palantir expanded their local offices. In 2020, Oracle announced it would relocate its corporate headquarters from Silicon Valley.

The pandemic supercharged Austin’s growth even more. The tech industry exploded as the world shifted online. Home buyers raced to scoop up cheap properties, and young workers seized the chance to work remotely under the Texas sun. And with so many people flocking here — Austin is now the country’s 10th largest city — developers and local officials bet on a real estate boom.

Interest rates were rock-bottom until early 2022, making it easy for developers to get financing for dozens of new projects. And since it’s common in Texas for commercial real estate to be built entirely on spec, developers could get loans without any guarantee that they’d be able to lease the space.

To cater to young workers with high-paying salaries, many buildings were designed as all-in-one complexes, with office space, apartments, shops and dining all stacked together. A new luxury building called Paseo promises the chance to “Live, work, play and rest in one place” when it opens in 2025. A mile away at Sixth and Guadalupe, 33 floors of apartments are stacked on top of 19 floors of offices. Elon Musk’s brother is opening up a restaurant on the ground floor.

Seth Johnston, senior vice president and market leader of Lincoln Property Company, said timing is on the industry’s side. The global developer is behind multiple Austin projects including Sixth and Guadalupe, which got rolling when financing was cheap. Now LPC and its peers will have the newest offerings with the sleekest amenities, Johnston said. And there won’t be fresh competition coming up behind them, since financing for new projects has almost entirely dried up.

“These companies, they want newer amenities in their space,” Johnston said. “They want fresher air filtration systems. They want touchless technology, and that’s harder to do in the older, ’80s vintage buildings downtown … By and large, there’s always going to be that flight to quality. And I think we’re in a position to hopefully take advantage of that.”

In a statement, Meta spokesman Tracy Clayton said Meta’s goal is to “build a best-in-class hybrid work experience.” The company’s commitment to Austin is also clear by the roughly 1,000 employees who live there, Clayton said.

Industry officials also argue that, technically, many of the buildings aren’t vacant. Meta’s name is still on the lease at Sixth and Guadalupe, after all, even while the company looks for new tenants. Another LPC building, called The Republic, has leases lined up for a law firm and a private equity firm. Another building downtown had 35 floors scooped up by Google, which continues to pay rent even though its move-in plans are still in flux. That means developers and their lenders stay financially sound, at least for now.

Still, only the biggest, richest firms can afford to lease huge offices they don’t use. And empty towers don’t do much to liven up an area or attract new customers.

Down the block from Meta’s skyscraper, Nikki Nichol was getting ready to open Ranch 616 one morning last month. The restaurant where she works as an assistant manager and bartender is typically hopping on weekends. Except lately, Nichol said more customers complain about the towering buildings blocking all the breeze.

When Nichol moved to Austin in 2010, she paid $695 for a one-bedroom apartment. Now she’s paying almost double for a studio. She said parking is “atrocious,” and that getting around the city is impossible because of all the construction. She said she can’t grasp the vision for a city that’s getting harder and harder to recognize.

“It’s like they’re going to ‘field of dreams’ it,” she said.

Remarkably, there’s a craving for even more space. Data from the Downtown Austin Alliance shows developers have proposed an additional 3.9 million square feet of office space — and would be moving forward if banks weren’t shying away from new loans.

“If rates were low and money was available, there’s every indication that these buildings would get built,” said Dewitt Peart, the organization’s president and chief executive. “Now the pandemic has thrown a wrench into everything. But I think the sense is that money still wants to flow to Austin.”

At the same time, though, all of the new space is driving down the value of decades-old buildings that are gradually hollowing out. On one downtown street corner, a drab 40-year-old building bears a large “For Lease” banner. Right next door, construction crews were working on a luxury, 58-story skyscraper.

Jeff Graves, research director at Cushman & Wakefield, can look out the window at the changing skyline. From his office, he pointed to a luxe new building right across the street from an abandoned, rat-infested government building that is slated for demolition. Turning a little, he gestured to an old Austin landmark that has managed to hold on to its tenants, which he called an outlier.

Just on the other side of Graves’s window, a construction crew was practically dangling out the side of a brand new office tower.

Graves lived in Las Vegas during the 2007-08 housing market crash, and wonders if a similar bubble could come for Austin commercial real estate. The answer may lie in what happens with prices, which so far aren’t budging. Leases at brand new skyscrapers — roughly $50 per square foot at the newest buildings — are so high that smaller businesses are getting priced out. But so far, landlords would prefer to throw in perks, like six months of free rent on a decade-long lease, before caving to a discount.

That approach may only work for so long. And things could come to a head if lenders get antsy that they’re taking too much of a loss.

“No one wants to be the first to drop rates,” Graves said. “They’re in for a lot of money.”

Other problems could hit Austin hard, too. Tech firms that bulged in the pandemic are laying off thousands of employees. Return to office policies are still fraught and in some cases, backfiring.

***

Zoom out a bit more, and cities nationwide are trying to figure out what comes next. New York and San Francisco are overwhelmed with untapped office space. Some economists fear that midsize cities, from Minneapolis to Memphis, could be even more vulnerable to a kind of “doom loop” that starts with empty offices and canceled leases, and spirals into something scarier for downtowns and city coffers.

And policymakers are still pushing hard to cool the economy down. Officials at the Federal Reserve have made clear that they will keep interest rates high for as long as necessary. No one knows how long their aggressive moves will slow growth, especially because the totality of the Fed’s moves may not have hit yet.

Some economists argue those delays are shorter nowadays. The Fed telegraphs its moves far in advance so the markets have time to price higher rates in. But when Coronado, the MacroPolicy Perspectives economist, looks around Austin, she sees consequences still ahead.

It takes years, she said, for massive commercial real estate projects to get financing and permitting, and finish construction and price out leases. By the time each new building goes through the cycle, supply will far outstrip demand. Prices could drop, even plummet, in a way the city may not be ready for.

“I don’t know whether this just means losses for contractors, but it’s fine. Or losses for some banks, but they absorb the blow,” Coronado said. “But I do know that even if it is the intended effect of Fed policy, the full effect isn’t yet in the employment data, in the construction data, that still lies ahead.”

Only time will tell. But already, the mismatch stands out. On a recent afternoon, shoppers milled about the Domain, a sprawling outpost of office suites, restaurants, high-end retail stores and hotels 12 miles north of downtown. Scattered between Gucci and Tesla storefronts are a few reminders that shoppers are still in Texas: a burnt orange window display at a jewelry store, a leather boots shop. An overhead speaker played Taylor Swift’s “Wildest Dreams.”

The office park nearby towered over the few workers around. Companies like Indeed, Vrbo, Amazon, IBM, Charles Schwab and Facebook have taken up space. But the overall vacancy rate across the complex is still 15 percent, according to Cushman & Wakefield. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post, and the newspaper’s interim chief executive, Patty Stonesifer, sits on Amazon’s board.)

Ryan Crawford was walking back from lunch with co-workers from AWS last month. Crawford said the area had been a bit more crowded since Labor Day, when a wave of return-to-office orders went into effect. But not by much.

“The bars, the restaurants are one-third full,” he said. “Few people are sticking around to socialize. Most people do live far away.”

Sitting at a table nearby, a man read a book on his lunch break. He’d recently learned he was laid off from the consulting and tech firm Accenture, which was shedding more than 500 workers at its Domain office. He declined to share his name, fearing retribution from the company.

He said he lived nearby and had mixed feelings as the site went up. The high-end offices with the high-paying jobs fit uneasily in what was otherwise a lower-income area, he said. On the other hand, he had an easy commute, until his job went away altogether.

What would happen to his old office, he didn’t know.

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Here are some facts about British Columbia’s housing market

Published

 on

 

Housing affordability is a key issue in the provincial election campaign in British Columbia, particularly in major centres.

Here are some statistics about housing in B.C. from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s 2024 Rental Market Report, issued in January, and the B.C. Real Estate Association’s August 2024 report.

Average residential home price in B.C.: $938,500

Average price in greater Vancouver (2024 year to date): $1,304,438

Average price in greater Victoria (2024 year to date): $979,103

Average price in the Okanagan (2024 year to date): $748,015

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Vancouver: $2,181

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Victoria: $1,839

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Canada: $1,359

Rental vacancy rate in Vancouver: 0.9 per cent

How much more do new renters in Vancouver pay compared with renters who have occupied their home for at least a year: 27 per cent

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

B.C. voters face atmospheric river with heavy rain, high winds on election day

Published

 on

 

VANCOUVER – Voters along the south coast of British Columbia who have not cast their ballots yet will have to contend with heavy rain and high winds from an incoming atmospheric river weather system on election day.

Environment Canada says the weather system will bring prolonged heavy rain to Metro Vancouver, the Sunshine Coast, Fraser Valley, Howe Sound, Whistler and Vancouver Island starting Friday.

The agency says strong winds with gusts up to 80 kilometres an hour will also develop on Saturday — the day thousands are expected to go to the polls across B.C. — in parts of Vancouver Island and Metro Vancouver.

Wednesday was the last day for advance voting, which started on Oct. 10.

More than 180,000 voters cast their votes Wednesday — the most ever on an advance voting day in B.C., beating the record set just days earlier on Oct. 10 of more than 170,000 votes.

Environment Canada says voters in the area of the atmospheric river can expect around 70 millimetres of precipitation generally and up to 100 millimetres along the coastal mountains, while parts of Vancouver Island could see as much as 200 millimetres of rainfall for the weekend.

An atmospheric river system in November 2021 created severe flooding and landslides that at one point severed most rail links between Vancouver’s port and the rest of Canada while inundating communities in the Fraser Valley and B.C. Interior.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

No shortage when it comes to B.C. housing policies, as Eby, Rustad offer clear choice

Published

 on

 

British Columbia voters face no shortage of policies when it comes to tackling the province’s housing woes in the run-up to Saturday’s election, with a clear choice for the next government’s approach.

David Eby’s New Democrats say the housing market on its own will not deliver the homes people need, while B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad saysgovernment is part of the problem and B.C. needs to “unleash” the potential of the private sector.

But Andy Yan, director of the City Program at Simon Fraser University, said the “punchline” was that neither would have a hand in regulating interest rates, the “giant X-factor” in housing affordability.

“The one policy that controls it all just happens to be a policy that the province, whoever wins, has absolutely no control over,” said Yan, who made a name for himself scrutinizing B.C.’s chronic affordability problems.

Some metrics have shown those problems easing, with Eby pointing to what he said was a seven per cent drop in rent prices in Vancouver.

But Statistics Canada says 2021 census data shows that 25.5 per cent of B.C. households were paying at least 30 per cent of their income on shelter costs, the worst for any province or territory.

Yan said government had “access to a few levers” aimed at boosting housing affordability, and Eby has been pulling several.

Yet a host of other factors are at play, rates in particular, Yan said.

“This is what makes housing so frustrating, right? It takes time. It takes decades through which solutions and policies play out,” Yan said.

Rustad, meanwhile, is running on a “deregulation” platform.

He has pledged to scrap key NDP housing initiatives, including the speculation and vacancy tax, restrictions on short-term rentals,and legislation aimed at boosting small-scale density in single-family neighbourhoods.

Green Leader Sonia Furstenau, meanwhile, says “commodification” of housing by large investors is a major factor driving up costs, and her party would prioritize people most vulnerable in the housing market.

Yan said it was too soon to fully assess the impact of the NDP government’s housing measures, but there was a risk housing challenges could get worse if certain safeguards were removed, such as policies that preserve existing rental homes.

If interest rates were to drop, spurring a surge of redevelopment, Yan said the new homes with higher rents could wipe the older, cheaper units off the map.

“There is this element of change and redevelopment that needs to occur as a city grows, yet the loss of that stock is part of really, the ongoing challenges,” Yan said.

Given the external forces buffeting the housing market, Yan said the question before voters this month was more about “narrative” than numbers.

“Who do you believe will deliver a better tomorrow?”

Yan said the market has limits, and governments play an important role in providing safeguards for those most vulnerable.

The market “won’t by itself deal with their housing needs,” Yan said, especially given what he described as B.C.’s “30-year deficit of non-market housing.”

IS HOUSING THE ‘GOVERNMENT’S JOB’?

Craig Jones, associate director of the Housing Research Collaborative at the University of British Columbia, echoed Yan, saying people are in “housing distress” and in urgent need of help in the form of social or non-market housing.

“The amount of housing that it’s going to take through straight-up supply to arrive at affordability, it’s more than the system can actually produce,” he said.

Among the three leaders, Yan said it was Furstenau who had focused on the role of the “financialization” of housing, or large investors using housing for profit.

“It really squeezes renters,” he said of the trend. “It captures those units that would ordinarily become affordable and moves (them) into an investment product.”

The Greens’ platform includes a pledge to advocate for federal legislation banning the sale of residential units toreal estate investment trusts, known as REITs.

The party has also proposed a two per cent tax on homes valued at $3 million or higher, while committing $1.5 billion to build 26,000 non-market units each year.

Eby’s NDP government has enacted a suite of policies aimed at speeding up the development and availability of middle-income housing and affordable rentals.

They include the Rental Protection Fund, which Jones described as a “cutting-edge” policy. The $500-million fund enables non-profit organizations to purchase and manage existing rental buildings with the goal of preserving their affordability.

Another flagship NDP housing initiative, dubbed BC Builds, uses $2 billion in government financingto offer low-interest loans for the development of rental buildings on low-cost, underutilized land. Under the program, operators must offer at least 20 per cent of their units at 20 per cent below the market value.

Ravi Kahlon, the NDP candidate for Delta North who serves as Eby’s housing minister,said BC Builds was designed to navigate “huge headwinds” in housing development, including high interest rates, global inflation and the cost of land.

Boosting supply is one piece of the larger housing puzzle, Kahlon said in an interview before the start of the election campaign.

“We also need governments to invest and … come up with innovative programs to be able to get more affordability than the market can deliver,” he said.

The NDP is also pledging to help more middle-class, first-time buyers into the housing market with a plan to finance 40 per cent of the price on certain projects, with the money repayable as a loan and carrying an interest rate of 1.5 per cent. The government’s contribution would have to be repaid upon resale, plus 40 per cent of any increase in value.

The Canadian Press reached out several times requesting a housing-focused interview with Rustad or another Conservative representative, but received no followup.

At a press conference officially launching the Conservatives’ campaign, Rustad said Eby “seems to think that (housing) is government’s job.”

A key element of the Conservatives’ housing plans is a provincial tax exemption dubbed the “Rustad Rebate.” It would start in 2026 with residents able to deduct up to $1,500 per month for rent and mortgage costs, increasing to $3,000 in 2029.

Rustad also wants Ottawa to reintroduce a 1970s federal program that offered tax incentives to spur multi-unit residential building construction.

“It’s critical to bring that back and get the rental stock that we need built,” Rustad said of the so-called MURB program during the recent televised leaders’ debate.

Rustad also wants to axe B.C.’s speculation and vacancy tax, which Eby says has added 20,000 units to the long-term rental market, and repeal rules restricting short-term rentals on platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo to an operator’s principal residence or one secondary suite.

“(First) of all it was foreigners, and then it was speculators, and then it was vacant properties, and then it was Airbnbs, instead of pointing at the real problem, which is government, and government is getting in the way,” Rustad said during the televised leaders’ debate.

Rustad has also promised to speed up approvals for rezoning and development applications, and to step in if a city fails to meet the six-month target.

Eby’s approach to clearing zoning and regulatory hurdles includes legislation passed last fall that requires municipalities with more than 5,000 residents to allow small-scale, multi-unit housing on lots previously zoned for single family homes.

The New Democrats have also recently announced a series of free, standardized building designs and a plan to fast-track prefabricated homes in the province.

A statement from B.C.’s Housing Ministry said more than 90 per cent of 188 local governments had adopted the New Democrats’ small-scale, multi-unit housing legislation as of last month, while 21 had received extensions allowing more time.

Rustad has pledged to repeal that law too, describing Eby’s approach as “authoritarian.”

The Greens are meanwhile pledging to spend $650 million in annual infrastructure funding for communities, increase subsidies for elderly renters, and bring in vacancy control measures to prevent landlords from drastically raising rents for new tenants.

Yan likened the Oct. 19 election to a “referendum about the course that David Eby has set” for housing, with Rustad “offering a completely different direction.”

Regardless of which party and leader emerges victorious, Yan said B.C.’s next government will be working against the clock, as well as cost pressures.

Yan said failing to deliver affordable homes for everyone, particularly people living on B.C. streets and young, working families, came at a cost to the whole province.

“It diminishes us as a society, but then also as an economy.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version