Dropping The SAT And ACT Is About Politics, Not Diversity. - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Dropping The SAT And ACT Is About Politics, Not Diversity. – Forbes

Published

 on


The University of California system is suspending its SAT and ACT testing requirements for freshman applicants through 2024 and eliminating them for California students after that. This is supposedly being done in the name promoting a more diverse student body, but its own research says the move won’t do that and may well be counter-productive.

At the request of the UC’s President, Janet Napolitano, the system’s Academic Council formed the Standardized Testing Task Force in 2019. Its mission was to examine the impact of standardized testing on UC admissions. It was chaired by Dr. Henry Sanchez of the UCSF Medical School and Dr. Eddie Comeaux, an African American education professor at UC Riverside who specializes in “Racial equity and justice in education” and “transformative cultural consciousness in student affairs”. Their report is here.

The Task Force “consulted dozens of studies concerning standardized tests, their predictive value, and their impact on access and diversity” and interviewed experts from the fields of testing, admissions, and education. It did not recommend dropping the SAT and ACT.

Why not? First of all, it concluded that: “At UC, test scores are currently better predictors of first-year GPA than high school grade point average (HSGPA), and about as good at predicting first-year retention, UGPA, and graduation.” Across all GPA’s the test scores are good predictors of the important measures of success at University of California campus: “For students within any given [high school GPA] band, higher standardized test scores correlate with a higher freshman [undergraduate] GPA, a higher graduation [undergraduate] GPA, and higher likelihood of graduating within either four years (for transfers) or seven years (for freshmen).”

What about trends over time? The standardized tests are becoming better predictors of academic performance over time. “Further, the amount of variance in student outcomes explained by test scores has increased since 2007 . . .”. Over the same period, high school grades have become poorer predictors of academic success at UC, probably due to rampant grade inflation. Imagine how much greater the pressure for inflated grades at high schools will be, with standardized tests out of the picture.

What about race, ethnicity and income? Do the SAT’s and ACT’s under-predict the academic performance of racial and ethnic minorities and low-income students at UC? Apparently not. Says the report: “Test scores are predictive for all demographic groups and disciplines, even after controlling for [High School] GPA. In fact, test scores are better predictors of success for students who are Underrepresented Minority students (URMs), who are first-generation, or whose families are low-income . . .”.

But doesn’t reliance on these standardized test scores clearly drive down the number of underrepresented minorities at the UC? No again. One of the Task Force’s conclusions was that: “given the state of research and UC’s size and unique system of ‘in the context’ review, it was not clear that going ‘test-optional’ would increase diversity of incoming classes, and the likely impact on preparation of incoming classes was not clear.”

To summarize, standardized tests are as good or better than high school GPAs for predicting academic performance at UC schools. The trend over time is that standardized tests are becoming better predictors while high school GPA is becoming worse. Standardized tests do not under-predict future academic performance by minorities or low income students. Finally, the UC’s own expert Task Force did not conclude that eliminating them would enhance diversity at UC Schools and did not recommend going test-optional.

So, despite all this, why is UC dropping its use of standardized tests? The most likely answer is politics. According to the New York Times: “During the debate among the California regents this week [regarding standardized tests], numerous speakers used the word “racist” to describe the exams.” It is a shame that racial grandstanding triumphed over the careful analysis of facts and data by the UC’s own very distinguished, diverse panel of experts. 

According to the same New York Times article, the “Varsity Blues” cheating scandal was also invoked as a reason to stop using standardized tests. This is completely illogical. The college admissions scandal, if anything, showed that high standardized test scores can’t simply be bought by high-priced tutoring. That’s why the convicted parents had to pay off proctors. Furthermore, the Varsity Blues scandal also relied heavily on falsifying athletic records. But, there is no indication that the UC is planning to revisit the sacred cow of powerful admissions preferences for recruited athletes, which disproportionately favors students from wealthier families who can afford the high financial burden of sports participation.

Finally, it should be noted that there is talk of the UC developing its own standardized test. Perhaps the UC Regents know of some way to make a better test, but one would think that they would develop such a test first and then announce that they were dropping the SAT and ACT. And even if they do develop an alternate, will students applying to, say, both UCLA and The University of Michigan, now have to take two sets of standardized tests? Surely it will be more affluent students who are capable of finding the time and resources to handle that double burden.

The University of California’s decision flies in the face of the conclusions of its own experts. They should put facts and evidence above politics and reverse course.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘I’m not going to listen to you’: Singh responds to Poilievre’s vote challenge

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says he will not be taking advice from Pierre Poilievre after the Conservative leader challenged him to bring down government.

“I say directly to Pierre Poilievre: I’m not going to listen to you,” said Singh on Wednesday, accusing Poilievre of wanting to take away dental-care coverage from Canadians, among other things.

“I’m not going to listen to your advice. You want to destroy people’s lives, I want to build up a brighter future.”

Earlier in the day, Poilievre challenged Singh to commit to voting non-confidence in the government, saying his party will force a vote in the House of Commons “at the earliest possibly opportunity.”

“I’m asking Jagmeet Singh and the NDP to commit unequivocally before Monday’s byelections: will they vote non-confidence to bring down the costly coalition and trigger a carbon tax election, or will Jagmeet Singh sell out Canadians again?” Poilievre said.

“It’s put up or shut up time for the NDP.”

While Singh rejected the idea he would ever listen to Poilievre, he did not say how the NDP would vote on a non-confidence motion.

“I’ve said on any vote, we’re going to look at the vote and we’ll make our decision. I’m not going to say our decision ahead of time,” he said.

Singh’s top adviser said on Tuesday the NDP leader is not particularly eager to trigger an election, even as the Conservatives challenge him to do just that.

Anne McGrath, Singh’s principal secretary, says there will be more volatility in Parliament and the odds of an early election have risen.

“I don’t think he is anxious to launch one, or chomping at the bit to have one, but it can happen,” she said in an interview.

New Democrat MPs are in a second day of meetings in Montreal as they nail down a plan for how to navigate the minority Parliament this fall.

The caucus retreat comes one week after Singh announced the party has left the supply-and-confidence agreement with the governing Liberals.

It’s also taking place in the very city where New Democrats are hoping to pick up a seat on Monday, when voters go to the polls in Montreal’s LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. A second byelection is being held that day in the Winnipeg riding of Elmwood—Transcona, where the NDP is hoping to hold onto a seat the Conservatives are also vying for.

While New Democrats are seeking to distance themselves from the Liberals, they don’t appear ready to trigger a general election.

Singh signalled on Tuesday that he will have more to say Wednesday about the party’s strategy for the upcoming sitting.

He is hoping to convince Canadians that his party can defeat the federal Conservatives, who have been riding high in the polls over the last year.

Singh has attacked Poilievre as someone who would bring back Harper-style cuts to programs that Canadians rely on, including the national dental-care program that was part of the supply-and-confidence agreement.

The Canadian Press has asked Poilievre’s office whether the Conservative leader intends to keep the program in place, if he forms government after the next election.

With the return of Parliament just days away, the NDP is also keeping in mind how other parties will look to capitalize on the new makeup of the House of Commons.

The Bloc Québécois has already indicated that it’s written up a list of demands for the Liberals in exchange for support on votes.

The next federal election must take place by October 2025 at the latest.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Social media comments blocked: Montreal mayor says she won’t accept vulgar slurs

Published

 on

 

Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante is defending her decision to turn off comments on her social media accounts — with an announcement on social media.

She posted screenshots to X this morning of vulgar names she’s been called on the platform, and says comments on her posts for months have been dominated by insults, to the point that she decided to block them.

Montreal’s Opposition leader and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have criticized Plante for limiting freedom of expression by restricting comments on her X and Instagram accounts.

They say elected officials who use social media should be willing to hear from constituents on those platforms.

However, Plante says some people may believe there is a fundamental right to call someone offensive names and to normalize violence online, but she disagrees.

Her statement on X is closed to comments.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version