Economists say Ottawa must pull more levers to fix the economy - Financial Post | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Economists say Ottawa must pull more levers to fix the economy – Financial Post

Published

 on


Looming economic challenges on the horizon, including softening business investment, a dip in consumer confidence and the persistently high household debt-to-income ratio should be sufficient reasons for the Bank of Canada to cut interest rates, some economists say.

“We are in the throes of not just a slowdown, but a shift to an economy that has essentially stalled out, even though it might not be a recession in the classical sense of the word,” said David Rosenberg, who runs his independent research firm, Rosenberg Research and Associates Inc., and has been bearish on the Canadian economy for some time.

“Lowering interest rates will weaken the Canadian dollar and give a competitive boost to the business sector,” he added.

In comments made Wednesday morning in the wake of the Bank’s move to hold interest rates steady, Canada’s central bank governor Stephen Poloz hinted he would consider an interest rate cut, given weakening economic data across various parts of the economy over the past few months.

“I’m not saying that the door is not open to an interest rate cut, obviously it is, it is open,” Poloz told reporters.

The central bank also slashed its forecast for fourth-quarter annualized growth to 0.3 per cent from 1.3 per cent in October, and pegged first-quarter growth at 1.3 per cent.

Poloz — who will step down from his position in June — has been a holdout among major central bankers. He has resisted a rate cut because of Canada’s high debt levels, in particular real estate debt, which deepened thanks to the low interest rates of the post-crisis decade.

The pace of economic growth in Canada dipped in the third quarter of 2019, due in part to declining exports of non-metallic minerals and agricultural products. But in that same time frame, business investment rose, a key data point for the Bank in determining the extent to which monetary levers should be exercised.

“Much of the Governing Council’s deliberations focused on how persistent this recent slowdown in the domestic economy might be,” the Bank of Canada said in a statement on Wednesday’s interest rate decision. “Some growth indicators were affected by temporary factors, including an early winter on the Prairies, pipeline shutdowns and strikes,” it read.

Ontario and Quebec, on the manufacturing side, are going to be challenges

Brett House, deputy chief economist, Scotiabank

Analysts will now be poring over details of retail sales from Statistics Canada on Friday to gauge consumer sentiment.

“Retail sales takes on even more importance … given the concern about a slowdown in consumption,” Ian Pollick, head of North American rates strategy at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, said in a note to investors, and added that he now believes there is a 75 per cent chance of a rate cut in the first half of the year. “Specifically, it would appear that the Governing Council remains very concerned that consumption — a pillar of resilience — might be more overtly impacted than initially believed.”

Scotiabank’s deputy chief economist Brett House believes there will be two rate cuts in 2020, but that they won’t set off a new round of borrowing. 

“We have been forecasting cuts in 2020 for about seven to eight months now. Much of the borrowing has already taken place this year; that horse has already left the barn. I think if you’re going to see borrowing, it will be from small and medium-size businesses that want to lower their costs,” said House.

But given that Canada’s interest rate stands at 1.75 per cent, there is less manoeuvring room for the bank, according to Finance Minister Bill Morneau, who thinks fiscal policy needs to play a greater role in addressing economic challenges.

“I think we have to be realistic” about expectations of central banks, Morneau said in an interview with Bloomberg TV. “Their ability to be effective … is different than it was in the last real challenge.”

Canada is managing its “fiscal framework very well,” which makes it resilient, Morneau added.

Despite a boost in business investment late last year, Canada is most certainly going to experience slower growth in 2020, especially in sectors that are trade exposed, like manufacturing, says TD’s senior economist Brian DePratto. “Ontario and Quebec, on the manufacturing side, are going to be challenges,” he said. 

DePratto also believes that a rate cut in 2020 could be on the horizon, but also that it would only serve to solve economic trials in the short term. 

“Rate cuts create issues down the road. The evolution of debt levels in this country and concerns about financial stability are echoes of past policy decisions. A happier mix would be giving the government a fair bit of spending room where you are not relying just on the household sector to push things forward,” DePratto said. 

Scotiabank’s House points out that prudent fiscal policy on the part of the Canadian government should involve strategies to not just temporarily stimulate the economy but also targeted measures to raise Canadian productivity and lower household debt such that long-term economic growth is sustained.

“There are lots of things the government could do. Increase housing supply in urban areas. Greater spending on affordable child care. Interprovincial trade has to be part of the story as well … we are the only G7 country with free trade agreements where it is still relatively difficult to trade within our own provinces,” he said.

For Rosenberg, who regards sky-high household debt levels as the economy’s biggest problem, the federal government could do just one more thing in tandem with an interest rate cut: lower taxes. 

“The fiscal response should not be increasing spending, it should be broad-based tax cuts that are geared towards low and middle-income households to ease the debt-servicing burden,” he said.

“But here’s the problem with the current government in Ottawa: they think that spending money is going to be the panacea instead instead of cutting taxes,” Rosenberg added.

Mario Iacobacci, partner at Deloitte’s Economics Advisory Group, was one of the few economists who took a more optimistic view of the state of the Canadian economy. 

“The reality is, we remain close to full employment and we are operating at capacity in most parts of the country and in most industries. We suspect that the Bank will stick to current rates for the rest of the year, because there are no signs of a persistent slowdown yet,” he said.

With a file from Bloomberg News

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version