Finance students at NYU Stern School of Business learn about environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment with the help of hard cash as well as lectures. They invest real money through a teaching fund that is at the heart of an experiential learning course. But setting up an ESG portfolio proved to be an education for staff as well as students.
An array of ESG standards and metrics made the launch a time-consuming process. “Even once we’d started the fund and put the money in it, it took us at least a month before we bought our first stock,” says Anthony Marciano, a clinical finance professor at Stern, in New York City.
Prof Marciano teaches the course based on management of the Michael Price Student Investment Fund, a family of funds with a value of about $2m. “The other funds started from the get-go. With a value fund it’s easy to pick your benchmark,” Prof Marciano says. “But we ran into a lot of complexities [with the ESG fund] that we wouldn’t have had with the other funds.”
Finance academics and students are not alone in feeling perplexed. Over the past year, investors have poured money into stocks and portfolios with an ESG focus. Evidence shows that they perform well and may even weather global crises such as the coronavirus pandemic better than other funds.
But what is often described as an “alphabet soup” of acronyms denoting the different forms of ESG evaluation and reporting — from SASB and GRI to TCFD and GIIRS — leaves companies and asset managers, as well as finance professors, scratching their heads.
“Companies are sinking in a sea of too much data,” says Colin Mayer, professor of management studies at the University of Oxford’s Saïd Business School. “They are confused and irritated by the amount of information that they’re expected to provide.”
This makes it difficult to develop courses that cover ESG evaluation, says Prof Mayer. “One can teach the most widely used and accepted approaches,” he says. “But what is difficult to do in terms of designing a course at the moment is say: ‘This is the standard that will emerge as the one that is going to generally be applied.’ That level of clarity is not yet there.”
If the teaching of ESG investment evaluation is still evolving, so too is the inclusion of sustainable investing in core finance courses.
What is difficult to do in terms of designing a course is to say: “This is the standard that will emerge”
“There are very few finance programmes that include social responsibility, ESG and sustainability as dominant themes to be covered in all aspects of finance training,” says Bruno Gerard, who teaches ESG evaluation at BI Norwegian Business School, which is developing an MSc in sustainable finance.
When sustainable finance is taught, it is often through electives. Instead, it needs to be integrated into mainstream finance programmes, says Martina Macpherson, senior vice-president, ESG, at rating agency Moody’s, who in 2018 was part of a UK government-led task force on social impact reporting.
“Otherwise we are creating subject matter experts in silos,” she says. “So it ultimately has to be in the core finance course.”
She adds that part of the problem is that until recently publications such as academic journals seldom included research on evaluating the social and environmental impact of sustainable investments. “In finance-led journals it’s changing,” she says. “But it’s very recent.”
This has proved a challenge for Norway’s BI in the development of its MSc in sustainable finance.
“When we were looking around for textbooks that we could use, we only found two or three,” says Prof Gerard. “And they don’t build on a very strong academic tradition.”
“We’re looking at how to bring the next generation of sustainable finance leaders into the domain through education and through the forward-looking perspective of careers and opportunities,” she says.
Some courses are emerging from outside the business school sector. In April, for example the IIX Impact Institute — part of IIX, which was created to develop the world’s first listed exchange for impact investing companies — launched an online course called Measuring Impact for Sustainability.
Meanwhile, Prof Gerard believes other forces will accelerate the teaching of ESG evaluation in finance. “There is student demand for this,” he says. “But also in Norway all the asset managers come to us and say: ‘We have to run ESG funds, our clients want them, and we don’t have people who can run them.’ So there’s acute demand from the employer side.”
TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 100 points in late-morning trading, helped by strength in base metal and utility stocks, while U.S. stock markets were mixed.
The S&P/TSX composite index was up 103.40 points at 24,542.48.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 192.31 points at 42,932.73. The S&P 500 index was up 7.14 points at 5,822.40, while the Nasdaq composite was down 9.03 points at 18,306.56.
The Canadian dollar traded for 72.61 cents US compared with 72.44 cents US on Tuesday.
The November crude oil contract was down 71 cents at US$69.87 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was down eight cents at US$2.42 per mmBTU.
The December gold contract was up US$7.20 at US$2,686.10 an ounce and the December copper contract was up a penny at US$4.35 a pound.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 16, 2024.
TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 200 points in late-morning trading, while U.S. stock markets were also headed higher.
The S&P/TSX composite index was up 205.86 points at 24,508.12.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 336.62 points at 42,790.74. The S&P 500 index was up 34.19 points at 5,814.24, while the Nasdaq composite was up 60.27 points at 18.342.32.
The Canadian dollar traded for 72.61 cents US compared with 72.71 cents US on Thursday.
The November crude oil contract was down 15 cents at US$75.70 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was down two cents at US$2.65 per mmBTU.
The December gold contract was down US$29.60 at US$2,668.90 an ounce and the December copper contract was up four cents at US$4.47 a pound.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 11, 2024.
TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was little changed in late-morning trading as the financial sector fell, but energy and base metal stocks moved higher.
The S&P/TSX composite index was up 0.05 of a point at 24,224.95.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was down 94.31 points at 42,417.69. The S&P 500 index was down 10.91 points at 5,781.13, while the Nasdaq composite was down 29.59 points at 18,262.03.
The Canadian dollar traded for 72.71 cents US compared with 73.05 cents US on Wednesday.
The November crude oil contract was up US$1.69 at US$74.93 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was up a penny at US$2.67 per mmBTU.
The December gold contract was up US$14.70 at US$2,640.70 an ounce and the December copper contract was up two cents at US$4.42 a pound.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 10, 2024.