Evan Saugstad: In politics, timing is everything - Alaska Highway News | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Evan Saugstad: In politics, timing is everything – Alaska Highway News

Published

 on


​​On Feb. 23, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made a surprise announcement – Canada’s emergency against the Freedom Convoy was over, shocking most that he would capitulate so easy. So what was the new and secret intelligence to make such a sudden U-turn?

Consider this: in politics, timing is everything and Trudeau was just handed a golden opportunity to bury his vitriolic past and mistakes. He received word that Russia was beginning to invade Ukraine, and voila – time to make his announcement.

Normally, given that the Senate was still debating the merits or need of such an emergency and that Trudeau was hearing from his co-opted bankers that people in large numbers were afraid of him and his dictatorial stance and were now taking their money out in droves, that civil liberties groups were gaining traction in their assertions that this fake emergency was trampling on people’s rights, and that his bought and paid for friends over at the NDP were beginning to get cold feet in supporting such measures, it might seem odd that he would capitulate instead of doubling down with more hate speech against those he does not like, as he normally does.

Nope, none of that mattered anymore.

In my expert and learned opinion, Trudeau’s backroom handlers told him in no uncertain terms that he was to immediately call a press conference, to get in front of the Canadian people and tell them that he had now determined that the emergency was over and that we could go back to pretending it was real and no longer valid. You see, he was told that by doing this now, in a few minutes the biggest news story of the year would be that Russia was now attacking the Ukraine, and by the next morning any news story about his persecution of Canadians would be banished to the back pages and soon forgotten by his friends in his media.

How prophetic and, as sure as death and taxes, come the next morning, try to find a story about Canada’s fake emergency when the world is watching the Ukraine declare a real emergency as the Huns were now at their door. And, I don’t think they needed to debate theirs.

I’m sad for Ukraine with its real emergency, and sad for Canadians that Trudeau once again sidesteps telling the truth. But it isn’t over, it just remains to be seen if he and his backroom machine can now co-opt the Parliamentary inquiry. An inquiry dominated by Liberal and NDP members blocking any real discussion, not that we will ever hear about it as all is completed in secrecy and only Trudeau’s version can be released.

There will also be a public inquiry within a year but given the propensity of the Liberals to block, drag out, and otherwise obstruct anything meaningful and/or of value to Canadians, we may likely never hear from that one until Trudeau is long gone and we have had another election.

Now that I have time to reflect on this sordid affair, what else is of note or importance?

Do reports of Tamara Lich’s presiding judge being a former candidate for Trudeau’s Liberals have anything to do with her still being in jail on mischief charges when axe murderers can be back on the street before the police can finish the paperwork?

Are the reports that the police never gave a list of convoy donors to banks and asked their accounts to be frozen mean anything, when the banks were given a list of accounts to freeze and told that all money directed toward those accounts could also be frozen? Doesn’t it only take a minute for banks to search their databases and gather such information, and given their release from all liabilities, then forward such info back to the police?

Will any of the millions raised in support of getting dissenting voices to Ottawa ever be given back to their respective donors, or directed to those intended to receive such largess?

Will Ottawa businesses and residents sue their city for falsely claiming the downtown was dangerous and that all business should be closed? Will Ottawa council ever admit it could have erected fences around any building and across any street they so chose and without Trudeau’s blessings?

Will we ever hear from former Ottawa Police Chief Sloly why the politicians would not use a “political” solution to end the impasse, rather than police resorting to clubs and threats of bullets?

Will we ever know what Trudeau promised Jagmeet Singh to have him play along in the game of charades? 

Will we ever find out if the swastika flag bearer was a plant or not? 

How long will it take for our national media to recognize and come to grips that this was Canada’s largest act of civil disobedience that resulted no buildings or police cars being torched, not a single business looted, not a single police person injured, and, until directed otherwise, police were able to freely talk, discuss, and negotiate with “protesters” with no threats of violence or intimidation and no requirement for guns drawn or clubs raised?

Will the average Canadian who watches the same national news source, morning and evening, ever wake up to understand that what they saw was a carefully scripted narrative that broadly supported Trudeau’s unsubstantiated assertions and mandates that portrayed all protesters as extremists, supremacists, annoying people that do not belong, misfits, etc., etc.?

Will the majority of Canadians who openly hated and advocated for extreme measures of persecution of the unvaccinated ever come to grips that expressing hatred to fellow Canadians is not cool? Will they ever accept that this misdirected hatred was at the express pleasure and direction of many of our political leaders and public health authorities?

Can we expect that late some Friday afternoon a civil servant will post on some obscure website that Canada has finally created a plan to end the persecution of the unvaccinated in Canada and that we will now all be allowed to resume our normal lives and rights as Canadians, while Trudeau simultaneously announces that all guns he has confiscated will be sent to the Ukraine to help in their efforts to defend their country?

Finally, will we ever accept that all effective protests do involve the disruption of fellow Canadian’s normal lives? Will we remember what women did to make their voices heard and then achieve the right to vote in Canada?

And I’m still waiting for an all clear to give in support of the defence of our truckers who went to Ottawa and are now paying the financial price for advocating for rights for all fellow Canadians.


Evan Saugstad lives and writes in Fort St. John.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

News

Virginia Democrats advance efforts to protect abortion, voting rights, marriage equality

Published

 on

 

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Democrats who control both chambers of the Virginia legislature are hoping to make good on promises made on the campaign trail, including becoming the first Southern state to expand constitutional protections for abortion access.

The House Privileges and Elections Committee advanced three proposed constitutional amendments Wednesday, including a measure to protect reproductive rights. Its members also discussed measures to repeal a now-defunct state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and ways to revise Virginia’s process to restore voting rights for people who served time for felony crimes.

“This meeting was an important next step considering the moment in history we find ourselves in,” Democratic Del. Cia Price, the committee chair, said during a news conference. “We have urgent threats to our freedoms that could impact constituents in all of the districts we serve.”

The at-times raucous meeting will pave the way for the House and Senate to take up the resolutions early next year after lawmakers tabled the measures last January. Democrats previously said the move was standard practice, given that amendments are typically introduced in odd-numbered years. But Republican Minority Leader Todd Gilbert said Wednesday the committee should not have delved into the amendments before next year’s legislative session. He said the resolutions, particularly the abortion amendment, need further vetting.

“No one who is still serving remembers it being done in this way ever,” Gilbert said after the meeting. “Certainly not for something this important. This is as big and weighty an issue as it gets.”

The Democrats’ legislative lineup comes after Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin, to the dismay of voting-rights advocates, rolled back a process to restore people’s civil rights after they completed sentences for felonies. Virginia is the only state that permanently bans anyone convicted of a felony from voting unless a governor restores their rights.

“This amendment creates a process that is bounded by transparent rules and criteria that will apply to everybody — it’s not left to the discretion of a single individual,” Del. Elizabeth Bennett-Parker, the patron of the voting rights resolution, which passed along party lines, said at the news conference.

Though Democrats have sparred with the governor over their legislative agenda, constitutional amendments put forth by lawmakers do not require his signature, allowing the Democrat-led House and Senate to bypass Youngkin’s blessing.

Instead, the General Assembly must pass proposed amendments twice in at least two years, with a legislative election sandwiched between each statehouse session. After that, the public can vote by referendum on the issues. The cumbersome process will likely hinge upon the success of all three amendments on Democrats’ ability to preserve their edge in the House and Senate, where they hold razor-thin majorities.

It’s not the first time lawmakers have attempted to champion the three amendments. Republicans in a House subcommittee killed a constitutional amendment to restore voting rights in 2022, a year after the measure passed in a Democrat-led House. The same subcommittee also struck down legislation supporting a constitutional amendment to repeal an amendment from 2006 banning marriage equality.

On Wednesday, a bipartisan group of lawmakers voted 16-5 in favor of legislation protecting same-sex marriage, with four Republicans supporting the resolution.

“To say the least, voters enacted this (amendment) in 2006, and we have had 100,000 voters a year become of voting age since then,” said Del. Mark Sickles, who sponsored the amendment as one of the first openly gay men serving in the General Assembly. “Many people have changed their opinions of this as the years have passed.”

A constitutional amendment protecting abortion previously passed the Senate in 2023 but died in a Republican-led House. On Wednesday, the amendment passed on party lines.

If successful, the resolution proposed by House Majority Leader Charniele Herring would be part of a growing trend of reproductive rights-related ballot questions given to voters. Since 2022, 18 questions have gone before voters across the U.S., and they have sided with abortion rights advocates 14 times.

The voters have approved constitutional amendments ensuring the right to abortion until fetal viability in nine states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Ohio and Vermont. Voters also passed a right-to-abortion measure in Nevada in 2024, but it must be passed again in 2026 to be added to the state constitution.

As lawmakers debated the measure, roughly 18 members spoke. Mercedes Perkins, at 38 weeks pregnant, described the importance of women making decisions about their own bodies. Rhea Simon, another Virginia resident, anecdotally described how reproductive health care shaped her life.

Then all at once, more than 50 people lined up to speak against the abortion amendment.

“Let’s do the compassionate thing and care for mothers and all unborn children,” resident Sheila Furey said.

The audience gave a collective “Amen,” followed by a round of applause.

___

Associated Press writer Geoff Mulvihill in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, contributed to this report.

___

Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Trump chooses anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health secretary

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump says he will nominate anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, putting him in charge of a massive agency that oversees everything from drug, vaccine and food safety to medical research and the social safety net programs Medicare and Medicaid.

“For too long, Americans have been crushed by the industrial food complex and drug companies who have engaged in deception, misinformation, and disinformation when it comes to Public Health,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site announcing the appointment. Kennedy, he said, would “Make America Great and Healthy Again!”

Kennedy, a former Democrat who ran as an independent in this year’s presidential race, abandoned his bid after striking a deal to give Trump his endorsement with a promise to have a role in health policy in the administration.

He and Trump have since become good friends, with Kennedy frequently receiving loud applause at Trump’s rallies.

The expected appointment was first reported by Politico Thursday.

A longtime vaccine skeptic, Kennedy is an attorney who has built a loyal following over several decades of people who admire his lawsuits against major pesticide and pharmaceutical companies. He has pushed for tighter regulations around the ingredients in foods.

With the Trump campaign, he worked to shore up support among young mothers in particular, with his message of making food healthier in the U.S., promising to model regulations imposed in Europe. In a nod to Trump’s original campaign slogan, he named the effort “Make America Healthy Again.”

It remains unclear how that will square with Trump’s history of deregulation of big industries, including food. Trump pushed for fewer inspections of the meat industry, for example.

Kennedy’s stance on vaccines has also made him a controversial figure among Democrats and some Republicans, raising question about his ability to get confirmed, even in a GOP-controlled Senate. Kennedy has espoused misinformation around the safety of vaccines, including pushing a totally discredited theory that childhood vaccines cause autism.

He also has said he would recommend removing fluoride from drinking water. The addition of the material has been cited as leading to improved dental health.

HHS has more than 80,000 employees across the country. It houses the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the National Institutes of Health.

Kennedy’s anti-vaccine nonprofit group, Children’s Health Defense, currently has a lawsuit pending against a number of news organizations, among them The Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by taking action to identify misinformation, including about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy took leave from the group when he announced his run for president but is listed as one of its attorneys in the lawsuit.

__ Seitz reported from Washington.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

In Cyprus, Ukrainians learn how to dispose of landmines that kill and maim hundreds

Published

 on

 

NICOSIA, Cyprus (AP) — In a Cypriot National Guard camp, Ukrainians are being trained on how to identify, locate and dispose of landmines and other unexploded munitions that litter huge swaths of their country, killing and maiming hundreds of people, including children.

Analysts say Ukraine is among the countries that are the most affected by landmines and discarded explosives, as a result of Russia’s ongoing war.

According to U.N. figures, some 399 people have been killed and 915 wounded from landmines and other munitions since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, equal to the number of casualties reported from 2014-2021. More than 1 in 10 of those casualties have been children.

The economic impact is costing billions to the Ukrainian economy. Landmines and other munitions are preventing the sowing of 5 million hectares, or 10%, of the country’s agricultural land.

Cyprus stepped up to offer its facilities as part of the European Union’s Military Assistance Mission to Ukraine. So far, almost 100 Ukrainian armed forces personnel have taken part in three training cycles over the last two years, said Cyprus Foreign Ministry spokesperson Theodoros Gotsis.

“We are committed to continuing this support for as long as it takes,” Gotsis told the Associated Press, adding that the Cyprus government has covered the 250,000 euro ($262,600) training cost.

Cyprus opted to offer such training owing to its own landmine issues dating back five decades when the island nation was ethnically divided when Turkey invaded following a coup that sought union with Greece. The United Nations has removed some 27,000 landmines from a buffer zone that cuts across the island, but minefields remain on either side. The Cypriot government says it has disposed of all anti-personnel mines in line with its obligations under an international treaty that bans the use of such munitions.

In Cyprus, Ukrainians undergo rigorous theoretical and practical training over a five-week Basic Demining and Clearance course that includes instruction on distinguishing and safely handling landmines and other explosive munitions, such as rockets, 155 mm artillery shells, rocket-propelled grenades and mortar shells.

Theoretical training uses inert munitions identical to the actual explosives.

Most of the course is comprised of hands-on training focusing on the on-site destruction of unexploded munitions using explosives, the chief training officer told the Associated Press. The officer spoke on condition of anonymity because he’s not authorized to disclose his identity for security reasons.

“They’re trained on ordnance disposal using real explosives,” the officer said. “That will be the trainees’ primary task when they return.”

Cypriot officials said the Ukrainian trainees did not want to be either interviewed or photographed.

Defusing discarded munitions or landmines in areas where explosive charges can’t be used — for instance, near a hospital — is not part of this course because that’s the task of highly trained teams of disposal experts whose training can last as long as eight months, the officer said.

Trainees, divided into groups of eight, are taught how to operate metal detectors and other tools for detecting munitions like prodders — long, thin rods which are used to gently probe beneath the ground’s surface in search of landmines and other explosive ordnance.

Another tool is a feeler, a rod that’s used to detect booby-trapped munitions. There are many ways to booby-trap such munitions, unlike landmines which require direct pressure to detonate.

“Booby-trapped munitions are a widespread phenomenon in Ukraine,” the chief training officer explained.

Training, primarily conducted by experts from other European Union countries, takes place both in forested and urban areas at different army camps and follows strict safety protocols.

The short, intense training period keeps the Ukrainians focused.

“You see the interest they show during instruction: they ask questions, they want to know what mistakes they’ve made and the correct way of doing it,” the officer said.

Humanitarian data and analysis group ACAPS said in a Jan. 2024 report that 174,000 sq. kilometers (67,182 sq. miles) or nearly 29% of Ukraine’s territory needs to be surveyed for landmines and other explosive ordnance.

More than 10 million people are said to live in areas where demining action is needed.

Since 2022, Russian forces have used at least 13 types of anti-personnel mines, which target people. Russia never signed the 1997 Ottawa Convention banning the use of anti-personnel mines, but the use of such mines is nonetheless considered a violation of its obligations under international law.

Russia also uses 13 types of anti-tank mines.

The International Campaign to Ban Landmines said in its 2023 Landmine Monitor report that Ukrainian government forces may have also used antipersonnel landmines in contravention of the Mine Ban Treaty in and around the city of Izium during 2022, when the city was under Russian control.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version